* Posts by Charles 9

16605 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009

Web devs want to make the Internet of S**t worse. Much worse

Charles 9

"You name it, I'll disable it, thanks."

Pretty soon, most of the web will REQUIRE it just to run, in which case you'll have a decision to make. Bend over or go back to the Sears catalog (as in abandon the Internet altogether)?

Charles 9

Yes, I do get it. What I'm saying is that the big big plan is to make it so that modern society comes part and parcel with Big Brother via the backdoor. How will you buy a dumb TV, for example, when there aren't any left because TV standards will REQUIRE an interactive TV just to pick up the channels? You can't use analog TVs by themselves anymore because all channels for digital, for example. That's just the first step.

And it'll apply to all appliances soon, using powerline networking or whispernets if need be to get around anything cleverdicks/smartypants try to block the networking (and using suicide circuits to break the devices if you try to kill the radio chips).

Charles 9

You forget the times BEFORE that, where industrial pigments and sanitation weren't so abundant, plus most people grew their own food or bartered from the neighbors who also grew them. As I recall, back then life expectancies STILL weren't over 50.

Charles 9

I'D like to suggest that, to them, it's not a mess; it's the desired result. It's also the human condition; you versus the neighbors. And unless you want to go back to hairshirts, making everything you need from scratch, no electricity or running water and life expectancies under 50, you pretty much have to bend over.

Charles 9

"A UL for software needs to occur. We need to give software the same legal status as hardware and allow software companies to be sued. No more 50 page disclaimers. Software needs the same legal status as any hardware device, like a car."

How do you deal with the China angle, though? China has sovereignty, and most of the devices come through gray markets where regulation doesn't really exist.

Charles 9
FAIL

Re: Security First

"Jeez. Just how long will it be, and how much pain do we have to go through, before the companies that make any kind of coded kit, from toasters to PCs, realize that the first action in any code is to make it secure? It seems probably never in the case of when, and not even when the pain kills the patient in the case of what has to happen."

In most spheres, security doesn't sell because it gets in the way of getting the job done, which is the first and foremost requirement of ANYTHING. You buy things to get jobs done; if not, you're throwing money away. Security first can ONLY come if a Machiavellian Prince with some scruples takes over the world and demands it with extreme penalties for noncompliance. Otherwise, sovereignty, competition, and overall human stupidity will ensure it'll never happen.

Search engine results increasingly poisoned with malicious links

Charles 9

Re: "looking at location or IP"

Both peer-to-peer and blockchain have data costs, and many users have low data caps, meaning they'll end paying more for less. That's why I had to give up on freenet and bitcoin.

Good luck securing 'things' when users assume 'stuff just works'

Charles 9

"...unless companies start building secure products then we're goosed."

But the money's not there. Customers want the job done FIRST, secure somewhere below that (especially if, like it usually does, it INTERFERES with getting the job done).

Charles 9

Re: Stop training users not to update!

So what happens when you're caught between Scylla and Charybdis: you CAN'T update because it'll break, but you MUST update because it's already broken, and you're obligated to use the device for legal, contractual, or practical (as in it's the ONLY one that'll work with your setup) reasons?

Charles 9

Re: How about what BT/VM do?

"Which is why some of us keep saying the solution is to make such security provisions mandatory. You want to sell your stuff here? This is what you have to do.

To some extent it levels the playing field - those costs are common to all products. And for manufacturers who can't afford that, maybe they're best kept out of the market. If they were selling cars would you consider it acceptable to omit bakes to enable them to compete on price?"

You ever thought about the Law of Unintended Consequences? Instead of keeping them out, you'll just move them to the lawless badlands of the gray and black markets. If people want them badly enough, they'll be provided in spite of God, Man, or the Devil. See Prohibition.

Charles 9

Re: Physical handshaking

"NFC comes to mind. Easy, cheap, extremely short range (almost contact only, if you want), and good enough to home routers and such."

Someone points a Yagi antenna at it. Range significantly increased.

Charles 9

Re: White goods

"Manufacturers passing the buck to non-technical customers are doing just that passing the buck for their poorly implemented products."

They're passing the buck because that's what customers want. At least with cars they run on government-run-and-regulated roads. But a router runs in the privacy of one's home, so how are you going to possibly enforce an Internet license?

