Re: How exactly is this helping to fight "terrorism"?
what makes you think that is their point?
They want the data, all of it, all of the time.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"But forcing free men or commercial entities to express views they do not believe, is a red line that simply cannot be crossed if you want to hold any semblance of legitimacy as a democratic government."
In theory no.
"Even the American government hasn't gone that far. "
It has.
Either you know this and have an agenda for denying it or you don't, in which case you're not as well informed about this subject as you seem to think.
"What's seriously impressive is that the Indian Space Agency originally intended MOM to fly on the GSLV rocket, but when that suffered a series of launch failures, they switched to the PLSV."
I thought this was a natural for the GSLV but then I looked at its launch record...
Shocking.
The GSLV is really shaping up as a work horse for the Indian programme, but they really need to get the bugs out of the Cryogenic upper stage.
Only India has a Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle.
Despite it's everything-but-the-kitchen-sink engine and propellant design it's been very reliable with a 91% (22/24) successful launch record. It's 1400Kg to GTO payload should be enough to put some instruments and a big enough braking motor into Mars orbit.
Well done to India for doing this.
"Can be handled, I'm told, by taking the line that only your immediate boss can give you orders, regardless of how senior they are, and that everyone else must go through them."
Excellent.
It's called a "Chain of command." It's a notion that seems out of place in the world of matrix and "flat" management.
I'd also suggest making it clear that if someone wants you to know something they explicitly tell you.
This avoids the old "I thought you knew" BS that some nappies managers indulge in.
"Our company has actually lost work because we didn't use enough gender neutral language in responses in the past - so I'm more aware of this now than I used to be."
"Gender neutral language."
That would be things like "We, they, it, the," and of course "a" instead of he/she.
Note MS Word (being American) flags this as too "passive."
I keep expecting it to scream. "WHAT ARE YOU? YOU GOT TO BE A MAN ABOUT THIS" (and show a hand-slapping-face icon).
Challenging stuff, this English, is it not?
"Have you heard of the fascist Republic of USA? 46 MEELION people in poverty. Still spunking BEELIONS on NASA."
They might also like to reflect that Aircon on overseas military bases > home delivered pizza market > NASA budget.
NASA is <0.5% of the US Federal budget.
OTOH it is 18x bigger than the Indian Space Research Organization.
Wheather or not it delivers 18x more result is more debatable.
Well I believe the best to date is a thing called a "fission fragment rocket."
Essentially a high efficiency no moderator nuclear reactor designed to fir those fission fragments out the nozzle.
Estimated performance is several Kg of thrust (which is pretty good for this sort of Isp) with fragment velocities of about 3-5% of the speed of light.
Thorium Molten Salt Reactors are the way to go, developed in the 60's at ORNL, they can't blow up, melt down or make weapons. Low pressure, burn 99% of its fuel and solves the waste problem? energyfromthorium.com
True.
Pity most of the major nuclear players do not make their money from building the reactors but fueling them
That's about 20 micro A current draw.
Of course the questions (as always) are a)How many updates per second (minute, hour, day, week,year) do you need and b) much is going to be transferred.
"Give me as much as possible as often as possible" is not helpful
But let's see what they can do.
It took several hundred years to break people of that habit.
BTW Crystallization experiments for this have to be done very carefully. The slightest difference between the surface conditions on the 2 containers that the water contacts will probably invalidate the results.
It's the zero probable cause.
I think anycountry country where people care about their privacy should establish in country clouds.
While theoretically a natural disaster can wipe out large parts of a whole country the chances of anything wiping out a whole country are very remote.
Thumbs up to the Swiss for the first (?) legal "data haven"?
Legendary for the rule of "Run the program twice to make sure you get the same answer."
A Seymour Cray design they skimped on a few things to get more speed.
Error checking being one of them.
That said finding a (fairly) unobtrusive notation is quit impressive.
" "nations do not have friends, they only have interests" - adapted from a remark by Lord Palmerston, 1864. "
I think you'll find the quote is "Nations do not have permanent friends, only permanent interests" and it's by Disraeli.
"But also, and more interestingly for me, this technology appears to be a very good basis for either single or dual stage to orbit reusable launch systems."
Is it happens DARPA will be holding an open day on the 11th for a M10 1st stage launch system.
