Do they never learn?
It's obvious, if a girl looks like she's 21, she's really 15.
3725 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2009
When I make source available for other people, I go out of my way to make it as easy as possible to build, aiming to get it down to a single file to double-click/run/execute/etc. I really hate it when I pick up some source from somewhere and I have to spend several days just getting it into a state when I can get it to build.
The thing I really hate is when the documentation outright LIES. I don't call it "wrong", it's plain and simpel LYING.
Eg: (blah blah....) drop down, select 'Import All'
THERE IS NO "IMPORT ALL" OPTION!!!!11111!1!!!11!1
Several frustrated days of back and forth with the "further up" helpdesk... Oh, you have to have permission XYZ to do that.
WTF!?!!!??!?!?!?! First rule of interfaces: If an option is unavailable, MAKE IT VISIBLE SO YOU F*********ING WELL KNOW IT'S THERE BUT UNAVAILABEL!!!!!!!!
I aim to get instructions down to a single page of A4 so it doubles as a checklist you can tick off as you go (or fill in details, eg user's name, user's logon name, user's email address, etc), and anything that's too long to fit as an aide memoir is referenced to supplementary sheets. Once you've gone through it a few times ticking off while refering to the supplementary sheets, you only need them for occasional reminders.
So, eg:
Update A/D user details with (see D):
name, building, address, email address, change password:Yes
With D saying something like:
Start->Admin Tools->Active Directory Users and Devices->RunAs->your admin ID
View -> Turn Advanced Settings on
blah.thing.uk->North->Yorkshire->(site)->(user)->Menu:Properties
General: name, job title, site
Address: site address
Account: etc etc etc (I'm working from memory)
Most of the time once you're familiar the two lines in the checklist is enough, but every now and then you have a brain fart and think: where's the proxy address? WTH is it???? Check notes, ah! Dammit, need to bloody turn bloddy advanced bloddy view on.
Well, he had not been told anything about shutting down the system, and the documentation for 'reload' didn't mention anything about shutting down the system. Fault in the documentation, not with Sam.
I've (re)written loads of procedures like this, and specifically include such "common sense" instructions specifically because if you're coming with no prior knowledge, then it isn't common sense. Some even start with "remove equipment from box".
I remember this biting me way back in the early 1990s. Cleaning the drum(?) in a laser printer. I followed the instructions in the documentation.Took shiney rolly bit out, put it to one side. Read next paragraph, start digging into printer to remove next part. Mini-boss came past: DON'T EXPOSE THAT TO LIGHT! IT WILL DESTROY IT!!!! covering it with a towel. Me: How would I know that? Where does it say it???? There's no warning. Flips over two or three pages, and there it is.
"Basically, the court said that health care is a state matter, not a federal matter."
Slight correction, basically the supreme court said that health care is a politician matter, not a court matter. The report even explicitly states that it could be federal politicians, not just state politicians.
"But when it comes to creating new rights, the Constitution directs the people to the various processes of democratic self-government contemplated by the Constitution—state legislation, state constitutional amendments, federal legislation, and federal constitutional amendments"
DOBBS, ETC, page 127.
The invention of the tractor allowed the creation of the NHS.
When you have 80% of the population scraping a living out of the dirt, you don't have any population surplus for a mass healthcare service, or anything else of modern comfortable society. Reducing the amount of human labour needed in mundane tasks releases that human labour for more valuable tasks, even if those more valuable tasks are cleaning people's bums and lifting them in and out of bed. We can afford to have armies of skivvies feeding Grandma her gruel, in the indoors out of the rain, because that army of skivvies isn't toiling away in the fields instead, outside, getting rained and snowed on.
The problem is it's only six inches tall and human's eyes are about five feet above the ground. Humans navigate on autopilot by subcounciously scanning stuff at eye level with the subcouncious trained-by-experience that there will be nothing to trip over if the eye level is not blocked. These things will be a damn danger. People'll be tripping over them all the time as there's no eye-level warning that they're there. Just like bloody rugrats and yappy mutts that careen through your feet with no visible indication they're there. Human workers will be have to counciously force themselves to unlearn their toddlerhood and force themselves off autopilot and have to forever look at their feet to check they're not about to trip up.
