Ugly bugger
It looks like a Nike sneaker with encephalitis.
345 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
How about "ad misplaced to miss target audience, 99.99999999% of humanity gets on with its life" for a title?
Back when I was in college, anti-apartheid demonstrations were happening a lot on college campuses. A friend at the student newspaper (you do remember newspapers, right?) had to write a story on how 300 people showed up to one. I suggested "32,700 students find something better to do on a Friday afternoon than mindlessly chant slogans at politicians on the other side of the globe".
Oddly enough, his editor didn't like my idea.
... and it's easy to see why. The pollution is just sent elsewhere, like downwind of the coal plant (a place where few watermelons(*) chose to live). The huge batteries cause quite a bit of pollution in the mining and refining process, plus when you add in all the shipping ... Then there is the added weight of the battery systems, and if you want good mileage, you reduce weight; thus the batteries are contributing to something they're supposed to fight against.
On top of all this, cars like The Pious lose money. When GM and Toyota were busting up a joint venture earlier this year and divvying up what was left, Toyota offered the Prius to Gm to "sweeten the pot". GM, however, wouldn't take it because it would hurt GM's bottom line.
And honestly, a good diesel will get better mileage. My six year old VW Golf TDI gets 46MPG with my driving style. Besides, once you get past 40MPG or so, the fuel reduction (and thus pollution reduction) gains get smaller for each MPG you improve; it's an equation of diminishing returns.
I'm leaving now before El Presidente sends in the 1MPG Army tanks to take me away for re-grooving.
(*) - a P.J. O'Rourke term for post-Berlin Wall environmentalists: green on the surface, red to the core.
iTunes started as SoundJam (who else here used that?) in the OS9, maybe OS8 days. It was MP3-oriented from the word go.
My own feeling is that Palm is being, at best, slippery. If they want to use the iTunes set-up, fine. It's a directory structure of MP3/AAC files, organized with an XML file. Sending the wrong USB ID to claim you are an iPod? Mm, sorry. That opens up a can of security worms, to be honest.
I feel bad for Herr Link und seiner Familie, but this is the greatest story I've read in ten years. Even beats the one about Al Gore spending thousands of dollars for gas heating for a guest house.
Although it still doesn't top that one from 1995 when a liquored-up exectuive, Gerard Finneran, three sheets to the wind and having been denied yet another wine because of his behavior, pinched a loaf on the food cart in first class on a flight to New York. Let us never forget this man. He gave mankind two valuable services: 1) irrefutable proof that a title makes no better than anyone, and 2) the reassurance that no matter what we've done, we haven't embarrassed our moms like that.
(Unless we've been on a reality tv show, of course.)
"I always understood that Vista was really a rushed touch up to XP done at the last minute after they totally gave up on Longhorn."
You are absolutely correct. I'm an OS X user and a longtime programmer in Unix environments. However, Longhorn intrigued me when I first heard about it and what they were working on: a new kernel written from the ground up, a new and improved security/permission paradigm, an OO file system, a new shell that used the best-of-breed features of shell/scripting/interpreted languages, etc etc etc.
However, a couple things happened along the way. Win2K was pretty successful, but when Apple released OS X (and, gasp, seemed to be recovering and attracting people) in late 2001, it took MicroSoft by surprise. (Not that they were alone.) In the meantime, Apple was releasing software like iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, etc, not to mention the iPod, that were turning heads and attracting buyers on the consumer side. On the corporate side, most Unix vendors were happily falling on their swords, but Linux was becoming a serious player. MicroSoft have always touted how cheap Windows was compared to Unix, but how do you compete with free?
So Apple was impressing people and winning users who were sick of the Windows security problems. And a lot of these people were tech-savvy. I recall that in the company I worked for at the time, the Windows administrators bought iBooks for their personal use. That says a lot.
