Re: "Artist's impression" of asteroid destruction
I like panel three, which depicts the raining of of radioactive debris upon the earth.
Good job, Russia.
Feck off into your Circus, May.
16005 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
Thankfully, they did not - 100Mt will probably split the Earth's crust leading to some interesting and protracted geological phenomena. That was the idea behind the weapon in the first place - its designated target was San Andreas or Yellowstone.
Sounds like another meme about unbelievable Soviet weapons, Alien Contact and Tesla's supewrpower tachyon fields.
perversions with regard to personal firearms and assault weapons
Absolutely correct. I like my AK-74 unadorned with random tacticool shit and also not in pink with "my little pony decals".
The only thing it should do is put speeding splinters of metal into a bullseye at moderate distance.
Shit was horrid.
But the wood lining made it worth it.
And what do you mean, "vaporware"? It existed in what amounts to the computing stone age. So how can it now exist now? (It's not like it's on the level of classical Greek's Parthenon's Fine Engineering, which the Greeks of nowadays are apparently unable to reproduce accurately. That's what you get when your genetic potential is diluted by ... ARGH! JOKE JOKE! HELP!!! MACEDONIA FOREVER!!!)
Economies have regular up and down swings.
No they don't unless they are printing money to implement "recovery".
The results could be bad enough that the US needs foreign investment to sustain life.
Foreign "investment" (i.e. stocking of rankly toxic T-bills) IS the only thing that keeps the US alive.
Countries that once viewed the US and oppressive or competitive would now be using it for profit.
Although (or because) he knew the score, Obama gave 38 billion US taxpayer trinkets to a certain very rich country. Thank you for noticing.
It's a descendant of Alpha if I remember correctly.
Apparently not:
Report on the Sunway TaihuLight System
Shenwei-64 Instruction Set (this is NOT related to the DEC Alpha instruction set)
Very little on the detail design of SW1600 chip was make public but various comments in the web and some history of the 江南计算所SW微处理器 indicate that SW has it original from the DEC alpha chip 21164
How is it even possible that no-one has wikileaked the instruction set?
“This problem impacts our investigations across the board—human trafficking, counterterrorism, counterintelligence, gangs, organised crime, child exploitation, and cyber”, Wray said.
What? No politicians with the hands in the cookie jar? I'm so disappointed.
I even weighed it. It turns out to be about three quarters of the right scale weight for a fully fuelled real one.
Do you get translucent LOX/Kero bricks to fill it?
Now, it would be nice if they did Russian designs too, which are more adventurous.
I used to do plastic model kits of Apollo things. That was cool and instructive. I also know all the details of a Tiger I...
> and lego relies on tolerances of a fraction of a millimeter.
WHY (and would that even be particularly expensive).
> I find it amusing that some old aircraft have tolerances measured in centimeters for their wings,
I have never seen someone build an A/C ourt of lego. I'm sure the FCC would disapprove.
Looks like Stansilaw Lem's "The Upside-Down Evolution" comes a bit early.
they pose a growing threat to the U.S. warfighting forces if used for nefarious intents
It's goo to know that they don't pose a growing threat to the donut-eating forces, especially if used for benevolent intents.
Anyways:
Armies began to change from living to nonliving forces. Initially, the effects of the change were undramatic. It was like the automobile, whose inventors did not immediately come up with an entirely new shape but, instead, simply put an internal-combustion engine in a cart or carriage, with the harness removed. Similarly, the earliest pioneers of aviation gave their flying machines the wings of birds. Thanks to this kind of mental inertia, which in the military is considerable, not very radical new missiles, unmanned tanks, and self-propelled artillery were adapted for the new microsilicon "soldier," simply by reducing them in size and installing computer-controlled command modules. But this was anachronistic. The new, nonliving microsoldier required a whole new approach to tactics, strategy, and, of course, to the question of what kinds of weapons he could put to best use.
This came at a time when the world was slowly recovering from two economic crises. The first was caused by the formation of the OPEC cartel and the big increases in the price of crude oil; the second, by the collapse of OPEC and the sudden drop in the price of oil. Although early nuclear-power plants were in operation, they were of no use for powering land or air vehicles. This is why the cost of heavy equipment such as troop carriers, artillery, missiles, trucks, tanks, and submarines, not to mention the cost of the newer (late-twentieth-century) types of heavy weapons, was constantly on the rise, even though by then the troop carriers had no one to transport and before long the artillery would have no one to shell.
