Dag-nabbit
So Gary McKinnon taught them nothing..? I'm looking forward to the next batch of leaks already.
1321 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
“Meanwhile, the PC ages and slows down as it is loaded down with new or updated software.”
Only if you subscribe to the upgrade treadmill. A 10-year old PC running Win 2k, Office 2k and Opera/Chrome/Firefox will do everything most ordinary mortals will need and as quickly as a new PC running the current MS bloatware. I know this because I have one at home and the other at work - my old PC starts up in under a minute from POST (even quicker if I use Lubuntu)...
As for security, I think most of the bugs are written for current versions, so another reason to remain unfashionable.
The piece of law that says, in effect, that you can’t complain about a non-compliance after six months needs to be sorted out too. The University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit has used that already to wriggle off the ICO’s hook and parliament sits on its hands because it doesn’t want too much enquiry into anything that keeps the population alarmed and allows them to invent new taxes. IMO, of course.
(The politicians are the weasels, BTW. CG sounds a reasonable bloke.)
All the harrumphing by the Pentagon (and The Sun, natch) about security and ‘our brave boys’ (TM) merely draws attention to the nakedness of the Emperor. Such information is way too old to make much difference on the ground, and as for long-term strategy, it would be nice if we had one. This won’t affect the squaddies, but it might make people wonder how the spooks justify their existence in the information age.
Won't the interleaving cause trouble when the digital signals are turned up to full power? My understanding is that they are currently on low power to avoid co-channel interference with the analogue signals, so it seems reasonable to assume that the reverse will be true after switch-over. Will they be worth anything to anyone, in other words..?
It's not a conspiracy - it's just what academics do when faced with the choice of funding to carry on producing the required results, or no funding not to.
Physicists like Lewis and Dyson (and Feynman, before them) are used to doing proper 'hard' science and are outraged by the behaviour of climatologists and their ilk who produce results to order, such as sugar producers funding 'research' into the harmlessness of their product.
To quote Graham Stringer, of government committee fame, it's not science, it's literature.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/10/oxburgh_science_select_committee/
"The City of London police dropped their investigation of the Phorm trial, claiming BT had reasonable grounds to believe it had customers' consent"
How do they work that out, then? Did BT threaten to cut off their phone lines if they didn't drop the case?
I hope HMG will pass on any euro-fines to BT, otherwise we will all end up paying for Mr Ertegrul's little adventure.
"he's already lost more than he could have ever gained"
Apart from becoming (in)famous! And now every like-minded 'Christian' in the US (and there will be plenty) will be joining up and sending him money. There's no such thing as bad publicity, especially in the Land of the Gullible...
And he's starting to retract his cancellation.. :-(
"So, I went straight to the head of the billing office and reamed that woman a new arsehole."
Nice. I don't suppose it occurred to you that the woman you spoke to was probably had nothing to do with the mistake? I get angry with bureaucracy all the time, but I try not to chew out the person who answers the phone!
You admit that mistakes get made, even in your smoothly-oiled wholesale operation (you seem to specialise in holes), and tacitly admit that some got through:
"many times mistakes in applying payments were caught before the statement hit the mail"
I.e. sometimes they weren't. Presumably you fired the perpetrator on each occasion?