Re: re-using an existing field is very risky too
"And if that failed you'd loose everything, not just a part of something."
Don't know much about mainframe reliability do you?
Or their backup practices.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
The best I could come up would be special hardware to speed up the finding of the right killer phage for a bacteria, then identifying the ideal culture conditions.
Note that's where their specificity works against you. IIRC they used to use egg embryos for this (yes that business with Michael Caine in "Billion Dollar Brain" is real). How specific it is is another matter. Is it down to the species? or down to (literally) this variant?
BTW I think they tend to use the "T Even" series of phages for modding the contents of C.Coli, usually T4.
"You're alternative is going to result in a lot of people dying. The advantage of phages that they co-evolve with the viruses they eat so it is more difficult for a virus to completely out-compete them."
Err, yes & no.
"Phage" is the old name for virus. These are viruses that parasitise bacteria.
They are highly evolved to attack those bacteria, which is part of why they are quite useful, in there is very little danger of them jumping (several major) rungs up the evolutionary ladder to attack humans, unlike that favorite host organism of genetic engineers e.coli (which happily lives in humans already.)
Where Stalin set up a phage research institute in his home state.
Once again when the UK has a development the first question they ask seems to be "Who can we sell it off to."
Or is because when they approach UK companies they are told "Not interested?"
And BTW that ability of bacteria to evolve defenses to all antibiotics would be practically impossible without the drug industry selling them to livestock (mostly chicken) farmers as "growth promoters," exposing lots of bacteria to sub lethal doses and allowing them to pass on their resistance through plasmids.
Thanks for that Big Pharma.
It really does come down to the Authoritarians and the non Authoritarians (I'd call them believers-in-democratic process but I think you can how corrupted Democrat has become in America).
These people seem to think that spying on everyone 24/7/365 makes the spied upon feel safer.
Just another weird delusion we will one day treat as grounds for barring from any elected office.
Note that DARPA is the almost impossible mission force.
But when you think about it this does seem a good question. Why can't you use software to help fix your problems with software?
But as people have pointed out how many of these problems could have avoided if existing tools were used at the right time in the development process?
Wheather they want it to or not.
The word will get round if you kit is s**t.
And while I'll not it's on the internal side rather than the external side it is wireless, so not quite as "internal" as I'd like for a start.
I like my privacy so I disable wireless access to the router by default. But that's not always an option.
Thumbs up for finding it. The mfg can have a thumbs down for putting it there in the first place.
It's the legal one.
But I agree this should open up different business models.
But for starters NO US staff/offices/servers is a good idea.
Switzerland looks to be the only country that takes personal privacy seriously with a well functioning government, but there must be others?
"So in the US, you can walk into any Starbucks and get free Internet without even logging in (but you may have to watch an ad). In China, that would be illegal, as all the real identity of all Internet users must be known at all times."
So instead you get rampant identify theft.
Sounds like you need to run any access through your phone if you want to cut down the number of people who can steal your identity.
"The heating systems are coal-fired, and they are also clearing their corn fields by burning them. They used to get coal for free, but now it's merely heavily subsidized."
So basically it's smog.
This is what London looked like up until the 1950's.
Perhaps the Chinese should look up an old British document called the "Clean Air Act."
Note they have already ruled out certain theories about such black holes.
Personally I've never understood the interaction between masses at high velocity and gravity waves.
It always seemed obvious that a GW detector near a big particle accelerator should be picking up feint but repetitive pulses when the accelerator was running.
But thumbs up for reducing the search range and pinning things down.
So in principal a good idea.
Unless of course you can only put this layer on inside a hugely expensive (and small) UHV chamber of course.
It's V 0.1 tech but applied to ultra cheap thin film cells (the kind that really do come on a roll) or the ultra high performance triple junction cells (>43% already) this sounds like a winner.
If they can only get the commercialization right.. :( .
So you can trace the flow from the idea to the software that carries it out.
For the full "tin foil hat experience" you will need to avoid the banally obvious hole of a compromised compiler, so yes you will need to verify your compiler, which you will have personally boot strapped from a copy of the source code by directly keying the bits into the file (can't be sure the assembler has been compromised, can we?)
For the rest of us the first 2 items and free communications between testers should suffice.
But remember 2 things. 1) Mono cultures are susceptible to single (but complex) attacks, hitting everyone at the same time. 2)Patching, proper staff training, limiting what parts of your stuff are visible to the global internet and requiring your apps suppliers not need to run with root privileges for basically trivial tasks will (probably) end most of the security issues of most companies and institutions.
But that's too much like work for too many PHB's
"So anyhow you need seriously specialized technology to get this working well enough so it'll be able to compete with WIFI. It's not just "modulate the LED light you already have"."
Yeah. IRDA was the thing for palm top wireless connections to printers.
Small transducers, stopped by walls, no licensing issues. It had it's attractions.
Relatively slow by modern standards...
That should give phenomenal contact density, but only for every 2 die pair in the package.
I guess they're seen the layers between the dies as sort of stress relief layers to absorb some of the forces involved, deforming to accommodate any forces in the dies.
Intriguing to see if they will go to some kind of processing-in-memory that has been proposed off and on since the mid 80's.
"Because if it is a USA company (or has ties to the USA) then it will be grabbed by the NSA using the Patriot Act. I don't have any embarassing diseases, but I still don't want the USA gov't noseing around in my privates."
It will make a nice companion ot the census data that Lockheed Martin collected last time (and the time before that) round.
"I like the Lithuanian system for government records. "
Funny you should say that.
Lithuania has a total population of about 5 million people.
And no IT infrastructure when the Soviet Union pulled out.
so more or less a green field site with a very clear idea of what state snooping could do for privacy and freedom.
"Yes I know you make most of the money on the popcorn, but think.
No more film copying and distribution.
Instant cash in the bank. Release on Monday. Profit on Tuesday.
Some will do it slower, some will do it faster.
And all those staff you pay for copyright enforcement are no longer needed.
Result. $$$$."
And then of course I woke up.
You know it makes sense.
But that was a long time ago.
The formal administration of the internet (insofar as it has any formal administration) should be a non governmental body and moved to a country which respects all rights.
I would suggest Switzerland
"I thought part of the NSA's mission is supposedly to be protecting Americans. How is it protecting Americans by weakening their privacy and protection from adversaries by weakening the tools they use for protection? "
Easy.
"We had to destroy their privacy and sense of safety in order to keep their information more private and their lives more safe."
But IRL "Why should we give a s**t how the American people feel? We didn't bother asking them when we took their privacy in the first place. "
"Also, I think from subsequent reports when they signed up to the emission reduction targets they only considered electricity and signed up on basis that 20% electricity from renewables was "doable" and only afterwards realized they'd signed up to 20% of all energy from renewables and since in UK the vast majority of heating is gas where there is no option to switch to a "renewable" source then to meet targets we need to switch 50-60% of electricity to renewable sources."
Not true.
A quote from Tony Blairs office stated he knew the figure covered all UK energy and wanted the UK to face a challenging target.
And of course he was a)Leaving power and b)Handing over to Gordon Brown. so signing up is a)No skin off his nose and b)Let's him stuff his hated rival big time in a way that can't be recovered from.
Just another little "gift" to the British people, along with the Nationa ID card register, the children's database, longer ANPR data retention and a few others.
Politicians, always ready to put settling old scores ahead of the public good.