140 posts • joined 5 Jun 2008
The reason uploads haven't increased...
Is because the upload speed is crap. FFS, if I had a decent upload speed I would have my home data backed up offsite and be able to work from home. As it is, I can't. Yes, I can (and do) download somewhere between 50-100gb a month with online gaming, software updates, Netflix etc, but I can't upload fuck all at the measly .7meg upload speed. Faster internet infrastructure isn't just about downloads, give us a decent upload speed and watch the knowledge economy grow.
To be fair (and I do believe this was pointed out on a previous article about this), Telstra are the only supplier of broadband to a lot of exchanges in regional areas that struggle to get better than ADSL 1 speeds (myself included). This is not to excuse their poor showing on the table, but merely to explain that the aggregate statistics could quite likely be skewed by the large number of low speed customers in areas not serviced by the other providers.
I'm no fan of FOXTEL, but it seems rather disingenuous to imply that Telstra's part ownership of that company is the reason for their poor download speeds, when there are other factors at play.
Volume up, speed down
My personal experience is that since Netflix launched in Australia my ADSL download speed reduces by about 60% during peak periods (6pm -midnight) every day. I used to get a consistent 9mbps download anytime of the day or night up until early this year. Now, I can still get the 9mbps during the early morning and most of the day, but it drops down to about 3-4 Mbps in the evening. That being said, the Netflix algorithms must be seriously good as I can still stream two different shows at once (on different devices) even at 3mbps.
He did lie on his application for citizenship, but I doubt many other people have had their past gone through with a fine tooth comb like they are doing with him. So on one hand, he broke the law, but on the other it could be fair to say he is being targeted because of his subsequent actions.
He could also have made an honest mistake. Given that he fessed up to the hacking stuff, it seems strange that he didn't mention the speeding ticket. It may just have been that he didn't appreciate the full meaning of the word 'convicted' in the situation of admitting guilt by letter and paying a fine.
Not sure if the same thing is available in blighty, but here in Oz we have products called Reverse Mortgages. Basically, the lender gives you the money now for a stake in your property, then when you kick the bucket, they take a proportion of the proceeds from your house sale to cover the loan and accrued interest. Can go spectacularly wrong if you don't set it up right (like the lender turfing you out before you die because the loan equals the equity in your house), but can be good if set up correctly. Quite popular with older people who have substantial capital tied up in their home, but little superannuation to draw on (a lot of baby boomers are in this situation due to the housing price bubble in Australia over the last 20 years).
Re: 2015: Close that barn door!
Actually, bypassing Geoblocking is not illegal (at least in Australia). As a breach of the Terms of Service, the most you can expect is for your account to be cancelled. There's a very good reason that iTunes, Netflix and HBO don't make it hard to get around geoblocking (which they could easily do) - they still get the money. Most estimates I've seen is that somewhere between 100,000 to 200,000 Australians accessed Netflix US via smart DNS or VPN before it launched locally, that's a hefty chunk of change. Particularly if you didn't have to pay for the licensing rights to that content for Australia.
Re: 2015: Close that barn door!
I agree with you on the whole mindset with downloading media. I work at a university and just about everyone I talk to downloads moves and TV shows via torrenting. These are uni students, academics and professional staff. The 'convenience' and 'but it's not available any other way' arguments just don't wash with me for most of them. If they can work out how to torrent a file, they can work out how to get around georestrictions for services like Netflix US, Amazon Prime or even iTunes US.
Even GoT is available as a legit download here in Oz (if you want to pay for a craptapulous cable TV bundle at about $50 per month).
At the end of the day, it's less about 'convenience' and more about price. I think a lot of people also rationalise illegal downloads by saying to themselves "well, the production has already been paid for, they've made their money from cinema/TV/cable sales, so what I'm doing doesn't really effect the bottom line - it's a victim-less crime"
However, there are still many issues with the availability of media and the actions of media companies that are compounding the problem. Even with ITunes US, Netflix US and HBO NOW (the combined cost of which is about $30 per month including a smart DNS service), I do find myself not being able to access certain movies, TV shows that I want to watch - but it's not a common occurrence given the wealth of other options available on those services.
