no.
I think the first lesson in the school of the jobsian way is "Don't fire Jobs."
Clearly they weren't THAT well versed.
1937 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Oct 2008
for the love of $deity, ban the model dialog. This has been a complaint of mine since the introduction of the GUI. there is ABSOLUTELY nothing that so important an application has to interfere with my usage of another app. If you need to tell me something to continue, pop the dialog and go to sleep until I respond.
meet hard-place.
The problem with this article is it kinda is shoving the studio-agencies between a rock and a hard-place. On one hand, you expect them to price based on regionally appropriate pricing, but at the same time they HAVE to assume the lowest is going to be what they get. The "grey market" imports will ensure that.
Eliminates copyright violations though.
("grey market" imports are not copyright violations, because they copy *IS* made by the rights holders, not some non-authorized party)
"Who said it was patent related?"
Every
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/23/samsung_battles_apple_with_kubrick/
Reported
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/09/apple_wins_injunction_against_samsung_galaxy_tab_in_europe/
News
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27076_3-20096061-248/samsung-cites-kubrick-film-in-apple-patent-spat/
Story
http://www.pcworld.com/article/238488/apple_again_cites_inaccurate_evidence_in_samsung_patent_case.html
On
http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/08/02/tech-wrap-itc-joins-apple-samsung-spat/
The
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2383768,00.asp
Matter
http://www.ebnonline.com/author.asp?section_id=1038&doc_id=232290&itc=ebnonline_gnews
you've never talked to the guys over at Violin, have you?
An 80T Violin system is pretty massively expensive. Their stuff is in the category of "we don't list prices, because if you have to ask, you can't afford it." Generally you don't put all your data on it, just your active data set (what you need to be fast).
You DEFINITELY wouldn't put silliness like disaster recovery, and volume testing on it. (that would be kept on a more-conventional array)
"X for morphine ergo X for insulin" FALSE.
Insulin and morphine are VARY different drugs, administered under VARY different rules, for VARY different conditions.
What is done for morphine (a highly addictive, opiate, analgesic (pain killer)) has nothing to do with with how Insulin (a hormone for regulating carbohydrate and fat metabolism) is regulated.
but since you appear to be lazy to be arsed, I'll look for you:
"You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed)."
-- http://twitter.com/tos
so, no co-ownership, and it doesn't "become public (domain)." They just require you to license it to them. IF a media organization has a partnership with them, the license would appear to extend to that group. IF i saw something I posted where to show up on the beeb (unlikely, as I dont use twitter), I would invoice them and let them produce a valid license from twitter.
That is an beautiful non-sequitor.
The person you are responding to did not ask "What makes him think rights holders want German copyright law imposed across the EU?" he asked "what makes him think he has the right to impose German copyright law across the EU?"
A German deciding German law should be imposed over all of the EU member-states is no less arrogant then an American deciding American law should be imposed across all EU member-states. Sovereign states are sovereign.
You didn't answer my question, you just supposed they provide a offer, let me re-ask the important part:
Did these companies always provide a written offer to supply the code upon request?
If they did (at all times), they are good.
If they did not at any point, their license was revoked. If so they have to contact every copyright holder and secure a new license (which was really the part of the article that was surprising to me.
If there was or was not a request is irrelevant unless the offer has been made. This is an honest question, I don't own any of these companies products, and haven't read the paperwork that came with the phones purchased by others so lack even anecdotal evidence to this effect.
Did the vendors include a written offer to provide a machine readable copy of the corresponding code?
If not, a subsection b defense would also be invalid, and they are in non-compliance.
Section 3 subsection b is quite clear on the matter, the offer MUST accompany the distribution. The offer MUST be made and it MUST be EXPLICIT. The problem in a subsection b defense isn't the time frame for providing the code, it's if no offer accompanied the binaries.
Of course, this is the exact type of reason many vendors prefer BSD.
Never mind the glaring historical inaccuracies, you managed to may a one sentence thought drone on for four paragraphs, with a plethora of sesquipedalians. Good show!
(ok I can't leave the historical inaccuracies alone)
I'm not sure you really ever used an Apple II, or you'd know the inaccuracies of your description of Apple's founding principle. I almost get the impression you think Apple was founded in 1983, rather then 1976.
Later on, you again show a lack of understanding of history, only HP's this time. If you really look at when HP went down-hill, it started when they DROPPED many of the item's targeted at engineers. It has been in decline since shortly Carly Fiorina took the helm, and divested Agilent Technologies (which has been repeating the mistakes of history, and divesting parts of itself lately). Some of the major decisions under her "leadership" where openly opposed by Walter Hewlett. The engineers haven't been at helm of HP for a decade.
yes, there are a few of you here who like to run the never-ending PC upgrade treadmill. That maybe 20% of the elReg readership, it's closer to 1% of the (developed) world at large. A developer cannot depend on you having the newest wizzbang-shiny graphics card, ergo they cannot afford to assume you do.
