Re: google checkout.
I wanted Google Checkout to be a good alternative. Even gave them a try when they first started out. Two orders, no deliveries, no ability to contest or get my money back. Never, ever, ever again.
7544 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
I avoided Paypal for a long, long time. I've only within the last year gotten one for the sole reason that they were the only accepted way to make payments to a website. And no, I haven't been on eBay in a long long time either.
You want me to stop using Paypal? Great. Give me an alternative. Because credit and debit cards just don't always work. And I say that as a crazy 'Merkin.
except that passing funding through the States is irrelevant. Banks are required to REPORT on suspicious transactions, not stop them. Because quite frankly too many honest transactions raise flags on the suspicious list (e.g. deposit of over $10,000).
So this is all down to somebody at PayPal being a butthead.
The first idiot charged would have been the still nameless lawyer who leaked the data to his roommate "but expected him to keep it confidential." Nail the SOB to the wall: felony jail time for him, civil damages to IMB, his law firm, and the stock owners he defrauded.
Downvoted because too many people like you have become too willing to roll over for anybody claiming authority. The authority of SCOTUS if it is truly binding on society must come from society. When SCOTUS renders too many decisions which look at best to be too much like the spin of a roulette wheel, society still has the right to say SCOTUS was wrong and has abused the power with which it was entrusted.
Copyright is copyright, and public broadcast is a LIMITED license. The limit is that you the consumer receive it directly from the copyright owner or their authorized reseller. Aereo is neither the consumer nor an authorized agent. And apparently the rewritten cable laws eliminated what was once a safe-haven.
Having read your unpopular post above, I think you are wrong on this reply. I don't like what you have written, but considering it carefully, I think you are correct. Therefore, because of the way the relevant act was rewritten, so long as the data is transmitted on private lines other than the presentation device itself, it counts as broadcast.
Now where I do see a small opening is in challenging the Constitutionality of the re-written law, which it doesn't appear to me happened in this case. But let's face it: a single person is far less likely to be able to afford the lawyers for that case than a corporation is.
Liability and damages in these cases don't depend on whether or not you are reselling a service, only that you are infringing on the value of the the copyright protected materials. The ability of a plaintiff to collect damages does, but not the ruling itself.
A volunteer organization I participated in tried to make that argument for services we wished to provide at a convention. We were shut down cold by the lawyers.
Yes, but notice how they left out one of the most helpful bits:
BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, GINSBURG, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN,JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which THOMAS and ALITO, JJ., joined.
Breyer [Clinton, Democrat]
Roberts [Bush Jr, Republican]
Kennedy [Reagan (88), Republican]
Ginsburg [Clinton, Democrat]
Sotomayor [The Big 0, Democrat]
Kagan [The Big 0, Democrat]
Scalia [Reagan (86), Republican]
Thomas [Bush Sr., Republican]
Alito [Bush Jr., Republican]
In 86 when Reagan appointed Scalia, Conservatives still held sway in the Reagan White House. By 88 the RINOs had mostly taken over and sought a stealth candidate with little paper trail for Democrats to attack. Roberts? Well, after the 0bamacare ruling, we've all pretty much decided the NSA turned over incriminating photos to The Big 0. But there's no getting around the fact that every Democrat appointed justice voted to put the screws to the little guys.
See, this is why you can't be rich. One sentence does not make a book. You need to go on at length about the history of printing, maybe even discuss the development of writing as the precursor to printing. At least a chapter on the development of movable type. Then move on to lithography. Perhaps dabble for a while on the typewriter before moving to the first ball head printer and pin printer. Meander over into the field of pen plotters then return to the development of the first laser printer.Only THEN will you be properly positioned to begin your discourse on ink jet printers, marketing madness, and the fall of civilization.
Having done all of this properly you can then hire an agent, work out a deal with a publishing house and print the book. Only to discover that Bezos thinks your book costs too much so your publisher will have to sell it to him at cost or he won't be able to move any copies.
Have a nice day!
They're not selling the spaces. They're collecting finders fees for the available spaces.
It certainly is a service to other drivers. If I can spend $5 for a space and save 30 minutes of driving around waiting for a spot to open, it's worth the money to save the time. And it's not like the city is losing revenue. You have to pay for the space if you use it. In fact it could even drive up revenue. If I know I will have a space available it might be worth it to me drive downtown when otherwise I might drive elsewhere.
