@Destroy All Monsters
"But why would anyone do that except as a late-night fun-and-giggles project and/or to attempt to identify a particularly hot mate?"
Ho ho.
You really need to use that joke icon
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
1) There is no problem. Your just not using it right.
2)There might be a small problem for a small number of users.
3)There appears to be a bigger problem with a larger number of users.
4)By larger we mean all users
5)But we are planning a fix and will role it out real soon now.
"That one square centimetre is about the size of the finger; the contact is for perhaps a second or two... it's not going to do a lot of charging, I feel."
True.
But what about all those swiping motions on some phones?
That's where the big power is.
My instinct is this might be enough maintain memory during a battery replacement, but any active radio (WiFi, Bluetooth, GSM) is going to be needing watts of power
"But I most certainly do not want them (or anyone else for that matter) maintaining a log of precisely when and where I drive. "
You appear to think this is your data.
In this universe the people who collect it think it's their data.
And the sock puppets politicians agree with them.
"Data gleemed from these devices will be analysed the results of which will be used to assist planning of UK road networks. Police may also use the data to assist in any way that helps investigations and makes for more efficient policing of the nation."
Sounds like you've already put your CV in.
But is this just because they are now slurping up so many more phone calls/texts/emails they just can't store as much as they used to for a single victim "targeted" intelligence subject?
But remember this "FISA Modernization Act" does not get rid of THE PATRIOT Act
All your data (If it's a)Going through a US based company b)Going through a US based server) belong to Uncle Sam.
Just another proof that bad cases --> bad laws that take decades to (begin to) fix.
So not exactly an unknown subject.
Doppler shift is given by 2 things.
Motion of the comm sat (known very accurately)
Motion of the plane.
Subtract out the frequency shift of the satellite and you know if the plane is going away or toward you, or possibly some more complicated path.
What's surprising I think is that Inmarsat actually collects that much fine detail about the signal, as well as the messages it transmits and receives.
"t's pretty straightforward and is a product of Nestlé's ongoing evil whereby they try to convince women that they should buy their "healthy" formula instead of "disgusting" breast milk which is, er, free."
I think this was the brainchild of former Nestle executive "deadly" Ernest Saunders, the only man ever to recover from (apparently) Alzheimer's disease, shortly after he was acquitted of all insider dealing charges at Guiness.
A truly remarkable medical feat.
"Oh? I thought that was simply a feature of the way British electricians seem to do their job.."
Plaster dust in the switch during building work can cause some interesting flickering/poltergeist style lighting effects.
Disconnect mains power
Take out switch from box
Disconnect wires
Apply vacuum cleaner
Reconnect all hardware
Switch on mains
See what happens.
"during a call its useful for deaf people. I have a firend who his deaf and when someone rings the bell at his apartment the lights in every room blink."
How ingenious.
Does it do the same when his phone rings as well?
"My daughter wanted to major in biochemistry and genetics. I heartily approved. Once she got to university however, she changed her major to computer science. We argued over it, of course. I pointed out to her that all the truly difficult work had been done in computer science, and that the next big thing was in the field she had first set out to master. "
Yay.
Go hogs
Funny that.
Forgetting PRISM is the NSA's internal name for this, and that each company could have been given its own name to deliver data under (I quite like LYING WEASEL but I'd guess SOP would require something more randomly chosen) makes writing PR denials very easy to do for a US company.
And while THE PATRIOT Act remains on the books PR is all it is.
If they do succeed it will no longer be AI.
Despite 60+ years of failure people persist in thinking that the "obvious" way to duplicate a very large collection (10^10) of low speed (but very high fan out / fan in) elements operating in parallel is with a small number of high speed serial executing machines.
So why should this version be any more successful than any of the previous?
"Even if you were using ping-pong tuners for your alternates - and you almost certainly aren't - you still need to lock your decoder clock to the clock reference, find the assorted tables necessary to interpret the ES streams, then wait for a GOP start before you can actually decode anything. And if there is any issue with A/V sync, you might have to delay further."
That all sounds very convincing.
Except my STB is also a recorder which allows watch-while-record.
Are you saying the system is "time sharing" the receiver hardware virtually on a frame by frame basis to allow this?
Because (apart from incompetent implementation) the only other reason I can think of is that the system powers down the 2nd channel in a rather misguided attempt to save power.
The "common sense" way to implement this function is too effectively switch the outputs of 2 live decoders between a single channel to the monitor, not to have a "primary" and "secondary" decoder and switch the channel inputs between them.
With both decoders running continuously I'd expect channel switching to be possible on the next frame output, whatever frame rate that is.
Obviously I'd expect switching to a totally new channel to take longer, but the speed of the switching for existing channels is rubbish.
"If 20s is a real figure, rather than an exaggeration for effect, I'd say there's something wrong with your setup (or maybe it's a sign that your signal is weak). I do notice that it takes longer to switch between Freeview HD channels (albeit only a second or so) than standard Freeview, "
Actually rechecking things it's 20 secs from switch on. Having read up on "1 sec boot Linux" implementations (I'm pretty sure that's what at its core) that's unimpressive. It's actually about 3 secs between channel changes but it's still 3 secs when I hit the " back" button on the remote IE it should be just swapping the output from the 2 decoders. Likewise with the picture in picture function.