So there was Microsoft, with Longhorn already looking shaky, and wondering what to do. They released XP, a name which drew laughs because of its similarity to the name of Apple's OS, and which is basically a Win2K service pack with a new skin slapped on it. I recall that most people at the time were saying "Why do I need to pay that much for a new interface? Win2K runs fine on my machine, I don't want to buy a new one, not all my drivers will work with XP, ..." Sound familiar?
So yes, Vista was more or less a last-minute XP, but XP itself was more or less a last-minute 2K.
The more things change, ...
Apple will sometimes do this, giving a new feature to a lower-tier part of the lineup. Generally this means that: A) the lower-tier part of the lineup is facing direct competition from a competitor and needs the differentiator; B) they've got something bigger in mind for the higher-end item; C) they still haven't worked all the kinks out, just 99.99%; D) they hate you; E) some of the above.
File this under "Things I Don't Get", because I don't see the big deal about the Beatles' songs being on iTunes. The people who want The Beatles have the CDs already (if not the 45s). Seriously, I don't see how a popular pop band that broke up 40 years ago is going to do more for Apple than the latest rappo-pop sensation that all the kids are going on about. Maybe it's an image thing, but it seems to me that it would harm the Beatles' image as old and unimportant rather than the Apple/iTunes image of the best place to legally buy music online.
I also recall that it took 4 or 5 years to get the band's catalog onto CD.
Paris, because she knows the importance of making yourself open to new media
If AT&T/SBC is losing money, maybe they need to look at themselves for a change.
Wankers. Remember, SBC was the company that told the FCC that the problems with their missing scheduled land-line installed dates was that the people in the Midwest expected them to show up and do the installations on the date that SBC had chosen.
(Where's a Darth Vader/Deathstar icon when you need one?)
Remember, this isn't the old AT&T. AT&T was bought by one of the Baby Bells, SBC. When SBC took over Ameritech (the Midwest Baby Bell), service immediately went to sh*t and the normal 14 day wait for landline service went to two months ... and they still missed the date. When a class action suit was filed by a bunch of people in the former Ameritech region, SBC's official response was to blame the customers for expecting good service.
Some things never change.
I wonder if Nigel Tuffnel is the lead research scientist.
FWIW, the US never did regard the IRA as freedom fighters; the Kennedy family did. (Old Joe, mob boss that he was, knew how to get them money and weapons.)
This weapon may seem impractical today, but in the sense that arquebusiers would have seemed to Napoleon. They're developing a new weapon system; you have to work your way up to the battlefield-ready ones.
And negotiating with/ignoring/appeasing terrorists worked so well during the previous two Democrat administrations that it surely is a wonderful idea now. (I had three friends die in the World Trade Center attack. I don't have a lot of inclination to be appeasing terrorists.)
Really? If we're chopping down football fields' of trees a day, then we need poor nations to industrialize ASAP.
Seriously. From 1945 to 1990, the amount of woodlands in the US east of the Mississippi quadrupled. *Quadrupled* This is in a time of blow-out urban sprawl in the most densely populated part of the country.
What happened is industrialization (ie the at-the-time technological industries) needed people to work for them ASAP. A lot of people on marginal farmland, tired of farm work (and who can blame them), decided they'd had enough of farming and looked forward to a regular weekly wage.
If you want to save trees, build factories.
Warning stickers? Are you kidding? This happened in Joliet, Illinois, which is in the United States of Litigation. There are warning stickers about this EVERYWHERE at the gas station.
As I've often said, some people are just beyond help and should have been eaten by wolves years ago. As great as civilization is, it's too bad it so effectively trumps evolution.
How much is this going to cost me? I'm an American taxpayer. I practice a useful trade/skill. I take care of myself and my family. I ask for no special priviledge or treatment. And I know that any government action or inaction is going to cost me money.
This investigation will change nothing, burn through taxpayer money, and line the pockets of Obama and his string-pullers. In other words, business as usual.
