Re: Wow
I don't mean to scare anyone but he'll be old enough in 71 days.
4662 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
I think to shift the whole spectrum they would have to change the refractive index of the vitreous as it would change the wavelength of the light as it hit the retina. It would also introduce an optical distortion at the back of the lens but perhaps it might just require a minor focal adjustment to work out.
The thing is AI, at this point in time, is pretty bad. Sure, it can make a picture that can fool someone at a casual glance ans while most won't stand up to close inspection, the picture type is far easier to train than the toaster advert or recommended video algorithm. The reason is simple, picture fakers can be trained with high quality pictures but "recommended for you" adverts are limited to either small data sets, your personal history, or irrelevant large data sets, the history of everyone who's bought a toaster or watched this video.
The topic of the rant has the same problem. The data set used to recommend these videos comes from both with the small set being the kids family and a large set being kiddie spotters and their time stamps. In the end it's simply a matter of garbage in, garbage out.
Option C: Get down with Yoti.
Is it me or does it seem the whole point of the Yoti survey showing 60% support was largely for the potential investors of the 'Your Digital Identity' company.
I can't say why but I'd really like to see the questions on that survey.
I think the problem is that given some gaggle of people where the total number is unknown, it's much easier to simply determine what percentage of flags are false. It could be that given a glom of 10,000 faces it only recognizes 800 as even being human faces and as you say, some could also belong to horses.
I hate to ask but given how inaccurate the system has thus far proved itself to be; do they have data on the number of faces (horse or human) observed vs the number identified as people? Oh, and how does it do with the Insane Clown Posse?
Yeah, that episode certainly showed just how thin skinned Musk really is. It seems many of the twitterati are thin skinned whether it be Musk, Trump, or AOC they are alike in their rush to tweet a "nuh uh, I'm right and here's proof you poopyhead!" style retort with often highly tenuous "proof".
California's carcinogenic substances bill, a.k.a. Prop 65, is little more than a lawyer subsidy and has been that way for at least twenty years. Why would a bunch of lawyers in DC want to pull the plug on that?
The easy thing to do is put a prop 65 sticker on everything and then don't worry about it. Nobody cares any more and it makes for very effective lawyer repellent.
LOL. So the Senator calling for backdoors in encryption is crying that potential backdoors in inverters are bad. Oh, those aren't "our" backdoors.
Seriously, everyone has long been saying the grids could be hacked at any time. I fail to see what makes solar inverters so special other than it's made by "them".
Not all have wonky shadows. In the lower set it's clear one is lit from the side while the fake could be a head on flash. After playing a few rounds it becomes easier to tell what to look for. Many of the fakes have strange features like several hairs floating in space offset from the rest. Another with glasses was missing a temple piece and other such things that make you think "something's off". In the lower pic on the fake gent, what would be his right ear seems behind his head rather than attached to it while the few strands of the woman's hair down beside her neck is something that is natural but would unlikely to be included by an AI.
The problem is that people still trust Google even after all their spy shenanigans so it's obvious that most people simply don't care. The answer is simple, don't buy Google products or willingly1 use their services.
1. Given how deep their tendrils run on nearly every website it can be very difficult indeed. It's as bad as, if not worse than, the software years ago that stated "requires IE6" in order to run.
Chances are that if one can afford a 3D metal printer at the present time they also have access to getting it properly heat treated. IIRC, the 1911 Ian mentioned was printed in stainless steel although I don't recall the specific alloy. Yes, there have been mostly all plastic guns made and exploded as you might expect but every one that I've seen the gun was clamped not held in the hand for test firing.
There were a few guys on youtube some time back making slam-fire shotguns from about $20 worth of pipe and other bits from the local hardware store. I seem to recall one went so far as to make a multi-barrel slam-fire seemingly to prove he could.
That's why assault rifles using such kind of ammunition are so deadly, and their wounds more devastating.
Your buying into a myth, so called 'assault rifle' ammunition is arguably less deadly than standard hunting ammunition. The AR typically fires a 55-63 grain full metal jacket bullet at between 850 and 950 meters per second for about 1,800 J and the AK fires a 120-125 grain full metal jacket bullet at about 735 meters per second for 2,100 J. Being full metal jacket bullets they don't expand but may tumble to increase the wound channel.
Meanwhile typical hunting ammo like 270 Winchester will throw a 130-150 grain expanding bullet to 850-950 feet per second for about 4,000 J. Notice this round has twice the energy and because the projectile is far superior aerodynamically it will retain that energy to much greater distances.
Finally, I'd like to know the "standard" wound against which "more devastating" is compared. Is it perhaps a two inch ice pick? I find it highly unlikely the standard is a 100 grain hollow point stepping out of a 270 Win. at well over 1,000 meters per second.
Given there are an estimated 300 million guns in the US plus who knows how many being printed or machined off the books it's unlikely that any new law is going to put a dent in the numbers of firearms available. It certainly won't make it harder for criminals as this very case proves.
Also, I doubt interactions with police is going to get any better until they tone down current procedures and training. Too many cops today have the attitude that everyone else is just a criminal who simply hasn't been caught.
Yes, we all need protection from the dreaded possibility of having the throw pillows not match the drapes or improperly dried hair.
Seriously, legislation is only really necessary when the barriers to entry are high which limits competition and against unfair trade practices. The problem is that getting it right is difficult. It's similar to moving jello, it needs minor support to guide it along but gripping with an iron fist gets you nowhere.
I'm guessing there are probably several variations which all disagree with each other. Here's another:
Beer before liquor will make you sicker; liquor before beer and you're in the clear.
Of course the problem with this study is that it just goes to a fixed BrAC level. It doesn't attempt to show whether someone would change their pattern after a switch. I know the missus gets a bloated feeling drinking beer or anything carbonated really so she would only have one and be unlikely to drink anything for hours after that but wine or Irish cream would be another story entirely.
Bah, the blue team isn't any different. There actually were bills in congress laying out net neutrality rules before the last president felt it wasn't going fast enough and went all executive order happy. Too many people forget that patience can be a virtue and even imperfect laws are better than easily revoked edicts.
Oh FFS! I can see this soon being a requirement for continuing coverage by everyone from private plans, Medicare, and NHS.
Oh wait. Bears shit in the woods and being an outdoorsy type I know roughly what look for. You know, this could get very entertaining indeed. Note to self, check grizzly and cougar droppings for evidence of human remains.
I do love hearing these stories. Of course that's only because I had a new HVAC system installed four years ago they were pushing a smart thermostat for just $50 and when I said no thanks they went touting all the benefits of the connected smart phone app. At which point I went into the other room, pulled the old Nokia E66 from the drawer, came back out, and asked how to install the app on that. The only response was "Oh" and now I have a nice programmable dumb thermostat which just works.
You never see a baby pigeon, they must come out of their eggs fully grown and ready to eat anything.
Having had mourning doves nest in one of the wife's planters on a long weekend while we were away, I assume they develop similarly, perhaps it may provide a reason why you never see a baby pigeon. As best I could tell with the doves is that they went from eggs one day to totally fledged and gone inside of two weeks. I tried to get snaps every day and from the last picture of an egg I caught to when they were largely fully developed and nowhere to be seen was 13 days. I can't say for certain which day they hatched but it was clear they had hatched 10 days before they left which gives a 3 day window and I'd wager the exact time depends on things like food availability. In short, about a week to week and a half to bulk up and another 2-3 days for the flight feathers to completely grow in and they are nearly indistinguishable from their parents.