Bah!
So, if I read it right, to avoid being tracked you simply have to stay out of California and Israel.
Well, I call "SAFE"!
7284 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2008
But you don't understand: The Republican Base loves GWB and believes he did a *good* job.
Or at least, that's what Hannity O'Reilly and Limbaugh will have The Republican Base believing come election day.
If Jeb Bush stands, he will win the nomination and stand a very good chance of taking the White House *despite* his family's record on just about anything you care to notice. I'm terrified because I don't think we can stand another financial disaster and there's been a major banking failure C/W taxpayer bailout under every Bush's presidency to date.
And deficits always run away faster than TMI-2 under a post-1980 Republican. As I just said to a colleague: if Republicans are the party of big business how come they can't run the country at a profit like Clinton did? Is it that every Republican in politics is a failed businessman?
Every single Republican president that I've lived under in the USA has presided over an economy that is wheezing like a tubercular street person.
I believe that was the prevailing opinion back in 2000 when sensible people knew a boob like GWB couldn't get elected.
Then we got 8 years of total mismanagement in which America was successfully attacked by a known threat from a known source, the replacement of the "nothing to fear but fear itself" principle with the color-coded "The sky is falling! The sky is falling" Chickenshit Little Doctrine, and, as the icing on the cake, the ship of state was crashed so hard onto the reef of Economic Malfeasance that it very nearly sank completely with all hands proving to the world how unworkable American Capitalist Economic Theory was.
And in all that time I never once believed the country was under the control of the person elected to the president's office, but was being controlled by the venal, vicious and paranoid old man he brought with him to sit in the other chair.
Most of the machinery that put George the Second on the throne is still in place.
I'd be afraid. I am afraid.
It took about 30 years and the effects of post-war liberalization to get Germany anywhere near an acceptable industrial base. etc. Holes in cities. etc.
Good. Doesn't make up for the rationing that went on for 10 years after VE Day in England or the big holes in Coventry, where I grew up, yea unto the early 60s or the war-caused power rationing that closed factories for hours every day so *England* couldn't get back up to speed at full, er, speed.
Dear recently post WWII Germany: That's what you get for being a bunch of gits.
The real problem with the personal cloud and indeed the vast majority of IT tech coming down the pipe for the last 10 years is not the technology, it's the willful obfuscation of what a given scenario actually encompasses by use of maddeningly imprecise marketing-friendly "clixby*" terms.
"8X performance vs (insert competitor)" - Does NOT mean "8 times the performance" or there are some horrendous misprints in the metrics on the slide being shown as this is said.
"On demand scaling" - rarely is on demand anything as it requires a negotiation of some sort in order to switch on the resources in question. That negotiation may be entirely electronic but since billing is involved look for unforeseen complications when the resource is actually needed that once in any given year.
"Vertical (anything)" - Better check your vendor's marketing bible before you buy.
"Fault tolerance". "High availability". These are terms that mean specific things to vendors. Unfortunately, the fine print is on a per vendor basis.
So is it any wonder no-one is doin' it rite? If you drive a technology by aggressive marketing you can't be upset when no-one takes it very seriously after a couple of seminars**.
* Clixby - politely uninformative The Meaning of Liff 1st edition
** Technical term for disguised high-pressure sales presentation.
And here I thought that anyone needing an air-gapped computer would understand that the air gapping would need to be at the *computer* network level, and the said computer would still need elementary protections such as not executing code from external devices by default and firewalling them until they passed AV testing.
I mean, once upon a time all desktop computers were air-gapped and the savvy companies still had warnings about sneakernet AV practices pasted to the support columns to properly indoctrinate the workforce.
But then, I'm an old person who was once a mainframe Cobol programmer and so by default a dimwit. What do I know about the exciting world of modern IT?
So lemme see if I have this right: The UK Government has finally gotten behind the idea of training kids to be computer programmers (we'll leave aside the wisdom behind that in the larger sense for another time) just as the local iteration of the industry is laying off and dumbing-down (anyone who thinks the state of the art AI is gonna be a replacement for human rat-dancers has spent too much time drinking the kool aid).
Wot, no strategic vision?
As for letting said AI scrape Stack Overflow et al, I predict all that will do is make the AI snotty and uncomunicative, undoing years of R&D in cognitive pattern analysis and advanced lexing.