Most people do not buy a top-of-the-line PC. Most people do not upgrade their PC every 2 years. YOU ARE THE EXCEPTION, NOT THE RULE. (feel good about yourself, I just called you exceptional!)
Games are not made to show off the top-of-the-line machine, they are made to make money. That means they need to be playable by a wide-spread audience. Even if you make a PC version, you still have to target a 2-3 year old machine.
In processing resources, tablets may be able to challenge consoles (ignoring that tablets are a crap interface for most popular game-styles (would work well for RTS I bet)), you can't DEPEND on what's there. It's actually worse then the PC.
Ahh, but most PCs don't do intense database runs, that's a server workload.
Most PCs aren't running LA Noire, that would be a console. (AFAIK it's not even available for the PC). Even Crysis was available for consoles, and is a case-study in why consoles are better for gaming then PCs (hardware predictability).
The tablet is your "window" into the resources of a more powerful system. We have been moving that way for a while. Whether that is a good model for most of what we do, is another question entirely.
Are you kidding? Everyone (even guys) count as women on the internet!
Did SitC have a teenage demographic? If so, is the demographic STILL teenage? I'll be honest, I have no idea what it's demographic is. I think a more interesting question then "what percentage of SitC's audience is female?" is "What percentage of females are SitC fans?"
Why are we using browser detection at all? Hasn't CSS included notations for different formats for a while now?
@media handheld
Of course, many of the mobile and tablet browsers ignore it (because they generally look like crap where they exist at all), so many sites are resorting to UA detection to FORCE on us the crap-version.
Here's a thought, stop serving different pages to different browsers. Just serve everyone the same compliant page.
Why does this really matter?
I mean a cock-up's a cock-up, and they shouldn't have made the mistake, but how early you get the results back doesn't affect the outcome does it? I understand trying to release them all at once and all, but getting this worked up is just sillyness!
Wasn't that the point? Anonymous holds no opinion and all opinions. They are always both for and against everything. They both do everything and do nothing. They cannot be fractured, for they are the essence of fracture. They are, by their own definition ("We are Leigon") the essence of mob-mentality... only they are not just one mob, but many.
You don't HAVE to be world accessible to be attack. Stuxnet proved that little theory (which had been floating around for a while). You just need to accept that sneakernet is still a valid attack vector.
Yes, they should fill in USB ports with epoxy, but that really doesn't happen often.
but (as you point out) it maps DAMN well to a few tasks. the problem I'm seeing at the moment, is that all this non-relational hype is sometimes (but not necessarily always) just a cover for poor design.
Proper relational databases (sit down MySQL, you don't get any credit here. The lack of proper enforcement of relations in MySQL is IMNSHO one of the biggest issues this is a backlash against. MySQL is all the disadvantages of relational DBs, with none of the benefits.) means the DB is actually checking the data for you. Did some yahoo try to say John Smith drives a cat to work? Well "cats" are not in SillyDB.AutoMfgs, so a PROPER relational DB refuses to add it.
I've done some experimenting with redis, and it is nice for some things (session data is a great example), but for many things the advantages of relational are really hard to ignore.
mine the one with a PostgreSQL copy in the pocket
You and I have a contract. I pay you 1M you deliver me 2M widgets in 6 mo. If you cannot deliver that within the time-frame and budget, then you did not deliver.
FULL STOP.
IOf course attitudes like yours are the reason no government project is anywhere near budget or on-time.
"Because, if London was as awash with guns as the average American Wal-Mart, there would certainly be fewer burnt out buildings and a lot more dead people this morning."
I think that was his point. Remind me, are you with him or against?
You say "people" some of us say "arsonists, thieves, and murders." The first two are pretty obvious, the last... well, there will be a body count even with the UK's firearms policy. But, look at the bright-side, maybe all the wonton destruction will stimulate the economy </brokenwindowfallicy>
no, this is completely different from the Indian situation. RIM was asked for the traffic going through servers they control, they complied.
India is mad because RIM says they can't give access to data going through servers they DON'T control. If the Plod in the UK asked RIM for the traffic transversing one the BESes I operate RIM would say they can't give it. This is not because they don't want to, it's because they are incapable.
Despite the rather slathered on sarcasm, you kinda have a bit of a point.
It is the responsibility of the reader to sort out the quality of the material. you shouldn't depend on others to think for you. I'll admit I took the story at face value, but I also recognized that it stunk to high-heaven because of the extreme selection bias in (real) surveys like this.
In short what I saw mostly from the comments section of the last article was case study confirmation bias. This article and many of the comments could be categorized with a river in Egypt.
As someone who has photo-induced seizures, yes, I HAVE heard of fluorescent tubes hurting people. The last seizure I had required two pins and a screw to fix a broken and dislocated shoulder. Followed by half a year of rehabilitation to restore full movement to my arm.
"The flicker of a faulty fluorescent strip light, however, could trigger a seizure in people with photosensitive epilepsy." --http://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/photosensitive-epilepsy/triggers#lights
But I'm sure your ignorance is FAR better proof then the millions who have epilepsy and seizure disorders.