Sports Direct introduces new staff uniform.*
It makes a bold statement about your corporate identity and is easy to clean.
*Price deducted from you pay over the succeeding months.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Someone can't read an interface specification properly
Someone can't implement an interface specification properly
It was too much of a performance hit to zero the right size block of memory.
Shouldn't most interfaces be implemented as state machines with the baseline code written by a tool and that code rarely needs tweaking?
What exactly does it do for me and why will I pay $WTF to do it?
Technology push can sometimes take people in directions they never realized they wanted to go.
But a lot more lasting success seems to come from finding out what people are unhappy with now and just doing something to fix that.
to opt in to use.
In the conventional use of the term, not the weaslly inverse logic method of CMD for ISP to not filter your content.
But let's keep in mind the 2 word to watch out for where gumint systems are concerned.
Mission creep.
Today fare evasion (but it's still a criminal, not a civil offense). Tomorrow....
The viciously hooked beak for
Tearing into PHBs
Cons-sultants from Strategy Boutiques with their paradigm de jour.
Politicians whose (lack of) temperance of view is matched only by their ignorance of the subject they are spouting on about.
Nice work. Although IRL I don't think the Sun's readership on Merseyside is going to rise anytime soon.
Sometimes called a "root cause" analysis.
The SW upgrade was the final event in the chain.
Break that chain anywhere before that and it would not have happened.
Examples being
Why no regular testing of backups? Why no test SAN to check software updates? Why no hot backup system? A single SAN,even with data stripped across multiple hard drives and with multiple PSU's is still a single point failure if the control software is bricked.
Here's the thing.
Untested backups are not backups.
They are a lucky charm you stroke for good luck.Management that does not require this to be tested regularly is incompetent to the point of delusional.
They should work, but bitter experience taught me they don't always.
Yes it's time consuming to prove what should be a null result (backup restores original data) but imagine how good you feel when you find out it doesn't before you need it?
"Blackie" was stripped of his Lordship and sent to jail.
He famously referred to minority shareholders as "terrorists"
The truth is it's usually the Board you should be worried about.
These characters seem to only hold large share blocks due to generous (sometimes obscenely generous) compensation packages then proceed to line their pockets further while the company turns to s**t.
You missed a <sarcasm> tag there.
This sounds like a CYA law, possibly preceded in private by an "Oh s**t" moment as someone pointed out to them how p**s poor their anonymization process actually is.
But I'm with earlier posters. Let me say it loud and clear.
IT'S NOT THEIR DATA, IT'S YOURS.
If a government insists you supply this data they should be aware of a)How it can be misused and b)How to store it securely.
If they can't maybe they should not be collecting it in the first place?
Like GPS it has an unlimited number of viewers / receivers.
Decent data rates mean your PVR will have no trouble. recording it.
Between better image quality and a viable PVR will most readers want to waste bandwidth like that or use it for downloading stuff they can't see on a channel?
Yes it looks like they are missing something.
Which suggests we are about to discover something new to add to climate models for all planets.
I will note 2 points.
Below triple point water sublimes from solid to vapour but doesn't water vapour act as a greenhouse gas, even if it's not "concentrated" into droplets?
How deep would carbonate deposits have to be to be invisible from space? Is there enough time for that cover to blown over or otherwise form on them?
Doesn't this date back to "Paladium" and "Trusted computing," where MS mean "Trusted by Big Corporate customer to prevent unauthorised access to any of their documents off site unless you pay them big money and/or a senior manager."
In theory DRM could be used to allow individual artists to be receive micro payments and ensure you only pay once for something but each individual person does have to pay, rewarding creativity.
But IRL what are the f**king odds of anyone implementing a system with such goals?
Somewhat smaller than the googles revenue root of FA.
The difference between the UK and a lot of Europe is that in a lot of Europe farming is a part time occupation, with lots of people doing it in addition to their regular jobs.
In the UK that seems to be confined to BBC presenters.
The most despicable thing about this is not the biggest political, whole society affecting change in a generation is being made by a PM with no elected mandate.
It's why it's happening.
To keep the Conservative party together.
To stop supporters going to UKIP
Because the Home Office could not do their f**king job over decades.
The only criticism you will see in many British newspapers is that 2 years is too long and the Brexit needs to be harder.
That is not the nuclear option.
That would be the 1 clause act suspending The Senate and Congress and instituting direct rule from the Oval Office.
IOW "Thank you for your service but if you're not in the Cabinet you're not needed. Please vacate the building in the next hour. "
But no one would be megalomanical enough to do that in the 21st century in the most powerful country on the planet, right?
IIRC the MS thing was a non US citizen not in the US and (I think) it was a MS subsidiary in Ireland.
Bottom line. You can't trust a US company, or it's subsidiaries, to keep your data (business or personal) private from the USG, and the USG does not need a reason to ask for it.
"Privacy is dead" says the creepy Eric Smidt.
He would. It's in his interests that people think that already, so Google can keep pushing further toward making it so. Creepy is clearly a student of Lenin and "pushing in the bayonet" till it meets steel.
Perhaps it's because in Germany running a CNC is viewed as a job worth having and they don't just put anyone in charge of one?
One of the worst legacies of the (formally) strong trades union environment in the UK seems to be the continuing preservation of "demarcation and differentials" between who does what and how much that job is paid.
Not surprising when you consider one of the first efforts at collective bargaining was met by deportation to Australia, under what was effectively an anti terror law of the time (I wonder if it's ever been repealed?).
Wrong. You'd better be sitting down for the next part. It may be a bit shocking.
In Germany the operators are trained to set their own machines.
So instead of 1 person setting machines for a whole factory the whole factory resets their own. In hours, not days.
Saw this in an old documentary comparing the UK and German fitted kitchen industries. Both use CNC saws and routers for the bulk of their work.
So it seems German workers are naturally smarter. Or maybe their vocational training schools actually work.