One annoyance is that (particularly with ITunes), sometimes a movie is available to buy, but not to rent. I rarely watch movies more than once, just let me pay a reasonable rental fee (reasonable for me being about $5, what I would have paid a few years back for a new release rental DVD).
tl;dr. The arguments supporting 'illegal' downloads such as torrenting are becoming less relevant, but the big media companies still have a way to go, and work to do, before all those arguments become specious.
Re: Demand for Labor's FTTP network: 38% at 12Mbps, 38% at 25Mbps
Also, how many of those who took up the lower speeds mentioned were languishing on ADSL of less than 10mbps? From memory, the 'average' broadband speed in Oz is something like 7-8mbps. For me, and many of the people I know, upstream speed is the issue at the moment - something that FTTH can fix.
Broadband cap shouldn't be a problem
I have ADSL with 9mbps/1mbps (roughly speaking) in rural Qld and a 50GB month quota. Most nights my wife watches movies on Netflix (US) whilst I play destiny on xbox one. We rarely hit the monthly allowance cap. YMMV, and yes, sometimes the movies stream in SD, and no, we don't have a bunch of teenage children also on our network (2 person household).
Oddly enough, the NBN is the cause of your problem
bear with me, this is a bit long...
I live in a rural area and about 10 years ago all we could get was 56k dialup. The government of the day introduced a program to provide fixed wireless in rural areas to make up for the deficiency of the network. We got an antenna on the roof and moved up to a 512k download speed. Unfortunately, the system was line of sight and trees grew in the way of the signal path, so it stopped working after a couple of years. In the meantime, Telstra upgraded the exchange to allow ADSL2+. Meaning I could then get 9mbps downlink (which is what I have to this day).
Back then, Telstra would upgrade exchanges on a rolling plan to ensure the service provided grew with the community. Once the NBN was mooted, this pretty much stopped. Nether Telstra, nor anyone else, was much concerned with upgrading the network when It might all get replaced or commandeered by the govt.
The upshot of this is that even though I live in a rural area, my internet speeds are better than many people I know who live in inner Brisbane (if they can even get ADSL) due to the poor state of the infrastructure and lack of upgrades over the last few years.
I should also point out that I live more than 3km from our exchange, so distance isn't the limiting factor. The limiting factor is the fucking government (of both political persuasions) stuffing around with the NBN rollout to the extent that if you don't have NBN, you're basically screwed.
NBN rollout has basically stopped any ADSL upgrades and everything is now getting congested.
My guess is that you are suffering from something akin to that, where your local exchange is at capacity and no more capacity will be added because of the NBN.
So anonymous are going to defend freedom of speech by denying freedom of speech?
As an avowed atheist I have no truck with religion being used as the excuse for all sorts of heinous crimes and propping up dictatorships, and abhor the actions of the nut jobs in France over the last couple of days. But this does seem a bit contradictory.
Not all satire is good satire
For further reading:
And (linked from the article above):
I'd never even heard of the magazine in question before the last couple of days, and I certainly agree that no-one should ever be murdered for expressing an opinion. Just putting these links out there as an interesting viewpoint. :-)
Re: Bumper Sticker?
I tend to agree. I'm lucky enough to live on a rural property (1 acre) on the Sunshine Coast hinterland (Qld). I can drive to work in about 35 minutes on country roads through gorgeous countryside (The Glasshouse Mountains). However, if I want to go further south to Brisbane, I'll inevitably get caught in the traffic snarl of the Bruce Highway (it's Australia, there's always something called Bruce). The biggest problem is that most of the jobs and infrastructure are concentrated around the capital cities, and certain regional centres. There is bucket-load of land available for people, but little infrastructure (jobs) outside of those urban centres. A forward thinking country would invest in something like an NBN or at least a decent national rail network to distribute those jobs around, but unfortunately the politicians in Australia seem more concerned about trite political slogans. I guess it's probably the same everywhere else :-(
Re: One simple point
Would if I could. I'm on a rural exchange and Bigpond is all I get. My point was less about my needs than about moving Australia away from being a consumer to a producer of internet products. I'm well aware that Telstra throttle my upload speed for their own reasons, but the fact remains that the copper architecture is not capable of supporting high bandwidth for both up/ down for multiple premises.
