Re: because mine has gone off while complaining of a low battery.
And almost always between the hours of 1 am and 3 am local time. Never 5 pm when it might be convenient to change the battery.
7544 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
When the people doing the hacking are state actors at the Five Eyes level, that looks like an awfully big assumption to me. In which case switching to HTTPS only creates a false sense of security. Switching to HTTPS is probably a good idea for non-state actor malware, but I doubt it's going to help in this case.
but given that they still haven't managed to kill off IE6, I'll take them with a grain of salt.
Google stopped explicit support for IE8 in November of 2012. Our agency outsources to them for mail. Not more than two weeks ago when I was providing an external customer with the credential information for their new account they noticed the unsupported browser notice at the top of their browser window. Yep, his company was still using IE8 because of internally developed applications.
Well it starts with not complying with the police officer's direction. It escalates when you give the cop lip for doing his job. And it's pretty much guaranteed once you assault the police officer.
Yeah, I've been pulled over by the police for speeding. I've always found them polite, direct, and forceful. Pretty much what an officer needs to be these days.
The real problem with PGP isn't the principles behind it, its the same problem that plagues secure web sites: there is no secure but easily used exchange for certificates. We "solved" that problem for websites by designating a couple of suppliers of top level certs, and everybody buys their certs from them. But that approach doesn't readily work for PGP email keys. Maybe Google, Yahoo, and MS could setup some sort of free public storage for certs from which people could download keys, maybe not.
Nope.
First off, in order to be accountable they'd have to have some authority in the company by which they could affect share price.
Next up, you can't be sued for attempting to enforce your civil rights unless in making such attempts you make false allegations.
Not merely not just his friends but truly independent. The problem at the moment as the mayor of the town has noted is that the black community so distrusts the police force they won't apply to work on it. Which means you can't assume they won't be lying if the corroborate the victim's story. In the same way this story broke running under "white racism" they all know what they're supposed to say to back up a brother. Racism doesn't only come in white sheets.
That's Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton, good friend of Jesse "Hymietown" Jackson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley_rape_allegations
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/08/05/209194252/15-years-later-tawana-brawley-has-paid-1-percent-of-penalty
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/jackson.htm
http://ajrarchive.org/article.asp?id=370
Yeah the riot starting race baiters are back.
The only bullshit here is what you are spewing.
Within hours of the event happening the riots started. The police have been on call 24-7 since then. They probably have interviewed the witnesses and their notes are waiting on their desks. Problem is, since they're out on the streets trying to protect the public from looters and worse, their reports aren't getting written so there's no official story yet. And no, the cops' story isn't what is being published. What is being published are the facts that fit the anti-police, racism everywhere meme of the LSM. Even this story doesn't include facts released by the police that show there is more to the story than the neat little template the author and you are using to promote a political agenda that has nothing to do with justice to the cop or the kid who was shot.
People using this phrase are racist. The facts say otherwise. In the 1950s, at the height of Jim crow, arrest rates for blacks were lower than they are now. Poverty was provably higher than it is now. So poverty is NOT the cause of increase arrest among the black population.
You want a better explanation? The rising crime rates among blacks are a result of the racist attitude that they just can't help themselves so their behavior should be excused. It gets damnably worse when it is justified because of "endemic racism in society."
No he isn't. You or I are not expected in the normal course of our jobs to confront situations in which we need to use lethal force to subdue someone. The police have procedures for dealing with such incidents and we do not routinely read their names when they shoot someone.
The names of suspects are only put in the public domain when there is little anticipation of a lynch mob attacking the suspect before a trial is held. That is not the current atmosphere in Missouri, nor even here on the pages of El Reg where the police officer has already been assumed to be guilty. Even within this article there is no mention of the police chief's remarks that the face of the officer involved in the shooting was severely bruised as a result of his encounter with the so called harmless and surrendering victim.
While I find the idea of the post-scarcity economy absurd, the robotic argument assumes robots mine the raw materials. You can equally substitute nano for robots for a different branch of utopianists. The thing is, while we've seen a lot of proto-dystopias, we've never seen a proto-utopia.