A launch mission runs about 10 mins. A cruise mission runs hours. Design options for a 1st stage LV would be unthinkable in a cruise mission. If it works at all Spacex's RLV tech will be running long before this is flying.
"Yeah to me the most impressive part of the SR71 was the power plant. "
The J58 was (IIRC) originally chosen for a navy fighter that got cancelled.
Not that technically the ramjet part is not part of the engine but is part of the nacelle, as are the inlet and outlet.
The whole package working together is what gave the SR71 its performance.
BTW the only other country that flew turbo ramjet aircraft in the 50s was France.
"Many technological marvels of the 20th century were the result of military research. I suspect the amount of public and private wealth realized from the Internet dwarfs the money put into developing ARPANET."
Actually true.
"Getting reliable and cheap scramjets makes it easier to get humanity into space,"
Written by someone deeply ignorant of the difference between "launch" and "cruise".
"It's pretty amazing the things that can be done these days with the crypto primitives we have. It's totally possible to set up an identity (read: pseudonym) system that is totally (well, computationally, to any degree you want) anonymous. That's why I called you out on your initial comment."
So (IIUC) with this system in place we could prove that all messages supposedly coming from "Frumious Bandersnatch" do come from you, but not who you are?
Authentication with anonymity?
Ingenious, if it works.
" If it did have access to the microphone and a universal driver could be written in assembler, then it *could* poll and listen for audible tones, which then would form the basis for data pulses. In tape systems a one or a zero is represented by an inflection in polarity with a pulse width judged by measuring the edges."
I'd also question the bandwidth of the usual PC microphone speaker combos.
IIRC the typical aution I/P channel is not that high a quality.
"You clearly have never seen some of the desks on Mahogany Row."
True.
Besides, a good bit of the bulk is the melting pot and casting operation. Not to mention the expanding spaces. I think we can do without full justification."
Also true, but how are you going to produce the multiple copies of a letter?
" I'm not sure how you propose to implement sceen-edit with a phototypsetter. Not to mention how you plan to develop each frame "
In my OP I limited it to last line editing.
"Not to mention how you plan to develop each frame "
While I'd like to have seen more use of a photographic approach the challenge is tough enough (I think) that no solution should be ruled out unless it's very cumbersome. The trouble was always going to be building an erasable photographic film. That said the USAFRL did work in the mid 90s with bacterial rhodopsin in PVA using 2 color write (1 in the IR) and the IR frequency to erase. Their achieved resolution was 1400 line pairs/mm so a quite small piece could have served.
"Well, a screen ful of AAAAAA would be a bit boring. and I suspect that the 48 characters typical of early (pre 1960 or so) Data Processing equipment would do for a character set."
True but worst case planning is that. I chose 24 x 80 because a lot of TTY programs seemed to go with that by default. Regarding a character code well Baudot, used for teletype/telex systems would be more authentic.
The reason MS hacked up the BS that was "Pen Windows."
Described as the first OS designed to run with a pen and mobile computing (IE Not permanently connected to a LAN, and wha that implies for document transfer).
Test hardware was 286 based so I'm guessing it'd scream along on anything more recent.
"Whilst most current implementations of Forth run under a host operating system, there is no reason that Forth cannot be completely stand-alone."
True.
Forth's background is process control and fast response, low memory foot print were key drivers in the late 70s and early 80s.
Take that further and you are into full embedded apps. I think the trouble is Forth is too flexible.
Everyone rolled their own OS functions for their hardware and no one developed a specific OS (Not quite true IIRC the "Gavillan" early 80's laptop was meant to have version of a Forth based OS. No idea what happened to that).
"Yes, we can listen to all your conversations and emails, but there's just noting interesting enough in them to do anything about.*"
*This conveniently skips the small detail they (like all good data fetishists) also archive the stuff, as you just never know when some "nobody" will become a "somebody."
Who needs you to plan anything?
Never heard the quote "Give me 6 lines from an honest man and I'll find something to hang him"?
"But... I am terrified by the idea of massive data collection and retention over long periods."
You should be.
So a telephone on maximum power sitting < 0.3m from the equipment (or a harness) then it may be affected.
Bad news indeed
If plane mfgs started routing their nav hardware aerial feeds through the passenger seats.
In fact there is a group of people who might have mobiles on in close proximity to all that nav hardware.
That would be the people in the cockpit who were the first to be permitted to use mobiles.