For 40 years Intel has been about widgets
It's time to refocus on people.
2643 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2008
Intel wanted to cripple the feature set, OEMs wanted to put fat Windows on them and that drives up the cost. ARM, however, lets the maker make what the maker wants to make. Some makers want to make cheap Chromebooks and some really fancy premium ones with ultra hi-def screens.
There are no Windows tablets selling decently. People don't buy Windows tablets. This whole "Intel's future Atom wonderchip" business has long since come to the same trite meme as the Year of The Linux Desktop. If they ever ship an amazing mobile chip it will be as shocking as DNF finally coming available.
Of course with their top-end fabs 40% idle, maybe they've got a shot at accelerating the process progress.
But I already spent myself over here:
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2013/04/07/nasa_administrator_says_no_humans_on_mars/
Short story: with Amsteel Blue as a tether on Ceres a space elevator has some real utility with real stuff we can make right now, and acceptable engineering margins, that we can get out there with our lift capability, and a reason why. There is no other place in the solar system where this is true right now. Ceres has vast quantities of the most precious space mineral there is: water.
/No, I don't work for Samson nor any vendor that sells rope, nor any other relevant thing. I don't know if they can make a 900 km rope. I just like the whole "space elevator" thing, and am jazzed that there is at least one current use of Clarke's dream even if it isn't where he thought it was.
Not only can they be removed - they often are, and then some. For a while there Verizon was actually replacing the integrated search functions of their Android phones with Bing search in a way that could not be changed. They stopped that nonsense not because Google told them to, but because returns were horrific.
This is all well and good if you want to return a few tons a few times. If you want to return five tons a day for several years running you want infrastructure. Ideally what you do with that water is turn it into rocket fuel to move men and material quickly and cheaply about the solar system, so you will want quite a lot of it.
Even with a steam cannon you are unlikely to get better results for less cost.
You know where a space elevator would make sense? Ceres. 0.028 g surface gravity, 9 hour rotation period means the stresses would be manageable with normal materials (ordinary wire rope, probably with embedded heating elements and/or power), and the Clarke orbit would be a mere 782 km above the equator. Solar power lifts work well at 0.03g. And what needs lifted up off Ceres? Water. Gigatons of water. And of course any other material you might find on an asteroid, or manufactured goods made of that stuff. But mostly, water.
Of course that's at least 120 tons of 1/4" wire rope - more likely 140. Getting it there would be a bit of a challenge as the whole Dawn spacecraft less fuel is only 800kg. But it's doable, and could lift loads of 5 tons per trip.
Don't like it? Don't buy it. There are people who live always online lives and it is not a crime to tailor products for that specific customer group. Not everybody is the same. Not everybody has a car but they still sell gasoline.
/sheesh. I think I just defended Microsoft. I need to sit down.
A strong showing for Windows HPC Server is driving a surge in supercompute buying worldwide. "The smooth AD integration was the thing we had been missing in our compute clusters all along" said Tim Waters of NLRCCB. "Clearing up that the new system absolutely could run Quicken was key to getting budget committee approval."
It was in the run up to Vista. Bright lot, those guys. After years of burning cash buyer Lenovo is happy to get margins of +2.6%. IBM's market cap is back on par with Microsoft's these days. Now that Windows 8 is upon us and PC Biz is a straight loser nobody's going to buy Dell's money pit.
Good luck to them. They're going to need it.
Bottom's up!
@Mike Dimmick - Patent trolling is over half of Qualcomm's revenues. IETF knows this.
Specifically in the case of WebRTC standards - the extant topic - Qualcomm attempted to block the audio codec "Opus". They failed. Their claims were investigated and found to be groundless. The "Opus" audio codec is incorporated as a mandatory component of the standard.
