"that Dara Ó Briain (O'Brain?)"
The fellow with the Physics and Maths degree.
Probably a better choice.
Youu might add that Rowan Atkinson's degree is Electronic Engineering.
So probably quite a good choice for GPS or computers.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
" I was on the receiving end of an awful lot of "affectionate teasing" in school and it made my life a misery."
A fair point and in a 1 to 1 workplace environment can be very nasty.
However he has somewhat set him self up as a a bit of an all round know it all in public and in that situation you should either be very well prepared when you talk about something or admit your ignorance if called out. After all he is likely to earn considerably more money for doing it than anyone informed or smart enough to trip him.
" I don't understand why we would be doomed if we need to burn more gas (or even coal) occasionally. "
Because it will not be occasionally. As many have pointed out on this and other threads the target for onshore wind is 26% and offshore is 30% That's a little over 6 hrs in every 24 or 8 hrs in every 24 running. The expected situation is that A.N. Other power source will pick up the slack the other 16-16.8 hrs a day. Which sounds like a lousy use of that money.
The reason you're so impressed by the figures for the last few days is they are so damm rare. BTW at least one onshore UK site racked up 6% run time last year.
You seem to have a problem remembering those figures, despite them being mentioned frequently when this debate comes up and you seem interested in this subject.
"No additional capacity is required as power stations already exist, they just have to work less hard, in particular burn less gas - every Watt produced by a wind turbine saves about 2.5 Watts of gas."
The problem is not that wind cannot reduce gas consumption (like most other renewables, including biogas).
It's that it cannot do it reliably. Calm wind can persist for weeks over the whole of Europe
Without a very diverse set of renewables (with the support infrastructure, including the necessary energy market mechanisms) to take up the slack and handle many small(ish) generators this plan is doomed.
Yes the UK has windy sites, but it's also got tidal, wave, micro hydro, geothermal (every well in the North Sea, of which there are several thousand, could generate 500-1000kw) and biogas resources.
All of them are more reliable than wind, but they are a bit complex to explain to thickies ministers.
BTW You are aware that roughly 20% of the UK's electricity is nuclear generated and most of that is due to go out of date over the next next 5 years or so?
"It's not just the last 4 days were wind power was close to 100% continuously and produced record amounts of electricity "
Is that 100% of 24 hours in a day or 100% of the usual 26% of the time that onshore wind is expected to run for.
Not trolling just being clear on the baseline you're using.
"40% of UK electricity being generated from gas is the problem"
Time to consider more biogas?
Centrica reckoned it could be good for 40% of UK gas requirements and would make the UK less vulnerable to Russian extortion "negotiation."
"Yes, and the "Future Prime Minister" Ed MicroMiliband was the one happily signing us up for the stupid enviro-commitments while he was in the Labourast Government together with his bro."
He didn't sign anything.
That would be Tony Blair. And despite being told it could be done for electricity but not all UK energy needs went ahead and signed it into law anyway.
He wouldn't have to implement it and it was a nice ..|.. to Gordo on the way out as well.
"They are obnoxious. They spend more on lawyers, patents and market image than R&D or innovation. Jonathan Ives has even admitted the design styles are copied from Braun/Dieter Rams. The last worthwhile things they did was investing in ARM (for Newton) and Ditching OS9 for BSD based OS X."
Behold the iEadon.
"but there was a brilliant article in Private Eye covering the success rate of these hedge fund recommendations in London over the last 5 years and how only one analyst has been able to make suggestions that would have given an investor a positive return"
Many people don't know Private Eye publishes a city column.
They should.
"India are already researching "flexible riser" tech that will work at 6km. they have remote controlled mining machines on the seabed that slurp the material and send it skyward to a platform."
I did not know this.
I had thought this sort of deep vacuum cleaner tech was pretty esoteric with no one really looking at it due to the lack of demand.
Sounds like I was wrong.
Excellent news.
Actually neither is correct.
Re-checking Computers in spaceflight, the NASA experience indicates the main cycle was 28 microseconds, or 35.714kHz. It's about 9% better than the Apollo AGC, which weighed about 90lbs (Voyagers was about 20lbs but only doubly redundant). Using COTS parts (albeit the rad hard SOS versions of 4000b parts) also probably made it a lot cheaper.
The 4kHz signal is something I read in an E&WW article and was described as the "heartbeat" but the NSA book describes it as being about 0.5-1 Hz.
TTFN
As for the IT angle.
1 of the first NASA processors to use CMOS for the logic and the memory (no core store. Even the Shuttle GPCs were not prepared to go that far).
4Khz processor. <64KB of RAM. Try writing an image compression routine in that space.
Bulk data storage by reversible tape drive.
BTW it's true the parabolic aerial radiates about 15W but radio engineers talk in term of EIRP, effective isentropic radiated power, which would be the power you would need to deliver the same energy density in the beam across the surface area of a whole sphere. That number is quite impressive because the beam is such a small fraction of a sphere.
