Bah!
You had me on the hook but lost me at "nsfw demon".
7284 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2008
"electron valves???"
Do you mean thermionic valves or have a couple of pages of some 1930s pulp magazines gotten mixed in with your notes old boy?
I worked with someone who reportedly cut his digital teeth on one of these things. I often thought it explained what a miserable git he had become by the time we had the fabulous high-tech ICL 1901T.
I was not exaggerating, but you miss the point so much I have to wonder if you shouldn't pull over, doff your spaz-spex for a moment and actually take a look at the real world for a bit.
I don't give a toss if you want to pile yourself into a bridge abutment while watching stock quotes or (best possible case using unobtainium technology not yet on the horizon) a virtual reality overlay to "see" through fog (that is likely as out of date as the usual GPS nav system is) to obviate the otherwise very sensible need to slow the f*ck down.
I care that your exercising YOUR free will and indulging in stupidly dangerous activity endangers ME and my family and friends.
It's an unwritten law around here that it's always the drunk who causes the pile-up who walks away with a few cuts. Well, I don't want to be in the other cars when you step from the wreckage of yours, looking sharp in your Googleshades.
And yes, using a non hands-free phone IS illegal in New York, as you could have easily found out if you weren't so focused on getting that info directly at the eyeball while you drive. But that legislation will not cover these accidents waiting to happen because they *are* hands-free.
For once a politician is being proactive with a demonstrably problematical technology. I applaud that. Better to piss off a few Grogans (who can always move to Montana where I understand drivers are free to do pretty much what they want behind the wheel and good luck to them) than end up with dead bodies and no legal recourse.
Idle thought: I wonder how much damage is done to a human eye if someone is wearing these stupid things when their drivers side airbag deploys into their face at the speed of sound?
It's not illegal to fit center-of-the-dash GUI screens in cars either. I dig about three young drivers a year out of my front garden as a result. Last week I lucked out when the f-tard was going the other way and took out my neighbour's power pole, fencing and two of his cars which he'd had the nerve to park in his own driveway. I never saw so many airbags inflated in one accident scene.
And as for common sense, nowhere on the driving test for any of the places I hold a license (which would be the UK and New York) is "common sense" required or tested for. As a result I've seen plenty of lack of same hurtling along the M6 and the LIE. The best one in recent memory was a bloke with a sandwich in one hand, a coffee in the other and a bedsheet newspaper unfolded across the steering wheel. I can only assume he was steering "John Candy style" with his thighs. And who here has never seen some dolt speeding along and texting?
And the behaviour is what is being banned. Specifically the behaviour of driving while wearing these ridiculous things. No-one is saying you can't have a pair of spaz-spex in your glove compartment.
"The man is a geek at heart and counted amongst his friends was one Douglas Adams. In my book, that speaks volumes, for no geek would *dare* to speak badly of that fine fellow."
Oh no? The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Umptet is at least two volumes too big, Dirk Gently was a waste of my money twice and Douglas Adams' implementations of computer games suck balls because he either did not understand the basic difference between experiencing the Adamsverse passively and being landed in it or did not care enough to fund effective playtesting of same. I offer up both the HHGTTG text adventure and Starship Titanic in evidence M'lud.
Must get back to my Raspberry Pi.
I reckon problems are bound to crop up from time to time. Word still offers - to those who are willing to actually RTFM and learn how to use it properly - the most flexibility on layout within a document of any of the commercially available word processors.
Try porting a columnar format from Word to Write and you'll rapidly find out who is the leader of the pack, and I say that as someone who uses OO as my personal office suite. Want two columns on one page and three everywhere else? Word will do that for you without breaking a sweat, but you are the one who'll be sweating before you get it done in OO.
The CLI products people are pushing here are fine and dandy, but all have a considerable learning curve that people simply will not tolerate - with Microsoft products, which are expected to work perfectly and intuitively out of the box on any platform.
I'm often cheered by the double standards of the MS bashers. My favourite for years was a colleague who felt Word was a dead loss because it piled acres of styles into any HTML-ified document.
When I pointed out that there was an easily found switch, well documented, to turn off that behaviour he still ranted about the need. When I told him that the reason for the behaviour was the (to me entirely unreasonable) requirement that any document saved as HTML not only had to look exactly like the Word doc version, but had to be perfectly back-portable with no damage, he still felt it was unreasonable to make him look in the help where the first topic under "Saving as HTML" was "How to turn off the style nonsense" (paraphrased).
This from a guy who spent months on various BBS learning he hard way how to configure Linux on his laptop.
