It is worth nothing [is it, though? – ed.] that a very similar boast was made last year:
I see what you did there.
4662 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
Perhaps they just saw the writing on the wall and figured it wasn't the big deal bloviating politicians wanted folks to think it was. Sure the "Ruskies" got quieter subs but arms reduction talks were proceeding, Reagan had the Saudi's cutting Russia's oil revenue through high supply and lower prices, and shortly there after the Berlin wall fell and the cold war ended in late '89. That means Toshiba was punished for a few years after the Red threat was officially over.
OMG, AC managed to figure out how to post an actual link. Good for you AC! I knew you could do it.
And kudos on partially proving me wrong but thanks for proving that an unregistered drone is still nothing more than a flying paint can and as the rule doesn't start until next Monday, most will still be unregistered and legally equal to a clay pigeon.
Why can't an unmanned aircraft be a 'civil aircraft of the U.S.'?
It could be but it would also mean it was the property of the United States and I'm sure entities like the State Department and DOJ have their own civil aircraft. Just as an aircraft 'of the armed forces of the United States' means it is the property of the armed forces and not just any armed forces but only those armed forces which belong to the United States. Furthermore the "aircraft of the armed forces of the United States" covers all aircraft not just civil aircraft.
Does the law allow you to take pot-shots at a drone sitting on the ground, a bucket or a clay pigeon?
Actually the law doesn't typically address such things. The law is much better at addressing things that aren't allowed. But the short answer is yes, skeet, trap and sporting clays are perfectly legal sports as is plinking which is typically done with tin cans rather than buckets or drones. Please note that buckets and drones have no more legal protections than a tin can or a clay pigeon even if the any of the above are 'in flight' as clay pigeons often are. Granted, you can't just shoot trap in the middle of a busy freeway but that's addressed with something like a law limiting the discharge of a firearm in a populated area or some such.
Well AC, you've got me. I did go read the definitions that you couldn't be bothered supplying links to so I've provided them here.
(2) “special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States” includes any of the following aircraft in flight:(A) a civil aircraft of the United States.
(B) an aircraft of the armed forces of the United States.
(C) another aircraft in the United States.
(D)...
So the drone doesn't fall into either A nor B but would appear to be scooped up in C. But don't sprain yourself patting yourself on the back so fast there AC. If you read that first part carefully you'll see it only applies to "aircraft in flight". Naturally you're thinking a flying drone is obviously an "aircraft in flight" but let's check the law on the matter. It reads:
(1) “aircraft in flight” means an aircraft from the moment all external doors are closed following boarding—(A) through the moment when one external door is opened to allow passengers to leave the aircraft; or
(B) until, if a forced landing, competent authorities take over responsibility for the aircraft and individuals and property on the aircraft.
Huh, drones don't typically have external doors and aren't typically boarded so there is no way for it to become, legally, an "aircraft in flight". Let's see where we stand, since it's not legally an "aircraft in flight" it isn't in the "special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States". Therefore said law doesn't apply and it's no different from the same drone sitting on the ground, a bucket or a clay pigeon.
Actually AC, that law doesn't prohibit shooting at any aircraft. The relevant statement would be (a)(1)
(a) Whoever willfully—(1) sets fire to, damages, destroys, disables, or wrecks any aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States or any civil aircraft used, operated, or employed in interstate, overseas, or foreign air commerce;
Inasmuch as the drone was civilly employed it wouldn't fall under the special jurisdiction of the U.S. and likewise it wasn't involved in commerce at all, much less interstate or otherwise, so it would appear to be fair game. Being unmanned the other sections of the law are inapplicable.
Funny thing, if it carries enough momentum and energy to knock the target off their feet then it should do likewise to the shooter or at least a broken arm when said momentum and energy are imparted. Granted, there's a bit to be said about bracing oneself and catching the target off balance but typically folks shot in movies are thrown many feet by the impact and the recoil felt by the shooter is near nil.
The online business is the one getting the tax-free subsidy here.
The online business also has to pay shipping at a per piece rate. The brick an mortar store pays shipping on a container or full trailer rate. If the brick and mortar store had to pay UPS, Fedex, etc. piece rates for everything then yes it would be a fair comparison but they don't. You get a rather nice break on shipping when a semi pulls up around back and disgorges its entire contents and the small franchise shops get the benefit of splitting that semi with others of the same shop in the area. Unfortunately it's often the small mom & pop operations that suffer because they aren't getting large shipments and don't get to split the cost of a truck with another business.
One of the problems the larger chains face is themselves. The last time I went to Wally World was to buy a Wii Fit balance board accessory as a gift, which tells you how long ago it was, and after researching the price online I went down to the local Wally World and found the price for the unit on the shelf was higher. Ah, but they match online prices I thought but that proved wrong. If it was a competitors price they would have matched it. Since it was their own online price, they wouldn't match it but was told I could order it online and have it delivered to the very same store for pickup and it would probably only take a few hours for "delivery". Gobsmacked because I knew I'd be getting the very item that was on the shelf with the free "delivery" and pick-up at the store in a few hours instead of simply matching their own online price right then was enough for me to drive home and order it from Amazon albeit at a slightly higher price with free delivery to the intended recipients house in a few days. I even asked the sales clerk if management knew silly things like this were driving people to competitors and she chuckled saying that she tells her boss about it at least every other week and more often around the holidays. Sweet kid, I'm glad she wasn't paid on commission and I hope she found a better job.
