I'm not worried..
Now had it been acquired by these guys I might be a little bit more concerned.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Now had it been acquired by these guys I might be a little bit more concerned.
But all languages compile down to the "Machine Interface" level with is like an object aware assembler which shields you from the underlying actual hardware.
I think the most frequently useful thing about PHB's pushing for "The Cloud" is it gets IT to look at what the real costs of hardware, software, training and support are.
For some it will work out cheaper (provided the legal implications, which are huge, are worked out).
For others, not so much.
So London license, London licensing rules.
Oh wait "We're not in London, we're on the internet. That does not count."
B**locks.
Uber lost this the day they accepted they needed a license in the first place.
Nor do I see any other private hire company doing this jointly with them. Not surprising. Uber want a monopoly and I think their competitors can smell it on them.
I personally liked the bit where the person answering the mobile call (on some systems) paid part of the cost.
Just looked at that and thought "WTF?"
I'm not saying GSM was the best standard, or that the US telco's couldn't have gotten together and come up with a better one.
But they didn't. And the rest is history.
Should have. But let's take a peek inside a dev's mind after it happened. Something like this....
"But, but the time to market was tight and the protocols were complex and AWS hardly ever fails and beside it was going to cost extra and my fried told me no one else does it."
I think that just about sums up most of the people who did this.
BTW in real engineering there is the idea of a Licensed engineer. If you design a building and it's built as you specify (IE all materials and procedures followed) and it falls down below design loads it is your fault.
Well that's the whole point.
AWS DC failures are rare enough that this bunch of companies thought they did not need to code migration into their "cloud" software.
Result. "Cloud" reverts to 1 site server farm.
Server farm fails.
System is borked.
Stack based architecture with in memory register set.
The biggest issue with the transputer seems to have been that word length equal to the address length. I was never really clear if this was a policy or just a rather bad design decision, given the common SoA was 8 bit processors with 16 bit addresses.
No. This mission is in place at the Sun/earth 1st Libration point, 930 million miles from Earth IE close to 4x the Earth/Moon distance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Space_Climate_Observatory
Apollo 8 (which this mission roughly models) was also crewed. However there were earlier Apollo missions launched on the Saturn 1 (which is why Apollo was so small, despite the diamter of the Saturn V)
As for crewed or uncrewed. I wonder if you realized all the Shuttle takeoffs were fully automated? The crew would have only become involved if there was a serious fault (and what that turned out to be is "nothing" in the case of the Challenger disaster in 1986 :-( ). Likewise Shuttle had "autoland" software in the software suite from about the 3rd flight. It was not used because the pilots (having spent years of time practicing for their flight) claimed they could not get the feel of the controls if they had to take over. This would have been off as the Shuttle is FBW. It would have been a strange fault that killed the autoland SW but left the vehicle controllable at all.
Would an experienced professional 'naut be useful if something went wrong? Possibly, but I suspect the two people going will be quite well trained (not 18 months in Russia but well enough) to cope with aborted takeoffs or off course landings.
As for radiation the mission SX launched BEO is specifically to monitor "space weather" and it's not the only mission to do so.
Solar and GCR monitoring (and forecasting) is massively better than during Apollo, which basically prayed there would be no major solar storms during the flights.
Apparently this concept is too subtle and sophisticated for European (or even USian) leaders and civil servants to grasp.
The usual reply is "You're smart people, you'll figure it out."
It seems when the "smart" people tell them it can't be done they don't think they are so smart.
At heart those is the dream of cops and spooks everywhere to be able to look at what they like, when they like without any kind of due process or oversight.
As this training film from 1983 shows , it's the enemy within you have to be most aware of.
Better user education can help cut down the stupid stuff but active malice (for whatever motivation) is another problem.
And TBH I suspect the D's natural management style has made an exceptionally high number of people who are quite keen to share as much of his Presidency as possible as widely as possible.
That's where goodwill helps your security.
Implies I don't.
And like various ideas people have about me it's also wrong.
It's not what job you find yourself doing.
It's what you do about getting out of it that's important.
But why should I be polite to someone who disagrees with my PoV, suggests I take illegal drugs and can't even put their own handle to their comments?
But as they taught at the holy arches if you argue with a moron customer you've already lost.
Have a nice day.
"you want the accounts to go to something which looks like a bank, works like a bank, but is not a bank."
And yet isn't that exactly what people who sell and plan Disaster Recovery services to large companies do? A remote data centre run by a third party. Also this is for existing customers. No new customers, no major account changes. Just keeping the core business moving.
I didn't say it would be easy or the banksterrs woundn't b**ch about it which is why it would need legislation.
"I really would like some of the stuff you are smoking "
Maybe you should ask your shift leader at the takeway where you work?
I won't be needing any fries with that.
Yes.
