* Posts by Charles 9

16605 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009

Uber breaks self-driving car record: First robo-ride to kill a pedestrian

Charles 9

I have, actually, and maintaining a tight speed is pretty easy for your average cruise control since it can react more quickly and thus not need to use the brakes: just light adjustments to the throttle is all. It only gets tricky when the angle changes (curves and inclines), but in my firsthand experience the cruise control (which isn't exactly state of the art, it's an early 00's car) tends to correct itself pretty smoothly.

Chap asks Facebook for data on his web activity, Facebook says no, now watchdog's on the case

Charles 9

Re: Evasive action

"You need to block all their domains (I believe around 1,500 domains at last count). On a PC, the easiest way is to slap them into your Hosts file."

IF you have access to it. You can't do that on Android without rooting it (which breaks things), and you can't run a filtering VPN if you're running another VPN already (Android last I checked won't allow you to chain VPNs).

And then there's the issue if Facebook decides to forgo DNS and hit straight to IP addresses or finds other ways to defeat firewalls by hooking up with commonly-visited sites that typically get whitelisted, to the point you either bend over or get off the Internet.

Charles 9

Re: Let the fines begin!

Bet you they just find a way to weasel their turnover numbers. It's just tax avoidance by another name...

Charles 9

Re: 'It's not clear whether he also has a FB account or whether he's a non-account'

"But that's the thing with the GDPR, the potential fines are quite large."

Until some genius finds a legal way to weasel turnover numbers...

Muslim American woman sues US border cops: Gimme back my seized iPhone's data!

Charles 9

Re: Entering a country becomes more and more like entering a prison.

"Try visiting India if you have Pakistani heritage. You will literally be denied a Visa."

So what happens when the two countries have to play cricket with each other (as both have Test status)? Do they have to use a neutral venue?

Connected car data handover headache: There's no quick fix... and it's NOT just Land Rovers

Charles 9

Two words: BLISSFUL IGNORANCE.

Charles 9

"You do know that if you have the reg plate of your previous vehicle..."

Assuming you live in a jurisdiction with such resources available AND the vehicle hasn't CROSSED jurisdictions...

Charles 9

Thing is, they CAN'T. They're not clairvoyant and can't be held responsible for things that happen without their knowledge such as private sales.

Charles 9

"There are, by some estimates, some 50,000,000 vehicles on US roads that are over 40 years old. These aren't all old junkers, these are carefully maintained family heirlooms. They are driven daily, both for utility and for fun. Outlawing all these vehicles would alienate a LOT of voters."

Many of those old cars required retrofitting to qualify for emissions standards and so on, and since inspections are an ongoing thing, grandfathering doesn't apply. So it could just require another retrofit, justified in Congress (who BTW doesn't listen to the people anyway) for environmental (emissions, traffic planning) and criminal reasons.

Charles 9

"The dealer should be making sure the car is digitally clean before sell on."

But what happens if it's a private sale, and no dealer is involved in the transaction? And it takes place either across jurisdictions or by some other way that there's no automated way to register transfer of ownership? It's very easy for ownership status to get lost in the bureaucracy.

Charles 9

"If all electric cars require connection to the internet (or any service provider whatsoever), then I won't be jumping into the world of electric cars. That's a complete dealbreaker."

So what happens when ALL cars MUST be connected to be declared road-worthy (so no, used cars are out as well)? Do you walk everywhere from now on even during a downpour?

Charles 9

"That only applies to people they have a contract with, and you are not in that group of people, so you can legally ignore the wording entirely."

I'd STILL call that false or misleading wording and legally subject to intervention. Unless there's a legally-binding contract or an actual criminal act involved, there shouldn't be anything that implies such.

Charles 9

Re: BIG FAT RESET BUTTON

But that enables Evil Valet attacks. It MUST be trickier than just doing something in the car or it CAN AND WILL be abused.

Charles 9

Re: let's go back to the good old days... oh wait!

Yes, you don't have to know where th we car is located now. IT BLOODY TELLS YOU!

I wonder when all new cars MUST have remote telemetry to be deemed road-worthy...

Charles 9

Re: NOT TO BE SOLD SEPARATELY

So why hasn't the labeling been challenged on exhaustion grounds?

Elders of internet hash out standards to grant encrypted message security for world+dog

Charles 9

Re: Love the assumption that encryption is about "mathematical methods"....

But doesn't that still run you the risk of it being one of your "Six Lines", even if it becomes stale?

Charles 9

Re: Cue firestorm

"The essence of encryption is that it needs to take longer to crack than the information remains significant. If it can be cracked in 20 seconds it doesn't matter provided the message is an instruction to do something in 10 seconds time."

