the best advices for dealing with large corps comes from Martin Sheen in Wallstreet
"He's in it for the bucks and he don't take prisoners."
Keep that in mind when any corporate type is speaking.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"Sure; user management on Windows isn't bad either."
I think you need to alter the grammar a little.
"User management *eventually* became as good as other platforms could deliver *years* earlier once MS had wiped out the competition and decided to add some of the things it had not bothered to install in the first place"
As someone once observed "If the Devil ever beat God he would have to take over some of Gods duties."
"Ballmer's biggest lie was that Microsoft had written a program - always nearly finished - that would convert source code written for Windows to run on OS/2"
Hahahahahahahahaha.
What developers will believe of MS *never* gets old. The did the same with the Windows 95 /NT porting process. "It's just like the Win95 API"
" and the opportunity to help Gates become the world's richest psychopath."
Ouch.
Sounds like the position optical computing was in the 1960's with photographic masks carrying out the FFT "instantly" compared to any computer implementation.
Possibly the furthest this work got was the Dunlop Aerospace developed "correlatron" which provided the terminal guidance for the Pershing 2 missile.
I'd suggest the 2 *big* challenges are 1) *gain* amplification of a light signal *by* a light signal and 2) eliminating interference techniques. I've seen *lots* of stuff which basically use this but it seems pretty useless if you want a device with *broad* bandwidth.
Perhaps the *next* generation will manage this.
An Octave (50%) *is*
Optical has a *long* way to go in that area.
The 3rd harmonic stuff is interesting as up-shifting the frequency normally implies very *low* efficiency. IIRC in the watt power level rather than the mW.
Remember folks another article in this series mentions internet traffic is growing by 40% a year so somethings got to be done.
Of course 39.99% is a)Spam and malware b)Pron.
"Surely a better choice would be to set up some kind of centrifuge or tethered capsule to provide centrifugal gravity, send up two astronauts for a year, and then see what kind of shape they were in at the end of the year?"
IIRC There *was* a plan to put a (small) centrifuge on the ISS big enough to study varying the level of g effects.
Not enough budget to get it built apparently.
Personally I'd suggest radiation effects mitigation and closed cycle life support will be *much* more effective enablers of trips to Mars. Of course if you could extend the techniques of long brain surgery (complete blood draining and low temperature till all brain activity and most metabolism seems to *cease*) from 12 hours to 12 months things could get interesting....
Not quite sure about "continuous" or if it's a downloaded log off the FADEC on landing.
IIRC GEC were big on proposing some kind of industrial LAN standard in the 1980s. I think Ford were on board but I'm not sure how popular it really became. I dimly recall "Manufacturing Automated Protocol?"
Perhaps Boris can shed more light.
Remote control of large industrial networks (gas, electricity, phone). SOP for *decades*.
Use of internet protocols Vs closed source proprietary. Not unreasonable.
Routing that data over the *public* internet. WTF? I think the phrase " *grossly* expanded attack surface" is appropriate.
Are they f**king kidding? Traders take *chances* if they take enough bad ones the whole companies down the toilet. The companies survival (and their jobs) *should* depend on (at least in part) on managers keeping a good eye on the risk level. So either.
a) They trusted their traders *implicitly* to not take chances (see first line) b) Someone had suspicions and wanted to show clean hands if they were right.
As a publicly quoted company UBS shareholders should discipline them by dumping them.
How could the biggest computer corporation in the world run by "business people" not IT people be so s**t at PR?
The way MS say it was they threw their heart in OS/2 with Windows as a side show. Big presentation and they are expecting a divisional VP to show from IBM.
PFY shows up and says "Good job guys (although I'm not quite sure what it is you're doing)."
From then on MS developed a desire to put the knife in and twist.
Which history demonstrated they were quite adept at.
By mapping the "saturation horizon" throughout the worlds oceans.
I'd call a shift from 1000m to 200m *dramatic* but this is at one location.
A further question is are there processes in the ocean that could *restore* the horizon by sequestering the CO2?
Thumbs up for actual field work versus computer models.
"Up until now I could write "in the last 25 years I had not heard from anyone who used Lotus Notes who did not regard it is a personal enemy""
Pacific (AS400 software house) had some good developers who like Notes as an application platform.
It seemed to be very good when you wanted to synchronize distributed databases with low bandwidth link.
Your colleague Tim Worstall may have encountered one of these applications.
"He did employ some great people to work on NT and copied many of the great ideas from OS/2 such as, hardware abstraction, extensible attributes and virtual filesystems."
That included Dave Cutler, the architect of DEC's VMS, another *serious* OS. I'm told NT internals matches VMS to a *surprising* degree, given the completely different architecture.
Clever idea, hardware abstraction layers.
"E.g. I found it at http://brontecapital.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/hewlett-packard-and-autonomy-notes-from.html"
Interesting read.
Looks like the Accounting function at HP (who presumably oversaw the due diligence from the HP end) can't add up.
Not good when you' re splashing that kind of cash.
"One further point, the goodwill still on the balance sheets far exceeds HP market capitalization currently..!"
And you know what happens to companies whose assets are worth *substantially* more than their market capitalization?
I hear the folk at OpCapita are at a bit of a loose end since Comet "unfortunately" went down the pan.
There's still a few nice chunks left that they could "release the value" of.
