Re: As it could have been done *decades* ago
Given RDP was in Windows XP since at 2001 yes.
I went to home working in 2006 in a firm that was far from technologically competent.
It didn't take much technology, just management will.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Turning complete protocol --> Full Turing machine to run.
So it's a computer regardless of what it's rendering/moving/etc
So it's vulnerable to a)Security flaws in the security model of the protocol (if it has such a model to begin with) b)Security flaws in the protocol generally c)Security flaws in the processor security model d)Security flaws in the implementation.
And once they are exploited you have an arbitrary process running loose inside your machine.
And then there are those f**king "management" processors that the mfg trusts but which cannot be audited.
Page 84
"OS/360, as a multilanguage processor, seems better regarded as a "natural system" than a rational system at this point in time.
"If we regard OS/360 as a natural system, like a cow, we are in a much healthier mental condition"
Saying something truly new in the IT business is hard.
As they used to call them back in the day.
A number of companies built successful businesses on their in house dev language and tools (like MDIS building the software most British libraries ran on).
And conceptually I also like the idea of a large organization in house IT being able to say to any of it's OS vendors "F**k you. We're off this platform. You're history"
But betting on Google to notdump this in X years, where X is a quite small integer?
As for "performance" the wrong answer produced 100x faster than an accurate answer is still a s**t answer.
They submit (even fund) this fairly public process where there vulnerabilities are revealed in public.
But seem to make little (any?) effort to improve their processes to cut down issues and improve quality.
Is this the price they feel they have to pay to get into the UK market?
The European market?
Of course no one can check what's really happening inside those chips.....
So this could be the illusion of security, rather than the real thing.
2 reasons.
It never gets done otherwise.
In big systems at some point some clueless f**kwit Bright Young Thing will come up with a cunning plan to (mis)use account names/result codes/birthdates/whatever for some other purpose which they may (or may not) bother to document.They are "special" records*
The consequences when these look-normal-but-are-not records (every sir name starts with a Q for example, as it's the least common letter for starting words in English according to IBM, and other such truly "special" features) will not be hilarious. :-(
Think of this as my first, last and only warning to anyone who finds themselves doing one of these things.
*Why do they do it? As Truffaut puts it in Close Encounters, "It is an event sociologique" :-(
I mean of course that then people know they really had to self-isolate or (literally) die. :-(
But that leaves the other 99% of the population (and most of normal life) to return to, well, normal.
Which from a ruthlessly economic point of view would be quite a good thing. People could catch it and that would be OK. Herd immunity develops without the death rate to go with it.
Sadly I know of no one actually going with this approach.
Don't worry.
In time people will be scratching heads thinking "C19, what was that?"
Compared to Ebola (77-93% mortality) 1% is frankly not that serious.
Until you consider it's more than doubling the UK annual death rate.
The problem is there is no test to find out which 1% it would kill outright.
Now if only such a test existed......
racist Brexiters."
Actually a fair number of them have died over the last 4 years.
In fact it's estimated the majority that gave this farce legs died by early 2018.
I imagine C19 has picked off quite a few more.
He's right about it being a while since Venus was looked at.
I've always quite liked the concept of "OK, we can send X Kg to planet Y. It's going anyway what do you want on board?"
Sure it's 3Kg but it's 3Kg on each approach, instead of 3Kg of a once-a-decade mission (if that).
I'd like to think they could still pull off a first recovery attempt before 2021, but I think that timetable is slipping so probably not.
Still pretty exciting times over the next few years.
With a whole new batch of implementation flaws to code around.
Yeay for that.
Although no doubt the software will be cut and pasted from SE developed with all the care and attention users should demand of a security application produced by a team of semi-lliterate code monkeys experienced devs.
Wrong.
They have no interest in stopping foreign companies buy up WTF they please.
With the exception of BAe.
Oh no. Billions Above estimate cannot be bought because they really are (supposedly) vital to the UK's defense.
Well no.
But "you" as in the collective members of the UK population.
Y'know, "The will of the people" as BB like to put it (carefully massaged by Cambridge Analytica's lies and without any help from Russian troll farms. No siree. No evidence of s**t stirring by Russia.
Just the 30 odd years of Boris's "work" starting at the Telegraph.
prime minister we've ever had (one one of only a few ministers overall) with a STEM background."
It hasn't.
And I credit that with her ability to tell the difference between all the BS projected about the EEC and later EU with the reality of power. I doubt she'd ever have let some back bencher have a referendum bill like the stupid and weak Cameron did.
Although it's interesting to note she seemed to get involved in politics after she trained as a barrister, which has much less to do with facts and much more with convincing people of your PoV (IE the defendant is innocent) regardless of such details as the actual facts.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
"The market*, the whole market and nothing" but the market has been UK Govt mantra since the Adoration of the Blessed Maggie in 1979.