I would happily go with a different provider for a higher up/down speed as it would likely be cheaper than what I am getting now ($90 per month for ADSL2+).
One simple point
Irregardless of all the political shenanigans and technical arguments in favour of different roll-out methodologies, I'd like to make one point.
I am currently on ADSL2+ and have a consistent 9mbps download speed. I'm quite ok with that, it suits my purposes adequately, for now. What does not suit my purposes is the crappy 0.7mbps upload speed. My understanding is that piss-poor upload speeds are pretty much universal unless you are on HFC or similar. The result of this asymmetry is that I cannot backup data to an off-site location or indeed reliably send image attachments to emails above a relatively small size.
For my thinking, what WILL make a difference is a high speed broadband rollout that allows everyone who wants to be both a creator and a consumer. At the moment ADSL (which is what most people have) is locking us into a nation of consumers. To grow a modern economy (ie not just digging shit out of the ground and selling it off), we need the upstream bandwidth to be able to produce and distribute. I am not confident that the MTM will have the congestion-free bandwidth to do that.
I'm sick to death of people trotting out arguments along the lines of 'we don't need FTTP because people will only use it for downloading movies'. Bullshit. I can already stream HD movies from Netflix over my current ADSL2+ quite comfortably. What I can't do is upload anything I produce back to the internet.
Re: Quit while you're ahead
All other things aside. I'm currently paying $75 per month for ADSL2+ that tops out at 7Mbps but most of the time only gives me 1-3Mbps on a 50Gb download cap. I'd be happy to pay $100 per month for a 30 Mbps connection and a large cap. Because of where I live, I only have Telstra Bigpond as an option. At least if the FTTH NBN had gone forward I may have had a choice of ISP.
Re: Southsea Arcade
Ha, ha.. Good old 'Slots of Fun' at the Clarence Parade Pier. I was a 'Floorwalker' there in 1987 (9am - 11pm, mon to sat for £90 per week). .The job basically involved keeping an eye on the punters to make sure they didn't bump the money drop machines or shove wadded paper in the payout slots of the one arm bandits to later come and collect the winnings. Punch ups on Friday nights between opposing football fans were a semi-refular occurrence and most of the staff were pretty dodgy too. The space harrier cabinet had pride of place right at the front of the arcade and was pretty much the only decent game in there.
Never encountered it
As someone who has logged 100s of hours on Halo and Battlefield multiplayer games, I can honestly say I've never heard any swearing. In fact I rarely hear any talk at all. Maybe it's because I play in Australia, I don't know. Meanwhile, BF3 itself has lines like "I'm getting my shit pushed in over here" and "fuck me, they're all over me" that are broadcast quite regularly, so this move from Microsoft seems somewhat hypocritical.
I work for a university in Australia and Microsoft are offering us Surface RT tablets for just over $200 apiece (without cover). I'm currently evaluating one running a preview version of the 8.1 version of the OS. It does have Outlook, but I can't get it to configure - I suspect it may be something to do with the corporate firewall. Anyway, if Outlook works on it, I'll probably get one as all other aspects of it seem fine. Speaking as an unabashed Apple user (iMac, Mac Mini, 2 Apple TVs, 2 iPhones, iPod and iPad in my house), the killer app for me would be the iOS remote app - then I'd sell my ipad ad buy a Surface RT.
Massive fail for foxtel.
As someone who is happy to pay for the media I consume, I downloaded all three seasons of GoT through iTunes. This deal will not make me take out an overpriced Foxtel subscription. I will investigate how to access GoT by getting around geoblocking. If all else fails, just about everyone I know gets GoT via pirated copies so I can still access it that way (but I'd prefer to give HBO my money).
My family had an Intellivison in the early 80's. I think my parents picked it up second hand somewhere. Most of the games were a bit meh. But, it did come with a game called 'B17 Bomber' that was actually really good. You got to select missions over allied Europe. You could switch between 'sears' in the plane so when you were flying in you had to swap between the different gunner positions to fend off enemy fighters, plot the waypoints and act as bombardier over the target. It was pretty well done for its time.
I can't see a picture of a WWII bomber these days without hearing 'B17 Bomaaa' in a cheesy digitised American accent in my head.
