What a farce...
I thought this sort of thing only happened when British companies tried to take over American ones.
605 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Nov 2008
The idea of moving something to a Lagrange point to block the sunlight is within reason, but moving the mass of an asteroid there is massive overkill!
By the time such a project were likely to reach fruition, technology should have advanced enough that we will be able to send molecular assembly robots there to collect space dust and re-arrange it into some kind of thread structure, then weave it into sheets thick enough to block sunlight. This way the sunlight can be blocked using far less mass. Admittedly we'd need a whole fleet of robots doing this in order to construct something of sufficient size in the timescale required.
A sheet would act as a solar sail and would be easily displaced, necessitating something like ion-drive shepherds to continually re-position it. The incident solar energy could be collected and used to power the ion-drives.
Introduce a Google Maps app for £499 that comes with an up-to £499 rebate when you trade-in your iPhone for an Android phone, plus on maps.google.com detect if the browser user agent identifies as an i-device, then display the message "Sorry, a flash plugin is required to view this content".
RE "The 47-year old far-right sympathizer has funded racist and extremist groups in Sweden – a fact coyly ignored by copyright activists and Pirate Bay supporters"
Just what are you suggesting Mr. Orlowski, should he receive a harsher sentence for piracy because he has a particular opinion in an unrelated area that you'd like to thought criminalise? Must fellow pirates feel compelled to distance themselves from him over this unrelated issue, sparking dissent in their ranks which is precisely the goal of their anti-piracy opponents? Any group that attempts to unite people around one issue will have a diversity of opinion in all unrelated areas.
This fact is not "coyly ignored", it is ignored because it is irrelevant. If you believe otherwise then please present some evidence showing a correlation, or better still, a causal link between one set of political views and the likelihood of committing or supporting piracy. In the absence of such evidence then we must assume there is no correlation.
"Extremist" is a relative word. Many opinions now classed as extremist by those who wish to corral or claim to represent "public opinion" were once foundational beliefs of societies past. Historically most societies have valued what differentiates them from other societies over what they have in common with each other.
Did they economise this by making it a top-loader rather than a tray-loader, which makes it less practical as a blu ray player under a telly - not to mention a PITA for swapping game discs?
This cut-down PS3 ought to come with a cut-down price tag, after all the 360 was about the same price nearly 5 years ago!
In the real world people don't walk around with name tags on all the time or with an ID number tattooed across their forehead, so why should we submit to this form of oppression online?
If we can go to a public place and express our views to anyone who will listen without being identified, tracked and potentially discriminated against forever after, the same right to anonymity should exist online.
Niemals kapitulieren to Big Brother, even if he bears a deceptive "don't do evil" charade.
And no LinkOfHyrule, expressing racist or homophobic opinions is not trolling, it's freedom. Get over it.
Cultural imperialism is not evil. True or false?
Who will defend the right of children to be raised in a natural family?
Will Google and Bing defend equally vigorously the rights of those individuals unfortunate enough to have been born with a predilection to paedophilia, bestiality or necrophilia?
On the subject of evolution v creationism, I have a question about evolution for the well-informed reg readership if anyone is reading this.....
If a species by definition cannot reproduce with other species, and it takes 1 male + 1 female of the same species to reproduce, how do new species come into existence and preserve themselves?
I thought evolutionary theory implies that changes in DNA occur due to random mutations, and that very occasionally that random mutation would create a new species that can't reproduce with it's parent species.
Therefore, to create new species, the same very improbable mutation has to occur in both a male and female offspring living in the same vicinity and same lifetime. How likely is that?
Your statements are nonsensical and provide no rational argument for the opinion you express.
"I am a Federalist as it is the only way forward"
Forward to what, to what destination are you heading? I am a Nationalist, and the purpose of a National government is to run it's National services. I see no reason why the individual governments of the nations of Europe are in any way disadvantaged at achieving that task due to their present size.
"we have a great past but now we are a small wet rock of the Coast of Europe"
Insults aside, I assume your point is that our economic position in the world is declining, because other world economies are catching up with our level of development? Well so is the relative economic position of the whole of Europe for the same reason. What does this matter? Provided we maintain a healthy per-capita standard of living and keep out of debt, I have no problem with the rest of the world catching up. The EU will make no difference to this.
"and the way forward is unification or we stand alone and fall."
How is standing alone, i.e. independence not a "way forward"? How is a world of independent nations representing the different wishes of different peoples not a workable model for the future of the world? How will preserving national governments which bring democracy closer to us as individuals cause us to "fall" in any way? Smaller democracies make it easier for us as individuals to effect change. To effect change in a large country like the US you need lots of money. A small country like Iceland, can quickly throw out a corporate-controlled government by one which says to the global bankers "no we will not take on your private debts as out national debt".
Re. "I have an old AMD Phenom II X6 processor. At some point I will likely want to put in a new CPU, perhaps when Piledriver (the next gen Bulldozer) arrives."
I expect you will be out of luck then since the socket AM3 motherboards sold with Phenom II CPUs don't support Bulldozer or Piledriver CPUs. You will need to invest in an AM3+ board designed specifically for the newer CPU architecture.
I take your point though, that generally AMD offer better backward compatibility than Intel, but this is usually newer boards accepting older CPUs than vice-versa.
I agree with your observation. However I don't think the intention is for everything to go via the flash cache, like a processor-memory cache would. Instead, some intelligent algorithm in the drive will only cache data that is read often but not written so often, such as the start up files of the OS, rather than the swap partition.
I'm concerned that for an esteemed futurologist he made no mention of nanotechnology.