It is free and open. Not only has Google provided a free license to all the 20 years' accumulation of ON2 codec patents that have withstood the tests of courts and time, they've now licensed the entire MPEG-LA patent library as well under terms that all them to grant those rights to VP8 implementors free of charge and without limit just in case. Specifically H.264 has no advantage over VP8 in terms of patent licensing as they are now cross licensed with each other, and there is no other credible solution for capturing or playing video. The difference is that H.264 charges license fees for some things, and VP8 doesn't.
MPEG-LA also doesn't guarantee that there is no patent on Earth that their license doesn't cover. But between the two groups, that's just about all of it. Nokia can make their noise, but the fact is that between MPEG-LA and ON2 patents, there's nothing out there left that really matters.
The claim that somebody out there might have a patent on it is just dumb. Of course it's true - you can't make a wicker basket without patent claims these days. But ON2 didn't have a problem defending their codec for 20 years, and now that they're owned by the world's second largest technology company with enough cash in the bank to buy Nokia outright if they had to, there is no need to fear that this tech is going to go away. Google already spent 133 million dollars to make this happen. They're not going to let a little investment in lawyer fees get in the way of the world having a global free standard for video compression.
Besides: we've been here before. http://www.osnews.com/story/26892/Nokia_s_VP8_patent_claims_we_ve_been_here_before
Founded in 1992, The Duck Company created a coder/decoder algorithm ("codec") for streaming video intended for video game cutscenes. It was called TrueMotion. In the more than two decades since they have been improving and releasing this as a series of codecs called VPn, where n is the version number, and we're up to 8 now. In 1997, Microsoft Corp. licensed The Duck Corp.'s TrueMotion 2.0 video codec technology to bring TV-quality video to the PC platform. In 1999 the company merged with a finance company and became "ON2" and then "ON2 Technologies". VP6 was selected as the video codec for Flash 8. Skype, now owned by Microsoft, licensed VP7 and all future versions for use in their video chat program in 2005.
In 2010 Google acquired the company for $133 million. Development of codecs is ongoing. Google has open-sourced the codecs and granted broad patent license as well.
There will be some here to say that the codecs are new, inadequate, that Nokia has trump patents that will squash this project. Nothing could be further from the truth. With over 20 years in the field providing an alternative to the MPEG-LA group's codecs, finding broad success at it, and weathering the legal assault from much larger companies around the world, they are still doing fine. They have a patent portfolio too, and it is broad and deep. With Google's deep pockets they will have little trouble foiling this attack as well.
In my opinion the availability of a free and open codec is of primary importance in modern technology, and this concern trumps any advantages that codecs like h.264 might have, as they come with the downside of trying to control who can make a device that captures, plays, or streams video and what content can be in the stream.
More at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On2_Technologies
There are a number of issues in play here.
1. Humans are more intelligent than we need them do be. A moderately good education and diet is going to bring the average human up to a potential that is going to make him unhappy for the rest of his life as he knows his potential is far more than than his available work prospects. The world needs ditch-diggers too - far more than those constrained to the role by their intellectual ability.
2. The state of US education is deplorable. Any ordinary kid can read at above "college level" by the third grade with sufficient diet and education.
3. But if we maximize the potential of each young human into entry into adult life we pretty much guarantee they will be unhappy for the rest of their days. That's probably not a good thing as unhappy young people have a tendency to induce radical social change without regard to the consequences more mature folk are aware of.
4. Regardless of the above we also have far more useful people than we actually need to produce the necessary, so we need to find something useful and rewarding for the rest to do. The alternative is to demand they do nothing. To banish useful, creative and energetic people to the fringe of society and starve them for lack of work is to demand they cause trouble. Lots of trouble.
Microsoft is now the FIFTH largest company in IT by market cap. The entire thesis of control their engine is built on is smashed. None of the others in the top 5 rely on Windows. Apple, Google, Samsung and IBM don't even use Microsoft products internally, and don't rely on Microsoft for profits. Those dependent on Microsoft like HP and Dell seem capped at a certain diminutive size relative to Microsoft for some reason. Microsoft is no longer dominant, and they are not prepared for a world where they are not dominant. They cannot control the pace and path of progress any more. It seems the way to grow big as an IT company is to not rely on Microsoft. Whodathunkit?
