Bah!
Yesyesyes, the cat, good.
Now explain Schrodinger's haircut. What, did he lose a bet pr something?
7282 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2008
My memory of the SubPrime Fiasco is slightly different:
The dodgy loans from many, many sources (including Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac but not by any means limited to them) were bundled by banks into instruments that were then fraudulently represented as solid investment vehicles by colluding with the SEC in a blatantly illegal fixing of the system.
Then said banks colluded to work an insurance scam under the blanket term Credit Default Swap. Not illegal mostly, on account of the deregulation begun under Reagan and continued by every President since having created holes you could drive a bus through.
No, those in charge of the banks did nothing illegal (at least, nothing that can be proved) when they bet against themselves, but what they did was unethical and downright stupid, bringing the nation's (and eventually the world's) economic engine to the brink of absolute failure. Treason might be a word to be tossed about here, given that the officers of the nation's superbanks are supposed to understand they have the stewardship of the economy, and that includes protecting it as well as exploiting it for personal gain.
But if you want me to believe that "President" Bush (does anyone believe he was the one running the country rather than the old guy with the oversized safe in his office?) had a grasp of the financial situation his ship of state was sailing, I'm going to need to be administered some very strong drugs of the hypnotic/psychedelic family before being locked in the machine from The Ipcress File for a week.
Tesla safety risk: a soundbite answer to a question involving dozens of complex variables. It completey evades the driver's risk of adopting a more relaxed attitude to situational awareness because "the autopilot has it covered".
The comment regarding accident stats connecting seat belt usage with increased accident rates is also overly simplistic and a clear example of correlation rather than causation. I could, for example, point out that in the same time period cars began shipping with all-round disc brakes as standard, resulting in drivers using them more agressively in traffic, and turbocharging became ecconomically viable and mechanically reliable, resulting in drivers using accelleration more agressively. I know this because I Was There.
And there is a difference between a Luddite and someone who would rather their kid, raised carefully and dutifully to all the proper standards espoused by SINKS and DINKS posting on El Reg forums these days, not be killed as collateral damage when some fucktard with more money than sense doesn't RTFM or does and fails to recognize the gap between designer hyperbole and engineering reality.
The Tesla is being developed in this case as one would develop software in a post-www world when it should be being developed more traditionally with the knowledge that even fancy expensive cars can kill people, just like the conventional auto industry does. A bad driver for a flatbed scanner will ruin your day. A bad driver for the Tesla "autopilot" will ruin someone else's life.
Also: naming the feature "autopilot" invites stupid people to act stupidly. We live in a world where I dig about a car a year out of my front lawn because young people equate cruise control and automatic gearbox with "I can fiddle with center console gui stereo controls while exceeding the speed limit in perfect safety".
As for beta - that doesn't mean it is an untested feature that is not of sufficient quality to be rolled out. It is an indicator to people to not entirely rely on the feature.
Tell you what: you beta test your Tesla on a private road away from me, my family and friends until it isn't in Beta any more and we are good.
Until then, what is called for is a siren about as loud as those used at football matches to sound inside the Tesla's cabin whenever some twat takes his or her hands off the fucking wheel in traffic so he/she can take a selfie.
Anyone caught photoblogging from the backseat of their Tesla while beta-not-ready-for-prime-time-autopilot is in charge should be recycled for organ donation.
And yet in Starbucks and Barnes & Noble and IHoP and any NY diner and any NY restaurant you'll see cash, and credit cards and debit cards being used to pay. Can't remember the last time I saw anyone so much as *try* and pass a check for their lunch or their books or their posh yuppie coffee.
US financial transactions are overwhelmingly done by debit and credit cards. Cash is always an alternative. Paypal for mail xfers, though I dislike using it (it seems to be strangely popular with UK web stores for some reason, possibly due to usurious merchant account fees charged by British banks) is the norm.
But for web and face-to-face sales, credit card/debit card is the norm.
Only the Electric and Gas companies will take a check (proper US spelling since we are discussing US banking practice) and they typically process the transaction as a direct debit (the equivalent of getting a cheque cleared immediately through the aegis of the Bank of England).
Mixing Aspberger's with an addictive personality disorder and you have the recipe for an unhappy life.
Reading the subtext it would seem that the man had few people left in his life who gave a damn, he having alienated his friends and neighbours to the point they would avoid him.
