Easy question, trickier answer
> a legal right to demand at least 10Mbps download, and 1Mbps upload speeds from their ISPs ... package should cost no more than £45.
Which do you want: fast or cheap? (you can't have both)
3497 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
> British ministers are stepping up their rhetoric on cyber warfare, with £22m to be splurged on embiggening an "offensive hacking" unit as Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt vowed to retaliate against Russian cyber-attacks.
If it is anything like other "defence" procurements, they will end up with ultra-expensive computers to hack-back with .... but no keyboards.
> truly lossless 10x photos
Yeah, great for selfies ..... of your nose hair.
But nobody except the photo aficionados will care about this. And those 1-in-a-thousand would never admit to using a phone camera for their version of perfectly framed, light-balanced and fully metered happy snaps
So this is neither fish nor fowl. It doesn't provide the vast majority with anything they would want or ever use. Neither does it fulfill the needs of those who would bore the balls off a buffalo with all the technical descriptions that (inevitably) accompany each proudly shown photo.
I suspect someone has dropped a decimal place.
The flywheel energy calculator here suggests that a 40kg ring flywheel with a diameter of 500mm at 50,000 RPM would store 34MJ of energy. That's about the same as a litre of petrol.
> One of the other mothers explained that when they saw her hubbie doing the school run, it made it easier to get their own husbands to do the same.
What the other mothers said: "I saw Bill Gates dropping of his kids at school this morning"
What their husbands heard; "If you drop the kids off at school, there's a chance you'll meet Bill Gates"
> A machine-learning software engineer has trained OpenAI’s too-dangerous-to-release language model on personal Facebook messages to show how easy it is to create a bot that can attempt to impersonate you.
I have a facebook account that I never use (in fact, I have several). Therefore even a 'bot that does nothing is already impersonating me.
> It peaks at 472GFLOPS, we're told, and consumes about 5W to 10W.
Given the size of the heatsink on that puppy I'd say it's expecting to suck much more than 10 Watts.
And as with all these sorts of product, the success or failure will depend completely on the level of support (both from the manufacturer and user community) that it gets. The documentation, development tools, examples and ease of use are crucial. We saw this with the RPi: there are much better boards out there - cheaper ones, too. But the RPi dominates because of its community - not because of its technical capabilities.
> "but then at the weekend a letter came through the door signed from 'me' that said the curtains gave the image of a house of ill-repute"
Maybe the author was writing a complaint. That the w(h)ine bar wasn't living up to "what it said on the tin". One imagines there isn't much else going on in Lostwithiel
> One of the top complaints about TensorFlow is that it’s clunky and not easy to grasp
It sounds like the very first thing this AI framework needs is an AI to run it. Then all the problems with badly designed code, workflows and architecture could be made invisible to the user.
> I believe the issue with continuing with the ISS is its running costs
Yes. However, those costs are based on NASA's inefficient and wasteful rocketry costs. SpaceX can send stuff up at a fraction of what NASA spend.
The biggie seems to me to be the orbit. Since the ISS is essentially a russian vehicle, launched from Baikonur, the orbit is inclined at an angle from the KSC. So there is a significant problem with reaching it from a Florida launch. If SpaceX was to take over operations of the ISS, they'd probably want to launch from Kazakstan. Whether the USAians would be happy with that could be the deal-killer.
> the Crew Dragon is currently just another way to get to and from the ISS (which will almost certainly be a home for fish at some point within the next 10 years)
So instead of throwing the ISS away, couldn't someone like SpaceX buy it? They have the capability to get there - probably at a lower cost than anyone else and with the honkin' great payload of the BFR, any refurb work would be a comparatively small "lift".
We are told that LEO is halfway to anywhere in the Solar System. So it would be quite handy for those with an intention to go to Mars, to have a staging post at the "halfway" point.
> each has made a convincing argument that this apparent extravagance has practical value
I don't buy this. All the screen has to do is to display the content currently of interest.
