Re: Technically born in Palestine
Yes - I wondered why the word "Palestine" was omitted in favour of "the country that would become Israel" - six words instead of one, and needlessly complicated.
4162 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
I am of a completely different mind-set to most of the posters so far (11 at the time of writing). There is no such thing as a bad tool - it is the user's intent that defines whether it is used for good or bad. This tool has the potential to great good, as well as [some] harm. Apple's modus operandi seems to be security through obscurity, and if any other company was doing that, they would be slated for it. The best way to attain security is to let a range of enthusiastic people have a crack at whatever the system is.
As far as I can tell, the buy-in is quite low for the online virtualised iOS, with only a custom on-premises setup costing up to a million dollars, which increases the range of people able to use it. Some of those may be bad actors, but, let's face it, they are already trying to get in anyway and Corellium makes no significant difference to that.
Having said all that, Corellium will almost certainly lose the case - the copyright issues seem fairly clear, so unless Corellium has some VERY good lawyers, Apple will walk over them without breaking stride.
"it's incredibly easy to determine who the mother was since they were the one that gave birth."
This has been so obvious to me since my early teens that I still cannot understand why inheritance down the male line began. It is utterly counter-intuitive, and has caused all sorts of harm to societies.
I have genuinely learned something today. I had no idea a) that there was an eggplant (aubergine) emoji, b) that anyone could associate the vegetable with a penis, and c) that the emoji is widely used as a symbol for a penis. I think my utter bewilderment at the human race has hit an all-time high (or low, depending how you look at it!)
"... damned if you do, damned if you don't." So be damned for doing the right thing, not the expedient thing. This is one reason I do not trust the police, and recommend that everyone should take the same stance - they are on no-one's side but their own, followed by that of the Home Office.
Just to underline the comments above - you cannot trust the police or the prosecution services, ever. They are not there in your interest, whether you are the accused or a victim. They exist *only* to serve their own interests and the interests of the governmental department they fall under. This *may* have been different at some time in the past in some places, but not now.
I hate it that I want to trust these bodies, but I can't.
"So, suck it up...I don't care...my bank covers my losses ( it's money they created out of thin air anyway ) and no harm comes of anything.
So, ask yourself, why do you care?"
That is possibly the most depressing post I've read here - worse than code junky and his Brexit crap.
Riot police are objectionable fuckers wherever they are in the world. They do not know the meaning of "proportionate response", simply becoming attack dogs for the Establishment. Let's not pretend that the ones in Hong Kong are any worse than anywhere else.
There is a very small proportion of people in the country who are doing the job they dreamed of. Sometimes, necessity is stronger than desire. Personally, I'd be much happier if my daughter became a lap-dancer than going on benefits - I'd be happier if she became a prostitute than going on benefits, to be honest. Just as long as she doesn't become a politician, I'll be happy.
"Dundee is always "interesting","
You didn't mention the "Dundee left", which involves actually indicating left, then swinging out to the right to make the turn. I have never seen this used by anything other than an artic, previously, but it is common here. When we moved up, I nearly wiped out a number of cars whilst attempting to pass them.
"2% or not the CO2 emmisions from Industry and our over consumption are wrecking the environment for our generations to come."
No, it isn't.
"Our attitude is contributing to melting of polar caps,"
They aren't melting. Some areas are showing some signs, but undersea vulcanism is probably the cause.
" so please think of others and think of your kids , grandkids and their kids."
I do think of my children and putative grandchildren - I don't want them living a hand-to-mouth existence because human-hating Greens have reduced civilisation to prehistoric levels.
I have seen some brilliant stuff on BBC recently, but most of it is CBeebies stuff*! It is rarely watched live (Iplayer or recorded, generally), but "Sarah and Duck" and "Hey Duggee!" are absolutely brilliant.
I've also just finished watching the series of "What we do in the Shadows", which was quite good, but that is an exception these days (on any channel/platform.
*Three-year-olds at home.
"What is society supposed to do with the hopeless rejects?"
