Re: Unsung triumph?? Yeah, right.
Because if they went through that service assessment...... they might not crash when there's a peak in activity.
560 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Apr 2007
PM David Cameron.. says: “I believe the creation of the Government Digital Service is one of the great unsung triumphs of the last Parliament."
Because you'd want to sing about the great triumph of the payments system for the Dartford Crossing being in alpha state over a year and a half since it went live, wouldn't you ??
Every time the latest GDS farce happens, I go off and look. Still alpha ?? Check.
Verify. Don't get me fucking started on that.
Turned out I needed to sign up to it to submit details of changes in personal circumstances for an adjustment to my tax code via gov.uk or whatever bullshit name the Web 2.x types have dreamt up this week.
Why they can't passport across my Government Gateway ID that I've been using for well over a decade for Tax, VAT, blood doning and God alone knows what else and thus should be more than good enough to verify my identity I can't fathom. Other than sheer incompetence and lack of understanding. Oh yes, see "Web 2.x types".
Anyways, go through all the rigmarole, 30 minutes later get verify from the Post Office because I distrust them slightly less than the other providers on offer. Of course, they've ambled off to the credit reference agencies for info to ask questions that might confirm I'm who I say I am. Go back to the gov.uk site, sign in, submit the changes. Sorry, for some reason I totally forget now the changes I want to make can't be submitted here. Please call us or write.
So I go back to the old HMRC site with my GG ID. Happily submit the changes via that route which is mercifully still working, new tax code issued within 2 weeks, no painful phone call or expensive letter required.
Someone please put the almost-entirely-still-Beta-flagged gov.uk and the crowd who work on it at the Cabinet Office out of our misery ASAP and tell HMRC there's (comparatively) little wrong with what they're doing at the moment and rip-and-replace is NOT required after all.
Ambulance driver missed signs of sepsis
You are Jeremy Hunt and I Claim My Five Pounds.
For your information, the people you are presumably referring to there, who are qualified to make certain diagnoses and carry out certain treatments, are professionals whose job title is Paramedic. They are not Ambulance Drivers, despite the Health Secretary's recent repeated attempts to down-classify them every time he mentions them in a speech. He's yet to change his language.
The one massive problem with ALL renewable power sources is that the are INTERMITTENT and can not supply base load.
And the massive problem when nuclear came along was that it was slow to turn on and off (and the problems weren't just with the reactors - I saw the video of what happened to the stator end windings on a 600MW set when it went from 0 to full load...) ie constant generation, whilst the load was variable - sort of the converse of wind/solar/tidal.
It's why Cruachan and Dinorwic were constructed in the first place. And they can do the same job for renewables - store until needed.
Anyway, we've kicked the can a decade or two down the road by extending the life of a number of existing nukes.
Even accepting (which of course I don't) the second half of the sentence in the quoted assertion, it's still faux science, because the first half of the sentence doesn't tell us (other than by implcation) which isotope of Uranium is being referred to.
I know I shouldn't have gone there, but just for the lulz I visited your website. In one essay (Nullius in Verba, presumably yours) I found:
"Uranium has a half life of 4.5 billion years in laboratory conditions but the decay rate is unknown and unpredictable in the Earths molten mantle"
This assertion tells me who is the faux scientist in one sentence.
Thanks for your ref. Now, that's interesting. The post has an insert headed "Update: 2014". Groklaw "closed" on 20th August 2013. All I had been aware of happening since then was updates to the various timelines (pretty much SCO vs IBM) and 2 or 3 new "news picks".
And those news picks have some PJ comments too, so it's not just Mathfox.
Kodak - ex-Interactive Unix. The only "other" Unix on 80386 in the mid-80s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_Systems_Corporation
I thought they were already in Chapter 7.... <clickety-click>.... Yes, converted 24 August 2012
David Boies' law firm undertook to carry on (this part of) the litigation until its conclusion for a fixed fee, and, if I remember correctly, a share in any settlement. So they're contractually obliged to the "trustee"-in-bankruptcy to carry on this farce.
But that was for legal fees, not expenses. Which is why things are now moving at a glacial pace. Boies et al know the chances of profit!!!! are very low, so they really are doing the bare minimum.
So the answer to the question is - it was all paid for up-front a decade or so ago. You'll note that Microsoft had some involvement in one round of funding back then. Allegedly.
If you don't realise why he's been so royally downvoted, oh well.....
I'm sure you'd just love the reputation of being the guy who lost 2 deep space probes that had gone the furthest of any manmade object and had been doing just fine for decades. Through your bright idea for how Things Could Be Done Better.
Seems you couldn't be arsed to upvote him, either.
HP 2100 not a mainframe, 'twas a desktop mini.
2nd year elec eng, 1974/5, programming it was part of the optional computing course.
We had to write the assembler, then hand-assemble it into the machine code, then enter it in with the front panel pushbuttons.
I thus gained an intuitive understanding of how instructions are decoded, logic flows through the ALU, and the way an ISR works.
Can I have the job please ?? I still don't "get" object-orientation :-)
C++ - agreed
C - show me another language which delivers damn near the same performance as assembler and allows explicit access to all the machine's registers (both of which are crucial for an operating system - I remember the OS that Olivetti wrote in Pascal) whilst giving you at last some decent higher-level constructs,and then I'd agree. And assembler with macros pretending to be higher-level isn't allowed. That's what we had before C.
"This is about computer networks"
I'd make the case that this isn't about computer networks, but about communication networks. In which case, they most certainly did exist. With exactly the same challenge to address as today's networks - how to communicate securely over an insecure medium.
In WW2, the medium was morse code transmitted over HF radio. This was easily intercepted with a sufficient number of skilled operators at sufficient receiving stations. These operators are amongst the unsung heroes - accurately transcribing random characters is far harder than plain language.
just large and with various bits that dont talk to other bits
Net result, the organisation says one thing and does another.
Hypocrisy, n.:
a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
I daresay that attribute in a human is derived from the same root cause - bits of the brain that ought to talk to each other but don't.
Knowledge of the means by which a behaviour occurs doesn't alter the behaviour itself or its effect on others.
Also known as "an explanation isn't an excuse"
"steps must be taken to ensure that critical customer information is protected regardless of where it is in the supply chain."
So, tell me Mr Outsourcing Provider Salesdroid - how I can do that (with extra special emphasis on the word "ensure") without spending damn' nearly as much as (or very possibly more than) I'd have to to do the whole thing myself in the first place ??
Gone very quiet, all of a sudden.