Re: Nowadays, they don't even pretend
HMRC owed me ten quid. They sent me a cheque :-)
2296 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
I can't blame Google, the EU specifically structured its corporation tax laws to encourage tax competition between member states by allowing companies to funnel revenues in this way. The only way to solve it is for the politicians to stop generating hot air and get on with actually doing something about it.
We need a definitive and blunt statement from the Irish government that if such data is released from their country without going through their proper procedures, prosecution will result. Then we get to see who blinks first. Of course Microsoft is screwed either way because one side or the other will drag them through a courtroom, although I guess the way they could do it is dump all the stuff to tape in the Irish facility and get the Garda to confiscate the box (having been told in advance) so they can then say to the US government that what they want is now in the hands of the Irish government.
I think the BBC probably try to balance the complaints, so if they get roughly equal number of complains about being too left-wing or too right-wing they assume they're in about the right place. Where their sense of balance is skewed is in giving equal time to crackpots and nutjobs who have plenty of hot air and very little credible backing (I'm not talking politics here, that would be too easy, more science).
American movies and sport are OK, you can just choose to go do something more productive or read a book. What you really don't want is the advertising. Dr Who on the BBC (as one example) is in a 50-minute slot. On BBC America it is in an hour slot, the extra ten minutes being adverts. Worse, the flow of the programme is totally disrupted by the interruptions every few minutes and it's not nearly as fun to watch. That's what you'd really stand to lose, the ability to go get lost in something on TV for a decent period without being interrupted by banal and stupid advertising, now often filled with someone trying to break the record for number of words spoken in a minute in order to get in all the legal disclaimers required by the lawyers.
They do, that's what helps subsidise the operation, especially selling their stuff overseas. I think turning them into an organisation that requires advertising income to survive would be a backward step, although I'm open to ideas on how else to fund it. I'm not sure the commercial TV stations would want to see it either, despite all the noise they make about uneven playing fields.
Of course, their licence PR could do with a bit of improvement, anyone who's had to deal with TVLO or whatever it's called now (Crapita?) knows that they assume anyone without a licence is a criminal. That's probably getting to be more true now they've widened the number of things for which you need a licence (they'll argue that if you have a phone or PC then you must occasionally be watching stuff that needs a licence), but back when it was a TV set or VCR, it was a bit much.
OK, so a TV licence costs £147, so just over twelve quid a month. If the BBC went subscription-only, how much would it charge? Then you'd have to pay 20% VAT on top of whatever they wanted. Look at what the subscription services charge for their stuff to see what people might end up paying for the BBC. OK, so the licence fee might not be the best way to fund the BBC, but turning it into a commercial enterprise where profit and cost savings are the most important things is not the way to go. Imagine the BBC with advertising, too. There's only a limited ad budget in the UK for TV< so if they suddenly pulled in a fair chunk of that, everyone else would get less money and would have to bump up their subscription fees to make up the gap, and you can bet it would cost more than the licence fee by the time they did that.
Be careful what you wish for, you might get it.
How about companies can leave such messages on my voicemail provided I get $10 plus another $2/minute of message in my account in advance of them leaving the message. That would adequately compensate me for my time in deleting the crap and encourage brevity on their part.
Or (b) just lock them all up.
At some point I'll figure out how to disable the voicemail on my phone which might also solve the problem.
The problem is if the call comes from a SIP provider. (E.g. Vonage)
You just treat it as withheld if you don't trust the source. If the SIP provider has robust policies in place that make it very difficult to spoof a number then you allow their CID through. If they don't then you block it. For many years (it may still be true with more justification now) that was BT's excuse for not passing on international CID, that they couldn't guarantee its accuracy. We ended up in the situation that if a call entered the country on a BT-terminated cable then it would present as INTERNATIONAL, if it came in via Mercury (remember them?) then you'd get a proper international CID displayed.