My guess is this was programmed by some linear thinking newby and it never occurred to them it's just a case of flipping between existing outputs rather than searching for a "new" channel.
I'd bet it's a lot less often than their PC/tablet/iThingy/phone.
But before people say the TV is dead consider the idea of a consumer
No mandatory configuration process.
It just works
I miss the day days of push button tuners when you you pressed the present and instant channel change. Maybe it's just a cheap implementation but 20sec just to flip between 2 channels (which you've been flipping between) is p**s poor and I'm damm certain it's the software bodge architecture that's the issue.
"But it's really important to realize, most people can't actually make the cut in good Engineering and Science programs. That's by design. It's also why proper Engineers command such good salaries. They're exceptional people with natural abilities and innate curiosity that have been refined through grueling educational programs. Expect much wailing, rending of clothes and pulling of beards when parents discover their little genius wasn't such a genius after all. He was just being awarded 'Morale Boosters' in return for tuition."
Or as the head of department put it at our introduction "We can't remember all your names, but since about 30% of you won't survive the first year that won't be a problem."
By graduation 51% of the intake didn't make it. The rest finished the course before the course finished them.
It seems a lot of "highly innovative" companies are happy at the size and turnover they already are. They rather do more "clever" stuff than "bigger" stuff.
It's a different kind of ambition.
OTOH some companies may produce fairly pedestrian products but in ever cleverer and cheaper ways.
And then of course there are the rump of SME's in the UK, whose owners lucked into the business and have been milking it ever since. They wouldn't know any kind of innovation if it wacked them on the side of the head with a lump hammer.
If C&C are hoping their growth is going to fix the UK economy they are s**t out of luck.
"Which is not a problem in its own right, PROVIDING that there is oversight."
That's the trouble.
They are doing what they were told by the people in charge.
The PIC's believe everything is justified.
I believe a psychiatric study of NSA management (and their political "masters") would be most revealing.
Which is of course why it will never be done.
"... proceedings, let alone having to fight them tooth and nail.
With this knowledge in the open how can any court in good conscience find it equitable to extradite - or even accept an extradition application for - a UK citizen to the USA to face charges whilst the USA does much worse to citizens and sys-admins of other countries, and their civil corporations, with impunity?"
Because he targeted the DoD and is therefor officially a "bad guy."
And basically made the DoD SysAdmins of the time look like jackasses.
Which is of course unforgivable.
""What, this burrowing autonomous drone with cutting attachments that can bore through reinforced concrete and pick up stuff? Built it for a military contract, but honestly officer, I think the NSA wants it, to breach buried cables and stuff. Well, hope you catch those ATM thieves!""
The last thing you need to give DARPA.
Ideas.
""half-truths and distortions.""
And who were they written to be read by?
Because by Ledgett's description they were either written to suggest the NSA cas capabilities it does not, which sounds like setting up a fraud to milk the US Black budget or does he mean they were written to play down the NSA capabilities, which are in fact more extensive than stated?
Note that the NSA under Shrub didn't need to do PR.
Because they (virtually) believed they were "On a mission from God"
""And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? ... God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion. ... What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.""
Actually that sounds somewhat like Chairman Mao's idea of a "continuous" revolution.
Which really is Communist.
Mine's the one with that little Red book in the side pocket.
"You're right about whole sections of motorway, and even whole motorways, being in the dark. "
So the HWA finally rolled out that Italian made "smart lighting" system.
Impressive. *
It needs dedicated wiring to carry the mains signalling free from being EMC filtered and uses a "Saturatable reactor," which is an old school power controller that fails on, rather than off.
"number of 132 million phone calls made every day here. Suppose they all last for an average of 10 minutes (not everyone can match my mother's phone habits, after all), and it's stored as 8kHz 16-bit PCM (8kHz is what the POTS is designed to carry, being sufficient for human voice) then over 30 days you're collecting 1.32x10^8 x 10 x 60 x 8x10^3 x (16/2) x 30 = 1.52x10^14 bytes required to store it all for 30 days. 152TB. It's not peanuts, exactly, but surely the NSA can manage better than this?"
Phone CODECs are a bit different to the normal (linear) kind.
They use a non linear sampling law (Merkins use a "mu" law, the rest of the world a different one). Basically that compresses 12 bits of dynamic range to 8.
The question is do you have to expand this to linear forms to do analysis or can you keep it in the 8 bit format?
For a worst case calculation, assume everyone in the UK is on the phone say 12 hours a day 365 days.
It's a big number.
But not big enough that the cost will deter the true data fetishist.
Then it's not.
While I don't think it's time to withdraw to a bunker in Montana I do think some (low key) contingency planning about this would be a good idea before planet Earth gets one of these pointed right at it.
Planning how to segment power grids, a few spare big transformers (for the electric arc furnaces needed to make more big transformers), backup to GPS ( not satellite based).