If the city were a business they would. They aren't so they don't give a damn. They've set the rates, designated the buildings, and set the available number of spaces. The people can go frell themselves if they don't like it. They know where the congestion is and they know why. They regard it as a good thing because it discourages people from driving.
Having an audible alert is still helpful for those rare instances where the self-closing door gets stuck on something that wasn't put away quite right. But again, this isn't an IP stack function but a local sensor loop and you are correct that the first step is the self-closing door.
Now this on the other hand:
The internet of things is shaping up as a riot of technically possible solutions, desperately searching for some problems. On the occasions where a problem can be solved, it often seems an expensive solution for a mildly inconvenient or infrequent occurrence, often with significant additional risks.
deserves about a googleplex of upvotes.
The only other useful thing I can think of would be something that warned you if the power had been out for an extended period of time. Or maybe make it even simpler and just warn if the temperature had exceeded certain parameters and indicate the time period for which they were exceeded. But again, a simple sensor arrangement on the fridge with an indicator on the door would seem to be far more useful.
I can think of one person I know of who might have benefited from a message sent to his email or smart phone on this front recently. Had to throw out a freezer because it came unplugged and he didn't realize it until weeks later. But even at that it wouldn't have helped him. He's still fighting with Verizon to get FIOS connected to his newly built home.
I had this debate about 25 years ago when I was working for a home automation firm. They were always talking about connecting the fridge, oven, and VCR to the telephone gateway which would let you control them. I would look at them and ask "Why? What benefit does this give me?" They kind of looked back at me dumbfounded. Once one of them said "Well, if you forgot to set your VCR, you could do it with your phone." My response, "But if I forgot to set the VCR, what are the odds it is loaded with a blank tape anyway?"
Mind you, I thought it was a cool system and had some useful features. I was trying to direct them away from trivial stuff to things that would make it worthwhile. In the end, I sort of won the argument, but it was the king of Pyrrhic victories: the company filed for bankruptcy a year after I left.
The problem wasn't a flaky O-ring architecture, the problem was a pin-headed manager not wanting to advise NASA to post-pone the launch because the President was going to call to talk to the teacher.
Oh, and the shuttle is a pipsqueak compared to Apollo missions with three stacks of liquids. So the solid fuel is purely down to cost.
I ran the numbers back in the article when El Reg first ran an article about the proposed settlement. The numbers looked to be on the right order of magnitude at the time for the number of people covered in the suit and appropriate increases in wages. And the worker classes necessarily need to be small in these types of cases or the courts throw out the suit because it "doesn't have an identifiable class" or some such. So unless the settlement amount changes from 213M to 2.13B forcing the suit into court is a craps shoot.
I think the 33% is before it goes to trial. After it goes to trial I think the figure goes up to 50%. I don't recall all the exact details, just that it was one of the reasons my Dad settled at a lower rate for a truly open and shut* injury case that was covered by insurance. Going to court risked the whole settlement, delayed payment, and wouldn't have netted him a lot more money because of the increased fees.
*Injury was a vehicle accident (18 wheeler ran a red light and nailed him in his bread truck) which almost cost him his leg. He was lucky. About three cars behind him was a surgeon who had just finished training in a new technique for reconstructing the leg. He took charge at the crash site and ordered the ambulance to his hospital. If the paramedics had taken him to their normal drop off, they would have amputated the leg.
I'm not against SMS or internet per se on the phones, it's the loud yapping I sometimes want blocked. You know the ones, yelling into their bluetooth sets so the person on the other end can hear them better. Granted I would sometimes like the delivery sounds turned off, but if you can disable the calls, you should be able to reset the volume control too.
Yes and no.
Given the filing (and the other good news from SCOTUS), they can't patent the concept of using a muscle like membrane for focusing. They can however patent a specific way of making the muscle like membrane and a specific set of controllers for the membrane, which is what they seem to have done here. I say "seem" because we'll have to wait for them to wield the patent in court before we know exactly what they intend.
Go back to petting your unicorns and hunting Yeti.
You can't even train the average IT people to properly handle all the potential threats out there let alone approaching the average punter. You need a suite of protections. And yes you're always at risk. Yes it sucks. But it is reality. Deal with it.
Back when I was a young 'un and could legally have a demand account, you put money into the bank to protect it and maybe make a bit of money off it. You kept a decent pile of cash for daily things, including the weekly groceries. You wrote a check for your mortgage, your insurance, and maybe a credit card or two. Even if you were going to the after Christmas sales at Sears and JC Penny's to buy clothing you just made a bigger withdrawl from the bank before you went.