But an actual policy takes an actual vision of what you want to achieve beyond "line my pockets with as much loot as possible"
Something the assorted chancers with their degrees in talking and writing fluent bu***hit (History, Classics, English for example) have little or no grasp of. "Character" is the word that describes a part in a drama played by a specific actor, not a personality trait
*WhateverTF "Market" actually means in some contexts, like that for electricity supply and gas for example.
The word you are searching for (or perhaps trying to avoid using) is bullying
As in the sentence "Trump is a bully"
It's not a strategy with Trump.It's a lifestyle. It's what he does, what he knows and what he likes.
He seems like an aging, petulant, prep school Ahole with a sense of entitlement well over anything that his actual achievements warrant.
He is.
And he doesn't like companies whose revenue model looks like BS.
"hat's obviously a very false rumor put out by someone hoping to hype the launch so they can sell their overvalued shares before the bubble pops."
Sounds about right to me.
Everyone wants to claim Buffet is interested in their IPO, but he's been consistent the risk is rarely worth the reward he can't be bothered on the scale that Berkshire Hathaway operates at.
BS meter is redlining like a Geiger counter in the engine compartment of a Cold War era Soviet nuclear submarine.
So what's an speculators investors move here?
Long term hold expecting ongoing stock price increase?
Waiting for an actual dividend (with a PE ratio measured in centuries)?
Buy early and sell out quick to offload on the real mugs?
Or as the Snowflake CEO might put it "We want to be the new Autonomy*"
*Not an actual quote
Doubtful.
Those people who build their beliefs on objective reality are pretty robust.
Only those whose world view is basically a fantasy are likely to crumble when actual reality intrudes*
*Although so many seem so detached from actual reality already I doubt they will realize it.
Oh yes. A big supporter of Brexit.
Still is AFAIK, although he and the firm have f**ked off to Singapore in the meantime.
I love "patriots" who love the UK so much they just don't actually want to be taxed there, or in fact live there either.
Let's look at those numbers.
Land. The UK is between Guinea and Uganda on the list of countries with less than 1.5million Km^2 of area. That's 1.47% of the full range
Population it's 4.7% of the biggest.
In GDP terms the UK is indeed 5th or 6th depending on World Bank, IMF or UN figures, for now.
So yes, it is a little country which used to have a large empire but doesn't anymore. As per your name, "Never fear, Smith is here."
must be the truth."*
Well, I had to let the Gammons down gently otherwise I'd be responsible for dozens of strokes across the Home Counties.
*And in this case obvious to anyone with their eyes actually open and their brain in working order.
Indeed.
Brexiteers love WWII so this is 1939 or the "Phony" Brexit..
No doubt they look forward to Jan 1st 2021 for the return of the Blitz spirit*
*That is a thriving black market for luxuries, an increase in rape and desperate sex to blot out the horror and the demolition of more of the largest housing stock built before 1919 in Europe.
Only joking.
The housing stock will remain the worst insulated, built and old in Europe.
WTF did you think those very rich people where bankrolling something that every economist agreed (with exactly 1 exception) would leave the UK worse off X years down the line than it would be inside the EU. Yes you'd be poorer, but they wouldn't. .
BTW Economists are notorious for not agreeing about anything.
Banjos are for playing.
That's what makes them banjos. Time for the conductor to play them once again.
The UK has a very strange financial sector that is basically not geared to talking to British industry.
Fund a bridge over the Bospherous. No problem. Fund a new large press with a solid 2 year order book once construction was under way? F**k right off you pleb. Part of the reason REL has struggled to raise funds throughout its history. In contrast SCramjets have had North of $10Bn pumped into them over 7 decades (REL's last investment round was about £100m, what Musk spent on setting up SpaceX) by the US military and failed to deliver a single working missile/drone/aircraft.
Actually the UK has quite a good track record of setting up niche technology (especially pharmaceutical) companies.
The problem is the complete failure of nerve as the investors can't wait to sell out to the nearest (American/Japanese/Chinese/Albanian/Whatever) corp that rocks up.
It looks like a massive failure of vision (or nerve) across British industry. Why should they sell up when they could lead? Because it's the saaaaaafe option. Like f**k.
Petersen. "Silicon as a mechanical material"
What appears to have changed is they have found a way to lower the pumping losses. An obvious way (borrowed from rocket combustion chamber cooling practice) is to use different sizes of channels in different patterns. A few wide and low for low heat, many and narrow for the high heat areas.The base of those fins will be highly stressed so it might be an idea to round the base of them with a liquid isotropic etch.
BTW 1.7KW/cm^2 may not sound much.
100W/cm^2 was the thermal limit for the Apollo heat shield for a reentry from lunar orbit (post landing analysis indicated it actually around 78w/cm^. NASA believed in having substantial margin).