Re: Just close it
Spoilsport! We need quangos to justify budgets but also to blame when things go wrong.
12166 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
Who'd have thought that the structure of an American sport would be dictated by TV?
This is probably apocryphal but when the football world cup was due to be hosted in the US, there reports that the TV networks were demanding that the games be split into quarters to allow for more advertising. Then they discovered extra-time and the extra advertising opportunities that offered.
More fluff from Pesce. Presumably he's being paid by some kind of company to promote the benefits of curation.
Now, when we need to find something of vital importance, we can’t.
But we can. Want to find out about PCR tests? Why not use the curated resources of the CDC? NB. I used Google to find the website of the CDC. Whether it's possible for most people to understand things like test sensitivity, etc. is another matter.
Google became more popular than Yahoo, Altavista, Excite, etc. precisely because it wasn't "curated". It proved itself more reliable than the pay-to-pay services. And SEO spam (mainly for porn and dodgy medicines) has been around as long as search engines have. Google has a vested interest in weeding out poor results as a way to demonstrate that its suitability for advertisters. But, as long as there is a market for quackery, there will be a supply.
The point is that we all waste much more power with other things than we could ever save by avoiding wireless charging. When it comes to phones, I'm sure overcharging is probably more of a waste than wireless in the real world. And that's ignoring the horrifically inefficient production, distribution and recycling disposal of our consumer electronics.
As much as I simply cannot do without it these days, back when it was barely available with a 56K modem, software makers had to get it right out of the door, because patching was inconcievable.
I don't know what planet you were on, but I don't remember bug-free software in the 1980s. Without a permanent connection, the vectors are different but exploits are as old as software itself.
I've never been able to quite get my head round the assumption that it's perfectly OK to release a product riddled with flaws and rely on point fixes after the fact to eliminate them.
In the US product liability explicitly allows this. OTOH, you must also accept that many exploits are based on code that was perfectly correct at the time of its development but may now be being used in a different environment, so some kind of leeway is required. And you have to think about handling the huge volume of open source software out there. That said, encouraging a sense of liability can only be welcomed.
This is naive. First of all, if Google has discovered a bug assume someone else has as well. Google is only doing research spy agencies and criminal organisations have even greater incentives to discover and exploit flaws. Secondy, while there have been a few notable exceptions, I think the trend is clear that Google's approach has helped improved practices across the industry: remember they give companies 90 days before going public and, in general, 90 days should be more than sufficient to analyse, evaluate and fix a bug. What can't always be done in the 90 days, is perform sufficient variant analysis to see if similar bugs exist. Fuzzing tools do exist, but even they are limited in scope.
Personally, I think that the example highlights the kind of thing that is possible and that will be done. The history of the depiction of women is long and complicated but, while there is no doubt that much of is sexualised (both nakedness and lack of it), there's also the observation that women do pay more attention to how they and other women look, in all kinds of situations, than men do. Nature vs. nurture, of course, but the correlation is long-standing. The aesthetic of the look is one description I've come across, where it relates closely with what people are thinking about each other – the kind of complicated thinking that my little brain doesn't seem to engage in very often – but that's by the by. Fan fiction is one of the areas most studied in this respect.
As soon as it was clear that Intel was not really behind it, it had little chance in the x86 world because it was shit for x86 code. And, as long as Intel kept producing x86 chips, they had little incentive to favour another archictecture.
x86_64 meant that people could have their c86k and 64t it without feeling the need to replace every bit of software on their systems. That was always going to be a big ask in the pile it high sell it cheap world of x86.
Nice research. I think the charity stuff is a bit of a red herring. The main focus should be on tightening up the scope of the charter and making clear what a public service is. Fees should be set to cover costs solely though, as this is difficult to predict, you need to allow for over and under fall of revenue with a floater designed to cover underfalls: 10% of profit isn't unusual. The rest can should either be handed over to the exchequer or donated to suitable nominated charities (educational, IT literacy, etc.).
Remuneration for QUANGOs is always tricky. On the one hand you want people with the right skills to be able to do the job, on the other hand it's a public service so some kind ethical investment can also be expected. The way around this is usually to remunerate the board for expenses only, though this can be at market rates, and pay staff market rates. Aside from pay, you need to make sure that board members are not beholden to invididuals or entities (such as member companies), are accountable and not in a position for empire building. Fixed term appointments can be useful here.
The current board has clearly failed on all fronts.
To be fair to the scientists, I think most enthusiasm was in the media focussing too heavily on the summary and one of the potential explanations for the observation, ignoring standard procedure of needing a separate, completely distinct observation required before drawing a conclusion. A similar thing happened with neutrinos in Italy, I believe. This is why we now have to completely distinct observatories for gravitational waves, because it's just too easy to be fooled by failures in the equipment, or increasingly the case, incorrect assumptions somewhere in the software.
Where do you get your numbers from? If the conversion can be done catalytically then it should be energy neutral. Currently, it's above 50% and, thus, better than batteries, which only look good because they're charged with power that doesn't include fuel duties.
Most of the beneficiaries, espeically Tesla, have virtually zero costs when raising new capital so this money will either end up as dividends or share buy backs.
This money would be far more effective if spent on research for the catalytic creation of hydrocarbons and fuel cells. Unlike the physics around energy density of Lithum batteries, which set some firm limits, the chemistry (and biochemistry) around creating hydrocarbons using renewable energy does look like it can be done below cost. This would give us a safe, efficient and fungible way to store excess renewable energy, which would be carbon neutral at minimum. If we can then develop fuel cells that can use what's produced we can create more efficient vehicles and reduce our dependency on energy imports.