These days you put money in the bank for the convenience of payment. Maybe you carry 40 bucks/quid around. Groceries go on the ATM card. Same thing for dinner out, even if it's just lunch at Mickey D's. Maybe you write a mortgage or rent check. More likely it's automatically withdrawn from your account. Same for your utility bills and your 4 or 5 credit cards. And it usually comes with overdraft protection so that when you run out of money at the end of the period you don't get hit with those nasty fees twice over on each bounced check.
Is there something Warner and I don't know about how hard it is to code a transactions system?
Probably. But since I've never done it either I can't tell you what it is.
I can however spot the flaw in your proposal. A flaw that you sir, should have spotted well before you put pen to paper electrons to phosphor as YOU are more the economic expert than I am.
Your transactional bank doesn't solve the problem of the commercial bank, it merely hides it at the Bank of England and pretends to have solved it. The interest payments are still dependent on exactly the things you've eliminated from your transactional bank. You've merely offshore/outsourced them.
While I appreciate the humor, that's the real root of the problem. Too many of us have too much month/half-month/2-week/week left over at the end of our money. So we're all living off rolling short term credit. If you want to rebuild our economy, for a while most of us have to cut back on expenses so we have money left over at the end of the period. And while that is happening the economy WILL contract because we're paying off all those debts we owe. Only once we get back in a position where credit is extended mainly for capital type investments will the economy recover.
Even that isn't simple. For instance back when I was driving my commute time could vary between 40 minutes and 100 minutes excluding days on which there was an actual collision in my travel path. There was a two month period when I was leaving the house at 4:30 am and had the 40 minute commute. Most of the time I left at 6:00 and it took 60 minutes. For 7:30 it was the 100. If it got past 7:30 I waited until 9:00 before leaving.
not sure how you'll count circa 1980 but mine would be:
Mr. Checkett
Mr. Light
Mrs. Lausch.
Mrs. [completely forgot her name]
who were all math teachers at the high school. Checkett and Light had lead on bringing in the TRS after comparing them with an Apple. All of them consulted with Todd B. who was one of my classmates when they got stuck. I was tutored directly by Mr. Checkett as an extra activity without credit from our Probabilities and Statistics class. My friends William and Eric each had an Apple II something and we plotted the sin a/a function on it after working on the problem in Calculus class. Mrs and Mrs told us there was no way to port a disk program [centipede clone] that they ran on the master computer in the classroom to the terminals attached to it. That didn't sound right to us so we got out the manual and were soon all happily playing it on the terminals.
When I got to college and took the intro course it was taught by a woman whose name I have also forgotten. Her I liked a bit more than either of the Mrs listed above. I didn't pursue my initial interest any further because she was honest with me. The next class was a weed out class. It wasn't intended to teach you, it was intended to drive away 5 out of the 6 people who thought they wanted to enter the field.
Probably for the same reason men are attracted to it:
There's no mushy gushy emotional interface. The computer does what you tell it to. Exactly what you tell it to and if it doesn't work it is your fault. You don't develop a relationship with it no matter how much the sci-fi shows try to sexualize it with their holograms and voices. For whatever reason, women are drawn to the emotional bonding. You can get that in PM and marketing, but not so much on the programming side.
Then you are quite oblivious. As a percentage of the US population, they are 4.8% which puts their over representation in that sample at about 5x. I can't tell from your post whether those numbers are applications or actual students.
Oh, there are a real problems.
1) Too many large companies with too much money have been able to buy monopoly service areas in too many parts of the US.
2) All the large carriers are now getting into the content delivery business as well as the service business. This opens a potential pathway for it to be economically feasible to gouge your competitors on the service end.
But reclassifying broadband service as common carrier doesn't nothing to fix the first issue. While it can be argued that it would help with the second, as you have pointed out there are significant costs associated with that, most notably that there will be a decrease in technological innovation as well as a rush to the bottom for service delivery. It seems to be the better solution to the second problem is that your content delivery has to pay the mean cost of your commercial service charges.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/201
Near as I can tell, it says the FCC will set ISP rates instead of the ISPs.
So the question is, who do you want setting your ISP rates? A politician who doesn't know jack about what he's regulating, or the tech company selling the service?