I am an American and have lived in quite a few areas of the country. I'm from the Midwest and I always have heard how terrible it is here. Yeah, the winters are rough, but not as grim as they are in New England. Yes, we have tornados, but Californians deal with earthquakes, drought, fires, race riots, and near-Scandanavian taxation; I'll take the tornados. Yes, the South is warmer, but as soon as the temperature hits 78F they stay inside because it's too hot, and they don't get winter frosts to kill of bugs and diseases. Etc etc etc. Every place sucks in its own way. Eventually I moved back to the Midwest to stay.
But as I rove through this great land of ours, I meet quite a few transplanted Midwesterners. By and large, they would like to move back, but their job/family/etc prevent it. I guess you don't know what you miss until it's gone.
"I love how Americans are getting upset over Megrahi."
I love how the rest of the world keeps telling us what to do.
To be honest, as a taxpaying agnostic libertarian white male American, I'm telling the rest of the world to go away and solve your own damn problems, to hell with you. Of course, the last time we did that, it lead to World War II.
Mine's the one with a copy of P.J. O'Rourke's article "Among the Euroweenies" in the pocket.
And where did America's religious zealots come from? Right, Europe. If you put all people of personality X in one isolated place and 400 years later their descendents act the same way, don't be filled with outrage or shock.
Sincerely,
A descendent of people who didn't want the Puritans landing in Jamestown
In the last decade or so, Apple either does something new, or gets into markets that are stagnant and limited and have devices that are mediocre at best. They didn't invent the MP3 player, but the iPod swarmed over the others because of its simple interface, easy-to-use software, ... then came smart playlists, the iTunes Store, photo, video, ... you know how it went. Ditto with the iPhone. Like it or not, it changed the playing field. People who would never before have even considered a smart phone, like my 70 year old parents, are considering an iPhone. Marketing? Maybe, but they also see the maps, some (to them) killer app, an easy-to-use interface, a simple way to take and make calls, ...
Now, HD TV? Sorry, don't see it. Unless there is some integration with the AppleTV, or that device gets embedded, ... Nah.
This is pretty standard. I worked for a company in a very specialized market (pharma/medical electronic publishing) with only about four or five companies in it. There was a 'gentleman's agreement' not to poach the other company's employees. Now, we were certainly free to apply for a job at the competitor's. We and the competitors were certainly free to advertise for people to fill a need. And given that two of the companies are based in the same town, there was some movement between people.
But actively poaching? That would have meant that the other companies would have started poaching your people.
So if Company X and Company Y, in the same industry, agree not to poach, this is not news. In fact, it makes complete sense. The employees aren't forbidding from moving, they aren't (or at least shouldn't be) bullied.
I think journalists, particularly those from a print background, don't get this, partly because most cities in the US have only one newspaper. Radio and TV people don't get as worked up about it, and unsurprisingly they have options within their own town. Go figure.
"Ugliest. Car. Ever."
Really? What about the Austin Allegro? AMC Pacer? Pontiac Aztek? Fiat Multipla? VW Thing? Gurgel Xef? Anything by Crosley? And this isn't even getting into the old Communist block, where design was done by someone with only an axe. Unless you count that leather-bodied car that stunned even Jeremy Clarkson.
Look, BMW's design has been going from bad to worse, but seriously, worst of all time?
"Such monsters have no place on our planet. Ban them immediately."
Due to the manufacturing process, a Prius does more environmental damage, start to finish, than a Land Rover Discovery.
If we want to get rid of monsters, the eco-mentalists are first on the list. They are merely watermelons: green on the surface, red to the core.
Mine's the one with Hayek's "Road to Serfdom" in the pocket.
I tried to write an app that detected spam email and shot a blinding laser beam into the eyes of the spammers and all their children. I cannot believe this was rejected, just because some innocent people got in the way. Given how they were dressed, they were probably blind to begin with.
(And yes, I do need the Joke Alert icon for this. Sadly.)