Re: "An email address is unique to a person. "
Just curious what kind of company needs an email group for all the women and for all the men?
I've never heard of such a thing before.
1434 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Jul 2008
"Aren't unpaid internships and being paid thruppence ha'penny a kind of ageism too?"
Kind of. Unpaid work is just plain exploitation.
But the younger tend to get paid less because they are worth less (not "worthless") due to their lesser experience, depending on the area, obviously.
"I'd only seen ads for iPhone screen replacement and people on public transport using iPhones with cracked screens"
That's my experience too. My hypothesis is that a large part of the iPhone market overlaps with the set of people who treat their phone with less respect than a miniature high performance computer made of fragile materials deserves. ie. the young, they've been brought up with them being a normal part of life, not a new high-tech gadget, and treat them accordingly, like a toaster. Familiarity breeds, if not contempt, then indifference.
I would imagine that in fact it will present you with dire warnings of all the terrible things that could happen if you continue, but will still allow you to run it. A bit like Chrome when you go to a site with a self-signed (or worse, a self-signed and expired) certificate.
"will there be anything outside of museums still using 32-bit Unix time?"
Of course there will. Some will be embedded or control systems built by suppliers who no longer exist. Those will be the big problems, because the users won't even be aware that a problem is coming.
"The sections of the A1 called "A1(M)" are of sufficiently motorway-like character that the law treats them as motorways (e.g. no stopping, no bicycles, no L plates except HGVs, etc.)"
And uses the term "Non-Motorway Traffic" on signs directing such vehicles away from it.
I think we can safely say that they are indeed motorways.
It's completely meaningless. What does "leaving the system mean"? Erased? nobody thinks that's happened. Transmitted to another party - of course, that's what "accessed" means. Unless the hacker was reading the HDD with a compass needle!
The difference is that this is aimed at consumers, not at professional pilots.
It takes a lot more training and people take it a bit more seriously (rightly or wrongly) than learning all the controls of their car and what every bit does.
So a large number of consumers don't know precisely what an airline autopilot does and does not do? And that makes it their fault if they therefore make a mistake about the capabilities of a system aimed at them for domestic cars?
I don't think so.
Nobody said "NASA thinks a few hours notice could save lives".
This one was only detected a few hours before because it's really small and consequently of no danger (as was shown a few hours after detection).
Larger, and consequently more dangerous, ones are much easier to spot.
"Frankly I'd rather see my data in their hands than in those of the dot-coms. Just how much democracy and transparency do those dirty little moneygrubbers aspire to?"
But the point has been made several times that the dot-coms don't have the power nor the ulterior motives of governments in this regard. They just want your money, as has always been the case, even Arkwright's corner store knew plenty about his customers and their habits, but again, only to sell them stuff.
Most of this is guessed/inferred, not actually known. Payday? Unless they are looking at my bank account there's no way they would know that. No, I don't have a Tesco bank account but I do have their credit card, the timing of spending and billing of which is entirely unrelated to when I get paid, as is my shopping.
Occupation/husband's occupation? Not sure how my supermarket shop could give this away, unless you buy a specific magazine for that occupation (how many of those are there?)
My guess is that Tesco and the others have a lot of semi-accurate and some completely inaccurate information about people.
The problem with the concept of Jaywalking is that it seems to criminalise harmless crossing the road when it's safe to do so.
If you are wandering in the road when there is traffic about, you are a danger to yourself and others and there may be a case for prosecution. If on the other hand you cross the road at a sensible time and perfectly safely, it's a waste of time and money to treat that as wrongdoing, which I have heard stories of many times.
To be fair, the BBC article does mention that they had years to prepare, and also finishes by saying
"cyber-criminals were never likely to have provided accurate contact details for their scam websites, and highlight that the law does provide added protection for legitimate registrants."
"Which is it?"
Read the article properly. He's saying that if you UNINSTALL as apparently recommended in these YT vids, that is not OPTING OUT, it's just removing the s/w. So a message is not sent to Canonical and consequently they don't know that you've effectively opted out.
You don't supposedly earn all of it, you supposedly earn the bit after tax has been paid.
If you don't like it, go and find somewhere uninhabited with no government, because that's about the only way you'd not have to contribute to society and infrastructure. There won't be any paid jobs there though, so no tax to be paid. What's not to like?!
And taxation is certainly not slavery. Nobody's forcing you to work.
It's true but they need to put in big letters that to get the full speed depends on your equipment, and Wifi frequently isn't up to it.
Many packages are sold as a Wifi Router and that's it. to your average punter Wifi is "the internet" and they don't want to mess around with cables, and most don't even know what a network cable is.