This could have been buried in pat numbers and stats but I found admirably concise. Some writers seem to feel that technical subjects have to be complex to understand, like you have to prove you're smart enough to read their work.
I'm no expert but I felt this gave me a good enough understanding that R-DMA gives you an 8x speed up in data throughput to a GPU, which sound s a pretty worthwhile gain.
Given what we now know about how many FLOPS it takes to animate a face this is not to be sniffed at.
Thumbs up for a nice write up.
Because if it didn't PC mfg would howl they'd been ripped off.
I think ARM have more of a shot at penetrating into big servers than Intel has of expanding into phones.
Provided the servers don't need to run Windows to supports some lump of code.
Keep in mind this "Great British Succsess Story" was mostly bought to you by Acorn Computers (UK based), Apple (US based), VLSI (US based). Wonder who got most of the money?
I'm glad they will continue to work their business plan for the time being. Thumbs up for their efforts but how many others has the British business environment created?
Not many.
"By the way the current worries about antibiotic resistance are partly the result of the cost research combined with the limited returns due to the short treatment courses. "
So it would give a better return on investment if the course was longer. IOW the drug was not quite so effective. If the drug company had a choice that's what they'd go for. Sadly for them it seems the discovery and development process is not quite so fine tuned to their profit predictions.
I think you've demonstrated my point.
as you take it for life
Drug companies main business is making money
A product that actually cures your condition (so you don't need to keep buying it) is actually a failure of R&D from their PoV.
Anyone who does not realize this has a fundamental misunderstanding of what they do and why they do it.
"Contrary to what many believe, TETRA (formerly known as Trans-European Trunked Radio) is a Open Standard and is primarily hawked around the place by EADS / Cassidian and Motorola."
Depends what they've been reading and where they've been reading it. TETRA has always been an open standard.
"Smartphones likely could provide similar services in most cases."
No.
Try setting up closed user groups,
P2P means this can work underground without assistance.
Frequency band means better penetration.
It looks like a clunky somewhat retro phone. It is not.
"Ha ha! No."
I wrote should not "will" for a reason.
"I suspect it'll take aggressive and concerted government intervention with hefty penalties to wake up any of the folk responsible for these systems."
Perhaps loss of rights to any bonuses might focus their minds as well.
"Natanz was a USB stickjob IIRC, so no Internet involved, at least directly."
I think that's sort of his point.
If SCADA systems are vulnerable even when not connected to the internet PHBs can say "well it got infected anyway so why give up on linking them to the net and using that fixed (and expensive) leased line tech instead.
Err not to spoil your fun but consensus for AMFM is that they are (mostly) a bot, as in an NPC.
Suggested explanations for their posts are mostly.
a) A simulation of mental illness like the "parry" program (sort of the flip side of Eliza)
b) A sort of textual "numbers station," issuing instructions to assorted (human) agents around the world for unknown purposes.
Historically mental hospitals ran guided tours of their patients (look up the history of Bedlam asylum for example). Another way to make money out of the mentally ill, perhaps (they'll probably call it "therapy" this time round).
That on its own should be a big wake up call. to people who run SCADA systems.
People have taken the time and effort to develop exploits for those vulns.
Will it change anything?
Probably not. I fear it's only when Board level staff do time that maybe some of them will decide "Gee perhaps we ought to do something about this."
"the whole FacebooK IPO was a Ponzi scheme."
No. In a Ponzi (I quite like the term "rollover") you use money from initial investors to pay later suckersinvestors.
In Facebook you run a campaign to convince people the "value" of the company is way more than it's total asset worth and its revenue (IIRC the P/E ratio for Facebook was in the 100s. IE if Facebook distributed all their profits back to their stockholders it would take them centuries to get back what they paid for them unless the price rose above what they paid for them).
That's more like a "pump and dump" scheme. Which appears to have been plaid with fake press releases for some firms and can happen amazingly quickly.
This is truly an issue of global significance yet there appears to be no integrated planning across all space agencies
Would the loss of a city be acceptable? How much evacuation notice could such a system give?
BTW the "fire a big nuke at it" is a fail according to NASA studies.
IRL the discovery of a NEO on a collision course with Earth would play out like the first 20-30 minutes of Armageddon.
Then they all go home to die.
"I'm not so sure what moiles are when they're at home"
They are a mis-spelling of mobiles for which I apologize.
"but if you actually look at the details, many of these "critical controls" are only relevant to enterprise networks "
Given most of a countries information travels over internet, landline or mobile phone networks I'd call them all ""enterprise."
I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding here.
Unlike gas, electricity and water networks there are two groups of users of the corporations computers.
Internal staff IE staff, who have some kind of job on the network.
Customers who do not but use them (but work through them) to talk to each other, web servers, other servers on the internet etc.
