Re: Irony
No one was proactive in fixing this, including companies that arguably make billions from using it.
12182 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
While it has in the past executed all kinds of cyberattacks, Russia has limited resources, specifically hackers to engage on this and the current brain drain because of the war and sanctions will also be having an effect. Even those sympathetic to Putin's war might well be considering their options. Reports are that the Russian military is already drafting reserves and training staff into the war. Who's going to want to wait for their call up?
The densities sound impressive and the technology that achieves it is impressive. But once you start thinking in the world of atoms then you realise that potentially there's a long way to go, which is why work on optical computers – bugger the size because switching is so much faster than using electrons – or molecular ones – a data centre the size of a sugar cube is ongoing, because we're reaching the physical limits of electronics, especially the ones like transistors dependent upon or susceptible to quantum effects.
Your argument extends a false premise into nonsense. Trade with America is essential for many economies for many reasons but these three are key: the size of the market, source of capital, rule of law.
That many sanctions are poorly thought out, ineffectual and partial is well-known, Iran springs to mind. But sanctions-busting is entirely market-driven and the Russian market is not that interesting for many, or do you think Putin the Paranoid is keen on letting the Chinese run its networking and telecoms?
Economically sanctions act to drive up the risk premium. If the counterparty then goes on to default, the risk premium is likely to become unaffordable.
That said, Russia did largely manage to avoid the full pain of sanctions post 2014. This was largely down to the profits made by rising prices on essential resources. However, strip the economy of energy resources and you'll see that it has been in decline for over a decade. This is why Russia continues to lose trained personnel, essential if you want to build up "substitute economy" and nowhere is this more apparent than in the armed forces which have thus far been shown to be far worse equipped than most imaginged. Though this is as much down to the kleptocracy as any inability to make parts.
Apart from selling military kit, which is incompatible with the stuff Russia makes, there isn't much revenue for Chinese companies in Russia. It's a resource rich kleptocracy, where the profits that come from exporting resources get spent on trinkets for the rich.
They're doing that mainly by listening in to the non-encrypted radio chatter, which is why they know that Russia is now deploying not just some troops, but entire battle groups from the Eastern Military District (Siberia). Ukrainian troops can all understand Russian and recognise many of the accents.
You make no commercial arguments for the switch. Apple has largely frozen browser development because it has achieved what it needs: a runtime to replace Flash for music and video content.
Switching to Gecko would be a huge wrench for Apple's team. It is far easier for it to pick bits of Blink and make it work with Webkit.
Mozilla as a corporation has made an awful lot of mistakes and wasted oodles of money on side projects that no one was really interested in.
The work on the browser and in the various bodies around the development of the web, including documentation, has been outstanding. I'm not heavily involved in web development at the moment but, should the need arise, I'd certainly be interested because good technical documentation is hard to write and, therefore, usually hard to find.
And while we're about it, what about gaol?
Gin and Ginger are both imports from languages with a soft "g". But that doesn't really matter because looking for logic in English spelling is asking for trouble! However, native speakers have innate rules for pronunciation and I remember assuming it would be a hard G when I first encountered it, not least because we already have jif in jiffy. I remembered being "corrected" as well but, the soft "G" has here has never sat well with me, so I stick with the hard "G".
Whatever your pronunciation, it was a great idea but later became many people's introduction to the notion of software patents…
Caution is inherent in many of the departments that chose to run SAP in the first place. Convincing them to move sensitive customer data to other people's computer systems is always going to be hard and that'e before anyone mentions compliance and data protection: contracts may stipulate that data must be processed on their own hardware and the fines for potential breaches of data protection law have always been steep.
Plus, having gone through all the pain and expense of installing SAP, few are going to have much appetite for migration: it will cost a fortune and the benefits will probably be small, come back in ten years or so…
If it were possible, I would completely ban high function interpreted language runtimes on boundary systems in an environment, but nowadays, so many admin tools rely on these runtimes that it's just not possible.
Seeing as you fairly easily install them as a single binary on a compromised system that's not necessarily going to help.
