Bah!
Ah, I see it now. Geolocking isn't to protect the little guy from Big Bad Hollywood. It all makes sense now.
Wait, what?
7282 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2008
And how is this manifest of long and easily mis-spelled variable names "better" than the GUI?
Not arguing that remote admin is better, and that to do it you don't need a GUI, but removing the GUI "just because" smacks of Thought Police Policy, and we all know how well that worked for, say, Windows 8. Or Windows 10 (from reports in these pages). Or the Office ribbon. Or, well, you know.
And if you aren't going to include windows in the box, you can't really go around calling it "Windows", can you?
Thanks for the nifty article. I think it worth pointing out that while indeed the sewers were designed with excess capacity, they wouldn't work long if not for the gangs of civil engineers armed with shovels and gas masks.
These workers are always up a certain creek and often up to their knees in it. Spare them a thought the next time you feel moved to use the metaphor for some mildly tedious desk-job problem.
You don't have to look much further than an iPod for an example of over-convergence in the control design. No separate volume control means that you have to hope the on-board computer figures out that your frantic anticlockwise scrolling means "turn the fucking radio volume down, my eardrums are bursting" and not the half-dozen other things it does. (The iPod radio volume levels are usually many times higher than the mp3 playback volume for a given setting, so switching from, say, Led Zeppelin IV to the BBC World Service without first either dialing down the volume or removing the earbuds usually results in a similar experience to being flashbanged in a telephone box).
Or even car radios that cannot be turned off if the ignition is off. That idiocy is over a decade in the market and still going strong.
It's not about the hackers "viewing your 1040EZ" you blithering twit. It's about having someone file a fraudulent tax return in your name next year and making off with a sizable refund check and leaving you,the hacked, on the hook for it all until it gets sorted out, which can take forever but in the meantime you still have to make good and the IRS works - legally - on the principle of guilty until you prove otherwise.
While not entirely happy about running the exploit to prove it works without authorization, I am flabbergasted that Starbucks would sic the Fraud Dog on the hacker.
I have a method for evaluating actions I often espouse to my younger, more hotheaded peers. Ask "what's the best thing that could happen?" and phrase the answer as the negation of the worst thing you can think of happening.
Which would possibly have the Starbucks Fraud Dog constructing the following exchange: "What's the best thing that could happen as a result of me threatening this idiot with fraud charges? The case does not become a public cause celebre, the public does not start staying away in droves as the newspapers pile in and the Starbucks brand does not take a damned good thrashing in the market as a result."
So the answer would seem to be to stay away from this insidious "Website A" at all costs.
Or not to use the Safari browser of course. Speaking for my own experience using it on an iPad Air with an intermittent internet broadband connection (using it on my train commute) it is much less robust in terms of being able to cope with the webs going away and then coming back after a "post" has timed out than my browser of choice. Firefox over WIn7 has no problem with the same scenario.
Trying to edit a "favorite" today had me snarling in rage as numerous attempts failed to update the bloody thing. I ended up deleting it in the end and starting over from scratch. Hands down the worst f*cking browser/platform combination I've ever used.
Tsk! Australians, eh?
Speaking as someone who loved the quickfire audio-visual mini-jokes larded into Road Warrior & Thunderdome I can absolutely believe the post apocalyptic tongue was intentionally firmly in radiation-scarred cheek.
Iconic movies, all of them. Everyone yaps on about the "aerial shot everyone steals from Bladerunner" but how many times have you seen a recapitulation of "the disarming of Max at the gates of Bartertown"? The Hobbit was only the most recent "homage".
A sadly underrated series. This latest one is high on the Stevie Watch list (I never go in the first few days as I prefer to watch without an infuriating field of tiny oblong foglights shining back at me).
Unless they are, such as those caused by mechanical failure or other factors not linked to the vehicle itself. The classic example is the rear-end shunt in heavy traffic that catapults the hit vehicle into the one in front. Another would be the driver having a heart attack or some other debilitating problem. Perhaps he or she has been shot by arguing drug dealers.
I don't think you should drive until your intellect-clouding rage over the issue subsides a bit, unless you've got a car that can stop itself of course.
