"Why send probes, send people....."
Spoken like someone with no idea of how far away Jupiter is.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
How many parts have to fail to render your media unreadable?
Can you remove the media from the box and stick it in another box and read it there?
Do you buy backup because it's cheap or because if your primary system f**ks up it's all that's standing between you and either personal or company bankruptcy?
http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency/news-and-events/2013/Mar/access-to-space-what-will-the-uk-need-in-the-future
Don't get too excited. It's a study, not an investment programme. They are asking questions at this point.
The UK actually has 2 test ranges at MoD Arbopath (Cardogan bay) and South Uist (Outer Hebrides)
"These look like very cheap ways of launching things into low orbit - though you wouldn’t want to live next door. You can largely replace the first stage of a rocket* with these and use really cheap and controllable fuel on the ground."
This one comes up on a regular basis. Using EM launch on the Moon is a viable option. People forget you have 2 problems. If the gun supplies all the velocity you're limited to bulk cargo as there is no real experience building engines that can survive 1000g (what you seem to be talking about is more like an EM launcher or mass driver, not a combustion gun which have much higher g forces).
And 1000 mph equates to about 444 m/s. That's M1.3. Orbital velocity is about M23. Where is the other M21.7 coming from?
Perhaps you would like to review your numbers?
"Is that perhaps why the UK is the only nation to have voluntarily given up a space program?"
No.
Because in the late 1960's a government commission of the "Great and the good" IE with f**kall knowledge or understanding of space concluded that a)Space was not that big a deal to HMG b)Funding an independent launch vehicle was quite expensive (around £10-20m for the development programme at a time when Concorde was on course for a few £Bn) c)Those very nice Americans would sort out any requirements for future payloads.
Problem is if you decide (late in the day) you want to add some new kind of sensor you've got a lot of hardware to fiddle about with.
One of these ideas that appeals to lecturers but less so to their students, who get stuck with the upgrading.
But as others have pointed out you moved your operation there for the low taxes and you weren't bothered by the infrastructure then.
I'd have to admit that a city that does not have good links even with its capital is not doing well.
That would be something like Birmingham not having a direct flight to London.
"Yes they are. Wide open is the default setting for Bind. Even DJB and MS wwere wide open last time I looked"
I was thinking the the human alerting of exceptional behavior and the auto throttling until the cause was investigated.
That part of his configuration.
Actual human being alerted to suspicious behavior
Auto throttling of bandwidth cutting in even before a human response.
I think if they had the answer would be "quite a lot better than what actually happened."
Hopefully this will have given various sysadmins a wake up call to review their configurations and tighten up their procedures ( Unless the proverbial PHB puts their foot down and insists it cannot be changed because it would inconvenience the CEO)
This presumes some of them even realized they were involved of course.
"My portion of Silly Con Valley's rise & fall & rise & fall & rise & fall & fall[1] & possible current upward trend[2] is in the works. Working title "40+ Years of Labor for THIS? (Subtitled "Why I bought a horse ranch ...")".
Unfortunately, when it gets published it'll out me here on ElReg ...
No aggrandizing here. Rather, putting history into perspective.
[1] Not a typo.
[2] Manufacturing is returning to TheValley ... Slowly, but it's definitely on the upturn.
House Rules Post your own message "
Now, if only you could process individual chips of Silicon in the way that you could thick film or thin film hybrids.
You can be a soap dodging techie but you catch more flies with honey than vinegar
If you're happy with your cave in the basement that's fine. But if you want occasional interactions with other people (some of them possibly of the female gender) and a shot at a pay rise you will have to embrace personal hygiene.
Jobs lasting legacy?
Persuading large number of people to buy the wolds most overpriced PC hardware.
"If you hire Woz(es) you also need someone to actually exploit them in order to have a product. "
Indeed. And when it came to ruthless exploitation Jobs was indeed the goto guy.
It's so difficult to find those charismatic borderline psychopaths that are still just this side of serial killer or ponzi fraudster.
"Interesting, thanks for the tip! I remember having small halogens in desklamps, small odd shaped bulbs with two little prongs. I haven't seen them as more conventional bulbs, will have to go get some!"
I'm writing this by the light of one. Standard fitting, lights as fast as an incandescent. Fully as bright.
Mercury is an environmental and neurotoxin. It's very nasty (and if the bulb was warm it will have a Mercury cloud to disperse.
You do know where the expression "Mad as a hatter" comes from, right?
"Just like first combustion planes had laughable performance, but looking at them ,someone with vision could imagine their amazing future ..."
True but they had a reason to innovate which drove many cycles of engine and structures development.
It was roughly 24 years between the Wright brothers at Kill Devil hill and Lindberg flying the Atlantic.
BTW I upvoted you. Improvement is possible, the question is how much will people want?
Well when the 2 person Voyager team flew around the world they used the tech of the Gemini programme with bags they dropped over the side when over open country.
Outside of general aviation things get a bit involved for long flights but they have to be faced.
That's not regulation as I understand it.
And I think protecting it by Royal Charter, so no Minister can unilaterally start fiddling with faster than you can say "Statutory instrument" is a useful move.
Here's the thing. You can lay most of the blame at Rupert Murdoch's New International operation and its corrupting influence on media, the Police and politicians. But no one stopped (or tried) to stop it happening.
Now we'll see how this works out. Maybe most outlets will simply not sign up and take their chances with the aggravated libel damages. You did it to yourselves.
"What you're doing is what I describe in the piece. Find a victim - pin their corpse to the front of your bulldozer, and steam through the crowd.