They already have enough of them and the exodus is not directly to the west but to other former communist countries such as Georgia where being discovery of involvement in pro-Russian activities might carry a slightly higher price.
The fact of the matter for Russia is that it doesn't have enough engineers to maintain the war effort as it is and many of these are leaving if they get the chance. This is the direct consequence of the kleptocracy that has eroded the status that used to be attached to such employment.
Coughing is only likely to occur if there has been damage to the bronchia, which is apparently less likely with the Omicron variant, which tends to infect other parts of the respiratory system first.
Hence testing someone with symtoms during a pandemic doesn't sound particularly revolutionary is very much like closing the door after the horse has bolted. Antigen tests remain about the best we have because testing positive is a good indication that you're infectious.
Depending on the state, lower tax rates in the states go some of the way to compensating for significantly higher healthcare costs in the US. But the main incentive in the US remains stock options which let people dream of retiring when Unicorn™ goes public in five years. During which time they're prepared to put in oodles of unpaid overtime, forego holidays right until the pink slip arrives…
While I do understand the information leak, the article doesn't make it clear to me how the tracker knows when it has a MAC address in the local part and hence to use this to track everything from that router. Is this done using a database for MAC addresses?
As it is, although my router is using IPv6 to talk upstream, it's also using a 4 to 6 tunnel to do so because so much of the outside world is stil IPv4 only.
But I also wonder if the bigger risk isn't being tracked, I think our consumer devices and own behaviour make it pretty easy to identify us whatever mitigation we try, but information about the network providing information for potential hacking.
FWIW "hormone blockers", etc. are already considered harmful in many countries (Sweden, UK) and by an increasing number of US doctors, incuding some who have undergone gender reassignment surgery.
I have plenty of sympathy for those involved but no time for the extremists on either side nor for the burgeoning industry that has sprung up around it.
The last couple of NASA landings have gone well so the data seems to be there. "Dummy" landings on Mars are prohibitively expensive – it's not the landers themselves so much as the time and cost of getting them there.
There's no doubt that the ESA has the capability to do it all but it is financially much more constrained than NASA and Ariane has to earn its keep. Furthermore, cooperation in scientific missions with other space agencies is considered a sine qua non.
The Windows interface before Windows 95 was deliberately crippled by Program Manager, the sole reason for existence was to avoid lawsuits by Apple. I don't think Windows 95 was much better but at least it had a tree menu avoiding oodles of windows opened just to start a single program.
Since then there have been several attempts to incorporate the ideas of Taligent with vayring degress of success.
Phishing has for a while relied on bouncing users around various URLs in a way that gateways generally can't because the resources required to run browser engines would grind servers to a halt. In such cases, protection is best done in the browser using one of your favourite ad and script blockers. Oh, and routinely providing spam and scam training for employees.
The sad fact is that the majority of Russians get their news from the TV and believe it. I was discussing this the other day with someone who is from Russia and is used to having difficult conversations with relatives there.
Then again, as many studies have shown, people elsewhere are not that much better informed. Still, at least we have a choice of competing conspiracy theories!
The thing that distinguishes Linux from other free Unix-related OSes such as FreeBSD is that Linux isn't a single piece of software from a single team.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, it's not as if every BSD release only contains code from the core team and then there's the ports. Ports have for years ensured that the OS release schedule decoupled from whatever packages users want to install. Linux might initially have an advantage is supplying binary packages and, while BSD has taken a while to settle on packager managers, it's never had the Yast vs yum vs apt vs… problems and cd path/to/port && make install
still always works.
Also, the bottleneck isn't chip design which has become refreshingly open and competitive over the last few years, but manufacturing. But you don't get many UV lithograph machines for the small change the VCs are handing out.
Oh, and while the size of the market sounds impressive, margins are going down across the range.
Static analysis of Python code has always been good and there are numerous example where static typing fails to prevent bugs. You need fuzzing and things like Hypothesis to test inputs.
Type hints are essentially compiler optimisations and were originally ruled out of Python for precisely that reason.