Target Price
Drop it to £100 and make sure I can run Linux on it and I'd be more likely to buy one.
2294 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
One assumes that US military GPS kit is built properly, otherwise LightSquared wouldn't have made it this far.
It is rather tricky trying to receive signals at -160dBm if there's something nearby radiating +30dBm, I challenge anyone to build a useful filter that would let one pass and attenuate the other by 160dB.
I'd say the fault is in letting the frequency bands be reallocated from satellite service. Had the relevant people understood the technical arguments and stuck to their guns, the US wouldn't be stuck with the argument.
I have to admit I bumped into the new settings a few days ago. I didn't think much about it at the time, apart from automatically unticking all the permission boxes. I didn't think to check back through the stuff they send occasionally to see if it was actually announced, but I guess I wouldn't have found anything if I had.
All that happens if 100,000 people sign up is that MPs get to debate it. At that point you'll be able to write to your MP and make your views clear and ask him to vote the way you want. Then he's free to ignore you and do what he wants, so no change there.
Sometimes it's worth signing a petition simply to get the debate because at least that way there's an action and we can move onto the next thing the media want to enrage us with.
Unless he had an explicit clause in the contract prohibiting him, he's free to make them. The BBC reports that because the helmets are functional and not sculptures (as decreed by the court), they're not works of art and so copyright expires after fifteen years. So in the UK he's free to make and market them.
If you've come up with a really good idea, patenting it and then trying to interest a manufacturer in making it under licence should be OK. Actively attempting to get it made is acceptable behaviour, and is often the only way some products get to market.
Indeed, some large companies won't talk to you about your idea unless you've at least applied for the patent because one of their fears is that they are already working on the same thing (not unreasonable) and are further advanced, which opens them to accusations of stealing ideas. However, if you've got a relevant patent then you're a player in the game even if they have gotten further towards practical implementation.
Anyway, the US patent system is terminally broken and it needs lots of trolls like Lodsys to abuse it and finally bury it.
Unlike a lot of people, it seems, I'm happy with a basic smartphone. If it's got a decent IMAP email client with encryption and a sane web browser and can do texts and phone calls, that's enough if the price is low enough. A few bells and whistles such as Google Maps (or even Ovi maps if they continue to exist), an IM client and a stopwatch (one of the few apps I use on my existing phone) and that'll be it.
I don't need Android or iPhone with their dodgy tracking and booby-trapped app stores, I just need a basic tool, so if Nokia will oblige with a low-enough price, I might buy one before they wreck their line with Windows.
Reduce the engine size a bit, and have a turbine powering a generator/battery combo with electric motors to drive the wheels. Chuck in some regenerative brakes and it might turn out to be fairly efficient. If the turbine is designed along the lines of the old Meteor radial jet engines then it could even be low stress and last a long time.
One of the things that Nokia did try to get right was to make the Qt environment cross-platform. I've only played with it on x86-class machines, but I'm aware that it has stuff in it that's supposed to be phone-friendly too. It'll even compile for Windows and OS X, although as mentioned above, either the developer will need to release the source code or be capable of compiling and testing for different platforms.
They did have one a while back who was clued up and acted as part of the team. I think he got a new job elsewhere though, one of the few who escaped safely.
Of course, the really smart one would be able to disguise his intelligence until after he got the job. Think hunting elephants with a spear - it can be done but it's dangerous and the squish potential is quite high. This appeals to a particular mindset.
... would work out that if he can divide, he can conquer, because the BOFH and PFY would be too busy fighting each other to organise an accident for him. When the BOFH comes back from his fun and games, he could announce the availability of the next bit of junket budget.
Of course, he might still get caught in the crossfire.
One big advance, not only in the media field, would be to impose a requirement that before a citizen of another country is allowed to buy or control a UK business, it should be possible for a UK citizen to buy or control a similar business in that other country. This would screw Murdoch quite well, given the US restrictions on media ownership, and quite effectively break up his news empire.
If that's a software description, can't the world just agree to drop the brain-dead US system and let the rest of us implement HTML5 because software patents don't apply (yet) elsewhere? That's the best way to make the point, let the US stew in its own juices until the citizens demand decent patent reform because the existing system adversely affects them. Corporations might be able to deliver campaign dollars to DC, but it's the people who deliver the votes.
Given what the previous government tried to do with our privacy, there's a bit of schadenfreude here. The only real difference between them and the journos is that the politicians merely changed the law so that what they wanted to do was legal.
Remember Gordon, if you've got nothing to hide then you've got nothing to fear.
