Mo' interfaces. Mo' problems
<sigh>
Again.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
1) This will be the first sample return since Stardust (which made the fastest ever re-entry to earths atmosphere of a man made object)
2)Prior to that the only substantial samples deliberately sent to earth (all meteorites are samples from off earth) were from Apollo or the Soviet Lunokhod.
3) Each mars launch window is 670 days apart (about 26 months) so if you miss one by a week or a month makes no practical difference.
What's really disappointing is that the concept of small positive displacement pumps were developed (in part) specifically for this mission but I'm guessing that despite this budget (or at least this request for a budget increase) they cannot afford to try that technology.
But it's not just the software.
Driving the software with non redundant sensors (which Boeing has done twice that I'm aware of so far) is not software but is certainly doesn't make that task easier.
Let's see if they can turn improve Boeing's delivery as well as its image.
Meet the 3 Horsemen of the Brexocalypse
David cretinous clod Cameron and his cunning plan to keep the Conservative Party united (and kill off UKIP). Oh for a patriot with a time machine and marksmanship skills.
Teresa if-she's-not-on-the-spectrum-I'm-a-Gazelle May. Triggering Article 50 for bu**er all reason and no actual impact analysis to find out the scale of the sh**storm she was causing.
Bu***hit "Boris" (because that's no more real than his belief in Brexit) Johnson. Proof that relentless sh**stirring over 3 decades can get you the dream job you've always craved because you deeply believe you are the next Churchill/Thatcher rather yet another rampant narcissist smart people can see you for.
By 2026 I suspect the number of those 17 million who will admit to voting for the clusterf*88k they caused will be on a par with the number who would admit they voted for The British Union of Fascists in 1936 on VE night.
Brexiteers do so love their WWII symbolism, don't you.
Which one of you keyboard warriors hasn't got the strength of their convictions to put their name to this post?
If you want to play better, play smarter opponents.
Finding bugs in an expert devs code makes you pretty good.
But if you don't you get to find out how a master coder thinks.
I like to think of like an MMA sparing bout. A strong piece of code takes on all comers and is still standing.
You want to play the game? You want a rep? Start studying the field.
Because of an election system designed (and never updated) when the fastest way to carry a message across the US was by horseback. Less than 10% of the people who vote will decide the who gets to be the 45th president.
If Nelly wins again he'll say because he's so great and any talk of postal electoral fraud will disappear. Otherwise he will go on and on about it like the petulant ex prep schoolboy with a massively-over-developed-sense-of-entitlement he is.
The question is can you convince that 10% that a 5 times bankrupt casino owner (who can't make a profit running a machine for separating people from their money) is in fact a total f**king moron?
That's the dog whistle that always works.
The all purpose slur.
AFAIK the last time a real socialist ran in CA it was a writer guy called Upton Sinclair in 1948.
His campaign manager was some low rent scribbler called Henning, or was it Heinlein?
Something about "Taking back your government," or some such nonsense.
Claimed super-duper-astonishingly-good-you-won't-believe how good fractal compression.
Had half a dozen pictures with massive compression ratios.
Algorithm? Actually grad students stuck in office for months.
Finally released software was basically brute force search for the coefficients and was sloooooow. Let's call Michael Beasley's claims (for legal reasons) "optimistic"
This has a similar whiff. Missing detailed structure and critical parameters not listed. This should never have been given major attention in a scientific journal. Early publication credit for preliminary results fine. But where's the f**king follow up?
My BS meter is redlining like a Geiger counter in the engine compartment of a Cold War era Soviet nuclear submarine.
Both came across as extremely demanding in getting results from others.
Neither seemed to have a very deep understanding of the technology they wanted.
Jobs trousering a $5K bonus while getting his mate to do the work would be something Holmes would admire. Likewise faking impotence to avoid a paternity suite. Pure genius. A man she could learn from.
Yes I've got Jobs nailed as a high scorer on the PCL-R. I suspect Holmes would actually score higher.
And she's tall and blonde, which we all know the Orange One is partial too. Bit talkative though. There's only room for one ego that size in the White House.
in other countries think of us."
No. We would not.
We really don't think most of you give a f**k what other people think of your country.
And as long as most of them stay within twenty miles of their front door f**king their siblings we're alright with that also.
a) The user knows exactly what they want to do at all times.
b) The data they are provided with is correct at all times
c) They never make keying or pointing mistakes
d) It is guaranteed that no two users will ever access the same record at the same time.
I've never seen a code analysis but IMHO 75% of all code is about not what the program does, but what it has to stop the user doing, or fixing it when the user gets it wrong. BTW just because you can't see the ton of code managing record locking in a proper DB system does not mean it isn't there.
In my universe a) is uncommon, b) is a fantasy c) is absurd d) is a distant dream.
Suez really was the turning point where Isreal, France and the UK learned who was really in charge of the New (post WWII) World Order
And it wasn't them.
Interesting about the downvotes though.
Do you not believe me or not like the UK's position in the world? Not according with your fantasy perhaps of "Taking back control"?
That is exactly how politics operates.
I always liked the French line that "Politicians get money from the rich and votes from the poor by promising to protect one group from the other"
As good a definition of how politicians (not politics) operate as I have ever seen.
You pay what I tell you to pay or I cut off access.
You don't have the bandwidth to download all that data and you can't collect it because I will not tell you where it is even stored
I think Kevin Spacey in Horrible Bosses put it quite succinctly.
"You are my b**ch"
Or to mis-quote Benjamin Franklin "They who give up essential (data) freedom to purchase temporarily lower costs deserve neither freedom nor lower costs"
Any business leader who doesn't get this is no leader, just a follower of fashions with no understanding of the issues.
Lifted from Xerox.
Newsflash.
If you publish an API (Applications Programming Interface). it's an interface
If you keep the implementation secret and someone copies that code, that's copyright infringement.It's a problem if there's only really 1 good way to do function X. :-(
Tricky ones would be undocumented calls. Part of the API but not in the official list so what's that? Fish or fowl?
These days I think I'd just tap the broadband line/phone line out of someones house.
Bound to be some device that a)Has a mic b)Sends it to a server c)Can have their security (or the data stream they are sending 24/7/365) compromised.
Do all those extra microphones and cameras in your house make you feel "safe"
Or just watched.