Note he doesn't actually say he's the man.
Just that he was involved in bitcoin (at some point).
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
For some reason the line from the old Mel Gibson movie "Payback" comes to mind.
"When you go high enough it comes down to just one man."
When it's their a**e that's going to do say 6 months for each persons data that goes astray you can bet things will get a lot tighter.
Improved compression (once) --> reduces bandwidth of every download x every jpg using that encoder.
And it's open source.
This is very much in the spirit of the founders of the web. Thumbs up.
I wonder if El Reg as a tech site already uses this JPG cruncher tech already?
"Mobile base-stations with an integral power source and someone guarding them are an option, but sooner or later the guard will be intimidated or take a bribe. Seriously, in Congo or even SA being nailed down is no deterrent to theft. Put it out of reach."
Technically perhaps.
It's every other aspect of the concept that people are sceptical about.
If they funded Commercial Crew to the level the President requests.
BTW if the SLS flies the problem then becomes how does NASA afford the payloads.
In truth the whole US system of funding needs overhaul but that's not going to happen anytime soon, and the assorted SEL' s in the Legislature will ensure that fails to happen until there is significant "regime change."
"But call centre work? It sounds ideal for con men who are by their very nature excellent salesmen - but not really for anyone else.
Are they going to handle credit card info? Are they going to handle personal details? That sounds like a recipe for a disaster."
Already done in the US.
Welcome to the prison-industrial complex.
"Icahn repeated his claims that the eBay boss had a "clear and insurmountable" conflict of interest in the sale, because his investor group was involved in the group which bought Skype for $1.9bn in 2009 - significantly less than the $2.6bn eBay originally paid for it in 2005.
In 2011, Microsoft snapped up Skype's service for $8.5bn."
But if I'm reading this right
CEO orders buy Skype at $2.6Bn in 2005.
CEO orders sell Skype at $1.9Bn in 2009 loosing $700m in the process to another company he has more of a share in.
Other company sells to Microsoft and trousers $8.5Bn IE a $6.6Bn profit.
Yeah, I'd smell a large rat here as well.
"4) Rewrite RIPA to severely limit the people who can use it or, better yet, scrap it entirely as unfit for (any) purpose."
Actually RIPA is the only UK law that puts any limits on govt behavior.
But it needs a hell of a lot of work to put any serious limits on "national security" "needs."
"You can't defeat terrorists by blowing up terrorists, that just creates more terrorists - you defeat terrorists by dealing with the root causes of terrorism. And pedophiles et al wouldn't exist if our society was more open to sexually positive experiences."
True.
But.
What makes you think this actually has anything to do with either catching paedophiles, terrorists, paedoterrorists or terrorpaedos.
This is the usual "coalition of the willing" between "gone native," usually authoritarian Ministers (or wannabe Ministers) and various data fetishist civil servants wanting to get their paws on more and more personal data.
"ell New Labour led the way on demolishing privacy in the NHS. The "Spine", "Connecting for Health" and the rest was all their baby. So there's that whole area. Honestly, I thought I could smell hypocrisy when I opened the browser, and then I saw the headline."
That being one of their less Orwellian plans.
How quickly people forget the National Identity Register AKA the cradle-to-grave monitoring database.
"So, in order to catch one or two people, spying on everyone is acceptable? It's the kind of logic that says it's OK to kill 1000 innocents, as long as you get the 1 you were looking for. It's completely out of proportion to the issue."
Yes. That's exactly the justification. MI5 Islamist suspects totaled 0.003% of the UK according to MI5 in 2007.
So of course 100% of the UK have to be spied on.
"What your typical, sheeple, paranoiad-delusional bleating fails to grasp is that a voyeur's prime goal is the sexual gratification of the act, whilst the prime goal of the NSA and GCHQ is to preserve the rights that idiots like you have to self-delude yourself."
What a delightfully innocent little creature you are if you actually believed that. :)
"It's rather ironic that you are able to post your dribblings with almost certain safety from terrorist attack due to the same actions that you mindlessly attack."
I think that's a variation of the "We fought a war for the likes of you blah blah."
Are you terrified this group of SEL's could actually win an election? LMFAO at that idea.
Sounding a bit paranoid there Mattie, if you don't mind me saying so.
IRL The real reason most people in the UK live free of the fear of islamist terrorists is because there are actually so damm few of them to begin with. In 2007 MI5 said they were watching 2000 suspects. The 2010 UK population was 62.3million
That's 0.003% of the UK population who might possibly, maybe, perhaps actually do something, eventually. Ever heard the phrase "Freedom is the right to be uncomfortable?"
It's not just disproportionate to the size of the threat it's grossly disproportionate to actual threat.
More damage and probably more lives will be lost in the next 10 years of extreme weather in the UK than by any real terrorist incidents. In fact the total of UK terrorist deaths 2000-2012 was 59, less than the number of people who die in botched DIY annually Lee Rigby's death would bring that up to 60 in 14 years.
I don't expect those figures to change your mind. The only question left is why won't they change your mind?
"So how many of those nude pics were of minors? Ah the perverted GCHQ, at least now we know where all those pedi's are getting their pics from!"
And remember kiddies the UK CP laws are possession. There are no "extenuating circumstances."
Anyone at GCHQ who has seen them is therefor liable for an entry in another govt database. The SOR.
"... and how we would've been blown to shreds by them terrorists long ago had it not been for the crucial intel tool that is Yahoo! Messenger! Intercept!"
You'll need to include some support for Israel and the superiority of HP Itanium servers as well.
It's been a while since we've heard from Mattie boy.
Do trolls go on holiday? Or has he crossed one line too many and got banned?
But of course this is the Civil Service where every department (despite all operating under the same UK laws) is so unique that it's simply impossible to share the sort of things that every organization does.