Of course the real question here is "Did Mrs D contact anyone at Microsoft to report her problem as a bug so someone could actually get a start on fixing it?"
No, of course I'm not serious. Everyone knows MS are supposed to guess what your problem de jour is and fix it without the need for actual communication.
Now if you are complaining about ribbons and daft desktops only suited to slabs being foisted on everyone you've got my vote. Pitchforks and Torches time.
Not really. The problem is that if the data as a whole is too homogenous the data that was removed needs to be identified *from* the journals and recovered but not any other stuff, which is one of those problems that make people resign and move to Canada.
Of course, this is why data should not be deleted, but should be removed from a database in stages by first setting a flag to say "pretend this doesn't exist", then moving the data to a longer-term archive and deleting it for real. That way you can get everything back at the record/tuple level.
Of course, that's how we used to do it on mainframes and everyone knows that when Unix was invented the whole nature of computing changed so much none of that old-school thinking was relevant.
Young people. They are so cute when they fuck up on stuff that was well-sorted in 1978.
I'm pretty sure that *this* is more accurately described by the technical IT term "inadequate testing".
It's not a bug if you never actually tried out the software in question in the conditions you were testing for. It's an ukfup.
And since every single aspect of computers is - if you chase the evidence far enough - "caused by humans" the qualifier is redundant.
Sparkfun sell something they call the Pi Tin. I used it on four machines so far with no problems. Snap fit, securely closed yet easy to open if needed.
Only problem if you can call it that is that there is no blanking plug for the GPIO access port.
Cheapest case I've found, too. It would cost me more than $7 to build one from Lego.
Save yourself the cost of the kindle and buy a HDMI to VGA converter for about $20. Then, when you are in the server room you can dig out the Pi, connect it to any of the keyboards and one of the old (and therefore not-fit-for-server-use) CRT monitors lying in a pile in the corner and Bob is your mother's brother.
Yes I know that's not the point.
The laptop would be a great idea I'd be all over if the GUI was more responsive to the mouse. I'm seeing many issues that probably boil down to mouse-click duration set too narrowly and "pixel mat under the pointer" too small. Clicks often don't register, and the pointer must then be moved a little before another attempt is made. I'll figure it out if I ever care enough, but anyone wanting to use the Pi on the go is going to need better than this.
The weather station and pub game ideas are fascinating though...
I see no reason to panic and get started on some demented Dolphin-Race to close a Dolphin-Gap with the Ukrainians by deploying our own Dolphins c/w head-mounted munitions.
No, what's needed is to train and deploy a squadron of Dolphin Floozies-of-the-Night in order to suborn these foreign military assets with their squeaky charms and come-hither somersaulting.
I rather liked the Golden Age style plot and story of Book of Eli.
For all the talk of serious sci fi, no real PKD story at all? Through a Scanner Darkly was quite faithful to the book I thought. If only Blade Runner had gone that route instead of ... well, water under the bridge. BR is a visual feast if a plot fail (and Ridley really needs to stop talking about it. Every word lessens the impact of what *was* in there).
Lord of the Flies? Perhaps a bit too abstract a stretch, but the plot is definitely the stuff of SF from the forties. (film and mainstream fiction always "discovers" these ideas about 25 years after they've been explored in genre fiction it seems).
Avatar is okay Space Opera, nothing special, but if you are going to cite Blade Runner you have to at least consider Avatar on the same basic merits - it looks good. I haven't watched it as much as I have Blade Runner, but that is mostly because I have a mad-on at the blatantly stolen-without-attribution scenery. I watched the credits to end and saw not one mention of Roger Dean, yet upon returning home astounded my wife by showing her a book of images "from the movie" that had been printed a decade before the film had been made. There's homage, then there's theft.
Alien? No mention of a movie that changed the game in horror SF? And the plot was so SF it was the subject of a lawsuit from a Grand Master - who won.
When Worlds Collide should have been mentioned too. Dated, but then, all SF is about the time it is written in, not the time it purports to be about.
The First Men in the Moon should also be seen, it being a reasonably faithful telling. I like it better than the Time Machine myself.
And while the imagery is satirical and the style tongue-in-cheek, Mad Max is most definitely a serious SF story and downright enjoyable to boot.
Ah, we really need to do this sort of thing in a pub with decent beer and some grub.
Easy to second guess of course, but seriously, your idea of a "serious sci-fi movie" about immortality being a Bad Idea is *Zardoz*?
I'm guessing you haven't seen the infinitely better in every dimension "Seconds" then.
Please reword headline to read "Ten Sci-Fi Movies Without Star Wars In The Title That I Can Name Off The Top Of Me Head".