Charles 9

Re: How about what BT/VM do?

Plus it doesn't help if the manufacturer is on razor-thin margins such that 2-3 cents per devices pivots it into unprofitable. And yes, many DO run on razor-thin margins as it's the ONLY way to compete. And that's against companies that have alternate revenue streams and can actually loss-lead.

Charles 9

Any auto-update mechanism can be abused. Didn't someone hijack Windows Update in the past?

Self-driving cars doomed to be bullied by pedestrians

Charles 9

Re: Hailing a self driving car?

"Newflash - there are already these things called "taxis" (maybe you've heard of them?) that you can hail that have been around since before the internal combustion engine was invented. Oddly it hasn't stopped people buying their own cars. Also the chances of anyone who's forked out a small fortune for a car just to let it become an unsupervised taxi where drunks can throw up with impunity or try and still the contents or fittings I suspect is pretty damn slim."

Newsflash #2, have your seen their fare schedules? Why do you think people avoid them unless they absolutely have to? Given how much we need door-to-door transit every day, all those taxi fares would add up to well over the car and then the annual costs associated with them. At least train and bus fare is much cheaper, but for it to be practical, you have to be pretty close to a stop or station.

The hope is that with automated cars, taxi fares can be reduced to make them less expensive than the ongoing costs of owning a car, convincing more people to give them up.

Charles 9

Re: Simple.

You can't automate shoes since it's the legs that do the actual locomotion, and legs can be some powerful things making them hard to control.

Charles 9

Re: Right of way

I was always taught the Right of Way means the right to travel across a specific area before others. Thus cars IN an intersection have the right of way over those coming to it, why straight-goers have right of way over turners, why emergency vehicles at work (sirens on) have right of way over other cars on the same road, and so on. Because it can apply at intersections, too, this applies both to cross traffic and to pedestrians. Pedestrians can be granted right of way under certain conditions, like during school hours or when a school bus, crossing guard, or police officer asserts.

Charles 9

Re: physics

"besides an AI will likely calculate the odds of stopping in time and decide to change lanes and slow down, avoiding the pedestrian entirely without compromising speed by much, bypassing the whole point., less they do something stupid, like change direction, into the lane the automated vehicle was moving into in too short of distance for it to avoid them, then they deserve the darwin award for being that dumb and dead."

Suppose it's a single-lane or the other lane's occupied? Or it's a human cordon where there's nowhere to divert (and these can stop human drivers)?

Charles 9

Re: But we will know who they are

And as the weather gets colder I imagine those lunatics will start committing crimes wanting to get jailed since jail will be preferable to being out in the cold; at least jail has a roof and laws protecting against cruelty while incarcerated.

Charles 9

Re: Yes, it IS a game of chicken.

"Or maybe add a manual override -- and then we're back to where we are now."

The main problem is the Laws of Robotics. At their core, we don't want robots harming us through action or inaction. By that standard, they'll never win against trolls who abuse the Laws. Any robots that don't won't be in use for long because of our self-preservation instinct.

Charles 9

"For anyone that doesn't want to actually 'drive' their own car in preference to sitting back and letting it get to their destination, they may as well get on a tram,bus ,light railway system."

Except it doesn't work door to door, which is the big appeal of this system, and no taxis are too expensive for most people to use as a commute.

Charles 9

Re: Automated lifts will never catch on

That won't work as the lawyers will get involved. I think this actually happened once. Can't recall if the victim survived the encounter.

Windows Atom Tables popped by security researchers

Charles 9

Because it was never broken. And you know what they say about what to do if it isn't broken...

And the thing is that this can be the initial link of an execution chain. Imagine linking this to a privilege escalation...

Uber's robo-truck makes first delivery of ... Budweiser in Colorado

Charles 9

If it made a quality product, as you put it, no one would buy it because that's not what they want. A-B are no fools. Neither is MillerCoors. They make what the customers want; that's how they make money, and if Americans are more interested in light and cold "pale imitations," then that's what they'll get. If you want them to make "better beer," convince all those American drinkers to switch to craft beer.

Charles 9

Re: Budweiser Light is like making love to a beautiful woman in a canoe...

I'm not. But they outnumber you. Plus I recall taste has little to do with the alcohol content, thus other popular "beers" among the party crowds are malt liquors, particularly in 40's. And let's not forget the cheap "bum wines" people drink when they just wanna get drunk quick, taste be damned.