In all fairness the article doesn't say that, but you are right that there is a perception that this is when the technology was invented as opposed to when portable electronic instruments became a) practical and 2) affordable.
And that was down to the abandonment of the original Moog/Roland/ARP style synths for the FM synths that followed in the wake of the DX7, which was not only simple to use, it had digital memory in which to store the settings (called "patches"). This crashed the prices of the old-school "analog" synths so far they were not economical to make within a decade. In '84 I picked up a new SH101 leadline analog synth with all the available bolt-ons for it for exactly one hundred dollars.
Once sampling (another technology that had been around for yonks) was affordable (which was around the mid-to-late 80s) the game changed again and you got everyone and his dog making much use of other people's work.
"The" synthesizer revolution was actually a number of major and minor revolutions that started with the subtractive/additive "analogue" synths that were monophonic and shared info, when they could, using a simple control voltage/gate hookup through the truly game-changing DX7 FM synth (which fathered the Yamaha affordable home keyboard market and got rid of the Wakeman Wall O' Keyboard Racks overnight to the everlasting joy of the roadies) and not long after a game changed again move to sample-based music generation systems, all alongside a transition to inter-music-toy communication using MIDI.
Parallel developments led to inexpensive polyphonics (it is harder to do that than you might think) and velocity sensitive keyboards, all important in the development of the astounding, damn-near real feal of today's electronic pianos with feedback mechanics that let you feel the non-existent hammers falling back after hitting an imaginary string through the same keyboard that moments before you could have sworn was just like a real pipe organ register.
Okay. So I miss my train while it is brewing.
And then I have a pot of cold coffee to deal with that night, tasting nicely of the hours it sat cooling on the heat before it timed out.
I think you missed the point of the Keurig: It makes one cup quickly and with minimum fuss and does it in remarkably few operations so you can be doing other stuff at the same time.
Yes it is more expensive, and I know that is a prime driver for your average UK consumer. For me it is catching the train and not having to deal with the leftovers that night.
As for the bloke who prefers instant: well, that's your right and more power to your elbow, but making instant coffee is no faster than doing so with a Keurig coffee maker, indeed, given that the Keurig usually comes with a timer and so is ready to go when I need it, instant would be slower and more labour intensive.
That's what I'm paying for when I opt for a cup of Keurig coffee. The cost is more than covered by the time savings. I wish I had one at work. I used to be part of a coffee-pot cartel but found I was always johnny-on-the-spot when it came to making the next pot, so I dropped out.
The DRM thing was out of order though. Any fool should have been able to see that it would be a non-starter. I'll bet there's already an Arduino-based work-around for that nonsense like there is for that "inexpensive" 3D printer that thinks its an inkjet.
I'd love to swap my laptop for a tablet but after 5 months of iPad ownership I'm in agreement with the view that while the iPad makes a decent platform on which to consume content, it falls way short of my needs when I get creative. Yes you can shoot videos and write memos but the as-sold software on it runs a poor second to Works (surely a baseline in useability).
Using the iPad for pdf textbook usage, which involves flipping hither and yon and switching between different texts is an exercise in How To Get Really Bad Carpal Tunnel as I try and bend the "multitasking" metaphor to my needs. Would it kill Adobe to add tabs and a flyback button to their iPad app?
Even the music player fights me, presenting the least useful (to me) "Radio" screen as the first choice when it should be able to spot the 80-odd gig of music stored inside the iPad and figure out that that might be the best place to go when I launch the app.
The spreadsheet looks useful right up until one tries to use it, when it displays some distinctly useless features such as not displaying a stored calculation when the cell pointer is placed over it so the bloody thing can be edited.
The only app I've bought that has not had buggy performance or stupid unswitchoffable design naffery is Skyguide, a rather nifty planisphere on steroids.
And while I'm on App Naffery:
Please Crom could *someone* add a feature to the Register app to hide the sidebar or make it configurable so accidentally hopping to a different article as I read because my right thumb brushed the screen is a thing of the past? I'm right handed. I hold the device in my right hand as I read. Take a leaf from the BBC World News app and then improve it by making the geometry configurable. I mean, this is supposed to be a haven of tech know-how FFS.
Gah! Where's the Tylenol!