Huh?
Since when did homage mean clueless scorn?
4662 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
"To make it manageable, the content will need to be highly compressed and the advantage of 4k starts to diminish."
I'd say the advantage of 4k starts to diminish at about 3 to 4 feet on the 56" OLED screen mentioned in the article.
Consider that a 56" 16:9 screen would be a tick under 49" wide and that 4,000 pixels across that width would provide 50 pixels per degree (ppd) at a distance of about 29 inches. Knock it back to 35 inches and that jumps to about 57.4 ppd and going all the way back to 51 inches pushes it over 78 ppd. At a typical viewing distance, for the sake of defining a convention let's call it twice the diagonal measure of the screen, 112 inches this becomes 162.7 ppd. Now then, unless you have exceptional visual acuity or like to sit rather close to the set all those extra pixels aren't really getting you a better picture because the resolution of the eye starts to peter out in the 50 to 60 ppd range.
To put this into perspective at 10 inches distance, the iPhone 5 and 4 gives 57.4 ppd and 55.4 ppd respectively. Likewise the Galaxy 4S with an impressive 1920 pixels across its 5" screen gives 78.1 ppd at the same 10 inches which is double the diagonal measure of the screen. So how far away would these phones have to be to give the same 162.7 ppd of the 4k TV? 21.1 inches for the S4 and 28.6 for the iPhone 5. I don't know too many people who complain about the crappy pixelated display on these phones and most people won't see the difference.
One last kicker, the above defined convention of a viewing distance that is twice the screen diagonal is fairly arbitrary but what it does is make the visual area constant among devices. In the first paragraph with the 56" TV at a 35 inch viewing distance would be like holding an iPhone 5 a mere 2.5 inches from your pupil and yet the picture would be just as clear as the phone would be at 10 inches. Perhaps I'm just a half blind clueless git but I don't much see the point of 4k TV on anything but an absolutely giant set that is to be watched from a considerable distance.
This isn't Chromecast vs AppleTV it's Chromecast vs AirPlay. Sure AppleTV may be 7 years old as you say but AirPlay has only been around since 2010. I suppose it is possible, albeit implausible, that Apple actually had AirPlay in the AppleTV and didn't mention it for the first four years.
Don't forget that Google will also have a database filled with your watching/listening preferences since it will know everything that has passed through your Cast device. If you like suspense thriller type movies expect to see more ads for the most recent releases of that genre in your next Google search. Who knows, perhaps it will even prod you for a rating on the last movie you saw when you log into G+. Either way, don't you worry about Google I'm sure they have several people working on new and exciting ways to monetize this piece of kit.
I did find it a little disturbing that developers have to have their Cast device whitelisted to use the SDK so it's clear that Google is keeping a firm grip on the little dongles. On a side note; they wouldn't have accidentally left testing code that reports your WiFi passphrase back to home base and wind up with their streetview cars accidentally logging into your secure WiFi, would they? Nah, why would they since they already have their spy fly on the wall. Hmm, did Darpa fund this?
The spawn of satan, Troll or Black helicopter? Since there's no tin foil hat, let's go with Troll.
Remember this is a survey about "Brand Equity" which Harris defines as "a brand's Equity is determined by a calculation of Familiarity, Quality and Purchase Consideration."
Since AT&T is likely to be very familiar to most folks and given limited number of national networks it is obviously in contention of purchases. Also note that just because they ranked above the category average it doesn't mean it is well loved it just means it's not most hated.
That only works if the real terrorists who use fear and loathing to manipulate the population are recognized for what they are. Unfortunately since they have the triumvirate of the podium of the media, considerable majorities in both the House and Senate and control the Executive branch that isn't likely to happen any time soon.
"Surprisingly, California didn't even make it into the top 10 states for broadband speeds."
Having lived in three of the aforementioned places it isn't surprising to me. Consider I went from a fair speed in NH at 5 Down/2 Up Mbps (3,000 people in 46 sq. miles) to RI at 7-8D/3U Mbps (3,500 people in 29 sq. miles) and now finally in the purgatory that is So Cal. at 2-3D/0.2U Mbps (50,000 people in 6 sq. miles) and each costing $49.99/mo. Wireless coverage is better here in SoCal but the speeds aren't worth crowing about. In short, as populations and population densities go up the network gets saturated and there isn't enough money in rolling out more bandwidth for the same price because both of my current choices are satisfied with the status quo. When I dumped one for the other, they didn't even ask why I was dropping them because they don't really care whereas in both NH and RI they were interested if I was switching carriers, moving or if they could provide a less costly option. Simple supply and demand really, when the supply of customers is high and suppliers low there isn't much demand to listen to customer complaints.
Time out. Stop the fight! Call the ref!
So the missus was complaining her computer was too slow and naturally I ordered all the expensive necessary components which amounted to not a case, keyboard nor power supply but everything else including the latest DVD press of Windows 7 Ultimate because nothing less will do and since I let her try out Blue for a week while I researched parts. This past week the parts truck made several stops and I had everything on hand for build up this very morning. Shockingly flawless and smooth build with the exception of a 2.5 to 3.5 adapter for the SSD but it was easy enough to gut an old CD rom and mount it in the tin box as I'm not the type to drop everything and hit the store for some 20 cent bent metal bracket. It was actually a fairly zen until...
