Neither
I'll take whatever Google comes up with.
2643 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2008
Many other vendors are doing the same thing. This is not to excuse Cisco. It is just to point out that these multibillion dollar corporations take the same shortcuts as the greasy neckbeard at your local mom & pop IT shop. Paying the "big vendor converged infrastructure" premium is not going to protect you from this.
Talk and text all you want. 2 GB of LTE data and unlimited 3G data for a price I can afford and NO Overages! No surprises, ever. T-Mobile has no problem with I don't trust any carrier enough to let them fondle my phone before I get it - I want it straight from the OEM unlocked and un fooled around with.
I called their customer support line yesterday to tell them thanks for not being a herd of jerks. No issue, no problem, no concern, no question. Just "thanks for being so awesome!"
Having dealt with many carriers over the last 20 years I have had none better. Not even close. "Uncarrier" indeed.
That PDF you quote broadband competition from has a statistical quirk: it is by census tract. So if one home has Comcast available, one has TWC available, and nobody else has any Internet whatsoever, that counts as "two or more competing broadband providers" for the entire census tract. It has other problems as well. Please be responsible and read the terms and conditions before spreading the misinformation that has been attached to this survey. Read it first at least.
When PCI3 was coming out I did a paper on how this was it, the physics of the copper ain't got no more at the run length needed for the industry standard PC. I was called seven kinds of fool of course. It is usually unwise to predict the end of anything in tech.
Hopefully this repeater business won't add so much latency that I'm proven right.
Form factors are changing though, with nodes going in at 1/2 to 1/4th the standard width. Or starting with a clean sheet. Maybe we will see some cool gpgpu designs without the repeater.
Lenovo has been just barely treading water for a decade. Yet somehow they have enough cash to buy both IBM's x86 server business and Motorola Mobility from Google at the same time. Is it just me, or is there some magic accounting going on?
The combined price of the two is more than 12 years of Lenovo's profits at the current rate.
We have ARM devices and know they work well. The Intel devices are an unknown quantity, and that makes Intel's road an uphill climb here. Obviously many were disappointed by previous generations of their product - but it was only recently that the premium ARM devices became passable. They are not so far behind. If they can get some units in people's hands this problem will go away. Benchmark arguments aren't going to do it.
Fortunately it looks like they have some killer reference designs in the pipeline. If they don't skimp on display quality, and do what they must on pricing they they should be OK.
T-Mobile is not. If you like to get your Nexus direct and un-tampered with from Google for a prepaid plan T-Mobile will welcome you with open arms. Sprint won't even tell you you can get a SIM that works on their towers from Fring. They certainly won't sell you one.
What is the point of that? We know that is not working.
Intel has even said at least 60% of their effort will go to Android and realistically this should be over 90%.
Their new tablet chip technologies promise to be interesting this holiday season, but we will have to see if the experience is good.
Most people don't get this, but the reason why people pay you money for your work is that they turn a profit on it. As soon as you can, look into working for yourself. I guarantee your boss will be the biggest ass, the most demanding jerk you have ever worked for - but you get to keep the money.