Coat as I think sensible HP staffers should be considering putting on theirs and going out the door.
"In buying EDS, Palm and Autonomy, it spent some 26bn and has written down around 19bn. "
So they've taken $19Bn dollars of *shareholder* money (either the money could have paid to shareholders as dividends or the charges on the loans they raised will be met out of money that *could* have gone to shareholders) and basically flushed it down the pan.
Sounds like some of those shareholders should lawyer up as well and administer some "Conrad Black" style discipline to the board.
Gimp mask because on *that* basis that's pretty much what's happened to the stockholders.
"Six billion quid buys a hell of a lot of arse-licking......"
That's about 4600 *years* of the UK average persons *lifetime* salary.
For that kind of money quite a few might be prepared to consider tucking into a few portions of M. Apotheker's stools in a full gimp suit with a couple of dozen journalists taking photgraphs.
Just saying.
"In some respects, I would prefer to have guaranteed availability in store of a smaller range flagged on the display, with other items on display carrying expected delivery information. This makes sure that immediate availabillity can be part of the customer decision up front, rather than making it something you have to initiate a dialogue with the sales person in order to find out that they have."
This sounds *very* pragmatic to me but of course that means *senior* management (at HO level) have to do some actual *thinking* about what to stock and what to hold centrally. Such *hard* choices on the pittance they are paid (yeah right).
"I would like to see some funding go towards Skylon, get that off the ground!"
Actually some already *has*.
But REL are *very* cautious about how much government cash they accept. *No* one wants another Concorde situation.
BTW ESA is *very* keen on Just Returne so the more cash you put in the more work you get out (on a programme by programme basis). So a fair chunk of that £20m is likely to come back to UK jobs.
for UK space policy.
I imaging the Iron Lady will be clanking around the old homestead tonight.
Sort of like a game of musical chairs. NASA "outsources" the service module (it's quite a bit more than *just* an engine) to ESA while pulling back on Mars while the Russians step in to do Mars transport.
The "ESA two step " anyone?
"If anyone's bothered to read The Book of Revelations, I don't think magic mushrooms are far off the mark."
The advisors and members of the Cabinet of *several* American presidents have read & believed it as *literal* truth.
Not really someone you'd want near any sort of nuclear release system. It could end in tears.
And not in the sense of "plug boards" it's an actual *instruction* set.
Quantum computer developers please take note
BTW I count *three* uses for the Dekatron.
Memory, display and logic (the ability to non-destructively read it and pass it to *another* device)
and if you can *freeze* the system you can do visual debugging.
I'm guessing the speed limit was set by relays, *not* the dekatrons.
Got to wonder if you could "overclock" this?
It's a start.
Was it for cutting edge computing textbooks which (perhaps) *demanded* in depth developer knowledge to catch errors due to their highly advanced cutting edge subject matter?
Despite my comment to another poster that it was time "they bought a gimp suit, as they seemed to be exactly where they deserved" I'd prefer to see people achieve all they are capable of rather than all they have been *allowed* to.
The idea of an open source project sounds pretty good. It's the equivalent of working in a charity shop for IT staff, except it's actually *useful*, gives recent live experience, positive recommendations from co-developers (*provided* you select the right project) who actually *understand* development, demonstrated you can work to deadlines etc.
You might also like to peruse Dominic Connors articles on the recruitment business. I was once told that anyone can put you down, but only you can *keep* you down. Something to think about.
" work in the rail automation industry and even in this field extremely out of date electronics are used. Why? Because the general consensus is after 10+ years all defects in the circuitry are known and can be worked around (look at the errata for the 80386...). When developing systems on which lives are at stake (or at which billions of dollars are at stake as in space flight) you want to limit the unknown as much as possible. Using older tech goes a long way to ensuring this."
I once went for a job with a company that tested embedded software. The SoA in commercial jet engine controllers was basically a Sinclair spectrum.
The *upgrade* for the Space Shuttle Main Engine controller was basically the guts of an early Mac (actually 2 M68k processors made on special order from Motorola on the same *chip* to avoid synchronization delays, not exactly COTS).
I think people often over estimate how *little* processing power is needed *if* your responses are not filtered through 35 layers of OS and app functionality (a claim made about Windows 95 IIRC).
"Apparently they were relatively rad hard, though apparently not by design, just luck in the manufacturing process. "
I think that was first discovered by a Surrey Satellite test sat. The article I read said something about using Tungsten Silicide rather than straight polysilicon for the gate electrodes but it was a *very* long time ago and rad hardness was not a driver.
IIRC Actmel have had a lot of mileage out of using a process for their *standard* chips which is not rad hard but more rad resistant, just using what's known about design rules that make the resulting design more or less prone to SEU and latchup (always a good idea with CMOS).
The people who design the electronics around particle accelerators (bomb level rad levels at science level funding) are *very* interested in finding cheap(ish) ways to build hardware that can survive in this environment.
I think the term *agribusiness* covers the #1 source of N2O (8x bigger than the #2) and seems to be a fair chunk of CH4.
These are about as far from "Cousin Homer and his 10 acre spread" as Wal-mart is from a corner grocery store.
That suggests there is a *lot* of scope for reducing both at *source*.
Ideally in a way that gives benefits to farm managers (lower costs, faster growth).