Ok, this is where I have to pitch my bitch. WTF is wrong with MS? I mean doling out DVDs with Windows 7 SP1 is absolutely daft. I understand the push is all for Wait W8 is on and W8 SP1, aka Blue, is nearly cooked but what about those of us who shouldn't really have a need to slipstream W7? You can still buy it brand new in the box both retail and OEM so what's the excuse? I had what was perhaps the smoothest build ever only to install Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 and run Windows Update only to find it needed 135 updates totaling 889 MB. No shit, nearly a fucking gig of updates. Now I've only got a $50 per month internet budget which means even if FIOS was available I couldn't have it.
I'm just saying, would it kill them (MS) to put out SP2 that we could either download or better yet buy? It isn't like W7U is $19.99 because if it was I'd keep my damn mouth shut but to ask for that kind of commitment for a single update session is nuts. Worst yet, I know that the instant it is finished I'll have to run it again since I'm sure there will be some updates that are dependent on earlier ones. Sorry, had to share the pain but on the bright side here it's 5:02 PM now, so time for cocktails and I know the perfect bottle of anejo.
"... not up as much as someone in 'Yahoo! Finance' thought they should be. Yes, that august body Yahoo! Finance."
Minor point but it isn't "someone" but merely that Yahoo reports the average, high and low estimates of analysts covering a particular stock. Those analysts are someones actually employed by the likes of Barclays Capital, Standpoint Research, BMO Capital Markets, Oppenheimer and UBS to name but a few. Also have a look at the "No. of Analysts" reported by Yahoo for each and you'll see that the Google statistic includes 40 analysts and Microsoft's has 31 analysts. As to why Yahoo! reports these numbers that are clearly integers with two decimal places in the earnings estimate befuddles me and that is especially true since in the revenue estimate it is displayed correctly.
Quick question, given the Lion download is a problem, is it the Apple store, the size of the download, the dodgy connection or a combination that is the main headache? I'm just curious if you wanted to be able to buy discs for a few bucks or wanted a smaller download or something you could do in chunks as available.
As for the rest of the questions. Are you up for compiling? Are you interested in keeping the older hardware alive and up to date as well as the newer MacBook?
Going cross platform limits your options somewhat distribution wise but it allows you to get your feet wet on the iBook before fully committing your main hardware. If that's the case and you don't mind the occasional compile, although the porting systems make this fairly painless, then I'd say your best bets are Gentoo Linux or [Net, Open, Free]BSD. Some others around here may know of other Linux distributions that are x86 and PPC friendly but when I still had an iBook it seemed that they all dried up except for Gentoo and I stopped looking when the iBook died.
Now then, for your iPod, you can try amarok, atunes, rhythmbox, yamipod, or banshee to name a few and if you're really game I understand there is a version of rockbox under development for the iPod classic.
From the US EPA webpage on Depleted Uranium Projectiles
"Be Informed -- Although DU poses little risk when outside the body, DU has about as much toxicity as other heavy metals, like lead. Because DU can cause kidney or other damage if inhaled, ingested in large amounts or at high velocity, it should be avoided by humans and animals."
Well, more or less. Still, how quaint.
"A 2010 survey of E-rate applicants revealed that half had internet connections that were slower than the average American home"
So how does their speed rate against the speed of the median American home? I have to figure the home net connections of Larry Ellison, Sergei Brin, et al does a bit to skew the speed of the average American home. Would it be too presumptuous to assume that homes without fixed, even broadband perhaps, internet access aren't included in the sample?
"Moreover, the agency's own survey indicates that 80 percent of schools and libraries believe that their broadband connections do not meet their current needs."
Given similar self evaluations, what percentage of home users think their internet connection meets their current needs? Personally since my upload speeds are on par with, if not slower than a good dialup connection I would say it doesn't but then I live with it because a subsidy isn't forthcoming based on my opinion.
Meh, just work a deal with Google, high speed internet and monitoring for the school in exchange for ads with little pop-ups of content here and there. Have to prepare these kids for the future, right?
Consider the following:
Case 1: In California folks steal plates just to avoid paying tolls. The ideal trick is to steal a front plate from a similar car that uses the FasTrak auto-pay transponder so when the thief goes through a toll the system matches the plate and figures 'oh the transponder didn't register we'll just bill it the the registered account' and nobody ever catches on until the victim either realizes they are paying a fortune to travel a road they don't use or they get a ticket for not having a front plate.
Case 2: My sister's beau had his car stolen in San Francisco where they live but they didn't get the transponder since they had it with them while they were out in the other car. The thieves used the car to cross the Bay Bridge for several weeks before finally dumping it in Oakland. The FasTrak system continued to bill his account for the bridge tolls via the camera knowing the car was stolen and not informing the police about what was an obvious commuter hour pattern. Several months later he started getting notices for dozens of unpaid parking tickets in Oakland which allowed him to find his car and call his insurance company to let them know where they could pick it up as they had already paid him for it. That was in February, he is still trying to sort it all out.
