Re: Interesting stuff
> Does it matter if we are using unmanned (piloted by a person or people still) drone, or a more traditional aircraft?
The way it was explained to me is that some groups have a concern that using drones lowers the bar for armed interventions. With piloted aircraft, we have some "skin" in the game. There is risk (both to the aircrew and the politicians) of "our side" sustaining casualties. That makes people in command think twice about committing forces. Add to that, a manned operation is a dam' sight more expensive.
But with drones, the operation is conducted from an office environment, thousands of miles away. There is nothing at risk except the cost of the drone. That makes the decision of when and where to intervene merely an accounting exercise. And therefore the prosecution of war becomes much more likely.