Sad. I am currently enjoying evangelizing the Pi3 as a proper work desktop computer to anyone too slow to get out of range and would have liked to thank him for doing the heavy lifting of the end-user experience.
Crikey, that leather-substitute topped desk looks like Inspector Clouseau has been playing billiards on it.
What a load of drivel stand-up desks are. I've worked in IT for over 35 years and can say without fear of knowledgeable contradiction that the desks are fine the way they are. What's needed is a new concept in chairs.
I envisage a Davros-like thing with integral karzi, wifi and Keurig. No more need one break train of thought with inconvenient trips to the bog or coffee machine (which in all likelihood will have only half-burned dregs in it because I'm the only bugger in this place who can fathom the workings of the drip coffee maker, a machine only marginally more complicated than the wheel for fuck's sake and what that says about the code you buggers are turning put doesn't bear thinking about).
What was the question?
Nothing will suffice but that the UK hold an immediate referendum on whether to stay in this "UN" political body, whatever it is (I mean, what is it? I don't even know what it does) or assert our national sovereignty and show those johnny foreigner types what's what - and, if I may venture so bold provide a shining example to them of what real leadership looks like - by voting with our British Feet in Brexit II, The Wrath of Farage.
Gotta love the Smart Meter Loons bleating about having "no alternative but to relocate". Perhaps a little more attention paid to real science would have suggested the cheaper option of sheilding the back of the meter with a ground plane. The thing only needs to be read from one direction FFS.
Genders? Not if you are talking about impersonal nouns. You can call people "miss" or "sir" using a modification of the same root. Not really the same thing. Finding this out yourself would have been very easy, certainly less onerous than making sense of the average man page.
I only really suggested it to see how fast people would see the shiny and start waffling about needing yet another new artificial language.
As for cultural baggage, I think there's some confusion between that brought to the table by the language and that being touted by certain loud parties speaking it.
The language has no baggage. I quit the local Esperanto club largely because of people who were attempting to hijack the term "samideano" to much the same effect as some of the comments here. That and the claque on the other end of the scale who were denying the local culture at all costs.
The point of the language and the reason it was invented was to provide an auxillary way of communicating to the people of Warsaw, whose population had six distinct cultures each with it's own language. The idea was't original, but it was the best implementation of it to appear at that time and more people speak it today than any of the other alternatives, inclding Klingon (which steals liberally from Esperanto grammar).
Amusing aside: the Encyclopedia Britannia once had an article on Esperanto in which it stated that the language would never be adopted in the East because Chinese and Japanese people couldn't pronounce some of the letters. Which would come as a surprise to the large community of Japanese Esperantists, some of whom I've met and spoken with (they didn't speak English and I don't speak Japanese)
Trust the French to illustrate the sort of cash-by-the-shovelful waste projects that got the whole messy ball rolling in the first place.
How about making Esperanto the official language and having done with it? No irregular verbs, no national or cultural baggage and takes about six weeks to become fluent.
Also: most respected full immersion Esperanto school is in France.
I have a better exploit that requires *no* access to the computer to steal passwords.
Instead the computer user is gassed through the front door keyhole by men dressed as undertakers as he or she sleeps. Then, the dwelling is broken into and a small camera embedded surgically in each of the computer user's fingertips, and connected via bluetooth to a powerful tranceiver surgically embedded next to the spleen.
The user is then partially revived, dosed with strong hypnotics and conditioned to believe his or her sore fingers came from trying to cut their fingernails in an electric pencil sharpener.
A van equipped with a receiver is positioned within range of the spleenomitter and the password read from the keycaps as they are struck.
No need to access the amchine at all.
"Before the internet no one would have set out to transform government and public administration by redesigning forms and guidance pamphlets. They would do that to make life easier for people, and save time in administration, but that's all: they wouldn't expect to alter anything else."
Bollocks. In 1985 in th US a half page tax form used by consultants to maximize shareholder value was replaced by a four page document in order to "simplify" it. Caused such a fuss the boss tax man had to come back from his holiday in the Caribbean to sort it out.
Good old Mitch, the only person in the game who read and memorized the rulebook, at least the "slow things to a crawl" bits of it.
The Do Nothing Senate. The Do Nothing Congress. Two chapters in a future history book. Short chapters, to be sure. So at least these lazy f*ckers will be doing something in the fight against global warming whether they believe in it or not.
Two years in and they get Tax-Payer Funded Healt Care For Life. Not a bad little con when you think about it.