Re: Affordability my arse
>>Fingerprint sensor that looks like it might actually be useful (for unlock and app purchasing) - AND might actually work,
> Rather than pins, passwords, gestures, etc... which all DO actually work?
.. and which are forgotten, copied, written on sticky pads etc etc. Usual for and against arguments apply.
>>All-new 64bit SoC - pretty damn amazing in a PHONE, FFS
> - pretty damn demented in a PHONE, FFS
Matter of opinion, see next for a possible use of all that power. Personally, what I see happen here is exactly what happened when Psion went from 8 bit organisers to SIBO (16 bit organiser): deployment in an easy device before expanding the technology through the range. Is the iPad 64bit? If not, I know where this chip will show up next.
>>Separate motion co-pro means future accessories won't need to fire up the whole A7 to get their thing on, sounds innovative to me...
> Can't see much purpose in making the handset constantly aware of it's motion while it's dormant. Isn't that what wearable stuff is supposed to be about doing better anyway?
Not dormant, but not in need of A7 processing - it's a subsystem. Duh. Same reason you have a separate graphics card which kicks the crap out of your main processor when it comes to chewing on graphic calculations. One of the possible reasons for this is ..
>>Camera that will probably take better pics than your average $150 compact,
> A joke? Any $150 compact will wipe the floor with your $700 iShiny.
.. the camera stabilisation. The idea of taking a couple of images with motion data attached is new, because acquiring and processing that data takes power too - hey, hello, a subsystem suddenly makes sense. And not having moving parts like gyros means less mechanics, ergo less risk of mechanical failure.
Oh, and ever tried to make calls with a $150 compact? No? Funny that.. I'm Ok with sensible arguments, yours aren't.