It's the gas turbines and hydroelectric generators that they control.
Stuxnet target was not the PLC, it was the motors those PLC's drove.
Why would you do this? I can think of 2 reasons.
a)Because you can b)Using your advance knowledge of the impending failure(s) to short the stock price or buy the company up cheap afterward.
The latter calls for Bond villain levels of cash but the former is open to any skiddie who fancies making a splash.
Could you really make a 500Kw gas powered gas turbine explode by remote control?
IDK. But I'll bet within the next decade someone will try.
"So the problem isn't "do I have to worry about who is doing it now", but it should be "do I have to worry about god knows who having access to that data in the future" - to which the answer is "yes - because I have absolutely no idea who I might have to worry about in the future"."
The same issue with the UK's National Identity Register, not the ID card per se, the cradle-to-grave surveillance it enabled.
"The security services are there to protect the nation and thus you. You must really have an inflated ego if you think any spy gives two craps about you. All the data is aggregated and only those thought to be doing something wrong are flagged."
Irrelevant.
The storage and processing have grown so cheap that it's possible to snoop on everyone
So the do.
And there will be plenty of that, starting with getting the existing system to dump out their data models and working out how that's going to map to Oracle's view.
Then looking at how Oracle does it's thing and deciding a)re-train staff or b)Re-write Oracle to look more like it's predecessor, using configuration options Bad idea.
Then finding out the clever stuff you in house systems can do that (presumably the things that give you a business advantage in the first place, which is why you wrote them),and implementing that in Oracle, or deciding the world has moved on and they are unnecessary.
Then doing the data cleaning before you extract/translate/load the legacy data onto Oracle
And that's before a single line of Oracle (which should be the last option behind configuring Oracle or retraining staff to do it the Oracle way) is written.
On the upside SAP financials were installed at NASA and they found $500Bn (yes that's more than 1/2 a trillion $) unaccounted for over the 11 centres over about a 35 year period. (See CFO Magazine).
It'll take a much better person than I am to pull that off. I wish them good luck.
They will need it.
"it does take immense balls to skewer ones' hosts like he does (case in point, Bush at the White House Press dinner a couple years back)."
Not exactly.
The President is the guest of the White House Press Corp at those things.
Obama I think handled his rather well.
But he also seems to have a sense of humour.
Biggest group of snoops on the planet -->NSA
Biggest group of users of product --> US govt.
Therefor the people best equipped to crack it will be the people who use it.
Of course as it's from Boeing and will have umpteen tons of paperwork to "prove" it's secure it will be bit more expensive than the average P. Diddy gold-and-diamond encrusted blingphone.
On the upside the Dreamliner batteries have already proved out the self destruct system a treat.
"It's not hard, or at least I didn't find it so, when you are aware of concurrency issues and know how to code parallel tasks and in particular what can be easily run or is appropriate for concurrent processing."
I think this depends on how many processors you're talking about. <8 probably fairly easy. Over 8 you're looking at Amdahls law to start biting down.
"The hardest part was dealing with the utter ball ache that was (and still is in some ways) concurrent access to the Windows GDI, let alone the complete train wreck often involved in running anything ActiveX related concurrently."
Not really sure why you'd do this. I'd have guessed Windows expects multiple apps to write to different windows on the screen as they run. I could see the trouble starting when multiple apps on a remote server want in as well.
"20 years ago, I worked for a company which made image processing boards based around Transputers. You could have as many chips as your wallet could stand, and the code would indeed auto-parrallelise, and scale nicely. If the principles were well-known then, why can't this still be done?"
Obvious question. Was it written in Occam?
A language designed for fine grained parallelism (IIRC each statement was conceptually a process, so it looked like a regular computer language but had some subtle features).
"I still suspect Skylon or that beamed propulsion research NASA are working on will be better in the long term as you would have only one stage, not a vehicle that breaks into 3 or more parts which all return separately."
The reason why SABRE/Skylon's funding has risen 3600x is not that it is single stage (and therefor easier to reuse).
The reusable F9 design (when it eventually appears) is expected to lose 60% of the F9 payload.
So either swallow the lower payload (presumably at a much lower price, but that is only at this point an "aspiration") or fly 3 payloads to do the same job.
Skylon is the same payload as a same sized 2 stage ELV.
That's important because the people who write the cheques work on the basis that GTOW --> cost.
Skylon lets you have your cake (SSTO from a runway potentially anywhere in the world, rather than a missile range) with no loss of payload.
As for beamed power that's a long way out for anything.
"Well, perhaps not a lady in this case, but a spy telling everyone not to bother to take any defensive actions, because they'll just bypass them anyway, does sound just a bit like someone trying to control with misinformation."
Yes. It's a variation on an old psychop speech I used to give.
My punchline was whenever someone tells you this why are they telling you this?
"There are very many SF stories going back decades based around the idea of America isolating itself from the rest of the world. They are all looking rather prophetic now."
"The Cold Peace" is the backdrop to Vol 1 of James Blish's "Cities in Flight" series.
A totalitarian theocracy in the US is a key feature of RA Heinlein's "Revolt in 2100," which given the SEL nature of some of these jokers is starting to look like a real piece of "future history."
"- The Iraq WMD lie basically killed whatever goodwill was left in the remaining part of the world that didn't have a grudge against the US. Dubya's Administration foreign policy brought hatred to the US and the whole NSA/PRISM thing was just the finishing touch to all that."
You missed the estimated $13T (that's a 13 with 12 0x) that the US is estimated to have stolen from the Iraqi economy.
Starting with the cost plus sole supplier contract award by "Gin Rummy" Rumsfeld through a trusted stooge subordinate when he was SecDef.
Would I be p**sed off if I was an Iraqui growing up in post invasion liberation Irqaq?
F**k yeah.