Charles 9

"Is there any irony in that an anagram of otto is toot, which is a little lame for the sound of the horn on 40 tonne's of steel steaming down the highway."

I thought the reason for the name was because Otto is a Palindrome.

Charles 9

"Supermarkets tend to do their own deliveries to stores with all products on one truck and each truck doing multiple drops other than to the very largest superstores."

That may be true with groceries but alcohol is a controlled substance. Due to licensing issues (license to brew, license to deliver, license to sell, etc.), beer tends to be delivered from authorized (and licensed) distributors with chains of trust going all the way up to the original brewers. These brewers deliver to many different stores with different profiles: from the small mom-and-pop, to the typical C-store, to your average supermarket, to the big-box hypermarkets, and each load is different in both size and composition. One size can't fit all because of the demographics.

Charles 9

Re: Budweiser Light is like making love to a beautiful woman in a canoe...

"That Yanks wouldn't know a good beer if it was tipped over their heads?"

Then explain the craft beer movement.

What this tells me is that Yanks are telling more robust brews to take a hike. They don't WANT a strong brew. They want something light while still giving them the relaxing effect of alcohol (thus they don't want water). Put it this way. This is beer to them and they'll keep it, thank you. If they want stronger beer, they'll buy stronger beer from the local craft brewer, but that's not their bottle of brew, so put a cap on it.

Charles 9

Re: Budweiser Light is like making love to a beautiful woman in a canoe...

But it's NOT water. AND it sells. Even in the presence of more robust beers. AND it's not the cheapest beer, either. So what does that tell you?

Charles 9

Now, admitted American mass-market beer is thin, but it's apparently what sells. Bud Light is IINM the best selling beer in a America which tells you something. And it's not like more robust options aren't available, either.

Divide the internet into compartments to save us from the IoT fail whale

Charles 9

Tell you what. If Big Brother insists on inspecting the things we do in the privacy of our homes, then civilization as we know it is pretty much shot.

Charles 9

Indeed, what's to stop these sentries being owned themselves and turned into bots?

Data ethics in IoT? Pff, you and your silly notions of privacy

Charles 9

Re: tyrants

"There's such a thing as "too much choice". I want service providers to make a lot of choices on my behalf. I regard it as the height of laziness when they badger me for all these decisions that they should have been able to take for me."

Is it the height of laziness or the height of butt-covering and lawyer-evading?

BlackBerry DTEK60: An elegant flagship for grown-ups

Charles 9

Re: The DTEK app is useless

As I recall, notifications can be disabled on a per-app basis on baseline Marshmallow. I know my S5, Note 4, and Iconia One 10 (all Marshmallow, the One has stock MM so it's not a TouchWiz thing, either) allow me to disable or prioritize most notifications on a per-app basis, and not just on/off, either.

PS. As for chucking the phone in two years, this may well become standard practice as hackers find hardware exploits like Rowhammer that no software can totally defend.

20 years to get Amiga Workbench 3.1 update, and only a fortnight to get first patch

Charles 9

As I recall, those 4.x Amigas were post-Commodore and used PowerPC chips and more modern hardware architectures (like PCI slots), thus why two codebases.

Bloody robots! 860k public sector jobs to be automated by 2030, say researchers

Charles 9

"Universal income aka everyone on benefits, may breed resentment among those working at those doing little, unless it is some form of workfare - 3rd sector jobs etc."

Not to mention with universal income the question becomes who do you tax to raise the money you need to pay everyone. By default, someone on the dole can't practically be taxed because it's circular. Who pays for Universal Income when it's--well--universal? And if you try to foist it on the rich, you risk defections since having wealth normally means having mobility as well. They can hide behind foreign sovereignty.

Charles 9

Re: Give you £100, you act as a government should, it becomes £200, £300 and more.

"Ah, yes. Currency hoarding. So the financial industry is just sitting on the cash and swimming around like Scrooge McDuck? #economicsfail"

No, resource hoarding, which they use some of the currency to acquire. The richest of the richest tend to own lots of real estate. Land is a tangible, inherently valuable, and perpetually scarce resource. You can probably find other such resources. Then what happens is that 99% of the population are scrambling for the 1% of volatile land still up for grabs. Or as I like to put it, twelve people stuck in the middle of a hot, arid desert with only one bottle of water. No matter how you slice it, it can't end well.

