"There are a few realities that need to be absorbed:-"
Let me counter your realities with the realities of a lot of other people.
"You do not have a right to drive."
We DO have the right to travel freely within the borders, especially in pursuit of our livelihoods. Otherwise, it's back to the "No Travel Without a Permit" thing again, in which case we do not have the inaliable right of liberty, in which case what good is this country?
"You do not have a right to live in the middle of nowhere, and work in the middle of somewhere."
We DO have the right to live, period. It's the inaliable right to life, and if it means living one place and working in another if that's the only option open to us, then no authority possesses the power to force us away from our only option; that would essentially mean writing us off as expendable.
"You do not have a right to live in territories which are only livable with huge energy expenditures (or by stealing someone else's water)."
You do not have the right to say where I get to live if options are short. If it requires huge energy expenditure, either provide the means or write us off, in which case the social contract is null and void, and we'll got it alone. And if I have to steal someone else's water just to live, it's a fight: twelve men stuck in the Sahara with only one bottle of water. Sorry, but at that point it's Cold Equations time.
As John Locke put it, all men are entitled to life, liberty, and property under the social contract (which the Founding Fathers altered to "the pursuit of happiness" in the Declaration of Independence). To deny any fundamental inaliable right is to deny basic humanity, in which case all bets are off. The Coronavirus crisis is accelerating the timetable of reckoning, I figure.