I'm sorry?
My hypocrisy meter is keeping stum except when I point it in the Guardian's direction where it goes off-scale.
Who exactly stole something from whom? Do we have Intellectual Property issues here? Maybe patents? Could you clarify?
16005 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
"we have to decide, as a society, if we think that allowing governments access to the location of their citizens is a risk worth taking in exchange for the benefits it gives"
Who is that "we" who has to decide. What does "as a society" mean?
Hold on, someone from a TLA is at the lobby window.
Schmittchen's sayings are pretty schizotastic (let's stay charitable here). He will certainly be getting hearings and success in the corridors of power. And he has been thinking about the problems of identity since the Internet was telnet, usenet and IRC? Somewhat an authoritarian mindest here, wouldn't you think?
At least Google comes clean about what it wants.
NO! I DON'T WANNA BE A GOOGLE NUMBER!
"The DoJ said Oracle had misrepresented its true commercial sales practices – meaning government customers received deals on worse terms than customers in the private sector."
If Oracle was busing empty fuel drums in circles through Iraq and then bill 200 USD/km, no-one would notice.
But a known overly expensive shrink-wrapped EULA with a download link? Well, sure, we want the best deal on THAT.
"DARPA's principal customer – the American warfighter"
Isn't DARPA a taxpayer-funded outfit that is allocated money seized from the populace to come up with stuff the that military-industrial-congressional-entertainment complex can make money off?
The "American warfighter" ("soldier" no longer Rambo enough, I see) is the dumb sod who ends up with his gonads blown off, so he is definitely NOT the customer.
Except when he finally needs those futuristic prosthetic limbs.
...that the US senate has recently gone out of its way to moon the Russians concerning the two breakaway Georgian republics and demanded that something-or-other happen about which the US has no authority (except in McCain's fever dreams), one can only hope that the Bear does not accidentally another whole rocket or start demanding cold, hard cash (and not in the form of greenbacks or T-bills) for successful launches, as it is wont to do.
Wouldn't be it far easier, not to mention less consumer-rage inducing, to sell those tables at below price in the first place?
Additionally, that "f'ing loads of WebOS users" comprises the people who persuaded themselves to buy WebOS material out of the rejects bin. How many are that and do they care about whether WebOS?
Jetty is just a "servlet container", i.e. a callback mechanism where the call just happens to be a HTTP request. Nothing particularly fancy.
A J2EE container is old-school anyway (so ugly and 2000). Today, we have "JEE" containers. And they contain services for messaging, naming, database access (EJB3), code injection, AOP, and whatnot. They also contain HTTP callback handling.
None of this is necessarily needed of course. And some of it should really be rolled back into the standard JVM environment, in particular some of the annotation-based facilities.
"it belongs to the shareholders, not the execs"
learn2capitalism
The execs have been tasked by the shareholders to perform daily biz operations. If the shareholders didn't demand an emergency shareholder meeting concerning the above problem, payout it shall be.
"It may be a stupid law, but the point is that it currently *is* the Law"
Only an ass has respect for a the law that is ass.
Addies for perfectly good Canadian medicines, don't even sell them yourself...
Big Bro' rings up, wants a pound of flesh. Cheap stuff? Trying to run rings around this here pharma cartel, son? You are going down! God knows you may be enticing people to open a meth house or something.
But at least the FDA-approved crap is save. Oh wait, aren't there several lawsuits pending about approved meds killing people years later? I must be imagining it.
/^v.+b$/i
1) The existence of languages that are not glorified macroprocessors?
2) The fact that other languages that are not glorified macroprocessors are less mainstream?
3) The von Neumann architecture?
4) The fact that in this universe, X-way processing does not guarantee a speedup of X?
"The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)"
Who are these guys and what are they doing for whom and why?
"The company also breached a rule that prohibits companies releasing information about prescription-only medicines that would encourage the public to ask their doctor for the product."
Why does such a rule exist? Do the blinders need to be kept on them good horses? Is somebody afraid of consumers?
"...where companies bring discredit upon and reduce confidence in the pharmaceutical industry..."
What does that even mean? What or who comprises the "pharmaceutical industry"? Why doesn't said company just bring discredit upon itself? Why should people have "confidence in the pharmaceutical industry" in in the first place??!?
It smacks of cartel logic trying to protect some turf, really.
You can only trust that he FDA did its approvals correctly (probably not) and Pfizer didn't deep-six the study showing inconvenient results (probably not) or that the production machine was squeaky clean (probably but sometimes not).
To add insult to injury, you get to pay top dollar because of the patent before your liver gives out.
"There's nothing evil about protecting your work and designs. If it was some little outfit claiming the patent against Apple you'd be praising them as the new messiah."
There is everything evil in getting State to protect "your work" and "your designs". Because it's not "yours" at all - it's built on others' work and others' designs. You have a success and suddenly its "all yours, all of it!"? Sod that.
The market should be about competition and selling things people want. Not about locking out competition and forcing people to only buy your stuff.