New upgrade "Quite good."
For Intel's wallet perhaps.
And using all 6 cores on the same job?
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
They are nothing like the sort of thing you'd see in electrical systems (unless they are faulty electrical systems).
And BTW you're heart going into MI is not subtle.
Clever tech (and the other sensors make it sound like a good exercise and body health monitor) but otherwise....
I''ll just bet they are.
Given what a clustf**k the ID cards bill was.
Tony Blair is long gone but his infection is as virulent as ever.
"will enable people to assert their identity online safely and securely"
It is a "service" the government (IE a bunch of senior civil servants and the occasional gong hunting Minster) demand
it will be neither safe nor secure.
Basically by delivering short pulses at around 200Khz to the chip as (IIRC) this puppy is NMOS, not CMOS
I think that qualifies it for being the worlds first battery switched mode PSU in a consumer product (but I cannot swear to it).
I thought they just bought the chip and stuck in the board. I'd no idea the chip was even programmable.
It takes a lot of money to buy a significant amount of MS stock, unless you bought (and held it) from a long time ago.
Normal accountancy rules you needs at least 20% for serious influence and 51% for control.
"Slice and Dice?" One can hope so. But yes the classic moves from here are a)Cull the loss making divisions b)Cut the R&D budget, although in MS's case that's more like cut the innovative-companies-we-can-buy-cheap budget.
"Seriously though, it doesn't matter. Of all the people I've talked to here in the US, none of them give a shit about the NSA stuff, and the only one that has an actual opinion thinks Snowden should be swinging from a rope. Really. They have no problem with the NSA stuff."
All the while believing the are in the freeist country in the world.
Wait till they try to organize and excercise that "freedom."
My prediction.
They will be fed assorted heavily redacted stuff showing a)The US is under constant 24/7/365 planned attacks b)Only complete monitoring of everyone all the time forever can save it c)We only spy on bad people, honest.
The law professor is a token concession to the idea of an "outsider" having access.
I like mushrooms. I don't like mushroom committees.
A mag tract 0.6mm wide and a head gap of 2 micrometres in 1963. Just to put that in perspective very early IC's were something like 10x that.
I've always thought Phillips were a technology powerhouse but have made some awful timing mistakes. DCC for example. But they got CC and CD. That's quite a good run for 1 company.
"You seem to forget how far we have come."
Processors will get faster.
Screens will get better.
Mobile phones will get smaller. Sorry to burst your bubble, but they did exist then.
Windows will still be a PITA.
That's called an "extrapolation." 27 years later what do we find?
Now a machine that can sit in your closet that can make anything you need from an adequate supply of raw materials, which could be just a mound of soil, was revolutionary.
And still is.
It took (IIRC) 2 or 3 major parts, with a load of bolts to hold them together and was ablatively cooled (although they had several test fires)
If you want simple injector systems look up "pintle injector." Developed by TRW and classified for years they claimed they'd never had a combustion instability problem with it and it's what the Spacex Merlin engines use.
BTW NASA also does a lot of test firing with essentially a 40Klb plug nozzle design.
The key issue with SLS I can see is surface finish and how much surface prep you need to do to reduce friction pumping costs. Something called "liquid honing" can help a lot with this.
Thumbs up for NASA doing some actual engineering for a change.
" I'll admit it doesn't make much sense for things like Earth orbiting space stations but it does for planetary colonisation."
I'd bet you'd wouldn't say that if the urine re-cycler had broken down again and the last spare to fix it was used 3 months ago with the next scheduled in 2 months.
"I remember Drexler speaking about honest-to-God nanotechnology (the one with the nanobots, what nanotechnology meant before marketdroids looking for the next big thing found about it) and saying that one day one would be able to put together a rocket engine in a vat filled with the appropriate salty solution and a few grams of magic nanobot powder. Just rinse when the light goes green."
Yes. That was in his doctoral thesis.
In 1986.
