"and to handle it according to government guidelines "
Sooo... they promise to lose it on the evening train home, fully unencrypted?
1937 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Oct 2008
I never said nintendo wasn't bad. They are. The whole industry is bad, they are just another example of it. What I am saying is you are being myopic in singling one out when it's a systemic problem with all the major publishers.
It's not even just a problem with games either. We have been seeing rehashes of the same stuff for years in major motion pictures as well. The industry has discovered a formula that seemed to work in the past, so do it again.
I'm not defending nintendo, I'm condemning the entertainment industry.
"but it's just another Ninty sequel"
The problem is I can say that about almost EVERYTHING that gets released on all platforms any more. How about FIFA 67, or Modern Warfare 42? The entire AAA games industry has gotten to the point that it's so expensive to make a game that there can be no failures so, rather then risk a completely new IP, they keep rehashing the old.
This is why there has been such a frenzy around crowdfunded games, a number of which pulling in millions. We are seeing nothing but homogeny amongst the major players, we want diversity.
<- The pirate flag, I'm sure the low sales will be attributed to piracy somehow.
"Totally agree. Even our licensing guys usally have to go to MS to work it out...and even then, you get different answers depending on who you speak to there."
Absolutely! There aren't many things I lothe more then dealing with MS licensing. Honestly, if I had the choice to never deal with them again, or never deal with the taxman again.... I think I would hug the taxman.
The way I am understanding the preowned mechanic is both new consoles actually have a system in place but only Microsoft have actively announced it and the internet have jumped all over it, but it is actually up to the publishers how and if they use it.
You understand incorrectly. Sony has been intentionally vague on this, probably to egg MS into doing this online every day, only resell if you pay us crap. Sony turned around and announced (after the internet has started to fume) that you will be able to whatever you want with your game. Play it, resell it, poop on it, whatever makes you happy. Any copy-protection will be solely for stopping copying. They aren't even doing region-locking.
MS on the other-hand have announced that if your XBone has been offline for more then 24 hrs, you aren't playing any games.
Microsoft have obviously handled the fallout from this all pretty badly, but I have faith (that sounds a bit religious perhaps) that things will work out and I will pick up an Xbox One in about a years time after the first production batch has been used up and any manufacturing problems get corrected.
Wow, that's brand loyalty. Almost the level of a Mac user. They have annouced "we plan to stick it to you," You know (and admit) they put out faulty hardware, but you are STILL confident you are going to buy it? Wow.
Personally, I'm not convenced I want either, but if you made me choose one, at this point it would have to be the PS4.
<-- Trollface, because that's what Sony is doing to MS.
Really. Ok, do something for me. Full screen your web browser and keep doing something else on the other monitor.
What? it turns the other monitor into a useless grey rectangle for no apparent reason?
I do not consider that to be proper support. I do consider it to be a horrid user experience, but apparently you don't have a proper understanding of what support is...
So if I give you an entangled particle, and alter my particle based on a bitstream. you record the changes in your particle, then bring them back and we compair, What will the results be? Will your observations become part of the waveform, only be collapsed when we compair?
If that's the case, why can I not send you the signal via the entangled particle, then send if via "slow" light. Your actions are then part of the waveform which is collapsed when the signal confirming what I send arrives. In effect, you take both actions and we just destroy the universe where you took the "wrong" action...
I sometimes wear two pars of glasses, but only one pair are sunglasses. One does reside on the top of my head, when I do.
In fairness to me though, both are a rather strong prescription, and normally it means I have been going in and out of buildings on a sunny day.
If they want this to catch on, they need to develop a way to apply it to whatever glasses are considered "fashionable" or happen to be my prescription. And maybe get it bright enough to use on a sunny day.
such FRAND terms including that a royalty shall not exceed the price of the product ( so £0 for free / open source software ).
So you get to give away a product, based on my research, ensuring I can get nothing from it. There is nothing fair, reasonable or non-discriminatory about that. That ensures the failure of every commercial entity doing any significant amount of research.
When you are in charge, I, for one, will keep all of my devices as trade secrets.
1) The current trend in the global economy is towards automation. Under that scenario it's easy to see the effects: you will have a few people and companies with lots of money and everyone else in low-paid service jobs. The fact is that corporation tax will have to be large just to stop a revolution.
You aren't taking it far enough, who are those service jobs going to service? You're talking about a situation where there are only 100 or so people in the entire world with the money to be able to go out to eat. How many restaurants do you really thing can be supported in that situation?