That would be why it will probably need new legislation to force banks to prepare orderly (automated) transfer of customer accounts (both business and personal) to a third party in the event of a financial crisis.
Not another bank and not an organization they own.
Actually you can.
The question is wheather this business (or the market sector it's in) is "critical infrastructure"
IIRC the UK actually has about 150+ ISP's. Would it annoy a lot of people if Vermin or BT failed in the UK. Yes. But that leaves another 148.
If you're saying a business depends on internet access quite a lot probably do. So if their business need it so much shouldn't they either take out insurance against failure and/or get a second supplier? It's the "We're special" argument again. Sorry but you are not.
Most of the cases you cited are monopoly networks (and even Royal Mail isn't that anymore). They'd have to be run in a hugely incompetent way for years to actually fail to make a profit.
And let's not forget that there is no national UK water network, yet I don't think anyone is expecting a water company to fail. Not given the profits they make for their (entirely) foreign owners.
Regulators should make it clear they are planning for bank failures and the market will be allowed to adjust IE no more bailouts. It is (IMHO) a waste of taxpayers money. The "mortgage" and "loan" books will be sold off and account management will be transferred to another institution so businesses can continue moving money around the real economy, where bills for real stuff are presented and need to be paid for with real money (granted there's fat chance of that in the US with so many of the responsible now working for the so called Federal Reserve). Likewise their property portfolio will also be sold off. Just like any other business.
However this is OT for the thread.
That starts when they've collected enough stuff they can twist into a form that something that can discredit her.
Uber was indeed founded just after the global financial meltdown triggered by US sub prime BS, the key players of whom are very much still in business, even if their banks are not.
<rant>
OT it's time for banking regulators to stop swallowing bank BS. They are not "Too big to fail." It's a business. When it fails you value the assets and sell them off for what you can get. In the case of sub prime mortages the real value of 5% solid mortages +95% s**t is not very much. SFW? You "insured" it. Fine. Claim on the insurance.
Businesses can't clear checks? Who still pays by checks? All banks should have a plan to migrate their account management to a third party in the even of financial difficulties. Not another bank and not owned by them. That's probably going to take legislation.
Banks are not special or magical. The clue that BS is being talked comes with phrase like "It's too complicated to explain." If you can't explain it to people inside your company, let alone outsiders, maybe you don't understand what you're talking about? That's fine for a salesman, not so good if it's the CEO who's saying it.
</rant>
or maybe 10TB of top secret data and 40TB of cat videos?
Just saying.
That's a lot of data to move anywhere. It suggests he has been moving data outside the NSA buildings (Which I thought was absolutely forbidden. As in not allowed under any circumstances, ever) for quite a while.
Personally I've always had a soft spot for a company that can incorporate the word booze in their name.
Perhaps because attacking a sovereign nations internal infrastructure without a declaration of war is a declaration of war?
TL:DR. I want to build an empire for myself and this is a pretty good way to do it.
Wants to "integrate" the private sector into US military. You could say LM with the F35 does this.
In the way the tail wags the dog.
Well you certainly sound very excited, and in a first ever post for at least two of you.
Software compression/decompression is quite processor intensive and should be farmed out to an ASIC for maximum benefit, although I guess a GPU could help as well (which is also a sort of ASIC given they are usually single source).
Yet quite a lot of embedded Linux hardware does this in software to save on flash storage for the software.
What we're having trouble with is just how "novel" is this IP? Most of the parts seem to have been done before and never achieved what seems to be a massive speedup on an architecture that's existed for decades.
As for things like real time 3d rendering this was a demos for a single and 4 transputer systems back in the 80's.
However I've been in situations where I'm looking at a product and I can't see what the USP is until I dug below the surface to understand what really made it different.
Right now I'm not seeing how what they say they are doing is giving the benefits they say they are getting. Perhaps the company should try to improve it's communication shills a bit more.
IE what was on the disk was not what was actually in the file. Which seems to be this things deal.
An ASIC implies faster clock rates than I've seen with FPGA's. They seem to struggle > 1/2 GHz.
This beast looks like the server for the TLA's
But I've got some real problems with this story.
a) It's all proprietary. b)Who controls the destruct button controls the servers. Is that customer or the company?
c) The big one. If that much of a speed up was possible why has it not been done before now? This is supposedly an x86 box at heart and that architecture has been around for close to 40 years.
Compressed executable image and compressed media images on disk. OK. Decompressed and executed but still needs small memory footprint? Sounds like executable is being shared between streams. That's time sharing to me. I would add the "thumb" instruction set on an ARM sacrifices some flexibility (smaller register file) for shorter, more densely coded instructions.
As for only 21% of server being used, that would be the window with a msg saying "__%" and the number 21 in it? Like those handy countdown timers all movie timebombs have.