We've been waiting for the future for a long time.
"Strip the case, display, buttons and individual batteries from the phones. Replace the laptop with a custom ARM powered board; etc :)"
You do know the guts of a mobile is what's inside those USB data dongles?
And yes they can do voice, but it's down to the sim card inside.
So 8 way USB hub --> 8 Mobiles.
Compiler targets underlyingcore functions in Intel based Android phones --> users rave about sharper performance, crisper game play, whatever enabled by faster executing core code --> Word of mouth increases sales of Intel based Android phones --> Fat bonuses and trebles all round.
But that Ubuntu malarkey sounds like a real handicap on this plan.
And of course while in theory an Intel written compiler should have some great tweaks, since they should be the best motivated people to explore their own architecture there is one question.
Where are the benchmarks for execution, not compilation?
And given Intel's dealing with hardware benchmarks "proving" their embedded processors are better than ARM's (which they weren't) could you trust those results?
And the gate oxide is about 1/10 that.
So roughly 2^7 width halvings gets you to 1 atom wide transistors.
At that point you've just about run out of atoms
But what about multiple layers. Well know you've n x 130W per chip to get rid of.
You are probably looking at chip packages with internal fluid heat pipe cooling to do this.
Or you cold go with the very low power neural simulation architecture started by Carver Mead more than a decade ago.
At whatever Intel wants to charge for it.
Perhaps Intel has guessed analyed the market carefully and this is indeed the perfect match for the phone capabilities customers demand for tomorrow. They do have lots of highly paid staff to do stuff like that.
I sense they still don't quite get the idea of customization. You know, the whole parts tailored to your specifications incorporating the peripherals you want on them?
Not to worry though. Intel have a very large cash pile left so they can afford another mistake.
Proceed with this nonsense at flank speed say I.
But I suspect it needs a surprising amount of late 20th century engineering know how (CAD/FAE high quality steels and the ability to cast and/or weld very big parts) to actually deliver it.
But it's one hell of an achievement. It's practical, highly energy efficient (from the number quoted to move those kinds of mass) and graceful
That might be a teensy bit of a problem.
Conceptually you can view this as a 3d display, with "voxels" (as the MI people call them) and 3 scanning light sources (that does not necessarily need a LASER system).
OTOH you can go with real holograms so you need to generate a 2d interference pattern (recorded from the imaginary object and a LASER reference beam inside the computer) then write that on the display and illuminate with your real LASER.
About 50-70 times a second. or 3 of them (different because of the wavelengths) superimposed to give a color hologram.
Back in the day I guessed something with Surface Acoustic Waves would be the way to go but no one seems to have run with it.
After that I'm guessing the finger sized motion tracking in real time will be a piece of odure.
"CGI has never IMO come close to the models and painstaking animated composite action scenes of the original episodes. Yes, yes, yes."
Trouble is it costs an arm and a leg to get it done right.
OTOH modern desktop fab techniques mean some of it should be cheaper.
With near term launch systems you will never get the kind of radiation shielding. In that sense it is the ultimate in In Situ Resource Utilization.
Sure it might not look very aerodynamic and the lander will need to b parked on it's backside going out but this baby would be the Mercedes S class of space transport. 5-10 metres of rock between you and any 'nad frying radiation.
Now if NASA talked about it on that basis.....
Thumbs up for someone (maybe) thinking they don't need a new spacecraft that masses 12x the ISS built on Earth
Mars in our lifetime?
The processor that flew the Saturn V had about the speed of a pocket calculator. But atmospheric flight is much tougher. At this scale the draught from an open door is a hurricane.
We've come along way from the Shuttle's GPC of 100lb+ and 0.4MIPS capability.
This is clearly "Top Gear."
Erlang?
Interestingly now that world + dog has standardised on IEEE floating point standard and given most of these systems are back end (minimal user interaction ) it should be fairly easy to write portable code.
Efficient portable code is a different question......