This final phase of the military's gigantomania in weaponry gave way to a period of microminiaturization under the banner of artificial nonintelligence. Oddly enough, it was only in 2040 that the informationists, cipher theorists, and other experts expressed surprise at how their predecessors could have been so blind for so long, struggling to create artificial intelligence. After all, for the overwhelming majority of tasks performed by people in 97.8 percent of both blue- and white-collar jobs, intelligence was not necessary. What was necessary? A command of the situation, skill, care, and enterprise. All these qualities are found in insects.
a product called finacle
If the "not fit for purpose" is due to the usual problems, the headline practically writes itself...
finagle: to obtain by trickery
"Who is developing this code?".
"Star Programmers."
"WHO?"
"STAR. PROGRAMMERS."
The building blocks for a smartphone were laid in the *early* 80s (if not 70s). GSM radio handsets, programmable calculators.
Complete bollocks. The software wasn't even around. Nothing was around.
But that kind of reckoning, the building blocks for a smartphone were laid when Leibniz invented the Stepped reckoner.
Quite right. Thing is, in Appleland, bad stuff is always someone else's fault.
Did you say Russia?
Btw, what happened to all those tablets? I vaguely remember that at some point the bus was filled with tablet/slab-fondling people but now I see none at all? Was I just dreaming? Has there been a dieoff?
These are the questions I've always asked and nobody ever seems to be able to answer them.
You need an Ashkenazi brain to grog this. Thumbs up for "Jewish Science". (JOKE! JOKE! HEEELP!)
Just remember that it's not a digital computer. Approach it the same as an analog computer.
In the meantime, if you can do linalg: Quantum Algorithms via Linear Algebra (unfortunately still not read, as I have to deal with management algebra mostly)
The classic example of where classical computers don't work too well is called The Travelling Salesman problem - ie what's the most efficient route to visit all the cities. Some quantum computers could calculate all possible paths *simultaneously*.
No! The class of algorithms efficiently computable by Quantum Computers (i.e. BQP) does NOT include NP-hard or even NP-complete problems.
Some scientists doubt if quantum error rates can be reduced sufficiently, but it's too big a prize to not reach towards.
Yes indeed: The Future of Quantum Computing (Hope this goes through, sometimes Forum Control™ takes a dislike links to Quanta Mag, I suppose it's on the list of the false-newsy sites somehow)
merge the screens of completely different machines into a seamless whole?
So you could have a laptop and tower-attached screen on the same desk and move the mouse pointer from the large screen to the laptop screen AS IF THEY WERE EMBEDDED IN THE SAME PHYSPACE. Then you would use the same keyboard to work on one machine and the other. Instead of being continually challenged to move your massive Plinkett-tier arms around.
If they did, they would know that if "virtually every person" had common sense they would not have voted for Brexit in the UK nor Trump in the US.
I don't agree. Not sure about Brexit, but in the US, it was clearly a case of desperation: The lesser of two weevils, as it were.
Do we have problems to solve?
Nope! let displacement activities begin.
“But far more subtly, simply changing the data in the big data datasets so that the AI algorithms reach the wrong results”
Leaving none the wiser because the "correct" result was wrong also as well as "interpreted" by the priests of the computer output and their political handlers.
Paul Allen, Microsoft’s co-founder, announced a $125m fund for the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI2) to kickstart a project to teach machines “common sense”. It’s tricky to define what that exactly means. AI2 have defined it as “the everyday knowledge that virtually every person has but no machine does”.
Wow. Everybody and his dog seems to have utterly forgotten about Cyc, a project meant to given Commensense Knowledge to machines, started in the early 90s. Using God Old-Fashioned Symbolic AI as God intended. I think it is still going on somewhere. Of course, the domain of knowledge representation and logic calculus not to mention hardware power have all increased tremendously since then, so an update on the situation would be nice.
Anon because I am genuinely concerned we now live in a society where having a minority opinion will lead to punishment.
Doubt no longer, anon (although I might disagree with the "minority" adjective). Even some NYT writers see that the Prancing Progressivist Pol Pot Pretenders are on a roll:
Yet I have to admit that something bigger is going on. It could be that progressives understood something I didn’t. It could be that you can win more important victories through an aggressive cultural crusade than you can through legislation. Progressives could be on the verge of delegitimizing their foes, on guns but also much else, rendering them untouchable for anybody who wants to stay in polite society. That would produce social changes far vaster than limiting assault rifles.
It's really like I'm reading a German newspaper in the early 20s.
Two things have fundamentally changed the landscape. First, over the past two years conservatives have self-marginalized. In supporting Donald Trump they have tied themselves to a man whose racial prejudices, sexual behavior and personal morality put him beyond the pale of decent society.
What is "decent society" though? It is the society of the duckspeaking/doublethinking self-proclaimed "liberal" ready to reformat actual society to feel Good About Veself (and possibly leech some govt money on the side; well, I also have the suspicion that it has to do with the ingrained outlook of a certain ethnicity, but I won't go there.)