Not necessarily. It could still be useful as historical evidence: the whole "Six Lines" thing. And it's not just interception you have to worry about. What about doubling and moles?

Charles 9

But they can always claim insiders, and there's no cure for insiders because that goes to the "sufficiently-alike impostor" problem, which last I checked was intractable.

Charles 9

Re: Cue firestorm

"Which is tomorrow's problem, not today's."

Don't assume that. That data center in Utah may just be a front for a working black-project quantum computer chewing away at the data.

Charles 9

The big problem is that most things in life, physical or virtual, are dual-use: inherently capable of being used for good or ill with no way to separate the two.

Texas ISP slams music biz for trying to turn it into a 'copyright cop'

Charles 9

Re: illegal

"I noticed that the complaint used the word theft, I'm waiting for some smart lawyer to ask the copyright holder how making a copy of a song permanently deprived them of that song."

The theft is of the revenues from a legitimate transaction. Kind of like how organized criminals get nailed for tax evasion.

Charles 9

Re: Arrogance

But how do they do that when it's hard to beat FREE?

It may be poor man's Photoshop, but GIMP casts a Long Shadow with latest update

Charles 9

Re: Please use standard Windows UI

GIMP is multi-platform and has to work on the assumption there is NO standard UI for file handling due to the many distros that are possible.

Charles 9

Re: Failure version 2.10.6

And there's a reason no open-source implementation can be made? Pantone perhaps is out of reach because of patents, but CMYK is basic enough. Last I checked, CMYK is simply low priority because DTP isn't the bulk of GIMP's users (you still have photographers, web image designers, et al).

Charles 9

He means compared to something like Paint where it's a standard tool: click, drag, done. I myself am a longtime GIMP user, but even I faced a learning curve at first.

Heads up: Fujitsu tips its hand to reveal exascale Arm supercomputer processor – the A64FX

Charles 9

Re: Why no ARM servers?

Right. Most ARM systems weren't built with modular, replaceable components in mind which is how servers normally operate (hot swapping, automatic failover, etc.). Most ARM systems today are SoCs full of trade secret sauce (because Qualcomm, Mediatrk, etc. are at each other's throats). Portable ARM systems are a whole different kettle of fish from server ARM systems. What you describe is relatively new and will need time to reach a broad-enough consensus.

You want how much?! Israel opts not to renew its Office 365 vows

Charles 9

Re: re: UK Government Capability

"In other words, the ability to say NO as many times as it takes."

Makes you wonder what would happen when a firm that can't take NO for an answer meets that guy who can ONLY say NO?

Big Tech turns saboteur to cripple new California privacy law in private

Charles 9

Or we might just see legal chicanery put into effect to reduce a company's fiscal turnover. After all, what's 100% of nothing?

Charles 9

Re: Strike back

And what if the companies (and their associated jobs and tax revenues) threaten to move away? Could affect budget discussions in Sacramento...

Facebook flat-out 'lies' about how many people can see its ads – lawsuit

Charles 9

Re: This is another easy win for Facebook

"The management said I was lying."

Then I'd have challenged it with surveillance footage, in the presence of a policeman so that any challenge to what the cameras display can be countered with legal threats (falsifying legal records etc.).

Charles 9

Re: And, of course....

Didn't work. Something leaked outside the private mode, probably some server-side tracking. After I discovered deleted cookies resurrecting (complete with pre-existing data), I learned how useless any kind of privacy-based system is these days. If they want to track you, they'll track you in spite of God, Man, or the Devil, and yes they'll track you even if you're anonymous. They'll just use what they do know to de-anonymize you later (Facebook is notorious for this AND defeating ad- and tracker-blockers).

Charles 9

Re: And, of course....

And if they hold exclusive content you need, such as a driver for an obscure piece of hardware (speak from firsthand experience--the alternative is to shell out for replacement hardware, so there's a real cost involved here)?

As it turns out, no, you can't just run an unlicensed Bitcoin money exchange

Charles 9

Re: America != World

Nope. He crossed INTO the US at Otay Mesa, San Diego. Once you're on American soil, you're subject to American laws, full stop.

Charles 9

Re: "...unlicensed Bitcoin exchange..."

Property exchange CAN be regulated, however. I think the latest call is that e-currency is a security, like a stock or bond, so regulation is done via the SEC.

Apple web design violates law, claims blind person

Charles 9

He could complain, but remedies would be more limited. Joe Public probably isn't an e-tailer and would be less likely to have "complicated" content. A sustained complaint to a Joe Public website would probably be more in the nature of "straighten out your text and tag your pictures".