Charles 9

Re: Ummm

The problem here is that even services are increasingly automated: tk th ed point you only need so many people, period, and all the rest are unnecessary.

EU ruling restricts rights to resell back-up copies of software where originals are damaged, destroyed or lost

Charles 9

Re: Steam

That would have to be tested in court, as Valve could counter their software is leased, not sold, or that the licenses they actually sell are non-transferable, which could potentially be upheld.

Charles 9

Re: Wide-ranging?

Not if they offer to switch out your disc. The key element is being able to replace your original if necessary. Now, according to this, it's not illegal to rip and transcode your CD, but (1) it MUST stay with you, and (2) you STILL need to keep your original.

Charles 9

Re: Did I read that right?

Put it this way. You can sell on an official copy (original media or an authorized download), NOT an unofficial copy (backup). Downloaded copies are assumed to be from digital distribution or so on, so a physical medium is not assumed, which is why this is allowed. Otherwise, you need your originals (or if they're screwed, a replacement set which the seller MUST provide for you). You sell this unofficial copy, you sell the license that goes with it, meaning any unofficial copies are void and must be erased/destroyed as per the license (this line of reasoning was what nailed Vernor of Vernor v. Autodesk on appeal--the copies he sold off had been voided because they were part of a lease agreement and were meant to be returned because an update had been delivered to the original client).

Charles 9

Re: Games?

Eighth-generation consoles all use BluRays. Those discs have a hardened undercoat because the media layer can be pretty close to that undercoat. I've found that if something scratched hard enough to mar the undercoat, you're probably screwed already.

Charles 9

Sounds OK to me.

They're saying yes you can sell your originals and the license to go with them. No, you can't do the same with limited (copies). They can go back to the seller for fresh media (which the ruling says they MUST provide) THEN sell them on.

ARM: Hold my beer, we'll install patches for your crappy IoT gear for you

Charles 9

Re: "The bottom layer is also supposed to work on any device and with any operating system"

But the only solution is to MAKE it cheap...or they'll just ignore you.. And don't count on regulation when there's a booming gray market and a country out there with their own sovereignty who could care less about you.

Charles 9

Re: Hey, really neat!

"There is value in exchange of ideas. There is virtually none in just shouting "that won't work" over and over."

But sometimes, like the Traveling Salesman Problem, there's just no practical solution. Well, apart from creating a new kind of human being...

App proves Rowhammer can be exploited to root Android phones – and there's little Google can do to fully kill it

Charles 9

Re: So...

kingoroot doesn't provide custom ROMs, which is what he's looking for.

The problem he has is that these cheapo Android phones have no user community behind them. WIthout them, custom ROMs jus don't happen. I happen to own two cheap Chinese Android devices, neither of which have strong user support and thus are stuck on their crappy stock configurations.

If you want to put a custom ROM onto your device, don't go for a Chinese Cheapo. It may be more expensive, but bona fide devices at least have enough people using AND customizing them to make them worthwhile.

No NY love for Airbnb

Charles 9

Except that's not in the 14th Amendment itself but rather a controversial majority ruling of Lochner v. New York, based on the Amendment's Due Process clause. Note, though, that this ruling was made in 1905, attitudes have changed, and to some degree the stuff that was struck down in the ruling now applies: probably because they're on the federal rather than state level. Contracts CAN be limited by law if they're shown to be unfair or otherwise in violation. Such conditions give rise to the legal term "null and void". As for Interstate commerce, that usually only gets applied when the parties to the business are based in multiple states such that the actual business being conducted crosses state lines. Something like a hotel, a person-to-person rather than business-to-business thing, usually wouldn't be considered interstate.

'Biggest ever' Linux release

Charles 9

Re: "commits"

Except that's commit the verb. We're talking commit the noun.

Chinese electronics biz recalls webcams at heart of botnet DDoS woes

Charles 9

Except this time the rogue devices have PROVEN to cause damage, so there's a legal basis now.

Charles 9

Re: UPNP is convenient.

And my point is that turnkey solutions are what the customers want. Good or ill, that's where they're paying, so sink or swim. The fact the gray market is booming shows that regulation won't help, much like Prohibition. The customer won't care unless it kills them.