I had thought that the technology for producing ICs would transition into molecular manufacturing, bringing about a new era of mechanical nanocomputers.
When built in 3D, we'd fit the most powerful supercomputers into the size of a speck of dust, without the frequency, overheating and current leakage issues that affect electronics at this scale. Or did Eric Drexler get it wrong?
A 20x increase in areal density would equate to increased data rate of 4-5x (or root of 20), and a similar increase in the number of tracks per platter.
Anyway, this article makes no mention of the 'salting' discovery reported recently, which ought to provide a cheap way of boosting the capacity of current PMR drives by a few multiples.
1. Buy enough site licenses for Windows 7 to cover anticipated future demand.
2. Transition all Windows-dependent applications to browser independent web applications before support for Windows 7 ends.
3. Switch to a sensible Linux distro at your convenience.
How can insulting less intelligent members of society as "thick dimwits" be considered morally permissible, while insulting people for other attributes of their make up is considered impermissible? This attitude would appear to be totally contrary to the stated aim of addressing "negativity toward out-groups".
There are several obvious flaws in how the data was gathered and the assumptions that it makes.
1. Have the samples been adjusted to compensate for how many years the subject spent in an educational (i.e. anti-racist and anti-homophobic indoctrination) institution? Those subjects who spend fewer of their formative years in such an institution will consequently be exposed to less indoctrination and thus be at a perceived disadvantage.
2. Given the environment of discrimination against racism or homophobia that exists within educational establishments, did those collecting the data not consider that anyone who has racist or homophobic beliefs is repressed within that environment? For instance, people are socially excluded, physically attacked and in some instances mandated to leave an educational institution for professing such opinions. Given this discriminatory environment, the researchers ought to have considered whether subjects provided truthful answers to all these questions.
3. The indefinite wording of the questions does not allow accurate conclusions to be drawn. For example, affirming that the subject "wouldn't mind working with people from other races" does not prove they are not racist. "wouldn't mind working with" does not discount a preference to work with people of their own race. Nor does it indicate whether they believe races are all equal.
By combining this new research with the conclusions of the Bell Curve theory (that racial differences exist in average IQ) we can infer that black people are most likely to have conservative, racist, homophobic (or "dark attitudes"). What possible benefit to society does this divisive research serve?
We should give nuclear weapons to Iran, and for that matter every other country in the world, then we can all be equal. It would be a cheaper way for the US, Russia and other nuclear powers to reduce their stockpile of weapons. Then the Iranians could spend all their money on improving their standard of living.
Once every country has nukes, there will be no more war, and all countries will be able to participate in international relations on an equal footing. Finally we will have real freedom and independence from the power mad NWO puppet masters!
Given that since the Earth was formed (after the Lunar impact) it has been hit by enough asteroids to form it's oceans and more, would this not mean that for a body like the moon with no volcanism or continental drift, that the entire surface down to a depth of perhaps several kilometers, would be formed from material acquired from asteroid impacts?
Hence, would any magnetism in the surface rocks not be attributable to a more recent phenomena?
We are all innocent until proven guilty of committing a crime.
The crime committed here was by members of Anonymous.
Freedom of thought must be a universal right, including the right to disagree with existing laws.
No one should have to resign just for having an opinion.
On this subject, why do articles have to be divided across pages? Are readers considered incapable of scrolling through a long page or are the Reg trying to get more page impressions and ads served? If it's the latter, why not show more ads in proportion to the length of the page?
By your argument there's probably no such thing as a racial type for any geographic area of comparable size, such as Nevada state, northern Persia, Yunnan province or a tribal area of the Brazilian rain forest. There have been continual movements of people and gene flow all over the world over the last 40,000+ years, even if most populations don't record their history very far back. The Maori are recognised as indigenous to New Zealand yet they've only been there for 700 years so must be indisinguishable from some neighbouring populations. It's obvious that broad racial types do exist and are identifiable with larger geographic areas like North America, Northern Europe, China, sub-saharan Africa etc. Indigenous Brits are predominantly descendents of Ayrian and Alpine Caucasians, pretty much like the rest of northern and central Europe.
I expect that critical threads will only be used for highly optimised code that does minimal memory access and can be accommodated in the first level cache.
I'm sure they created this feature after carefully analysing real world applications, it wouldn't have been dreamt up by the marketing department. In this era of slowing CPU progress, optimisations like this could offer considerable performance & competitive advantage (or help them catch up, as the case may be).
I've not written Chrome or Firefox extensions before, but I assume they're written in javascript and they require access to the global javascript environment for the tab in which they are active.
While you can isolate extensions that have instances in different tabs, I don't see how you can completely isolate two extension instances that are active for the same tab.
Anyone care to enlighten us?
Given that this is a forum for an IT website, and in most surveys IT workers are shown to have a conservative bias, we must conclude that the majority of thumbs up votes here are by infiltrators from other professions. Probably Sociology and Political Science graduates employed in government non-jobs at great expense, with bags of time on their hands to spend commenting on forums all day while the rest of us do the real work.
It would be interesting to see a graph showing time of day versus frequency of thumbs up and thumbs down votes, and whether they originate from .edu / .ac.uk / .gov / .gov.uk or .com / .co.uk etc.
This would be more accurately stated as: there is a wider distribution in the number of children fathered by men than there is in the number of children given birth to by women (obviously the mean average is the same).
i.e. Fit women wont necessarily have many more children than ugly women.
Low status men are out of luck but alpha males will father more children, some of them probably illegitimately.
I think there's also more homosexuality (ignoring bisexuality) among men than women which also contributes to this trend.