Re: Zuck on that Bitch!
The thing about California is that, through their sheer size, they can create trends that reverberate throughout the country. Don't believe me? Look up "California Emissions".
16605 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"I think "legacy" is a very weak argument for making copyright "life + 50"."
Is is the artist's fault if they don't get recognized, despite working their butts off, until very late in life...or even AFTER they die? At least tradesmen do their work and get paid, end of. Artistry is less consistent ever since working for a direct commission fell out of fashion.
"Copyright will be extended to infinity minus one day."
STILL illegal. As any math fool know, Infinity + anything still = infinity. And a minus is simply the adding of a negative number, so it still applies here. No, to make it limited, the value must be discrete and bound (infinity is UNbounded).
"And the "run yourself for office then and fix things" crowd is delusional to a disturbing degree if they truly believe people get to just decide to get into politics and do it..."
Hmm, then explain Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
And for some industries, like utilities, there only IS room for one provider (thus utilities are often termed natural monopolies. Otherwise, you end up with a multitude of unsightly utility conduits everywhere, raising NIMBY issues--and because of the physics of how utilities work, you can't just have state control of the conduits--there's no way to separate customers in a single network.
That could STILL have a knock-on effect. With the attraction of being the ONLY outlet with coverage, a network could feel covering the game isn't worth it anymore and decide not to buy. The only thing worse than ONE network hogging the coverage is NO networks covering it (10% of something vs. 100% of nothing). It's like with rural Internet in America. The main reason there's only one ISP most of the time is because the alternative would be NO ISP in the area. Without the sweetheart deals, ISPs wouldn't be willing to plunk down, and it's too expensive otherwise.
"From what I've seen automated fruit picking is done by the simple expedient of vigorously shaking the tree."
You probably saw a nut harvester, then. And yes, thanks to their shells and quantities, this is generally the most expedient way to harvest them. But you wouldn't see the same approach taken with, say, drupes, because you'll bruise the fruit, making it unsalable at market.
"But holding it and twisting it off? Not necessarily. A human has only two arms."
But who says there can only be ONE human at the tree? And unlike the robot their dexterity allows them to maneuver all around the tree canopy, plus their sense of touch gives them a better ability to handle the fruit just enough to harvest it without dropping it too far or squeezing it too hard. As mentioned previously, machines have difficulty with the soft touch, especially when the object in question is naturally irregular in shape.
"One that comes to mind is Asimov's foundation, where machines became so reliable that they would last multiple lifetimes, but when they finally broke there weren't any humans alive who knew how they worked"
Didn't they have machines to take care of that, including each other if necessary?
"If you want to replace a human by a robot, and still do the job the same way the human did it, then that is true for many jobs. However often, you want to do the job a different way in the process of automating it, a way more suited to automation."
But sometimes there is no alternative but the meatbag way, usually for reasons of ergonomics. The most prominent example being harvesting of delicate fruits for direct sale to market (instead of processing). Since consumers can be finicky about the textural qualities of the product, for-sale produce usually can't be toughened for machine handling, and they usually don't grow in easy-for-machines-to-reach locations. Plus getting them off safely usually requires a dextrous touch at the same time, giving a double-whammy to the machine (as arbitrary--as opposed to fixed--fine motor control is one of the tougher challenges of machines).
"You can stop crying now onefang, removable batteries aren’t coming back."
They've never gone away. There are plenty of phones with removable covers in other parts of the world. It's just the headliners that insist on planned obsolescence. I'm surprised there hasn't been a bigger push to mandate removable batteries after the Note 7 debacle: probably because those batteries were actually new and non-bulging.
Ever considered a belt pouch? You can get them as big as you need while still relatively free of bending legs, still relatively easy to reach, and the only requirement you'd need would be a belt (and I've observed a person wearing pants incapable of accommodating a belt to be very rare).
"When I've brought up very real scenarios where, for example, a rogue fleet manager of connected big rigs decides to redirect a few of his 80,000 pound trailers at high speed into the middle of a city, the blank stares are chilling."
Then you need to put it in starker terms. Let's see if they ignore that you've just described possibly the scariest terrorist scenario since 9/11. If THAT doesn't get their attention, then they've lost their survival instinct, meaning they're basically not human anymore...
"I'm guessing that in maybe a couple of decades folks will figure out that traveling the road to digital nirvana requires DRAMATICALLY reducing attack surfaces then exhaustively testing what few attack surfaces you decide to retain."
Trouble is, what about HIDDEN surfaces? Or the necessary surfaces being impossible to harden due to their use case? Sort of like a wall with a gate in it; the mere existence of the gate makes it vulnerable under the wrong conditions.
"Any idiot knows - or hopes - their coffee is hot."
