The answer to creepy always-on audio surveillance devices is simple: Do Not Buy.
There, fixed it for you.
2630 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jan 2009
...the military is also said to reverse-engineer alien tech...
Indeed, they did. And after years and years of reverse engineering they found -an re-engineered- Farcebook and Zuck. Unfortunately, the alien translator service wasn't that quick. And only thereafter deciphered the accompanying letter: "This is a serious risk of hugely dumbing down our society. Remove and dispose of as far away as alienly possible!".
Bummer.
A cynic might suspect Microsoft had deployed similar tech in its occasionally wobbly products...
I did it again. I used MS Word for writing more than, well, just a word. Silly me, I dared to having it compare two documents. Inevitably it crashed and while it tried to recover the file I skived off to El Reg to read today's Who, me?
Icon for Word, certainly not the column.
Not that I'm qualified to answer but within this context that should be perfectly acceptable. Trump, I think it is fair to assume, contains some form of neural network. And from my limited experience, that neural network behaves scarily similar to one artificial neural network that I built about twenty years ago.
It was a simple one, very trivial: input/output field was something like an six-by-six dot matrix and it was trained to recognise single-digit numbers 0 to 9. It did reasonably well for an experiment. But it had one major flaw: whatever the input was (maybe even for a blank matrix), it would always "recognise" a number. So, from a rather high number of stimuli, the output was limited to a very small number of possible reactions - but it would always and instantly react.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and flies like a duck, it probably is a duck. Problem is, the 737 Max looks like a 737 but doesn't quack like one and, crucially, doesn't fly like one. For fuck's sake, skip this mess of a system and just train the pilots to fly the bloody thing! Oh, too expensive, you say.
Years ago, in a different life of wearing uniforms...
We had been operating a comms relay station in a remote and presumably rather safe location. One lazy afternoon, one of our microwave links went down. That wasn't so unusual and I sent a team to check antenna and amplifier which were a few hundred metres away. As I talked to them on the phone, trying to isolate the problem, he suddenly said: "WE'RE UNDER ATTACK" And the line went down.
In the end all of us were fine. But somehow I'm still amazed how quickly a whole, snoozing squad can reply.
@Unicornpiss
"...they really didn't innovate, but instead built on others' inventions..."
That is pretty much the definition of innovation: improve an existing product, combine existing products in new ways. I didn't expect to find myself ever in the position of defending Apple. But even I have to admit that they had been a very innovative company. They didn't invent graphical user interfaces, touchy screens and, contrary to popular believe, not even squares with rounded corners, mp3 players or the lowercase letter i. Apple though took those things and a few and innovated them into a new and in many ways better experience than what the single inventions had been before.
This is innovation. Or, in the case of Apple, was.
I missed that one. But loaded the executable of Windows (3.11 or 95, maybe both - it's long since) in a hex editor and searched for clear text strings. And replaced some of those with something "funny" (probably juvenile) - to no consequences, at least not for me.
But can someone explain me how it was possible to lock down Win3.11? From what I remember we all where admins and could change the desktop background. And much else.
I fully understand the virtues of running a more independent infrastructure - just consider, e.g. the recent allegations and discoveries regarding Cisco and Huawei products respectively. That is one thing. It is a completely different matter though to oblige all ISPs to connect via pootynet routers.
I'm just not able to appreciate such and can't resist my inner evil that says: sod off, you feckin' sinister control freaks!
I consider myself not too gullible regarding conspiracy crap but I'm more than willing to have a go.
rather odd to see the US administration lean on its allies to ditch Huawei gear apparently out of fears of Chinese snooping via backdoors
There's nothing odd. It's not that the others' backdoors are so bad. The true evil is that our (i.e. US origin) backdoors aren't disseminated as is intended.
A fucking idiot?
Yes, most likely. But a raging fucking idiot, that is. He probably found that his expensive MBA wasn't worth quite what he had expected. Had he learnt something useful during his studies he would have known other -better- means of revenge than this pathetic act of vandalism.
How can you govern a country that has two hundred and forty-six varieties of cheese?
Well, I don't know how many but I believe that the British Isles produce a larger variety of cheese than France. As of late this just confirms what de Gaulle said though.
Edit: the British Cheese Board states over 700 British named cheeses. There you go, "mange ça!"
The whole Internet stands on my first 6.199.067
Right. Let me get this straight. Mentioned patent was filed in 1999. And the Internet, obviously since it stands on it, was created shortly thereafter. It all makes perfect sense! And I claim license fees for using my patented moroness. Prior art, you say? Bummer.