It's pretty shameless."
True.
But when we talk about how the British press is "kept in check" or some such by the law of libel only if you're rich enough to afford it.
That's like Americans going on about how they have the best healthcare in the world, with the (unspoken) addition the company has a decent health plan or you can afford it directly.
In the 1970s CT scan processing was an early candidate for using massively parallel (well thousands) of bit serial processors. Good idea but never took off.
Now you can get literally 100s of times that power in (by medical hardware terms) tiny sums of money.
With enough resolution and political will every politician could be inside one when they speak. Instantaneous confirmation of lies (or a sociopathic character that literally cannot tell a lie from a truth).
The possibilities are endless.
They have spunked invested something like an order of magnitude more cash in this area to get (apparently) less result.
For those who don't get what the big deal is over thin film or thick film technology.
1)Flexible, not brittle substrates (unlike both) 2) Transistors mfg in situ (unlike thick film) 3)Significantly safer materials 4)Designed for very high volume production and disposable use 5) Typically mfg temperatures in the low 100s of C, rather than the 700-900c firing temps of hybrids. 6)Much lower clock frequencies than thick film (but above what I know of the SoA for thin film).
Interestingly they also seem to working on making an on substrate clock. This is very tricky but the ability to deliver a high quality clock without a separate quartz chip is a major step forward.
" I do worry about "big brother" getting mixed up in the equation though."
And on past experience you damm well better be.
Whenever someone spunks this idea out (2nd or 3rd time round for this I think) the government approach always turns out to be a)big b)centralised c)holds stupid amounts of data for absurd lengths of time d)outsourced
QED clusterf**k waiting to happen.
High IIRC.
I think this is an excellent idea. Making it work is going to be tricky but the payoff is huge.
HIV/AIDS and other STDs are a huge burden and barrier methods are the only real way that this is going to be stopped. It's sad someone gets these diseases and they cannot be cured but why should their wives/mistreses/prostitutes pay for their stupidity.
It'll be interesting if the get static from the swivel eyed loons religious right in America for this.
Thumbs up for working on a big issue that the US govt probably won't touch.
Historically there has been the properties of the permeability permittivity (useful for capacitor design) of free space and the (derived) impedance of free.
All have measurable values but no one knew why they had those values (it's one of those "stop asking stupid questions, memorize the values and get back to work" conversations).
Given that it's been know the vacuum is subject to quantum fluctuations for decades it's surprising no one seems to calculated the implication what happens if a photon hits one (or more?) of these particles in transit. Just because they don't stay around for long does not mean that they are not "real" while they are here.
Even more amazing laser technology is at (or close) to being able to measure this effect.
Note that practically it would not change much. We would have to change the definition of the speed of a light in a vacuum to mean a vacuum with no virtual particles (which AFAIK is a complete abstraction).
Now if the rate and density of virtual particles remains constant then this just means you need to compute the speed of light slow down but if either varies then things could get muchmore interesting.
BTW GPS propagation already corrects for some quantum effects so this could improve navigation accuracy, especially over long distances or high speeds (but probably nothing moving slower than a serious fraction of the speed of light or ranges of several AU).
Thumbs up for picking up the ball and running with this.
Like It's always good to have some kind of upper or lower limit for an algorithm so you can stop wasting time looking for better (because there isn't one) but it's good to revisit those boundaries to confirm they really are boundaries.
And in this case they are not.
Note this limit applies to single layer PV cells. If you stack 2 or more different sets of semiconductors you can (so far) hit 43% total. But they are hellishly expensive (built for comm sat use).
How practical this research is remains doubtful. Upside is you push the maximum limit on a single layer PV. Down side is you add tricky nanowire fabrication (UHV chamber needed?) and I'm not clear if the spacing between the wires writes off that area of the cell for light collection. Incidentally resonance
implies an object with electrical dimensions close to the exciting photon, which suggests this is a narrow band improvement. Of course if that narrow band is at the peak solar wavelength (around 500nm, unfortunately Silicons band gap is around 1100nm) that could be quite a useful difference.
"At the moment, the thing that deters me from installing PV at home, is the cost and complexity around inverters and metering more than the cost and effort around the panels themselves."
So management costs, not technology costs.
BTW you might like to look at these hybrid PV/water heating panels as PV efficiency falls about 1% for every 4c rise in temperature
This IIRC is not the first time some network protocol relied on a number being "random" and it turned out it was not.
My instinct is despite it being an active research topic since the 1950s implementing the research is demanding and easily FUBAR'd.
Let me suggest that a)If you're implementing one and you do some tricky possibly non portable, possibly inefficient (but essential to algorithm correctness) thing you document it.
In the space shuttle flight software code they called these "alibis." If it's good enough for maintaining life threatening computer code it's good enough for you.
If you're reading it don't change it unless you really understand what's going on.
IIRC the Joint Speech Research Unit (part of Dollis Hill) gave the world speech transmission at 1200bps in the late 1950s.
All the institutions I listed may be world class research centres but apart from Prestel what is Adastral Park (I've only ever seen it called Martlesham or Martlesham Heath) actually known to the world for?
Although it sounds like there is still a lot of potential speed up to be had in the software architecture if 90% of the theoretical capability has not been used yet.
Thumbs up for move the idea of the "robot butler" (or for the slightly liess self indulgent a robot nurse) just a little step closer.
Of course that still leaves the mechanical elements.
Clothes recognition. Perhaps.
Pick up, iron and hang clothes on a hanger in your wardrobe. fuggeddaboutit (for now).