Fergit! Will I *never* be forgiven that business with the concentrated sulphuric acid? It happened in '76 ffs, and the only one remotely endangered was me. The bottle was empty long before it landed at the feet of those two lab demonstrators, at which point 90% or more of its admittedly high launch velocity had been mitigated by air resistance and drag, and I was the only one who suffered hearing loss from the explosion. And that got better. Sort of. Eventually.
Proper Science isn't safe, nor is it quiet. You want safe and quiet, don't be a chemist. Specifically, don't be a chemist near me when I'm being one.
The official domain name system was set up by a bunch of theorists with limited imagination and little real world connect for how their idea would actually be used. I mean, look at it: COMpanies, EDUcational establisments, ORGanizations. 19th century monolithic thinking meets 21st century infrastructure.
For all the talk, those "visionaries" had no real feel for exactly how empowering the World Wide Web would be (and a delightfully naive idea of what would be the most profitable for-pay leveraging of the technology from the get-go).
And when the marketers had gotten in on it, well, there went the initial intent. "Hey Mr Man-on-the-Street. What YOU need is your OWN DOTCOM!" (paraphrasing actual TV commercial from 1997-ish there). Classic case of an unenforceable standard.
The Genie is out of the bottle now, though. Can't go back. But it would be a refreshing change if the powers that be would get a fsking clue when it comes to not handing such useful domain names as "author" and "blog" to massive commercial for-pay enterprises.
Let's hope they market them responsibly and affordably.
Heh.
"I'm having trouble thinking of much you can build with a soldering iron these days that cant be done in code"
Well, you can't do this for a start:
http://colonelmoran.blogspot.com/2011/11/building-aethero-galvanic-exciter-part.html
And you couldn't build the thing that plugs into it either, which is too awesome for words (which is why the build blog fell into disuse)
Computer coding isn't making stuff. It's making pictures of stuff.
Wait 'til the young 'uns get a load of what I do with the latest thing I bought from Sparkfun. A bit o' solderin' some EL-Wire and a few feet of copper, brass and lucite and the magic happens again, only even more awesomely (assuming I can master the spokeshave).
Not wanting to rain on the parade of self-congratulatory put-downs of Bazza here, but I'd just like to point out that nothing was in fact "fixed", it was worked around. That is in and of itself a fine thing, but people are claiming a fix where there isn't one. What needs fixing is what made the helium line prone to blockage in the first place, and that will be a design or manufacturing issue that cannot be "sorted out with a lump hammer" much though I'd like it to be.
Pro space and anything that gets us there properly instead of by proxy. Robots and small bands of specialist people don't count - us means we the people, and until I can go into orbit as a matter of booking a seat on whatever form of transport is involved, "we" aren't going to space at all, "they" are.
"We need a solution that involves relatively clean and sustainable power generation (fusion \ solar \ hydrothermal etc)"
I don't disagree with your stance, but the first is made of unobtanium, the second is known to be only feasible under certain weather conditions and is not a grid-compatible technology anyway (attempts to make it look like one are one of the things that are killing it in some markets) and the last has an annoying tendency to suck large mounts of investment monies only to move to a different place once the hardware has been installed - though a few places do have what has historically been a reliable geothermal power capability and I would argue siting server farms in Iceland where they could be powered easily and cooled ambiently (with filtering) most of the time and the country could do with the investment would be a sound globally thought out "green" solution.
We need to look at all power technologies together, not as a six technologies enter one technology leaves Thunderdome situation, and that includes the nuke power that *does* work today.
We need to stop deploying huge industries that suck power and generate heat and suck more power to get rid of it in politically astute but technologically inappropriate climates that make keeping cool a problem to start with. Broaden the "no moving parts" thinking. Put hot server continents in cold places.
And as you say, we need to expand the idea of "green" to mean "not just green in my vicinity".
Rant over.
This really is too much!
Everyone should know by now that the technologically advanced world of Vulcan broke up as the result of a war in which weapons of planetary destruction were deployed in the primordial past, and that the planetary remnants formed what is now known as the Asteroid Belt.
This is basic history, confirmed by perilous expeditions made possible by Mr Edison and his wondrous Aether Propeller.
What are they teaching in the schools these days?
Works well until YOUR kid has a play with your neighbour's iPad ('cos *his* kid let yours have a go).
Of course, you'd have thought this out better if you actually had any kids. Amazing how these issues can broaden one's mind once the same set of mad skillz used in a job are put to work looking out for tiny clones.
You'd be amazed at what pops out of the code then, and how quickly DINK logic, formerly a bastion of What Is Wrong With The World Today breaks down.