Re: The military guide on the DPRK side overloking the DMZ
Never been there myself, but maybe it was one of the old gents in this picture:
That picture for me sums up a lot of the issues. Some gormless young ex-playboy being sheparded around by a couple of old soldiers who are still reliving the Korean War in their heads. Look at them. You can just imagine these old geezers thinking that as their clock winds down, they'll take the south with them into the long dark.
You almost had it. What you really need to look at is purchase power parity (I think it's called that). Up until a couple of years ago the exchange rate for $au was about 40p. So back then the relative salaries would have been much the same (multiply the uk wages by 2.5) to get the Oz equivalent. Yet, in the sometime frame the cost in native currency hasn't really changed ie a £10 DVD 3 years ago is still £10 now and a $30 DVD in Oz is still $30 now (roughly speaking). A better way to compare is cost of living (I think The Economist still produce a cost of living comparison based on the price of a Big Mac).
tl;dr. It's more than just exchange rates. You have to look at what the money will buy.
I don't usually buy into the whole 'my phone's better than your phone' gig, but I'm currently using an iPhone 3GS running iOS 6.1.2 and I never have a problem with it. Maybe you're holding yours wrong :-) or just need to upgrade the OS.
As its a work phone, I cold get a brand new iPhone 5 tomorrow, but don't see the need as the current one works perfectly. Battery life is as good as the day I bought it.
Re: Smart phone apps
In my job I come into daily contact with people on centrelink payments (unemployed, single mothers, disability pensioners). I can't recall the last one I met with who didn't have a smartphone of some sort (apple, Samsung or HTC). Tech may be expensive, but mobile plans are easy to get with most people not realising how much they are actually forking out over time.
On a related note, a standard landline package from Telstra that includes most calls is $80 per month ($960) per year. You can get a SIM card with unlimited calls to all Australian fixed and mobile phones and 6Gb do data per month for $300 per year. Even if you bought an iPhone 4, you'd still be ahead in the first year if you did away with the landline.
In reality, smartphone apps for centrelink is a good idea.
Was fun until I connected.
Downloaded this the other day to see what it was about. Sent about 10 minutes playing the 'server busy, retry' portion of the game which was quite exciting waiting to see if it would connect, quite a sense of achievement once i got through. Once I got on the rest of the game was dead boring, mindlessly tapping at blocks and then all of a sudden the whole screen just clears.
Honestly, he should have just released the first part where you try to connect to the server, way more fun.
Ok, I'll bite <:-)>
I've never understood how 'electing' an official is inherently better than said official being appointed through a competitive process designed to select the best applicant (and yes, I know that the process can be subverted). I've also never understood why it's so important to know the political views of the local dog catcher. I can see why you would want a say in who is on the School board, but not why you'd have a school board in the first place (shouldn't the curriculum be set by professional educators).
Another poster made mention of the fact that if people can't complete a ballot with 30 choices, they shouldn't be voting. I'm sorry but western politicians, by their nature, seem to pander to the lowest common demnominator, so people of differing abilities will be voting. Additionally, given the low voter turnout in US elections, I'd have thought making the process as simple and efficient as possible would be in the interests of a truly participatory democracy.
And while I'm on the subject...what's with getting people to vote on a Tuesday? It certainly doesn't enfranchise those on minimum wage, working long hours who probably wouldn't be given time off work to vote.
PS if my local school was run by a 'Board', I probably would want a say on who's on the board.
I guess at the end of the day, every four years the same thing happens.....a bunch of horses run around in a circle in Australia and two blokes apply for the same job in the US. It doesn't really matter whether the winner is a horse or a human.
why they don't use pen and paper
I looked into this during the whole kerfuffle back when Bush won over Gore. In Florida there were something like 30 (or more) individual votes that needed to be cast by electors on polling day. School board, dog catcher, police chief etc etc. given the volume of votes, it's no wonder they use machines like 'chads' to make the process a bit quicker. If they just restricted the voting to a couple of important things ( like for the president), they could probably use simple and secure pen and paper. The problem is all the other pissy jobs that people think they have to elect people into. Some times, too much democracy isn't a good thing.