I say go for it. I'd love to see whether the AI declares Reiser is Innocent after the first pass.
I once owned a Mini Traveller which I bet real money people couldn't steal even sitting in it with the keys in hand. I never lost money.
Most couldn't find the starter. It was under the driver's seat - original equipment too - you pushed the solenoid in with your thumb (or, rumour had it, you could use a stiletto heel if you wore such things). It was like starting a helicopter.
But the kicker was that almost no-one could find the battery (under the rear seat). Because in those days there was no need for "vital" electronic components to be powered up at all times people could and did fit simple rotary battery isolation switches. No juice, no start, no theft.
With the advent of the Raspberry Pi it occurs to me that a bright lad could fit an aftermarket device to turn off the ignition and jam the horn on if, after a few seconds, the computer couldn't detect the rfid device on your key fob.
If it weren't for the nanny state protecting the poor criminals you could replace the pansy horn blowing idea with a more manly phosgene dispenser connected to the air-vents, epilepsy-inducing strobe lights in the dashboard and overhead and ankle-level underseat flamethrowers.
Last week a friend was moaning on the uselessness of house alarm systems. I suggested he have his expensive system coupled to his powerful in-ground lawn sprinklers.
"What's the point?" he asked. "So they get wet".
Well, you can't stop the thieving, but you can make it much less comfortable for the bastards doing it, which is why my house alarm has an indoor siren as loud as the outdoor one. The thieves will be able to work with no interruptions from the police, but they'll be deaf for days afterwards. I know. It went off by accident around Christmas and I have the eardrums to prove it.
Installed ghost 14 on an XP machine about five years ago to do a full disc dump to removable external disc storage. It fucked up the exsisting NAV/IS installation to the point I had to strip is all out and re-install, the ghost nagware nearly drove me round the fucking bend whining about the fact that the external hard drive was only powered up when I needed to backup (it wanted to do diferential saves, I wanted it to be satisfied with weekly full backups) and then, to top it off, when I needed it to recover my hard drive it bleated that it couldn't find an image for the recovery to use.
So, self knackering software that wouldn't play with other software - from the same company.
So, I kicked Ghost off the machine and badmouthed it whenever anyone mentioned it, and when the subscription was up I dumped NAV/IS too.
No more Norton products for me.
Why the hate-on for barrel jacks Adrian 4?
I just upgraded the Chateau Stevie Visual Ents Suite from the old Phillips CRT and surround sound DVD wotsit and my Voyage of Discovery showed that pretty much all the equipment options as far as flat screen TVs, soundbars, sub-woofers and Blu-ray players all featured barrel jack power supply connectors.
I'm not trying to pick a fight. I'm genuinely interested in your objections to them.
" Lanier argued that by convincing users to give away valuable information about themselves in exchange for “free” services, firms such as Google and Facebook have accumulated colossal amounts of data ... "
And, as these firms are discovering even as I type, colossal amounts of data are not information. I love to use otherwise idle time at my computer allowing Google to gather more data on me as I browse myriad disconnected web sites of no interest to me in reality. I would pay real money to watch the faces of the poor git tasked with trying to make information out of all that data.
I mean, look how good they are at presenting me with targeted search results.
Exercise for the reader: Search Google for "White Slave" and glory in the flood of hits purporting to give one the lowest prices on White Slaves pasted down the right hand column of the Google results page.
"Information Age". Pft!
Two things occur to me:
a) The GUI performance of a Raspberry Pi running tailor-made Raspbian is execrable, all but unusable. Given the shoe-horning a Pi requires, how could a terra-bloat GUI be better?
2) Wouldn't putting Windows on a Raspberry Pi simply be a way of making the device cost the same as a PC to buy?
Before the screaming and leaping commences, I own two Raspberry Pi model B machines, an original 256 meg one and a spiffy up-memoried 512 meg one. All comments about performance verified by experiment and long nights trying to make the GUI work acceptably.
Dear Microsoft:
I've actually enjoyed using some of your products for years, generally abandoning them when the Hunt For Sales brought Unnecessary Sweeping Change.