But having to go to the faff of opening up the screen just to see that someone you don't care about has tweeted something you aren't interested in - and then having to fold the screen back down again to re-insert into said pocket? That all sounds like too much trouble.
> IBM Watson, which will be, er, put to work "enhancing branch advisors' expertise" and increasing productivity.
> That is one of the aims at least, assuming UK customers can actually find a branch,
Surely the point will be that an AI doesn't need a branch. It just inhabits the web. So potential customers will just see an avatar that doles out vague advice and then tells people to buy Santander products. Your financial adviser will just be an app on your phone.
Having been in similar situations myself (having a "dotted line" via pre-sales, to customer support, even though I was a developer) I would occasionally get support calls put through. Whether by accident or design. While it is considered rude to cut a caller off while they are speaking, it does not occur to people that you would deliberately terminate the call while you were speaki
What's wrong with paper records?
They are long-lasting, unhackable, easily copied. They have a universal format (writing) and can be used without any technology at all.
They don't suffer from "software rot". Nether do they become unreadable due to technology incompatibilities. They don't need licensing and they won't suddenly become unsupported if a supplier goes bust or gets bought out. Plus, they don't mysteriously stop working.
And best of all, they don't need to be constantly upgraded for no apparent reason.
> NHS trusts would be banned from buying the outdated devices.
If they still do the required job they can hardly be called outdated.
They might be inefficient, expensive, slow or unreliable. But if they haven't been replaced by something better, that tells us that the "alternatives" aren't actually better (however you choose to define the word).
That would seem to me to be a pretty damning failure of IT. That is it unable to come up with a solution that is acceptable.
But we know that many IT solutions aren't in fact solutions at all. Just more complicated substitutes. Ones that often perform the basic function worse than the thing they replace (not surprising if the original has been refined and modified over decades of use and experience) and offer a load of unwanted and never-user ancillary functions. Ones that seemed to the IT people to be a good idea, or were just easy to implement.
> Exports account for £5.5bn of that income
Although you'd think that with no domestic launch capability, All the product would be exported. Most of it in an upwards direction!
However, if the ultimate goal of BREXIT is to make trade deals, then the first and almost certainly the easiest would be with everything that isn't on Planet Earth. I mean, how hard would it be to get that one wrong? When all the negotiating team has to do is say "I'll take that silence as a 'yes', then".
> Back in June, Gartner found that just 4 per cent of CIOs had invested in and deployed AI
Odd! I would fully expect that a major consultancy firm would have a report that backed up every point of view that their clients hold. Isn't that why people use consultancies? For validation and to add credibility to the decisions they have already made - or are wanting to make.
So for them to have just one report - one that clearly is bollocks (though one person's bollocks is another person's lunch) - seems a bit odd. Surely they would have a whole range of them, from Nobody will ever use AI right through to Everybody is adopting it NOW.
So older people share more. They also vote more.
Could this simply be two manifestations of the same thing? That older people are simply more politically active, they take more interest. Whereas the younger people simply can't be arsed - either to vote or to share stuff. Alternatively, maybe older people simply have more free time, or more polite "friends" who won't shout at them for sharing crap.
This study (also reported on /.) has too many uncontrolled variables to be considered robust.
> Looking to the right side... when will that thing star to shout Exterminate! Exterminate! Exterminate!?!!
Just as soon as someone plugs in the toilet plunger
My first thought when I saw that thing was that if someone painted a smile on it's "top" it wouldn't look out of place in the next Star Wars film.
> Falling bullets dangerous or fatal
I don't suppose it has ever occurred to you that if law enforcement fired on the drone from outside the airport, into it, that the missed rounds (weighing roughly 12 grams) would simply drop harmlessly to ground on the millions and millions of square metres of concrete and tarmac that makes up the airport.