The extent to which the decline of the internal market you describe is sort of irrelevant to the larger point anyway. Once GM was solidly a command and control company, it ceased to respond to the market. Today it only exists because it is regarded as "too big to fail" and government stepped in to cover their mistakes.* Indeed, even with its "completed recovery", it isn't clear it's going to make it another 5 years without needing another bailout.
*leaving aside the question of what the opportunity costs of the bailout were, which is a valid concern.
Somebody runs through their data, runs the cost structures, runs payment structures, and calculates the best way to make money.
For small businesses it tends to be more back of the envelop calculations: I expect my typical purchase to be X. My processing fees are 0/.25/.50 per transaction plus 1/1.5/2/2.5% of the transaction. I expect x% charge backs, so that works out to ... +y% per item in costs.
Back when I first did this for a large east coast (US) fannish convention, we worked it out to about 2.3% per transaction for the vendors we chose. We decided to add a 5% processing fee and pocket the difference (additional equipment was needed beyond the vendor charges and they don't want you advertising their exact fees as that constitutes privileged competitive information). And yes, we assessed the 5% on taxes collected as well because the credit card was going to charge us for processing those taxes too.
We remember the past more fondly than it actually was. After Nimoy's stint on Star Trek ended, his next big show was In Search of which pursued exactly the same sorts of junk science only more so: ufos, alien abduction, Bigfoot, and even a couple trips to Ole Blighty looking for Nessie.
Yeah, I took note of that too. That's a line that to me says the only response when plaintiff's lawyers sue you is "Yes sir. How many zeros do you want on the check?"
At this point, I think the best solution is Linwood gets a big check, his record is expunged and he and the BBC part ways. At this point the well is too poisoned for him to work there effectively, even if they replaced all the rest of senior management. And that's assuming he has zero culpability for the failure, a position I don't think any of his defenders have taken.
Oy vey what a mess. Maybe you should just dissolve the BBC and start over. It might be quicker than trying to clean it up.
While both of your comments have some validity, on the whole I'd side with P. Lee. And yes, I have been there.*
There are far too many people in society who are willing to move your thoughtful comments on edge cases away from the edge and into normal for their own selfish purposes. So I believe we must insist the instinct is to always protect life and only deviate from that for the gravest of reasons which have been fully challenged at each step. It may not have been intended, but in the comment to which P. Lee was responding, I read a bit too much of the unrepentant Ebeneezer Scrooge: if they want to kill themselves they'd best get on with it; too much surplus population anyway.
*Still fight it daily in my own way because the neither the drugs nor the talking help beyond what recovery I have made. Not debilitating the way it once was, I'm functional in society and pay my own way. Sometimes I even enjoy myself. I just never forget where the abyss lies and do my best to avoid even fleeting contact with it.
Probably a chicken and egg issue. Mental health issues lend themselves to these destructive behaviors, the behaviors in turn make it more difficult to deal with the mental health issues. Wherever you find addictions you are also likely dealing with obsessive compulsive behavior. Since people are normally only in treatment after something destructive has happened, by the time doctors see it there are usually multiple entangled issues already present. OCB can also manifest itself in other destructive behaviors like gambling, sex, or even excessive online gaming.
Nothing trite about it. Until you deal with the reality I just described you won't be able to help anyone. Quite honestly, I took a fair bit of comfort in those around me with their eyes closed to it. Enough people knew and were trying to help me where they could. If I would have had even more people trying to help me, I like would have gone deeper into depression.
Possibly not as many as you think. Mental illnesses are tricky things. It is possible in the depths of depression for the outpouring of which you speak to make the person feel even more depressed.
I've been there once or twice. Only reason I'm still here is that somewhere deep inside was a will to survive that overrode the impulse to go jump out the window. No, I can't tell you how I finally managed to mostly break its hold. Neither can the doctors. It's not like the physical diseases we've cured where you can measure and test and have established facts when you are done. It's still more art than science no matter how much we'd rather it were science.
Monopolies and the local governments are still a big part of it. True you will get more competition in higher density, higher income areas.
Another factor for Virginia is that as I recall, they're pretty much the biggest transatlantic relay for internet traffic. All the big guys had their headquarters there once upon a time. I think that alone will tend to boost the speeds.