Outlook and Word are now rendered largely unusable to the casual or occasional user who doesn't have the time or budget for formal education in the new version of what used to be a reasonably intuitive product line. True, I needed help occasionally, but I was always able to recognize when this was the case.
Now I waste time trying to use the things before once again going to Google to find out how to do something I once considered trivial (the official Microsoft help is about as much use as hiccups are to a glassblower). Guess which product line is not allowed on my personal computer equipment any more?
You need to know something: I am never, repeat: never, going to own a Microsoft tablet computer. Designing your software to the assumption I will eventually See The Light will only result in hastening my switch to non-Microsoft-originated operating systems.
I do not need touch control, nor do I applaud your drive to make everything look and feel like I should be poking it with a finger. Tiles are ugly wastes of desktop that have no utility for me whatsoever. Foisting them on me is phenomenally bad in PR terms and a dead cert sales killer.
Please pass the word to your partners. I recently tossed out a very well known anti-virus/firewall package I'd used for years because they replaced the attractive and easy to figure out user interface with a bug-ugly tiled nightmare with less functionality.
Said package vendor is still mailing me under the impression I simply "forgot" to renew - against the evidence that my system no longer pings Vendor Central using the stealth "notifier services" that stayed around after I'd run the uninstall process. Azathoth bless Sysinternals for cutting the search and destroy process to only half an hour. Now there is a package of stuff with "We Get It" design.
I write stuff using my computer. For that I need a keyboard that doesn't either consume screen real estate or come packaged in such a small form factor my hands are pressed together while typing.
I draw stuff using my computer. The single advantage of doing so is that the drawing itself is never occluded by the drawing instrument. If I had one thing to say to Mr "no stylus" Jobs it would be "YOU CAN"T SEE WHAT YOU ARE DRAWING WHEN YOUR HAND IS IN THE WAY, F*CKHEAD".
Mr Jobs is sadly no longer with us, but the point still stands. Having the drawing instrument, be it a pen-and-tablet or mouse, off to the side well clear of the work being created is such a massively useful thing I'm staggered that people honestly can't see that for themselves. Ten seconds with a tablet computer and a drawing app should demonstrate it nicely to anyone.
One can only conclude that the people still foisting a "no mouse, touchy-touchy" model on me never use these products, and the less said about the suitability of such people for designing tools for my use the better.
So, at the risk of stating the bleeding obvious I'll sum it up:
1) What people like me want from the operating system is that it look and interact with them much like Windows XP. When thousands of people are telling you that they want to use your software bugs'n'all despite your screaming that they are being dense for doing so, perhaps it's time to stop using "they're stupid" and concede that perhaps you have been. Concentrate on refitting the engine and making the door locks more secure and stop f*cking about with the knobs and dials.
2) What people like me want from an Office Suite is that it be as easy to use as possible and that the thing that are broken under the hood be fixed, not the baby out with the bathwater chop'n'channel you keep giving us. I'm already done with MS Office for my own use. Your fault.
Just think: If you'd spent all that money educating people that even though Windows Whatever looked much the same as Windows Oldhat it performed better and was much safer to use, you'd have probably maintained that fantastic market share you won with clever and timely UI design (and a fair bit of clever marketing) in the first place. Now the sand is washing out from under you and your core business is a collection of products more and more people don't want to deal with.
Me included, and I *like* Windows 7, mostly.
Perhaps this is a natural defensive mechanism evolved to deal with resumés that have been meticulously and honestly compiled by the would-be candidate then passed through the grubby hands of a venal agent who "edited for content".
Can't count the times during my consulting years that I sat with a would-be client and had to explain that no, I can't do that and I didn't write that I could and would they please let me see what they were sent by Mr Ron Shady so I could wave the Blue Pencil of Truth at it?
Wait, yes I can. It was every f*cking time.
"With Windows 10, we think of the operating system as 'Windows as a service'," said Terry Myerson, Microsoft's VP of operating systems. "In next few years, you could think of Windows as one of the largest internet services on the planet. The question of 'what version are you running' will cease to make sense."
I'm guessing that this is weaselspeek for "Large protions of the Windows O/S will now download from the web on boot (providing you have a paid-up subscription) and Windows No Version Necessary will not work if you have no internet connection".