My instinct is the reporter has been deluged with a hosepipe of data and left with a bit of information overload.
Yes it sounds stunning, astonishing and a massive game changer. Kind of like that VR helmet from a few months ago.
Let's see if it's any more real.
They've either turned a blind eye or actively supported
CCTV with ANPR
DNA retention
Unlimited facial storage in a system designed for facial recognition.
With no expiry date.
Even splitting it into DoJ and HO did not put a leash on them.
Or in his case an honest civil servant (which AFAIK he technically is).
Once they are bought, they stay bought.
As for "light touch" regulation I think that was a popular phrase with the British Treasury Minister Gordon Brown before 2008.
Which is why HMG still owns RBS and RBS is still loosing money.
Ragel can write an FSM in C to parse a language.
But it also allows inlining of code by the dev.
It's not clear if the problem code was written by Ragel as part of the FSM or inserted by the dev.
If it's the dev then problem probably solved (although you should check the rest of the codebase to see if this idom shows up again).
If it was Ragel generated then any FSM generated by Ragel could have issues.
Yes turns out being a BOFH IRL has fairly serious consequences.
The back story here is that looks like an IT company with no actual IT capabilities.
IOW it's a sales operation for what sound like a bunch of fast talking sales types, with this guy (and his predecessor) doing the real work and who stabbed his mate in the back to avoid dividing up the spoils when the business is sold on, and thought they could buy him off with a bit of a raise.
Whey you behave like that as an employer you'd better be pretty sure the guy whose taking over actually likes and trusts you.
I wonder if anyone would buy this company now that they realize it's basically a shell, with no actually in house IT skills?
In fact this is more than a simple hollow plastic tube. It's a waveguide, 2 tubes and 6 micro electrodes co-extruded together. so it can inspect (optically or electrically) or sample in many places. It can then alter it's environment by injecting a fluid or sending some kind of electrical or optical signal into that environment.
I suspect it will be pretty widely used if it can be made at a reasonable price.
The sun's rising and falling being a fairly predictable event.
Can I just check he is actually F all to do with the well known software company which shares his surname?
Of course being involved with their management would make some of their behavior over the years more understandable...
Careful you'll panic politicians with such facts.
Which are available to anyone with access to a search engine.
You should have added that it's completely harmless without a large neutron source to irradiate it (small neutron sources being either very slow to make it radioactive or very complex to mfg).
You need an AI to tell you what people think of you (you're a greed ba***rd) or your company (which has no respect for anyone's privacy)? You're not someone from a reality TV show by any chance?
I am curious. 152 layers to do 1000 different classification. Now obviously "deep learning" or multi-layer NN to dispel some of the mystery around this term, is only a model of human brain function but how many layers does the brain have? I've seen one suggestion that there are only about 7 distinct tissue layers in the pre frontal cortex.
AFAICT this is nice round up of the development options available for people who want to get into to doing something like this.
The Magnox reactors were viewed as machines for making Plutonium for the UK nuclear bomb supply. Electricity was viewed as a side benefit.
Sizewell B was a PWR with a core systems design (including cooling loop designs) by Westinghouse.
The actual British 2nd generation was the Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor. IIRC this can match the steam characteristics of big coal and oil fired plants (which are about 200c hotter than PWRs) so you can avoid special PWR only turbines and alternators, the other big parts of a power station.
The downside is they need enriched uranium (Magnox was designed to use natural) and run CO2 at around 1000-1500psi (a PWR runs at 200atm but the water is much denser so the core is smaller), needing a shed load of pre-stresed concrete for the pressure vessel to contain it.
But the real downside is the continual tweaking by boffins, multiplied by numerous strikes meant some of them were 15 years late coming online, by which time everyone else had either bought PWRs or the CANDU design (which the British seem to look down on but is pretty flexible in terms of fuel). Also no two sites are exactly alike (which set of plans should you use?) and IIRC finding a new supplier for the complex shaped graphite blocks is going to be a PITA.
Because Westinghouse designed the PWR that most of the worlds nuclear power is actually generated by. It's a know brand despite being owned by CBS (who seem to own most of the not nuclear bits of Westinghouse, if any are left), British Nuclear Fuels Ltd and then Toshiba.
USB cards and Win10 running PCs?
Inquiring minds want to know, as soon as someone can log in of course.
This is an OPM grade f**k up.
TBH I suppose you can't expect too much from an agency that's stitched together from 22 separate organizations.
Although after 15 years you think they might have bedded down by now.
Since that's what Stuxnet did to have something to play back to the operators while it was f**king up the centrifuges it was targeting.
I'm aware of relay ladder logic and seen a bit of it on PIC microcontrollers. I'd always wondered if the more "language" like PLC's had started to take over but apparently not. RLC seems to be a)Simple enough and b)Expressive enough to get the job done for the foreseeable future.