That's your problem. You're hoping. Some people really ARE idiotic enough to not realize that coffee can be HOT. Remember, the lawyers wouldn't be suing and companies wouldn't be doing CYA moves if it hadn't actually happened in the past. I once read the story of a woman so absent-minded that she took off her (thick, as she was extremely near-sighted) glasses whenever she started to drive, oblivious to the fact one needs decent vision in order to drive.
"The fact that to be on the Internet one needed a computer has kept the price of computers down for all of us, hobbyists like me and professionals like many of you. I think if a company creates such a beast the cost of computers will increase dramatically."
The 90's called. They want their dial-up Internet appliance back. Remember the Mail Station? The original WebTV and Microsoft Network, which hooked up to the TV?
"Sorry. What we meant was 'A better alternative that actually allows you to get things done.....'"
It is the only logical way going forward. If you can't operate with the Sword of Damocles over your head, you shouldn't even try. THAT's where we stand now, and we just have to deal with it. Otherwise, we can just throw up our hands and go back to pencil and paper.
"Such groups don't last long in a country where the penalty for causing a fuss (also known as state sabotage or disagreeing with the Dear Leader) is execution..."
Depends. If the group is large enough and/or has enough support, they could end up starting a popular uprising, when it's Dear Leader whose head ends up on the chopping block...
"It just is not that hard to write something which takes various standard formats and canonicalises them."
But then it provides more room for "Who, me?" user errors. Limiting the field to exactly 16 characters tends to limit the scope of user error, especially the types the user will vehemently deny. It's rather a "pick your poison" situation since you can get hit either way.
"And address text boxes that insist that a county be part of the address that will go on the label when whatever it is is posted."
Which could be tough for a state like Virginia. See, since 1871, under the Constitution of Virginia, there is an explicit urban/rural divide. You're EITHER in a city OR a county: never both. So it's hard to put a county if you live in the City of Richmond, as Richmond officially does not belong to any county (and good luck picking a nearby county: there are 13 of them in the Richmond Metropolitan Area...AND three lesser cities).
If Pakistan and/or India start getting nuclear on each other's asses, I don't think that would trigger World War III. It would be ugly, yes, but I could see there being enough restraint among the remaining powers to, pardon the pun, "go ballistic". It's not like either country has that big an arsenal to begin with, anyway. As for North Korea, that's also questionable. Given the limited size of their arsenal, if they were to use it in anger, they'd probably use it The Sum of All Fears-style in a sneak attack for maximum impact.
"Of course the easy workaround is to provide a link to Fedex, UPS, etc. and have the customer arrange their own delivery. That way the sale is local so the seller only has to deal with one tax rate and if the warehouse is in one of the five states without a sales tax it's avoided completely."
How do you reason this? The buyer is still across the state line from the seller, so the tax rules still come into play, don't they? I mean, weren't they like that in the days of the Sears catalog?
I think part of the disagreement is over what to do with still-in-use legacy stuff (especially legacy hardware which can't be expected to be retired or replaced anytime soon) that can ONLY grok strict IPv4. They can't be replaced or upgraded to grok IPv6, yet there may be a need for it to cross the IPv6 network. Supposedly, someone's proposing a way to make this possible using nothing but IPv4, though I also have questions about how the whole business would go down in practice.
Two problems dovetailing here. One, quite simply, You Can't Fix Stupid. The other is the cruelty factor: being too dumb to live isn't considered by moral standards to be worthy of capital punishment (meaning if someone demonstrates themselves to be too dumb to drive yet too poor to have it done for them, we can't just tell them, "Then YOU LOSE. Game Over. Better Luck Next Life."). The dilemma make me keep thinking to those countries with high suicide rates, wondering if their societies actually have socially-endorsed relief valves for "dead-enders".
No amount of warning is gonna help if people are in such a state as to zombie through it. That's why there's such a thing as "click fatigue".
People NEED to drive to make ends meet; for many, there are no alternatives (no mass transit, taxis cost more than they make, and no coworkers nearby). If they lose the ability to drive, you're essentially telling them FOAD, which can adversely affect crime rates and so on. It's a complicated but very real problem, which is why the increased push for end-to-end automated transportation; there's a significant use case for them.
Still looks too much like afterthoughts. Where are the professional endorsements, especially in places like South Korea where this stuff is Serious Business? Where's Valve and their supposed Steam Machines? Let's see professional gaming companies put their money where their mouth is and give Microsoft the finger by putting Linux games FIRST (if not ONLY).
"If you aren't able to check the security of a device then don't install the effing thing.... It ain't rocket science it is?"
To Joe Stupid, IT IS. That's what IT often overlooks to their detriment. We need a solution for people who demand unicorns or else, think The Internet is their Web browser, and can't remember a password to save their lives.