At some level it's the big company, receiving thousands of identical complaints, that can paint a picture clear enough for FCC to see and understand. I assume that most of the junk calls that hit my system are spoofed numbers, especially when it's the local area code, given that I only know one person with the same code as me and they would register as known. If the house phone rings then it's the job of the answering machine to take the call.
Of course, the real problem is that it is too easy to spoof a caller ID. Perhaps if that could be prevented, so that unverified stuff presented as withheld or out of area, a lot of the scammers would find it harder to reach real people.
It depends on what you're sampling. Cabin temperature changes fairly slowly so you'd probably sample that once a second at most. Engine performance may well be sampling lots of data points every millisecond. Fuel flow, fuel temperature, combustion temperature, exhaust temperature, pressure at various points in the engine, RPM. Then there's all the other flight parameters, other system parameters (battery volts, bus bolts, system load, hydraulic pressure etc). It wouldn't surprise me if there's not a video feed in there too, for modern aircraft.
Most of the time it isn't needed, but if something goes wrong, then having access to detailed data from the critical period leading up to the incident may be really useful.
I will add my +1 to the Bose QC comments. I had a different set of NC headphones for some time but finally decided to splash the cash and it was well worth it.
I find that having music I know helps take out the residual noise. My ears just lock on to that and require no more brain power to process what they already know, and I can be oblivious to nearby conversations and work much better.
When it comes to music choices, most of mine dates back to the 70s and early 80s: Queen, ELO, Bowie, Quo, plus some silly ones like Star Trekkin' to lighten the mood a bit.
There's a lot talked about Millennials working in shared space but when you look, they're all hunched over their screen to minimise visible distractions and all wearing headphones to take out the noise of everyone else nearby. So much for collaborative workspace, they'd probably be much happier in offices and not open plan.
Maybe Facebook needs to add some detection to limit the number of outgoing friend requests you can make, or limit the ability of someone to create an account saying they're from Chicago when the incoming IP is halfway around the world.
Except my IP address currently claims I'm in London because I'm using a VPN that pops out there. When I get home it'll be a different IP address located elsewhere. If I fire up Google, for some reason it gives me google.hu.
Sites that insist on giving you a particular result based on where they think you are, and steadfastly ignore your attempt to correct them, are really annoying. It's only convenient if it's what you want to happen.
There's always this one...
http://www.collegehumor.com/post/6604189/lincoln-gives-fords-theater-review-on-yelp
What do you even need that still requires a local install? SAP, Oracle, Salesforce... all the business software is browser based and generally SaaS. There are a few outliers like Photoshop and IDEs, but they are working on it.
The performance of some of this stuff is dire, especially if someone has failed to put in enough bandwidth and someone in the office decides to download some large files (or puts a bunch of stuff on to Google Drive or Dropbox and everyone else's machine decides to synchronise content). A lot of technical stuff is still local, electrical tools such as OrCAD/Altium/Allegro, plus the mechanical stuff (Solidworks/Pro-E) because it's highly graphical and a browser is not going to cut it.
I've worked in a place which used SalesForce and it was hilarious watching the panic when it went down for a day a while back. I've worked in places which use on-line stuff that is painfully slow. I much prefer to run stuff locally, where outages and security breaches are entirely of local making.
That's right, I have never really embraced the cloud. My software is owned by me, in that I can keep using it (without upgrades, admittedly) without having to pay anyone else any more money, unlike all this SaaS stuff.
My Win10 machine keeps telling me it wants to schedule a reboot. Even when I've just done one. Given that it takes fifteen minutes before it becomes usable again, I am reluctant to sign up to its stupid game. I am giving serious thought to ripping out the hard drive for a fresh one and seeing if this machine will happily run Win7, then copy over the stuff I need.
Yeah ,like you buy a new car that is exactly the same as the old one?
I did once, upgraded because at the time the monthly payments required were cheaper than not doing so, assuming I wanted to keep owning a car. Old and new cars parked next to each other at handover, the sales chap said that at this point he was supposed to go over the controls on the new vehicle to make sure I knew where they all were. I just asked if they were all the same as the old one, he said yes and we agreed that he'd done the job.