Mobile devices that don't run Microsoft ware will outnumber Microsoft Windows desktops in a month or three, and they MUST be served. That means that on the server side Microsoft operating systems and services won't do as they're designed to leverage dominance and encourage dependence on IE and Windows. Likewise Windows Line Of Business (LOB) apps need to be rejiggered to be browser-based and platform-independent because a Windows-only client app just won't do any more as we've gone mobile without Microsoft. The protestations of junior .NET junkies will be beat down by CIOs and CEOs with iPads and Android tabs, iPhones and Android phones who needs must get their work done on the go, so shut up and deliver what is required or put in your notice.
This one is all over but the crying.
If you own one of the blogs where these things are discussed your server logs are rich with well-known Microsoft IP addresses. If their English isn't good they usually just paste talking points straight from the internally circulated "discussion guide", sometimes in context-inappropriate spots. Some try to rephrase as is recommended, but their lack of idiom leads to hilarious results and they cannot engage in a protracted discussion. Some are quite good. But they all bring their point of view involving whose fault it is.
The software engineers blame marketing, praising the UI and "design language". The hardware folks blame marketing too, pointing out their "innovative" features saying it's an excellent product nobody knows about despite a half-billion spent on ads and even though the RT hardware is an obvious retread of a year-old Android tablet that had been far surpassed on Surface launch day. The marketers blame engineering and manufacturing. The Office team even chimes in, pointing out that their ware is "essential for business and included free" neglecting the facts that this is the consumer grade tablet and the software isn't licensed for business use. By blaming each other they point to flaws in the team effort, and by using obviously ridiculous and untrue memes "enterprise grade" "not a toy" "Microsoft has unlimited funds to put it over", by making light about the weakness of the ecosystem - they reveal who they are. Most especially when they trot out the same fifteen talking points to every article over and over, bringing them into every discussion as can be seen in this and every ElReg article in the context list.
They don't realize we know who they are and how fiercely competitive they are being about trashing their own product and each other. It's funny to watch really. There are so many of them and they are so hard at it that you need only mention and disparage a Microsoft mobile product in your article to get hundreds of comments and thousands of views - enough to make it worthwhile even if it's only the 'softies trying to out-shout each other about which of them is most at fault for the fact that the product is collecting dust on the shelf. By doing this they are even making it profitable for the various blogs like ElReg to glance askance at their ware.
The Tao gave birth to machine language. Machine language gave birth to the assembler.
The assembler gave birth to the compiler. Now there are ten thousand languages.
Each language has its purpose, however humble. Each language expresses the Yin and Yang of software. Each language has its place within the Tao.
But do not program in COBOL if you can avoid it.
- The Tau of Programming
Android has literally always had it, and now is outselling his phone OS nearly 3:1 and just took the lead in tablets too. His whining that people seem to prefer what he thinks is a fatal flaw is a failure to adapt. Fragmentation is choice, and people like choices. Choosing is an empowering and enjoyable part of the purchase experience. An essential one. He should know that.
Sour grapes.
Can't wait to see it. I'm sure it will be Amazing. Also, it will be quite a while. He's a big thinker. Probably started the skunkworks on his next big thing quite a while back though - they do that at Google. It's called the "20%."
The merger of Android and Chrome is a way off yet too. Just too different as yet.
Apple is reportedly not happy that Google considers them so defeated they're sending in the second string coach. Phil Schiller in particular it having a case of the shrills.
Google I/O looks to be fantastic this year.
Google Now, that I turned off. It was just too creepy.
It applies to Flash, Web as well as the originally intended email, and dates from the dawn of the Internet. craphound.com
Synopsis:
(x) Blacklists suck
(x) Whitelists suck