I take all electronics with me in my carry-on because as I'm not allowed to lock my bag, I refuse to put anything in there that I don't want to lose. My checked luggage consists of clothes (possibly worn and smelly if on the way home), local food items that are not easily available at home and are legal to import and a few cheap souvenirs. Irritating if lost, but not too bad. They're also items that are less likely to be stolen in the first place.
Similarly, if I'm ever unfortunate enough to have something placed in my luggage (and I've had a few TSA 'your bag was searched' notices in there), one theme of my defence would be that because I can't lock the bag, I am not responsible for what is found in it once it has left my possession. Probably wouldn't work in most places though :-(
It was nice and quiet a week earlier. Of course, there was no launch planned, but the causeway was nice and quiet (and wet - we had some of those downpours) and we got some good pictures when it wasn't raining. Had they stuck to the original 28th June launch then it would have been a lot more crowded.
The point with encrypted data is that either they've already got the resources to decrypt it, so you'll be none the wiser, or they have to ask you for the keys. At that point, at least you know they're up to something, whereas the point of this article is to show that for unencrypted data they can get it without you knowing.
Not that I've ever trusted the cloud anyway, and this sort of thing just reinforces it. They probably already have information on me, but why make it easy for them to get more?
Apart from the dodgy stuff going on in family courts where the state uses secrecy to protect its abuses, trials tend to have a public gallery where people are free to go and observe.
It's still not a good idea for a juror to discuss anything about a case while it's in progress, but once the trial is concluded, commenting on the public bits (but not on any jury discussions of those bits) doesn't seem unreasonable.
Many people are nervous of doing jury service, so it would be better if jurors are able to discuss the overall experience, if not the specific cases.
Merely the fact that the URL is hidden behind the text is bad enough, "click here to log into your online banking account" is tempting to the ignorant and obviously works because the scammers keep trying it.
Outlook improved somewhat when the feature to automatically convert all incoming email to plain text was added.
They didn't include my local exchange. I wonder how many rural exchanges where there's long bits of wet string out to most customers are in the list? I'm guessing almost none, and yet these are the ones that would benefit the most from FTTC because 3+km of cable would be replaced by a few hundred yards at most. You probably wouldn't find the locals complaining about the large cabinets either.
Even your GPS or Kindle is going to radiate something. That's why any electronic device with FCC or CE approval will have been tested to determine that it's below limits. The Kindle is probably really quiet except when you change page and it wakes up its power supplies for a few hundred milliseconds of activity. I assume the wireless side doesn't operate unless specifically enabled.
What is not often appreciated is that the interference can be caused by two devices acting together. They both radiate on particular different frequencies and the two mix together somewhere and produce sum and difference frequencies. Even a rusty bolt can cause this.
I think they're being over-cautious, but because it's impossible to test every combination of gadgets against aircraft electronics that's probably not too bad an idea. Certainly during take-off and landing, which is when they do try to remove any possible problem. Once above 10,000ft the crew have got a bit more time to sort out a problem and so the restrictions are relaxed. We've all heard GSM interference on audio, in an aircraft you're probably within 10ft of signal cables and so could cause the same sort of problem.
My Aspire One is still happily working. It depends entirely on what your expectations were - I wouldn't want to do serious computing on that keyboard and screen, and I acquired a cordless mouse because it was easier than the trackpad, but as a quick way of checking email on the move, it's good. Mine is running Linux (but not the supplied distribution), perhaps it's crap with Windows.
At the moment it's sat on my desk as a basic Linux dev machine, talking to it using Cygwin-X on a windows machine so I get the benefit of a large screen and keyboard.
I can see them holding onto the information for 14 days, because that's the time limit for sending a NIP to the driver. After that it's too late.
Even so, as others have mentioned, it doesn't really do anything but note the existence on the roads of a vehicle with a particular plate, and with the prevalence of cloning of plates, they don't necessarily have proof it was the real one anyway.
The way to address the scaling of servers, assuming each phone has a fixed IPV6 address, is for the phone to register once with a server and exchange keys. Then if the server has traffic it can fire off a ping with its ID and something encrypted with the key to a defined common port on the phone. The phone then looks at the packet, checks its validity and notifies whichever application(s) on the phone have registered to receive notifications from the server, at which point they can connect and you've achieved the same as polling. The overhead of authentication each time is probably less than the overhead of all those polling packets flying back and forth. There is nothing to stop multiple registrations to multiple servers which can all send their packets to the common port. Telcos can continue blocking inbound stuff to mobiles provided they let through packets (in a standard format) to that one port.
There we are, unless someone has patented it already, it's in the public domain so go use it.