Charles 9

One, Apple's clientele is the general public, not a club. Two, Apple is publicly traded. That's two strikes against Apple being able to do what it wants. Companies that cater to the general public cannot exclude people, intentionally or not, without legal reason (eg. a restraining order). That's why things like the Americans with Disabilities Act which requires stores and other public-serving facilities to accommodate people who can't do business otherwise. It could easily be applied to virtual locations like the Web as well.

Charles 9

So how does a screenreader react when content it read once (read: somewhere in the middle) changes?

Charles 9

Re: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)

Makes you wonder, though, how you can maintain accessibility for a website whose content is inherently dynamic and therefore can't rely on static formats or even server-side scripting (because the content could update too quickly--think a hot eBay auction). I mean, can AJAX be made screenreader-compatible?

Charles 9

But doesn't that run the risk of the defendant "calling the bluff" and letting the case go to court with the hopes of getting it dismissed and setting a precedent, especially if they see MULTIPLE suits on the horizon?

Internet overseer continues wall-punching legal campaign

Charles 9

Re: "Nothing [..] enabled the Applicant to foresee the Appellate Court's reasoning,"

"I do believe there is just such a provision if I remember correctly. Something about a verdict "with prejudice" , which means the applicant is no longer allowed to pursue the case any further."

But wpuldn't they just challenge the ruling of prejudice on the basis of judiciary bias or some other claim? Or does such a ruling carry a legal basis of finality or even a threat of criminal prosecution?

Gartner's Great Vanishing: Some of 2017's emerging techs just disappeared

Charles 9

Re: 4D Printing

Then perhaps it should be clarified that all dimensions need to be SPATIAL dimensions (this locks out time, a TEMPORAL dimension). Meaning it's not a 4-spatial-dimension printer unless it can produce a hypercube or tesseract.

Most staffers expect bosses to snoop on them, say unions

Charles 9

Re: Legal Requirements?? -- InfoSec...

Then how do they safeguard against eye-to-hand copying?

Charles 9

Re: Legal Requirements?? -- InfoSec...

"If you work anywhere that has InfoSec requirements, then that thing slowing down your workstation is the indexer looking for things that aren't supposed to be on your workstation."

I have wondered about that. What happens when privacy laws conflict with data protection laws (say the job is at a government facility that handles other people's data). If the two types of laws conflict, which takes precedence?

'Oh sh..' – the moment an infosec bod realized he was tracking a cop car's movements by its leaky cellular gateway

Charles 9

Re: What about the trucks?

If a cargo is REALLY high value, it's bound to have guards and other safeguards (such as using an armored truck). It's very hard to transport something very valuable very secretly. Even if you try obfuscation, you can never rule out the possibility of moles.

Charles 9

Re: Default passwords...

So you're going to demand laws regulating things used in the privacy of their homes? Slippery slope here. At least cars run on government-funded roads.

Google keeps tracking you even when you specifically tell it not to: Maps, Search won't take no for an answer

Charles 9

Re: Stuff Like This Should Be Illegal

"nah. as a journalist once wrote a true conspiracy theorist will know far more about one particular facet of the issue than you ever will."

Can't that be countered by simply learning EVEN MORE about that facet than him (if by nothing else thatn using his own tactics against him, so it's always possible), to the point you can out-AHA him in an argument? I mean, at some point, you'll eventually corner him. Then what?

I wish I could quit you, but cookies find a way: How to sidestep browser tracking protections

Charles 9

Re: "Must Is Not A Word To Be Used To Princes, Little Man"

Or obscure device drivers. I speak from firsthand experience.

Charles 9

Re: "Must Is Not A Word To Be Used To Princes, Little Man"

But if they're the ONLY seller or it's a case where EVERYONE uses the same tactic? Do you just go without?

When's a backdoor not a backdoor? When the Oz government says it isn't

Charles 9

Re: RE: PGP?

"There IS something that a group of individuals can do for messaging -- namely use a privately implemented cipher scheme. To some extent it doesn't matter if it can be broken, as long as the breaking takes months or weeks. The eavesdroppers need near real-time access, which only the owners of the cipher scheme possess! This gets round the possibility (remote I know) that even PGP can be broken quickly. The private scheme might only be implemented for text messages."

Does it HAVE to be real-time, or can they just use the whole "Give me Six Lines" bit and work from there?

Charles 9

Re: The Holy Trinity

Too late to edit, so I'll follow on my own post. There's also the chance of a brute-force takeover, when someone gathers enough power to simply shove the existing government aside, at which point all the laws in the books are just ink on a page.