While becoming the movement of Dinesh D’Souza, Sean Hannity and Franklin Graham, they have essentially expelled the leaders and thinkers who have purchase in mainstream culture. Conservatism is now less a political or philosophic movement and more a separatist subculture that participates in its own ostracism.
Second, progressives are getting better and more aggressive at silencing dissenting behavior. All sorts of formerly legitimate opinions have now been deemed beyond the pale on elite campuses. Speakers have been disinvited and careers destroyed. The boundaries are being redrawn across society.
As Andrew Sullivan noted recently, “workplace codes today read like campus speech codes of a few years ago.” There are a number of formerly popular ideas that can now end your career: the belief that men and women have inherent psychological differences, the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman, opposition to affirmative action.
However..
The only thing I’d say to my progressive friends is, be careful how you win your victories. It is one thing to win by persuasion and another thing to win by elite cultural intimidation. Illiberalism breeds illiberalism. Using elite power, whether economic or cultural, to silence less educated foes usually produces a backlash.
Conservatives have zero cultural power, but they have immense political power [if only]. Even today, voters trust Republicans on the gun issue more than Democrats. If you exile 40 percent of the country from respectable society they will mount a political backlash that will make Donald Trump look like Adlai Stevenson.
"The next war will be civil".
I hope we can clarify things before we arrive at Zimbabwe Forever or Cambodia Control.
I'm for that. Guns and Government don't mix well.
While the US wallows in hysteria and hypocrisy (Hystocrisy?) about guns and newly activist kids looking bad on camera, meanwhile in Russia: Some kind of AK-74 school competition
Something cool for the garage, you say?
A Volksjäger of course.
A killengine made for kids.
Then I will get someone to paint Asuka Shoryu Langley on it, just for fun.
My trusty Nokia Asha cheapophone has met concrete floors more often than I can remember and is still fully functional. Battery is good enough for a whole week. Plus you have a real keyboard. Camera is just good enough to document traffic accidents though and the filesystem has a bug as undeletable files of 0 size have been accumulating over the years.
I could do without the "Facebook Button" retardation (one button to reach max stupidity?) and the interface, though simple, seems to have been designed by someone who used to be a co-designer of Colossal Cave Adventure in his youth. It would be excellent if one could just redesign it, if need be in Microsoft Basic.
The only problem is that women relentlessly make fun of me for having such a crap retro phone. OTOH, my age makes me more than impervious against such criticisms.
Oh well: MC Solaar - Victime de la mode
> Sends private keys in e-mail
> "We didn't say these are compromised"
What the actual fuck.
> drive to Comodo HTTPS certificates
Not even once.
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/03/24/fraudulent-certificates-issued-by-comodo-is-it-time-to-rethink-who-we-trust/
this is the same company that desperately clung on to Erlang for decades
You may want to make clear why this is a bad idea, Mr. Knowitall.
Erlang is a very nice language. Choosing the C++ fad over Erlang because "we can't program anyway" was a bad move and worthy of manglement fast-profit dumbass attack.
Also:
back end core systems in 4 London investment banks
I have seen papers about QUALITY code in that area...
Agile is amateur hour bollocks only suitable for mickey mouse toy web projects.
Meuhnon. Stop associating with low-skill IT outfits.
The impact of agile principles and practices on large-scale software development projects
And luckily, too:
It was involved in at least six accidents between 1985 and 1987, in which patients were given massive overdoses of radiation. Because of concurrent programming errors, it sometimes gave its patients radiation doses that were hundreds of times greater than normal, resulting in death or serious injury. These accidents highlighted the dangers of software control of safety-critical systems, and they have become a standard case study in health informatics and software engineering [which is weird, I always encounter 'software engineers' that haven't heard about it]. Additionally the overconfidence of the engineers and lack of proper due diligence to resolve reported software bugs, is highlighted as an extreme case where the engineer's overconfidence in their initial work and failure to believe the end users' claims caused drastic repercussions.
I don't think anyone was ever successfully held to account for this clusterfuck on the level of reconverted web programmers. The company seems to have successfully weaseled out b< denying and stalling.
Sat 24 Feb 15:47:26 UTC 2018
I wonder if AI has/will be developed with the capability to doubt itself?
Of course: Autoepistemic logic
All of this lies out in NP or worse, so you have to simplify and throw hardware and it.
Sat 24 Feb 15:39:54 UTC 2018
Remember, Remember...
The old discussions about the unfeasability of SDI ("Computer System Reliability and Nuclear War"), which journalists may not have heard about.
And this didn't even involve AI, just button-pushing.
Sat 24 Feb 12:53:05 UTC 2018.