Cortana, what is the average number of nukes? I mean, what represents n which divides the sum of ai? Is it country, state, nation, UN members? Can I simply walk around D.C. or London and add up the number of consulates or embassies and use that? I'm just wondering how to count places like Flanders and Taiwan.
You know what Cortana, nevermind all that, just give me a ratio of nukes per nutjob for the G20.
Given the current state of asset forfeiture laws in the U.S. it only need be something of value and could be perfectly legal.
I actually don't understand why he wasn't at least charged under 18 USC §1030(a)(2)(C).
Sure, internet refrigerators have been around a few years and washers and dryers with matching apps are pretty common. Come now, this is too easy did you even look?
This could be the best thing to happen to email since RFC 822. A new Thunderbird could literally define the beginnings of secure network communications. With the right tweaks over time and encryption baked in (TOR too?) there is an opportunity to alter the basics of email with a user base that has the potential to make things stick. No doubt it would be tricky but with the right direction it could be done.
You know, there are days when I feel I'm living that Chinese curse about living in interesting times.
Gentlefolk! Grab your forks and merge.
To be fair the inventor of "off" leds should be drawn and quartered followed by serious torture. Many years ago my mum bought a Sony receiver that had a red "off" led which turned green when it was powered on. The problem was up to then nearly everything had red "on" leds which went dark when powered off. Imagine my surprise when I pressed the 1/0 button to turn it "off" only to be met with Aida with the volume set at 11. Funny thing, not many devices still have that arrangement but unfortunately the evil bastards have discovered blue leds for damn near everything and they seemingly pump them at 20 watts.
Precisely, it's a trivial add-on but an unneeded cost if you're only going to remove it anyway. One of the things I don't like about many boards is that they usually stack a pair of USB A ports with an Ethernet port so while the board may be small it needs a case that's inches high or the bother of desoldering the skyscrapers. It's one of the things I like about the Pi A+ boards. With the smaller form factor I will find the Pi Zero much more useful. Cheers to the Raspberry Pi folks, thank you.
A straw sale is actually when the sale is to a person who is legally able purchase a firearm but is buying a it for someone who is prohibited from buying or owning a firearm. Lots of younger folks often get their slightly older friends to buy their alcohol, this is a straw sale and whether it's alcohol or firearms it is illegal.
What you are describing is a private party who has a firearm and is selling it to another private party which is little different from a car, a chair or any other sales between two private parties. This is not a straw sale/purchase but is instead a regular sales transaction and is legal. I can sell alcohol that I own to another party that I believe is legally able to purchase it and it is no different with firearms or cars or cell phones.
It should be plainly obvious that even if "all" sales were required to go through an FFL, it is highly unlikely that criminals will bother with the extra paperwork. All it does is add a de facto tax on the transaction for normal law abiding folks and does absolutely nothing to hinder criminals. It also doesn't even make for an adder on the list of criminal offenses as it's already illegal to sell firearms to criminals and it's already illegal for criminals to buy firearms so it's not something the DOJ could potentially bargain with since criminals would be able to claim that it violates their Constitutional rights with regard to self incrimination.
- a 200 metres rise would sink most major cities under water -
All well and good but there isn't enough ice on the planet to raise the oceans 200 metres. 200 feet ok, 200 metres, no. Granted that's of no comfort to Bangladesh as it would be completely flooded anyway.
Terrorists could easily adopt spam tactics and spread their message that way. It would be ignored by 99.999% of people who will think its just spam and don't know that "V1argra" is an intentional misspelling that carries coded information. It would mean that if, and that's a big if, the government ever caught on they would need something that breaks the code and would then have to monitor every piece of spam which is an amazingly large haystack.
Gah! There's that word being used, yet again, to mean something else entirely. Invariably when someone says intuitive they usually mean "simple", "discoverable" or "familiar". Unfortunately when some bright spark says that a UI should be intuitive (meaning discoverable) another understands it as intuitive (meaning simple) and we're stuck in the bovine feces of UIs that are impossible to be quickly productive with. The sooner the word intuitive banished from the land of computing the quicker we can get back to a better UI.
WTF, they are recommending that US companies break US law? I'd never thought I'd live to see the day when Congress would advocate anarchy. As much as I like the idea of Kant's idealized anarchy of law and freedom without force I've never seen it last much beyond the first encounter with a narcissistic zealot who then uses force to "restore order".
It's not exactly surprising given how many things now have a mobile net connection. It's more than just things like phones and laptops/tablets as many cars have one with the various homelink, uconnect, onstar, etc. services. I'm sure there are also lots of other connected devices as well and equally sure the number is growing every day with the whole IoT thing.
Most airports have been around a rather long time and they fly over areas populated by the poor because the noise lowers property values making it affordable to the poor and rich folks can afford to live elsewhere. Of course there are probably more flights now than there were but part of that is because airlines are consolidating their routes and many of the smaller airports, like the one I learned at, are actually being closed.