People are only rejects because they have been rejected by someone else. Your phrasing is typical of those who think that people choose to have no hope (the "hopeless" in your comment). A society that accepts the notion of "hopeless rejects" is creating them. Don't reject and offer hope, and you will be surprised at the results.
@Ian et al: A lot of people are saying "Ban guns, but you still can't stop people from doing bad things", or similar. The point that Kiwi and others are making is that, whilst it is certainly possible for people to do bad things without guns, it is notable that these things are not happening in the Western world. Taking into account every possible way of doing "bad things", the incidents in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand don't come close to the incidents in the USA by gun alone, by any measure. The fact that some of the "easy" ways of killing lots of people have never (to my knowledge) been used speaks to the fact that they are probably not as easy as claimed.
There seems to be a problem in the USA which is not entirely addressed by the gun issue. That people are willing to go and kill multiple people without some form of radical agenda suggests, as others have mentioned previously in this thread, that there is a serious issue regarding trust. I suspect that there is a vicious circle - "someone might shoot me, so, if I'm in doubt, I'd better shoot them first". Some sort of control on guns might help, but I'm not really convinced - I've posted before that the sheer number of guns in the USA makes it almost impossible to practically control them. There is also the fact that there is a certain amount of pride that the USA has given people unique freedom to own guns, and this forms part of the national psyche. These two things together make me think that the country is a lost cause, and that the rest of the world will just have to look on in horror as men, women and children are gunned down by arseholes with (or without) a grudge. The only hope is for ordinary people to come together and bridge divides, not make them bigger, because government isn't going to do it. You'll find life is much nicer if you trust people.
There is also the issue of health care - especially mental health care. Most pthe Western countries have at least some way to monitor mentally unwell people, and to do something about it. The USA seems fairly unique in its disregard of this vital aspect of people living together (though the UK seems to be trying to emulate quote successfully at the moment).
Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I have dealt with at least two cases directly, and know of a handful more. Police don't tend to prosecute women if there is a complaint - psychiatric services are the first port of call. I'll leave drawing conclusions to others...
@Peter2: I wish I could agree with you about the dossier. Even if I did, I would have to think that the next words would be "It would be a shame if your knowledge of any of this were to come to the public's knowledge, wouldn't it, Minister? What would people think?" Someone senior in the Home Office has a serious obsession with regard to not being able to access everything they think they should be able to, and will do anything to get their own way, regardless of how disproportionate the result.
Whilst I respect your point of view, FoxyFarmer, you have not made any practical suggestions how to deal with this specific health and safety issue. You have simply said "You can't do that!" to everything - some quite correctly, as in this case: deliberately harming any living creature is wrong whilst there are other options available. If you have any suggestions to help, please give them. If not, then you will just be ignored.
Shuffle steering is fine for when everything is in control, but hopeless when things deviate suddenly. I took advanced driving classes some years ago (taught by police drivers - i.e. the "White Caps"), and during one of the classes got chatting to the instructor about my rally driving. He said, without any leading, that I should remember that what I was learning on the course was good, but that I was probably more advanced than most advanced drivers simply because I know what a car will do when it is "loose" and also have better appreciation of the energy inherent in a moving vehicle. He also said that police drivers tend to drop the shuffle when it all kicks off because it is too slow to respond to changes in situation. As long as both hands are controlling the car (including changing gear), there isn't much can go wrong, he reckoned - though he didn't seem to be taking Murphy into account with that comment!
Bravo, Rich 11! The sanctimonious AC raised very similar thoughts in my head. It isn't what MPs do, it is what they don't do that makes them worthy of despite. There probably are some good ones, but those that get cabinet posts are never the good ones. They are ruthless individuals who put themselves first, the Party second, and everything else does not count. There isn't a single Brexiteer MP who actually thinks that leaving the EU is good for the country, for example (or, if there is, they've made a poor job of articulating it).
I have considered going into politics nany times, but having to be aligned with a Party, and having to parrot a particular line whether I believed it or not just to get selected for a seat isn't me. If there was any real chance of an independent getting in, I'd be standing like a shot. I will not support an inherently broken system of political parties, though.