Example: Proper thinking can show why "Parental Oversight" can never be the perfect answer to everything - the basic premise (Parental Oversight is Omnipresent) is flawed. Think of a kid as a secured account to which everyone in the world knows the password and you can see that the problems of properly policing a child's experiences with anything are monumental and cannot ever be universal.
Or better. Just remember the stuff you did that your parents never found out about. Were they bad parents for "allowing" you to do that?
The irony of protesting censorship by DDoS attacks is just too spiffy.
And what a mealy mouthed comment from someone who has "been in the trenches".
"I'm not happy with anonymity but I'm not saying what Anonymous is doing is wrong". Well damn. He *is* saying that the CoS is doing wrong by doing much the same thing to anyone who speaks out against it, so shouldn't he also be saying that waht Anonymous is doing is "wrong"? Doesn't the whole argument fall apart if he doesn't?
For the record: CoS is Bugnuts McCrazypants. I want everyone to be "clear" on that, although the "snakes in a volcano" thing is strangely persuasive after a few hits of weedkiller.
I dunno why people get so worked up about Clarkson et al. Top Gear's an entertainment show. He's paid to be over-the-top and people obviously like that because they keep watching. I sometimes can't stand that stupid singsong delivery if they're all doing it, but comments like "This is Sodom and Gomorrah with a steering wheel" make me relent pretty quickly.
I enjoy Top Gear, even though the fires are obviously staged, but I liked the "project" shows better than endless Aston Martin/Lamborghini/Porshe dick-swinging that seems to be the fashion right now.
Of course, we only get the same four dozen episodes on BBC America, so we're nearly word-perfect on the soundtracks, but anything is better than the idiot who occupies the other Non-Dr Who viewing hours 24X7 with his cooking and swearing. If anyone has outstayed his welcome it is Gordon Ramsay.
"Wrong, if you have Java 6 without the patch then you are vulerable.
Java is a compiled interpreted language and any exploit in the VM can be possible on multiple OSes in some cases."
But you see, since any time there is an "issue" in the Wintel world so many tektards are gleefully shouting about it you can pretty much get the gist within hours from the side of a milk carton, everyone else got the memo about Java from their browser weeks ago and, if they had any sense, took the suggestion seriously and turned the bugger off, since Oracle weren't being terribly pro-active about dealing with the problem.
In the Apple world the problems still exist, it's just that no-one talks about them (sometimes because getting a fix involves NDA paperwork - according to one famous Apple promoting geek). The uninformed Apple kit user - which is most of 'em - is rather hung out to dry on a string of increasingly untrue assumptions drawn using an internet crime model from the last century. No glee here in saying that, I use whatever comes to hand. Linux, Solaris, AIX, OS2200, Windows; all just tools needed to get the real work done (which isn't anything to do with computers as I keep reminding our "server division").
That bloke who was crying about not getting paid will likely either be overjoyed at the overtime or crying again soon - I'm told by our Java lot that installing 7 caused no end of problems in some of our legacy applications. Serves 'em right. We move money from place to place, we don't launch rockets or run massive shared world online games and we don't offer anything sophisticated in our website access because we don't need to. What we need is more Cobol* not closer ties to Oracle.
* which works, gets upgraded maybe twice a decade and has intrinsic money-handling data types that obviate stupid programmer lack-of-accumen. Never heard of scaled decimal young feller me lad? Let me introduce you to Mr Textbook. Mr Textbook, meet Mr Programmer's head.
I think it's pretty clear this politician is afraid of a specific threat, so the real question is: What's he been up to then?
Are we in pre-presidential GWB "apologize ahead of time for nothing in particular just in case you find something on me" territory?
Personally, having been alerted to this vile threat I plan on heavy investment in the soon-to-be lucrative market in counter-drone drones. A 1/8 scale Sopwith Camel with a Softair BB gun built-in should provide hours of counter-surveillance fun. Cabbage Crates spotted over the briny, skipper!
"Surprisingly they have not asked to register their logo."
Probably because it was nicked off the side of some Mesoamerican pyramid or stele. It sure looks like it.
The endless grinding Monty Python "jokes", "references", explanations of the "jokes" in case you were so shirt thick you didn't get the point and expansions of the "references" cross indexing them to the "jokes" - all instead of getting on with showing me the bloody language - was what made me ignore this eminently ignorable language for years. I figured if the people behind the language couldn't even write a fucking manual that was readable there was little hope for the language itself being a write-home affair. I only started looking at it again because I bought a Pi.
I think it's funny that a modern language has significant whitespace. I thought everyone knew that was a Bad Idea by 1978, the year I got started in IT.