This on the other hand is a very good question. They won't answer it of course, because the elephant in the room is that Amazon doesn't actually give a damn about authors, publishers or readers. They're just intent on dominating the market.
Maybe, maybe not. A great many of them have certainly made a hash of publishing decent books. I never actually entered the writing market although it was once my intended field. I do know from people in the industry that a decent editor is worth his weight in platinum.
But that is actually irrelevant. The relevant question is: Who owns the book? Surely the author is the first person to whom ownership should be assigned. Not the reader, not the publisher, and certainly not Amazon. Now, in order to sell the book the author may have transferred some or all rights for a limited or unlimited time to the Publisher. At which point the publisher has some or complete ownership of the book. Which means Amazon is attempting to extort the publisher and the author who are the actual owners of the book.
Not even necessarily shock but just panic. When I was a teen someone hit a boy riding his bike near our house. My mother went to call the police and couldn't remember the number. They'd just started rolling out the 911 system in our area. She'd gotten a sticker and put it on the phone. That sticker let her make the call.
That's actually a higher standard than NetScout will have to meet. Yes, it is opinion and so due a great deal of deference in the US. But, since Gartner claims to be making a technical assessment they need to be able to show unbiased methods for determining their rankings.
That being said, even the lesser standard NetScout is claiming will be difficult to prove, even if everybody in the industry suspects it is true. At least absent a smoking email.
The problem is with the word "responsible". Unfortunately and all too frequently, there's a difference between having your name on the door and actually being responsible for the project.
From my admitted long distance view on this, it sounds like as the guy with his name on the door as far as he was able to, he acted responsibly. He warned the BBC that the project was off the rails and needed to be canceled or brought under control. Warnings which were promptly ignored by his superiors who told him to carry on with the existing program. Then when the investigators caught the BBC wasting money, they attempted to shitcan him and put all the blame on him, aka scapegoated him.
Wrong problem. I'm familiar with all the accusations you've made. Back when I was playing their games on FB, they made no difference to me. I doubt they would now if I were still playing. Just before I quit playing I had finally cleanup my own finances enough that I was willing to cough up $25 a month to purchase some in game stuff. (I'd also figured out a way I figured my CC info was safe enough when I made the purchase.) So I ought to be exactly the sort of prime customer they are looking for.
So why did I quit? Two reasons:
1. Their server lag got to the point the game was simply unplayable. I'd log in and it would be five minutes before the playing field would display. As I'd be working along on something the server would suddenly reset. And I'd be back to the five minute wait while it loads bit.
2. Instead of letting the focus be on playing the game, it became farming friends to sell you things. Only, once you farmed yourself more than 35 friends playing the game, you discovered you couldn't send stuff to ALL of them, only 35 of them. Also a fair number of the rewards depended on visiting friends farms. That five minute wait listed above? Yeah, it happened each time you visited a friend's farm.
I've used Farmville here as an example, but the rest of their games had similar issues, except for Mafia and Vampire Wars where you didn't visit other people's playing fields, but the rest of the issues were still there.
My retired mother still plays. But they're never going to make a dime off her.
My own thought was that at that point you should lose your copyright protection and the code should become public use. But given the way most people treat open source, Stallman and his acolytes are the only people who would argue against it being mere semantics.
Whether or not a chunk has been abandoned is irrelevant. The monolithic code has been abandoned and it is in the public interest that the monolithic code continue to be supported. Yes, you do need to indemnify the company so that their continued use of a code segment isn't a violation of copyright on the old code, hence my preference for copyright expiration over OSS.
No you went straight to a better word when you defined "tapped": intercepted. And because it is intercepted without either delaying transmission (as would be the case if you intercepted a courier) or trespassing on foreign soil, is not as high a level breach as those operations would be.
Thank-you for the correction on SIN BET and the explanation.
Regulation is also less in the US, although the pols seem to have the petal to the metal in an effort to catch up.
The thing is, for all the benefits you see in those areas comparing the US to the UK, comparing the US to China you'll see the same benefits, albeit sometimes for different reasons.