And since flights were grounded, there would be no reason why all staff could not be ordered to remain inside. The worst that would then happen is maybe a little dent in an aircraft's metal skin - if it was incredibly unlucky - like hitting a squirrel on a golf-course - unlucky.
The reasons given for not shooting it sound entirely bogus.
A falling bullet from a "miss" will only reach its terminal velocity on the way down. It's weight is small. So it would be comparable to a hailstone.
As for where the drone falls, that (surely) is the responsibility of the flier. It is their illegal drone and they are responsible for its actions.
It seems to me that the real problem is that the security services are run by bureaucrats. People who are far more worried about the possible criticism and damage to their own careers than by the chaos, disruption and cost that thousands of others suffer due to their inaction and lack of initiative. This incapacity to act also sends a clear signal to anyone else who wants to cause trouble - anarchists - that a thousand £ drone can effectively "switch off" a major transport hub, cost millions of £££s an hour.
> The Kármán line, at 100km, has commonly been regarded as where space starts, but Virgin
> Galactic will point to discussions within the scientific community about revising this figure downwards
> to 80km.
It looks like Branson has learned something from RyanAir, which has contributed some "original" thinking regarding where the actual destination is!
It also makes you wonder if that will reduce the cost of the fare by 20% too? Or is this just a sneaky way of raising the price.
And presumably there were some credulous people back in 1977 when they saw R2D2 and C3P0 for the first time? Or others who think that Eastenders depicts "real life"?
Personally I am surprised they had to put someone inside. CGI / deepfake is so good at producing realistic stuff that a completely virtual robot (and probably the whole show) could be whipped up on a render farm.
> If you believe they are wrong, and that everything's just great and will be, could you please expand on why you believe that?
When you say "wrong" what it sounds like is whether others do / should agree with their politics. A field in which they are no better at thinking, analysing or solving than any other person of voting age. Being able to design packet protocols does not imbue a person with greater geopolitical insights.
But their views on the state of the world are irrelevant (unless you do agree with their politics). They are technical architects and really should limit their punditry to things that they know more about than ordinary folk.
That would be worth listening to. As far as opinions are concerned, they are like arseholes: everybody has one, but they are best not revealed in public.
> this appears to be a honest to goodness accident.
The story says that the robot dropped the can of bear spray and that it broke open. That makes it sound as if a human could have dropped it instead. If that punctured can managed to hospitalise 24 people, I imagine the consequences would have been much worse for a human who had dropped it - since that person would have been much closer to the tin when it burst.
Also, if there had been more robots working in the warehouse, handling what turns out to be hazardous material, then there would have been fewer injured people. Either way, the "lesson" could be construed that the greater the proportion of robots at Amazon, the safer the working environment would be.
And how long before all the world's "security" services are on the phone with job offers, consultancy requests and causal enquiries regarding just what extra hardware they would need to, ahem, research this new vulnerability.
The publication does sound a lot like an advertisement. It's just that what ordinary citizens would consider a fault is seen as an opportunity by those charged with protecting our freedoms!
> Some in the legal world fear the real reason for the project has more to do with cutting costs
And that alone would be an excellent reason. Anything that stops legal firms charging the rates of their senior lawyers (£200/hour recently in the UK, for a straightforward probate) and then having all the work done by an office junior, would be welcome.
If we can get web-present AIs to handle all the basic stuff that makes up the majority of a lawyer's workload that would be fantastic. If that could interface directly to another AI handling the bulk of litigation, that would be even better.
The only problem then would be how to get the system to work in such a way that those AIs would take 6 months to finish a simple job, when it only actually took a few seconds of compute time?
As for the Shakespeare quote? See here, but should that be a SIGTERM or a SIGQUIT?
> access to digital services is the lowest priority for spending
Not surprising since almost all NHS computer systems are so badly designed and implemented that they end up making people's work environment, stress and efficiency worse.