One might suggest that as the world evolves, people who can't figure out how to become comfortable with a new version of Windows after 10 years might be headed down the same road as the dodo.
That only works if Windows 10 is the only way to survive. It may be that if enough people switch to alternatives, it'll be the ones who stuck with the evolutionary dead-end of Windows 10 that will go join the dodo. All it would take is for some of the major software houses to produce full-featured Linux versions of their packages and a lot of small business would seriously consider a switch. Windows still seems to be better for managing and controlling large numbers of devices centrally though, so one might expect large organisations to persist.
For most people covered by English employment law, place of work is a contractual provision and can't be changed on a whim.
There's often a relocation provision in there. A couple of miles isn't enough to trip any redundancy provision - had they moved to Coventry then yes, staff could have claimed redundancy rather than move.
As others have said, the new office may be dire, not near their clients, not have working IT. If you live somewhere with a train line to Blackfriers or Canon St then it's likely to be a much longer commute too.
Not having working IT is fine, turn up, get paid, spend your time complaining about how bad it is because the infrastructure is preventing you from working.
It can take longer occasionally. It's a much larger place and very often smaller banks and credit unions have an agreement with a larger organisation to act as a world-facing portal for them (potentially reduces the amount of infrastructure and staff you need), so there's an extra step. This may have changed in recent years, one place I use now manages same-day stuff when it used to take a couple so perhaps they've cut out the middleman.
Had I been an employee, I think at some point I would have looked around at what company assets I could remove, to be redeemed when the money arrived in my bank. However, if it was a building with a few desks and PCs then that probably wasn't a viable option.
When I know I've got a long commute home, I tend to be out the door promptly as much as possible so as not to eat into my personal time. When I'm working from home, end time is a lot more relaxed, and the time I'd otherwise be spending unproductively sitting in a traffic jam I will often spend working. So, 8 hours in the office v 10 at home for the same money? Which one is likely to give more output?
Not that I'd ever seriously consider working for either IBM or HPE.
At least BT would validate your claimed CLI and default to something valid if you tried to spoof it. It would also tag on digital lines how much of the presented number it would vouch for. No idea if this is still the case.
Methinks VoIP gateways should be required to properly validate credentials before putting calls onto the wired telephone system, and perhaps the SIP (and other) protocols need to be updated to have a secure key exchange to allow verification of the caller ID. You can choose to omit the verification if you want, but then you'll come through as withheld. Any gateway with the power to inject CLI would have to meet the standards, and any that didn't would be assigned the default gateway number or at least a number from the valid range assigned to that gateway rather than any number the caller felt like using.
How strict they are varies. In one city I worked in the fire inspector used to come around and make us unplug any power strips that were plugged into other power strips.
Having seen how dodgy US electrics can be, I'm not surprised. Having said that, even in the UK they'll pull you up for chaining power strips, which I always thought was overkill given the number of fuses protecting against overload in a UK set-up. Perhaps check the fuse ratings though, too many 13A fuses where they should be 3A or 5A.
Since this should be a controlled document...
That's assuming a lot. Given the general level of competence demonstrated, either it was controlled inasmuch as it was written and never revised, so there was never a need to do change management, or their control process was along the lines of "use the document in this directory, it should be the latest version", which happened to have global write privilege.
Rule 3 - never lets Devs have access to stuff. Like small children, they *will* break stuff..
In a controlled environment this is good. If the Dev breaks something before the users do, it can be patched to prevent anyone else from doing the same. My unofficial CV has 'breaking things' as a skill, which dates back to using BASIC at school and being unable to resist entering '6' when asked to enter a number from 1 to 5, just to see what happened.
They could embed content server side, then you'd have to identify the ads from the content of the ads.