Of course there's always building a clock.
Unfortunately criminalizing is what happens when you have a bunch of lawyer politicians with nothing to do but appear to be "tough on crime". The easy way to appear tough is to make more crimes and stuff the prisons beyond capacity, much to the delight of private prisons and their lobbyists.
As far as stopping drone drops an easy answer is to put a roof on it. It doesn't have to be flat, it doesn't have to be continuous or solid. It merely needs to be an obstacle for linear or ballistic paths so a series of slanted panels with a gutter at the bottom that collects things that may drop on the panels. Drones will have a difficult time navigating something like a saw tooth pattern and it would also make a nice place to mount detection or interfering technology. For the panels that face toward the sun, solar collectors could supply extra power. Anyone worried about birds has no complaint and it would still provide indirect light and air circulation as well as making the yard useful even when it rains. Also note that rain water can be captured for use inside the prison.
So the boy didn't read the cut sheet from AMD when he bought it. The question of cores is one that will have to address what kind of cores now that heterogeneous chips are increasingly becoming the norm. What does it mean to say something has X cores when the chip can combine CPUs (x86 and/or ARM), FPUs, GPUs, DSPs or even the occasional FPGA? Do FPUs matter if software is optimized for GPUs?
Of course, such a ruling will be avoided if AMD proves its eight-core Bulldozer processors do not drop to four-core performance in multithreaded FPU benchmark tests.
Another problem entirely as it may well depend on the bit width employed by the benchmark. What happens if it doubles the performance of a four core at 128 bits but not at 256 bits?
Regardless, this kind of "I didn't understand what I was buying" crap needs to be bounced out. Would he sue because he bought a Tegra 4 because the five cores didn't work like they thought?
So assuming a 50% recharge daily and the 300-500 full recharge cycle life of the battery it seems reasonable to assume you'll get 600-1000 days, so 2-3 years, before it needs replacement. Given the price that means the lowest cost model works out to about $.50 per day for just the watch. I can see some people making that choice but not those of us who throw pennies about like manhole covers.
How much are Prius' subsidised?
Each Prius directly is a hard number to pin down. In the US there are $2.4B in active grants for plug-in and hybrid vehicle technologies. Further there are several tax credits available to the purchaser often at both state and federal levels. The 2009 ACES Act varies the tax credit from $2500 if the vehicle meets the minimum 4 kWh and increases with battery capacity up to a $7500 maximum. In short, it looks like the subsidy on each Prius is at least $2500 and potentially larger.
It's already hit the values. It seems there are some rather good discounts on the VW brand so there may be more coming to a Porsche/Audi dealer near you.
Is it legal to simply pump excess air into the exhaust to dilute the exhaust gasses? It seems the simple answer since they only look at ppm. Let's say you have a case where a turbo "leaks" from the high pressure compressor side to the low pressure post turbine side on the exhaust. If nothing else it might buy a few years more life by CARB-o-loading the EPA-filter.
It's not a question of if it's doable, it's a question of how much does it cost and will folks pay for it. For the prices they get for Porsche and Audi cars one wouldn't think it would be much of a problem but once a cheap "solution" is found it generally gets implemented universally.
You raise an interesting point. I suppose it comes down to how much damage the presence of the ball caused. Did it break a window and knock over an expensive vase? Did it kill a chicken in the yard? Did it cause someone to trip and fall? Did it merely leave a dent in the lawn? Each of these is a different degree of damage or harm. I do believe that you are free to discard it in the trash without trying to find the owner or you can simply turn it over to the police and let them deal with it as I did when I found a bicycle at the end of my driveway.
Likewise we can ask what damage the drone caused by its mere presence. Clearly it reduced the sense of security of the family. Perhaps it somehow contributed to other trauma, one of the daughters may no longer feel safe sunbathing in their backyard or perhaps refuse to even go into the back yard. In both the ball and drone cases the potential for harm is great it's just that with the ball it's more likely to be immediately apparent.
In some states, if the background check results do not come back within $num_hours (varies by state) the dealer shall sell the firearm.
The federal law for $num_hours is 3 days so that makes it at least 72 hours. I'd say that the FBI should be able to pull their finger out in three days but given that whole Boston Marathon thing where they had a much longer heads up it certainly gives one pause.
Regarding private sales, the point is largely moot since "gang banger" is unlikely to ask "drug dealer" to undergo a background check even if required by law to do so. More likely it's going to be a simple exchange of a paper bag for a newspaper through an open car window where the bag holds meth and the newspaper is folded around a pistol.
I'd say the garden hose option would be much preferable.
A garden hose isn't likely a viable option. Even if he has 80 psi head pressure he's going to lose quite a bit once it reaches the far end of a 1/2" maybe 3/8" copper line with assorted tees, elbows, shutoffs and freeze protection valves. Add to that the potential age of the construction with scale built up inside the pipes and you're not going to get much range when it reaches the end of a 50 foot garden hose. It is a garden hose attached to a bib after all; it's not a water cannon connected to a fire hydrant.