90% of ads are wasted, the problem is in knowing which 90%. Which is why the holy grail of advertising is finding a method of targetting ads to those who will be receptive to them. The more that human legislators insist that targetting methods perform the way they insist they should rather than the way that results in the targetting working, the more useless that targetting becomes, the crappier the end-user experience as 90% of the content flung at them is irrelevent to them. Do you really want to be advertising fly fishing equipment in Railway Today just because legislators insist that's "fair"?
"They did various ECONET servers in pizza box cases, but they were basically just Master Compacts badged and tweaked to act as ECONET file servers."
No they weren't, they are completely different machines, completely different motherboard, completely different boxes. You're close to comparing a printer with a radio just because they both have transisters inside.
Well, until he turned up in person with proof that has was the appointed LPA holder, the bank were unable to officially action the fact that his LPA had ceased. And once he had proved has was the LPA, the bank could officially recognise his Mum was dead and officially refuse to take any notice of what he was saying as his LPA was not longer active, and so officially ignore the information that his Mum was dead.
At some point the crowbar of common sense has to be wedged into the spirals of officialness.
I had a temporary position recoving the IT business processes after one of those. In this case reasonably simple things like "how to create a new user, how to allocate a phone, how to register them in the Spam system, what the naming convention is, what the server paths are". Yes, and crucially, where the passwords are stored. Everything was in the former IT's head, I spent four (half) weeks recovering them and Writing Them Down, and proofing them by implementing them a couple of dozen times and refining them.
And one thing many people seem to forget - ensuring all the documentation had the path to itself in the footer of the documents, so they were re-findable from a printout..
The WTO is in the business of reducing and eliminating tariffs and minimising exceptions, not imposing them. So the current situation is not a case of "exempting" data from tariffs, but the default position of *banning* tariffs on data if you want to be compliant with WTO rules. Countries like India are petitioning to get the WTO to move their trade rules backwards into a trade tariff environment.
Asimov got there first, a short story where USR addressed the growing public opposition to robots by developing minimalist insect robots that had such a small set of functions that the Three Laws could be trimmed down considerably, allowing for smaller and cheaper robots. Can't remember the name, and can't track it down.
Yerwot? The very first thing I did with Windows XP was set up separate user and admin accounts. Automatic instinctive behaviour from 20+ years before, starting with networked Beebs. Applications live in Read-Only areas with Access=PublicRead only. Before then I was continuously frustrated by Windows' inability to catch up with other systems.
It's not neccessarily things like styles and formatting, my biggest bugbear is that different versions of Word treat page layout differently. A programatically-generated document with (eg) 78 lines of text per page that looks fine on WordXX breaks on Word XX+0.1 with some internal rounding going the opposite way somewhere and the 78th line in every column bumping over into the next column, running all the way through the document, so you end up with the last lines on page Q across the top of page Q+1.
I'd bet it was some internal inches vs millimetres thing.
AC wasn't talking about the government deciding how many children you have, just providing financial incentives/disincentives to personal choice. Just as there's a financial incentive to put today's income into a pension and spend it later instead of spending it today. That's not the government deciding how you spend your money, just providing incentives and disincentives to your personal choices.
Having been happily(ish) using Zoom for the last three years of lockup for parish council meetings, I'd got used to being able to set my display name appropriate for the meeting, eg "Myname (Chair)" or "MyName (Dibley PC)". I've just started a new (public sector) job and we use Teams for team meetings. I naturally started looking to try and find how to set my display to "Myname (Field Tech)", but got further and further lost trying to find how to do it. I eventually browsed online to find out, only to discover "Only the administartor can set up users' Teams display name when creating the user account".
WTcompleteF?