I wouldn't mind that so much. If it's done server-side then they're not running potentially malicious code on my machine. I block adverts because of all the JavaScript and the fact that malware can arrive by that route, it's a security issue at least as much as an ad issue. The problem with embedding it server side is that it means the server has to work harder and it scales less well on a busy site. If they call in adverts from a different host then they'll still get blocked by some means because there will be something with which to identify the ads, so they have to host the whole thing on the same server as the content.
As for the travel log, they're really going to be looking at places like Iraq or suspiciously long visits to jumping off points to ISIS like Turkey.
Hmmm... I've travelled extensively to a country with a fair bit of gun violence and a repressive police force that will often shoot first and (doesn't) ask questions later. I wonder if they'd use that against me?
As for recording travel, when I had to compile such a list I just went through the stamps in my current and expired passports. I approve of countries that give both an entry and exit stamp, makes the job so much easier.
@Pat O'Ban
Probably more disappointed than surprised at the number that leak. Some of them are interesting, such as the one I used only to talk to a former ISP, who really ought to know better. I subscribe to the "Have I been pwned" list so I know a couple more addresses went this week. Fortunately the ones I use with my bank and credit cards appear to be intact so far.
My spam filter will bounce some stuff with "Address no longer in use due to spam", I thought that was a worthwhile tweak to let people know they need to contact me some other way.
I think I'd be inclined to create ten thousand new email addresses (easy when you own the domain) and list them for good measure. I already use several hundred, in that when a website asks for an address I create a new one for them to track spam, so a few more ought to be OK. I bet they're not expecting people to have more than a couple, one for work and one for home.
ETA: OK, I guessed wrong, they've got space for six.
This is just crying out for a small app that hits the search engine on your behalf while not actually bothering you with the results. A smart one would scan the news for trending keywords and then go look them up. Paying people for traffic is going to end up like the click fraud for advertising or the Facebook like farms.
Taxpayers should be on the hook for government mistakes, they have the power to vote out those in charge and really ought to be more concerned about the quality of the candidates put forward for election. I have no objection to individuals being prosecuted for blatant negligence though, although there should be robust checks in place to make it hard for an individual to screw up.
Google and Apple like it cos it moves the operators one step closer to being a dumb pipe, this is another attempt to put the brakes on that on T-Mo's part.
They need to adopt the approach slowly being forced upon OpenReach in the UK - infrastructure provider (pretty much the dumb pipe) terminating at the telco/ISP of your choice. So T-Mobile would morph into two parts, the airtime provider and the content provider. It would be even better if the cable operators could be forced to do the same, so you could deal with the part that provided an internet pipe and had them route packets to your choice of ISP as the end point. I use none of the added services of my ISP, they are just a dumb pipe to the internet.
Obviously any IT professional would have pulled the data from the cloud if it was known that the bill wasn't going to be paid, but I guess they didn't have one on staff. I guess we'll see a lot more of this sort of thing...
This is probably because the IT professional, if there ever was one, got fired quite early on and if they followed common US practice and escorted him off the premises, he wouldn't have had a chance to either initiate a backup or tell someone else to do it even if he'd been inclined to be helpful..
I see this as like renting an apartment. After so many days of moving out and not paying rent, how long are suppose to hold on to the former tents property. They were renting space on a cloud based system and stopped paying.
The other parallel is renting an off-site storage unit - they usually have in their Ts and Cs what happens if you fall into arrears and at what point they're allowed to auction off the contents of your unit to recover their costs. Now there's an interesting precedent, M$ to auction off the data to the highest bidder. That would really make a lot of CIOs sit up and take notice.
The downside of this is that if you're a small company in California or Oregon and you need to sue a large Delaware corporation, you have to decamp there. It would be good if the plaintiff could sue in their own local court too, but I guess that would be abused by a bunch of patent trolls all incorporating in East Texas.
If you look through the list of sites where I've had to reset the password, it's invariably the ones that try to impose a 'one of everything' rule. I guess I could learn to try 'expected password' and 'expected password plus this particular special character' before giving up, but normally it's try the password, try it again more slowly and carefully, then give up before the third failure locks the account.