I would suggest that most of these rules apply to the the servers and PCs used by internal staff.
I'd suggest the computers they use and manage and the way they use them can be controlled.
As for the users, well how about ISPs opening an account with a minimal set of open sockets and notifying the customer by email when their machine wants to open non default sockets? Or how about an email on how many emails you sent this month.
I don't believe ISP's, telco's and mobile companies are that special and I do beleive they can do more to stop botnets generating the tidal wave of crap they do without DPI.
And indeed they are.
They are the global facilitators for the transmission and dissemination of spam and malware.
Now they can argue they are merely pipes like the US Mail. But that goes out the window if they do packet filtering (with or without DPI)
As for the rest of these recommendations how many of these shouldn't be SOP for all infrastructure.
Now the question is do they apply to company servers, PCs and mobiles or all devices on the network?
"Not sure I'm going to be very happy with that. Strikes me as an ideal idea for terrorist or rogue governments to point the nice beams elsewhere.."
It made a great plot device for a Ben Bova novel.
IRL it's b****it
JPL have been lead researchers on this and you can look up why the terrorist hijack idea is rubbish yourself.
"Surely heating water to drive the steam turbine would be more sensible? I assume that they could heat the water more easily than the oil."
No.
300c oil is a hot chip pan and is at normal atmospheric pressure (IE 1 atm) as it has not boiled (depending on the grade).
300c water is at 85 atmospheres pressure at that temperature. That raises the materials properties of the oil carrying tubes substantially. You can play with the numbers yourself.
http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/fluid.cgi?TLow=250&THigh=350&TInc=10&Applet=on&Digits=5&ID=C7732185&Action=Load&Type=SatP&TUnit=C&PUnit=MPa&DUnit=mol%2Fl&HUnit=kJ%2Fmol&WUnit=m%2Fs&VisUnit=uPa*s&STUnit=N%2Fm&RefState=DEF (caution needs Jave enabled).
"Thanks, but I think there's more to this than meets the eye so far."
What I've downplayed is the bill the foundry will charge you for the work.
I'd guess both ARM & and foundry will set one off charges and royalties based on projected volumes and the volume for such systems is just not that large.
That would include proving the chip design has the necessary radiation resistance, which AFAIK is not cheap either.
"although in at least one company I know of, they're now suggesting source-level testing is sufficient and that something like a change from 68K to PPC would therefore not need sw to be re-tested using the appropriate toolchain and binaries! Nothing could ever go wrong in the toolchain, could it)"
On the surface this looks reasonable because the software will run on the same hardware and only the code generators and debuggers are going to need to be different,right?
But IRL both of those are pretty big chunks of software in their own right and I doubt they will be alone.
The fail is strong with this idea.....
"I currently struggle to see why any clean sheet or new-generation design would want to be on anything other than ARM, w"
Agreed. The question is how often people have that opportunity.
"I haven't seen much sign of ARM in the "tough" end of embedded systems where mil-spec PowerPC and the like used to be fashionable. Is there a presence or are these folk just slow to catch up (for understandable reasons)?"
In the US historically the USAF 1750A architecture has been the one a lot of people used (I think it's still running most ULA launches) but the rad hard versions of a POWER PC are where they've gone.
In Europe they seem to prefer the SPARC architecture, also implemented in some rad process with majority voting registers. Sun wanted to get more mfg making SPARC chips so I think their licensing was pretty lenient.
As both processor have enough power to host linux implementation they can leverage the whole tool chain.
The bottom line is ARM could be an instruction set that was used in this market if a company that wanted to get into the business licensed the instruction set and found a foundry to do the rad hard implementation.
http://hackaday.com/2013/03/05/finally-a-machine-that-makes-cheap-3d-printer-filament/
This is very exciting. It begins the process of not just building the printers but also the infrastructure to
support the printers.
Still a long way to go before a printer can self duplicate (I know they can do a version of the structure. I mean the motors, drive screws etc).
But a good first move and like others, so simple once someone has worked out how.
IIRC All software updates to NASA probes (and everything from the early 70s onward has had them) are treated as potentially hostile.The name of the game is don't brick the processor. this gets tricky when some of the bits used to store the new program on board are stuck at 1 or 0, like Voyager.
Note this fault is more a case of a fail in the Earth based support software (of which there is a lot. If they did the same as the earlier rovers quite a lot of it is open source). There is no evidence of the software to drive the rover being faulty.
If they're following the sort of process used for the Shuttle software they have found the root cause, fixed it, located other instances of the pattern and fixed those. But there have been budget cuts......
Bottom line is the process caught it before any damage was done and they are still running.
But then America also thought the Afghans were too stupid technologically challenged to read their (unencrypted) drone video feeds.
In mythology Nemesis punishes those who harbour false pride in their achievements.
Or to put it another way pay back will be a b**ch.