But this is just another example of politicians chasing the lamplight…
Is it still full of Samsung cruft, spyware and tracking?
There is some cruft but it's easy to disable most of it.
Does it try to inject advertising into my browsing or use of apps like Samsung tellies do.
No. Unlike a telly you're free to install whichever browser you want, along with tracker blockers like Blockada.
Still, I don’t feel like the S21 is really intended for power users, or those desperate to hang on the bleeding edge.
This has been Samsung's strategy with the S range for several years: occasionally something new but mainly improving on last year's model. This is also basically what Apple does and is good for customer loyalty: when you want a new phone, you generally want something like the old one, but better: more storage, waterproof, wireless charging, better optics, etc.
For those that want the bleeding edge it has the foldable range and will presumably continue to try new form factors and features.
They are plotting AND COMMITTING, genocide and insurrection.
You're close to a trilemma: genocide, insurrection and gun rights – you can have any two.
Plotting a crime is usually a crime in itself. As is incitement and that's how these things should be pursued. Going after the gatekeepers rather than the perpetrators will only entrench the role of the gatekeepers over what is and isn't acceptable. I'd rather have the law and the courts do that.
Parler is also a messaging app. I haven't followed the cases in the US but it's worth noting that Telegram runs its own server infrastructure and has, in the past, been victim of bans in the past, including, I think, by AWS which it uses to obfuscate location. The owner does say that he will close groups and channels if he thinks complaints legitimate but the main difference is that the platform was designed from the outset to be difficult to close down. Scaling on AWS to handle the traffic is one thing, being able to foil government blocks quite another.
It's the risk that all democracies run and supposed to be offset by people's better nature.
And the fact that the US Congress is full of partisan numpties has little to do with free speech on social media and messenger services. There have always been whackos there. The current excesses are driven more by money and the primary system which puts extremists on the slate. The electoral system favours the two party system and letting the legislature draw the electoral boundaries is very much letting the fox run the hen coop. That said, the recent rise of populism in democracies around the world suggests there are other factors in play.
I've always said it was healthy…
I found the copy of Rustler in the park and I'm just trying to return it!*
* Actually, I do remember coming across the odd wank mag in the park to and from school. Never understood why anyone would take them to the park except perhaps to perpetuate cliches!
Testing for prostate cancer has been a real problem with lots of false positives and biopsies causing more problems than they would have solved. Because little was known about PCA base levels, biopsies were often performed when levels were high for a population but not for an indiviual – rinse and repeat for other measures such as blood pressure. I'm part of a long-term EU study that will provide data on PCA base levels and development over time that will hopefully provide better data for future inference testing.
The value will matter in any compensation claims, which may extend to any third parties: this is after all in America. From the brief description, I assume Dropbox will be required to turn over logs of which files were copied and who had access to them. Dropbox doesn't automatically sync the whole file system and in my experience doesn't bother with removable storage so any copying will have been done deliberately.
Wireless charging has to be the worst, most inefficient way anyone could have invented to charge a phone.
Not really. Given a reasonable surface area and low enough current the losses are not that much greater than with many power supplies, which often have shitty transformers. Good phones with good chargers are now very good at getting this right. This is one of the reasons I switched to extension cables with integrated USB ports. I don't have any scientific data, but given the number of 5V devices I could switch to using them, I'm pretty certain it's had an impact.
And, overall, in the lifecycle of a mobile phone, the energy used to charge it is tiny compared with production and decommissioning.
While there is no doubt a risk of major open source projects being held hostage by a few major players, tinkering with the licences is unlikely to change anything. The open source principles have proved their worth time and again and many of the large companies have embraced them so much that they provide stewardship and resources for some projects. Companies that release their software under an open source licence should not be surprised if their competitors adopt it: it was their choice to do so. There is a risk that they can use such projects to dominate the market. If this is the case the regulation may be required, just as it would in any other case of market dominance.
Chip sales were given a double boost in 2020 by all the extra kit orderd for home offices, but also by stockpiling in China ahead of US sanctions. Data centres continue to expand, but so does their use of non-Intel (and non-x86) hardware. And Intel is still nowhere in the embedded market. Still, the company still has excellent engineers across the board and lots of cash so there is no reason to see why it shouldn't continue to be successful, though some restructuring is inevitable.
I think the amendment was framed with something like a restoration in mind and citizens should be able to fight fire with fire… But, it's possible to argue that this threat has diminished over time or could be countered more effectively by limiting the powers of the executive branch.
But political reform always seems to need upheaval to be successful and, despite the many problems in US politics, it still looks a long way away from the kind of consensus needed for meaningful reform. In the meantime partisanship, gerrymandering and regulatory capture will no doubt continue.
Trump's actions suggest that the details of the presidential pardon should be reviewed and clarified. But it's difficult to see a majority in Congress for this in the foreseeable future. But, in general, in order for such a power to have the occasionally necessary impact, you have to live with the odd abuse.
The problem with Trump wasn't with his abuse of power, but with the fact that he got chosen as a presidential candidate in the first place (because the election was outsourced to the media), then elected (because the other candidate was weak), and then feted by a party that had become beholden to him. Had he been impeached first time round this would never have happened, and the GOP would have started its renwal earlier. And calls for sincere electoral reform (ending the primary system, reforming the electoral college, etc.) might have been heeded.
Not having hardware acceleration is nowadays more than just a minor irritatiion, especially on ARM.
The best bet is to wait until another manufacturer sees the opportunity and releases their own ARM-based stuff. Though this would be easier if Microsoft or Google were keener on providing support.