I imagine this makes sense if you consider all PC users to be gamers who have to be connected to Steam etc get their games to start, or if you live in that parallel Stupid Universe.
I see the operating system as fundamental bedrock, not "a service".
Microsoft spokesweasels have a very specific meaning in mind when they talk about services, a meaning not predicated on being the most useful to me under the least helpful circumstances, which is what I require from an OS.
Exclusive page III pictures of Lutetia Hiltonius: clumsy chariot dismount gives The Examiner's readers a chance to check for themselves the veracity of those "going Grecian" rumours with a lucky up-toga woodcut you won't want to miss. Also, Augustus's calendar changes: vital for Rome's farmers or simply a pain in the cloaca for everyone without "Caesar" in his name? Our latest poll lets YOU decide!"
Had to google this because I know a Bob Shaw short "Light of Other Days", which is an excellent story revolving around "slow glass", which had no privacy invasion in it (actually it did, but not in the way you'd expect).
If you are intrigued I recommend not Wiki-ing the Shaw story, but finding it and reading it from an unspoiled standpoint.
Not sure where you found me being rude to you. There was no intentional insult in anything I said, just a denial of the contention that Kubrick's 2001 has an understandable ending from what he filmed, a view I remember being almost universally held when the film was new and shiny and one I subscribe to on account of having seen it many times (I actually like the movie but that's irrelevant - you can like and admire the work and still be critical of the things that don't work right).
My point on the other films was that they excited much comparison with 2001 in the media (all three channels and the radio) and revived the controversy over the ending, not that watching them conveyed some sort of badge of honor (in point of fact I never got round to watching the Star Trek movie on the big screen either). We tend to forget that in 1979 there were few notable A-list SF movies in the wild, it being the Half Decade Of The Disaster Movie and CGI in its infancy, so good SF movies garnered a lot of press.
However, if you say that as a teen consumer of SF you were completely unaware of this I'll take your word for it.
So, you saw it ten years (and more) after it was released? If I remember correctly that was the year Star Trek: The Motion Picture was in released and about six months before that we'd seen Alien, both of which drew lots of media discussion on SF in the movies, including many wry comments about the ending of 2001 (and responses to them). It was part of the SF movie zeitgeist in the UK in those days, at least, the bits of it I was privileged to experience.
No, you don't have to share my opinion, but you don't have to be rude about it either.
And if you can in all honesty look at what Kubrick did in the last five minutes of the film and take away what Clarke wrote about in the last few paragraphs of the novelization of those events, I'd be more than surprised, because some very clever people used to looking at hard movies (sixties, remember, when movies could be very strange indeed) watched it and said WTF.
And yet in the novelization Clarke didn't render the last few pages in scribbled hieroglyphs or any of the numerous avant-garde writing techniques used to distance the reader from literal meaning in use at the time (we are right smack bang in the crest of the New Wave here) , he just told everyone what was going on in plain English because - and here is the good bit - he wasn't that impressed with Kubrick's version himself.
Okay, but I get the distinct impression you are coming to the debate over "2001 ending: Brilliant or Crap?" debate from the benefit of having seen others argue it out and having had the ending explained to you in numerous commentaries and, of course, having read the novelization of ... well, not really the film since the book ending went down on Japetus.
See, I'm giving you the dubious benefit of my reaction at the time, when the film was shown on a curved screen in a theatre large enough to hold one and though I had read the book and understood what was supposed to be happening, it was still visual gibberish.
"And just because he could be entertaining, doesn't mean Arthur C. Clarke couldn't be a git when his own monetary interests were at stake" - from Christ, Not Another F*cking Potboiler With 2001 In The Title Private Press, 1972.
Entire article predicated on universally available persistent internet.
So you are SOL if that is the problem you are trying to fix.
No, not trolling, just exasperated at yet another techie who sees the net as so obvious it doesn't need factoring in to the "mobile or not" question - a stupid question anyway as are all eggs-in-one-basket propositions. The real world rewards diversity at every granularity you care to notice. The wise SA takes this into consideration when planning.
Well, for one thing I think you'll find the phrase was trademarked several years ago in connection with an abandoned iPad commercial campaign with the working title "Oo Eeze Zis Charlie?"
At least, I'm sure that's what internal e-mails being written and back-dated even as I type will prove.