Re: Don't forget mischief
Ooo, I don't like the fixing method. That screw is right in the centre of the "DO NOT!" protected zone, it would go straight through the feed cable. I'd fail any installation with those.
3718 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2009
Ooo, I don't like the fixing method. That screw is right in the centre of the "DO NOT!" protected zone, it would go straight through the feed cable. I'd fail any installation with those.
I first read MMM at university in the 1980s, and halfway in I was amazed by a Heinlein extract that I'd read just a few weeks earlier, clearly describing process management fourty years earlier. The best bit:
Engineer: Sorry, I dozed off.
Boss: That's why I got you a couch. If ever you're tired, lock the office door and have a nap.
A master quoting another master.
It's been clear for over a decade that the computing "biz" has become the same as the car business in the 1950s. What do you do when *everybody* has a car/computing device? They're manufactured so well, they essentially never wear out and need replacing. There's nobody left to sell to. What you do then is persuade people that last year's product is crap and needs replacing for the sole reason that it's last year's product.
I read through instructions before starting to discover what I will need before I get there. And in documentation I /write/, the first paragraph is a list of the things you will need later on. Get user's name and birthday. Prepare username in this format, prepare password in this format, prepare email address in this format. Prepare display name in this format. etc. /Then/ the rest of the instructions.
Documentation that does not match reality is worse than lying, it's outright FRAUD.
Select "bulk import", select "Choose file"....
THERE
IS
NO
'CHOOSE FILE'
OPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
One of these days I'm going to visit London, find the people responsible for our software and educate them with a two-by-four. There. Will. Be. Blood.
Suppliers just don't seem to understand they have corporate customers, paying them millions of zarbles. When working in the NHS we were supposed to be able to return unworkable brand new kit, but the contact line to return DOA kit treats you as a PC World consumer. "I need to return this laptop for DOA replacement". Have you tried to turn it on? "I've taken it out of the box, it's DOA". Have you tried pressng this when... "I've taken it out of the box, it's DOA". Please try plugging in a different monitor "I've taken it out of the box, it's DOA". Please try... "Look, I've got 499 other laptops to image, I'm not shitting about with ONE laptop trying to get it working, LET ME BOOK THE DAMN DOA!!!!"
More and more of these things are pissing off corporate IT Admins as the users don't know what on earth is happening, and think it must be something to do with their job, and click and follow and allow stuff, and we have to keep chasing our tails getting rid of it all.
Just last month, *something* changed in Outlook because Microsoft were pushing it through updates, and some users were blithely clicking on things "oh, it's The Computer, it must be what I have to do".
(checks notes) Ah, that's it. Microsoft "Improved" Outlook by moving the toolbar from the bottom of the lefthand pane to its own immovable pane. We had users booking tickets saying they couldn't remember how /they'd/ "messed up", and could we fix it for them. To which we were forced to answer: No. MS have buggered it up, there's nothing we can do about it. After hours and hours of trying, and eventually tracking down exactly WTF had actually happened.
At the start of the Great Lockdown my parish council started doing remote meetings. We started with Teams, but it was so crap we tried Zoom instead - and have kept doing so. £144 a year licence is quite affordable to use and a lot of smallers parishes.
There's loads of stuff Zoom doesn't do, won't do, gets wrong, is badly implemented, but it's miles better than Teams. Until last month it even still worked on my old XP Dev machine.
Gawd, builders!
At one site I'd done the first fix electrics, routing all the power cables as per protected zones (straight lines in line with outlets) ready for plastering. The next day I found the plasters had somehow chopped through a cable, and in order to refix it had pulled it on a straight diagonal and just managed to tightly rewire it. So it was now "invisibly" routed (in an area I knew would end up with wall fixings being drilled in), and with strained connections. I sighed, chopped out the damaged cable, re-chased their plaster, and replaced it with a new length correctly routed.
you have 1-2 strong core skills but you'd better be ready to be a jack-of-all-trades and willing to try anything
True, but employers refuse to see it that way. "You're applying for a Bamble-Weezle 2.5 development job? But your last job was Bamble-Weezle 2.495 development. F*** off".
What do they mean "provide" fax services? The telephone providers are in the business of providing a sound link from point A to point B; as long as that exists, you can send a fax, as faxes are - like any other data sent over a 'phone line - just data encoded into sounds. If you can /speak/ over a phone connection, you can send a fax over a phone connection.
weeee wah weeee wah kudung kerdung bzzzzzz weeeee...
Tax reformers have been campaigning for ages to have income taxed where it's generated, not where the owner lives. This capitulation to demands by the mob to tax where the owner lives instead has completely destroyed decades of work. The profits of the Facebooks and Googles of this world will now be entirely taxed in the USA instead of here.
Oh yes, I agree that in-year adjustments are a bit messed up, but the once-a-year end-of-year submission works perfectly adequately enough. I suppose I could look at having the wrong tax code as a government-enforced saving scheme. ;) Not so good if your code is too low though. But at least they are sensible enough that if you owe up to £500 they just add it onto next year's tax code.
Having just submitted my tax return, I think the HMRC website gets this about right. All the data input and presentation is in web/html. You can jump back and forth, you aren't blocked from filling page 6 because you haven't done page 5 yet. When completed you can review everything in web/html, with an option to download a PDF version as an offline reference. Which I do, print off, and file away, because I'm like that.
Please, HMRC, your submission website works! Yes, there are niggly flaws, but please, don't let the consultants and politicians nag you into "making it better" and breaking it. It's fine as it is.
"Similarly, your construction worker could be putting in a day shift on one site before wandering across town for an evening shift on another site. Night courts are also a thing in some parts of the world, so your barrister may also be able to flit between day and night jobs..."
When do they sleep?
All the above use human visual face-to-face verification. For a computer to verify somebody, all it has to go on is the sole piece of data "I am 18+". There is *NO* other data to work on, *ALL* other supporting data boils down to a repetition of the single piece of data "I am 18+".