Rather than allowing IT people to design stuff for the NHS - a group of people they generally know almost nothing about, I feel they should let the medical staff tell them what is needed. In most cases they would point to a non-computerised thing and say "make it do exactly what that does".
FAX machines spring to mind!
So this looks like it is intended to compete with the Orange Pi Zero+
Originally the FriendlyArm and Orange Pi ranges were brought out as cheap alternatives to the RPi. Often with more features included in the lower price. However the cost saving never really made up for the lack of community support, software or Linux updates. Now we have a "proper" Pi board that will hopefully compete on price (though I have never heard of anyone complaining their computer had too much RAM.
> You’re a small or mid-sized business.
The problem is that the term SME is applied to all companies of 250 employees or fewer. That is a huge range. From a small accountancy outfit up to a decent-sized manufacturing operation. And the set of requirements changes accordingly.
Most of those at the smaller end (for example: a garage, or shop) won't even have a full-time IT person. Even for the "large" SMBs such as those listed here with turnover (not profit) of £10million a year, a full time expert is out of the question.
SMBs account for 99% of UK companies and employ about half the workforce. I would suggest that what they need is something far cheaper, more streamlined and integrated. Since most small businesses will have largely similar IT requirements: website, payroll, back office, sales, VAT, stock control / inventory - and largely similar hardware and software (either a cloud or server - PC, plus third-party software), there would be a ready market for something that simply "does" all their security for them. Whether that would fully automate the work or simply list out what the IT person/people should do, would depend.
But I doubt many of the 5 million SMEs would be looking for a professional.
> Oracle staffers were about a week away from not getting paid, founder Larry Ellison has said of the firm's early days.
Many years ago I worked for a large blue organisation. We heard stories there that a while earlier the UK operation had to be baled out by the parent so they could run the payroll. And that was not during their "early days".
> the obvious question is “what’s new?” The answer is… not a whole lot.
But this is true of almost every Linux [ and by "Linux" we all know that means the kernel and the suite of apps that make up a distribution ] - and has been for years.
The question that rarely gets asked and even less frequently gets a satisfactory answer is: what will I be able to do, with this release, that I could not do before?
And most times the answer is "nothing". For many years now, all new Linux releases have been merely rolling the version numbers on libraries and utilities (squashing bugs and fixing security problems), adding support for new hardware and fiddling with the UI.
The only real change that has arrived in recent years is systemd. But even that is 4 years old, is hated as much as it is adopted and makes no difference at all to the users and the list of functions they can use.
One could argue that stability is a major benefit. That being able to take a user from 20 years ago (i.e. me!) and plunk them down in front of a Linux desktop that they will instantly recognise and be able to use, is a good thing. Apart from some minor silliness, like moving the position of menus and toolbars it is totally familiar. This is very true. But it is not innovation, it is not "cutting edge" and it is not what developers want to spend their time doing.
Linux has grown fat and slow in middle age. It is no longer the inspirational "alternative" it once was. It no longer leads in terms of utility or design. Yet it contains all the old baggage that makes it a hostile environment for people to adopt. Just try adding a new package - download this, edit that, compile the other, add new libraries to satisfy installation criteria, fix conflicts and maybe - just maybe - after a full day of effort and Googling user forums that shiny new app will work.
We should be at the stage where all a user has to do is sit at a screen and say (or type) "I want to write a document" (or letter, email, flame, program, magazine review ... ) and everything just happens. And the same applies to hardware - especially stuff you can plug in like USB. None of these should be issues, but they are all insoluble due to group dynamics and office politics within the community.
So Linux will continue to increment version numbers. Giving the illusion of progress without change. And in 20 years time someone else will re-write this comment about Ubuntu 38.10. That is, if the Y2038 problem hasn't destroyed the world.
> However, Wu is convinced it'll be enough to save the city a fortune in electricity bills for street lighting.
What's the "plan B" for when it's cloudy? Which judging by the 10 day weather forecast happens quite a lot