Moral: The system is designed to make money and you are forced to be a customer if you own a car. Nobody cares who you are or what you do as long as someone pays the bill. The "safety" in traffic safety cameras refers to keeping revenue safe, nothing else.
So exactly how does Mr. Rothenberg define liberty and freedom? Certainly if he is free to cast his cookies about then someone else if equally free to burn them. Perhaps he welcomes the tons of junk mail that comes to his door and maybe he would appreciate little gps trackers in every piece of junk mail he must love to carry around. Personally, I keep a shredding bin right next to the inbox and it probably digests a good 95% of all snail mail. Now all I need is a device that can automatically sort and shred. I'd just skip the sorting altogether if it weren't for those occasional but still pesky jury duty notices.
Yes, but at a system level you still have to account for the internal resistance of things like the battery and the traces on the circuit board. Also notice I didn't bother to mention that power also goes with CV2f although rightly I should have since it could easily be the dominant term given the theoretical voltage disparity if we assume the capacitance and clock frequency of both circuits were similar.
That said, I don't believe for an instant that they were measuring the current of the actual chip alone. It looks like they simply took the current of the entire device and subtracted off the current used by the display to get around the obvious disparity in in the screen sizes.
So the average nickel plated neodymium magnets aren't up to Apple's aesthetic snuff but a shiny coat of aluminum is novel enough for a patent? Clearly I need to run out and patent a copper washed neodymium magnet as well as brass, bronze, titanium, chrome, teflon, glass, porcine maquillage, ad infinitum.
I think it would handle the spin rather easily. I assume it uses technology similar to that used in DARPA's Samarai UAV by Lockheed which produces some rather impressive video considering it's little more than a single rotor blade.
That's my main IPv6 hurdle. Every piece of kit I have, even the printers, claim to be IPv6 ready except one and that is the one that my ISP, which is spelled with a v, makes me use to connect to their network. Sure, they will let me buy my own, no discount, but it has to be one of three approved models more or less identical to the unit I have. As you say, the box on the edge. I'd wager the stumbling block is that ISPs don't want to change their kit and have to retrain the service techs and deal with the support calls from customers who want to blame the 'new' protocol for their misconfigured [game, email, armadillo].
"Today's middle-bell computing consumers feel liberated from the thrall of geeks, I think..."
I think that is partially true but, speaking as someone who spent nearly two decades being the geek of the family, isn't it also partly the result of the exasperation of the geeks resulting in trying to make systems idiot proof? I imagine computer companies aren't any different since part of their quest is to reduce the number of tech support calls to zero. The ultimate goal is to have a 1/0 switch and [magic happens here] we get exactly what we want. I don't think anyone would complain, even Trevor, as long as the magic works but that's the problem. The magic too often doesn't work because the current attempts at magic are all misdirection without the amazing part.
Hmm, "Exasperation of the Geeks" isn't a bad movie title but it sounds a bit too much "Revenge of the Nerds" meets "The Net" meets "Plan 9 from Outer Space" for a general release so a porn movie perhaps.
There is also the existing security camera that could easily be purposed to spot and indicate a bare shelf to the folks in the stock room so the fleshy checking to see if those legs go all the way up that short skirt carefully overseeing store security isn't troubled by naked shelf warnings.
"I rather suspect that it'll be easier to keep upright (or even self-right) than a very tall robot on a small wheeled base."
Actually it's best to have the center of gravity as high as possible for balancing as it makes it easier to move the support under center and the added length means the moment of inertia is working in favor of not tipping. You can demonstrate this yourself by trying to balance different length sticks on your finger. A short pencil is particularly hard to balance but a long broomstick is considerably easier. Likewise, if you have a single stick with a weight that can be moved from top to bottom you can notice that it does get easier as the weight is moved up the stick.
I've got nothing against them using solar power. If they want to be "green" because they think it's the right thing to do and spend only their own massive stockpile of cash then fine. I just think it's disingenuous to say, "Oh look how green we are!" when they are doing it for the tax breaks which I don't think should be subsidized by everyone else.
Consider both Uncle Sam and Nevada are going to give them tax breaks with Nevada's going on top of the taxes they won't pay on the utility bill. How many of the same people who rail against Apple and Google not paying their "fair share" of taxes think it's fine to get a tax break when doing solar because it's the "right thing to do"? My problem is that taxes is a zero sum game so in order for someone to win (pay less) someone else has to lose (pay more) because we know as sure as the sun is coming up tomorrow that the government isn't going to spend less because Apple got a tax break.
I'm against it because I don't believe in the government redistributing wealth especially when that flow is toward the rich multinationals like Apple. Don't get me wrong, I know it probably won't be me who has to pay extra because the government has this nasty habit of spending now and paying later by way of deficit spending to pass the buck to the next generation. In short, Apple and their government lackeys aren't picking your pocket they're picking your children's pocket and "won't someone think of the children!"