You forgot to mention...
... the continual releasing of over priced map packs.
I like playing COD online with a group of mates, but it is getting a little tired and this version doesn't seem to address that
683 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Jun 2008
I'm usually a fan of Matt's articles, but this one seems to have been written in a weird bubble where facebook and twitter matter to people's work.
In the real world, the only people who need this info are in the press office / media team. The other 95% of the work force have NO need for facebook/twitter/other social media stuff for their work.
Honestly, what weird bubble was this written in?
There are Knowledge Management issues within even medium sized organisations on how employees generate, share and find information, but I'm pretty sure that it has nothing to do with social media (though I accept that technical solutions and approaches for one may be applicable to the other).
... as they have been on a variety of full time, part time and fixed term contracts. And at different levels of seniority.
As for using consultants, you don't expect the ministry of fun to have a ready pool of commercial & technical experts to work on a project like this do you?
Remember Mike Kiley (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/oct/03/whistleblower-sacked-bt-broadband) was one of the consultants... El Reg commentards had nice things to say about him.
... but very interested in the abuse of the FOI legislation. Does the tribunal and Information Commissioner have some kind of BBC blind spot? There's usually pretty good at holding other areas of the public sector to task over a strict interpretation of the Act.
Very disappointed that the BBC Trust also hasn't weighed in on this - of course the managers at the beeb will be tempted to try not to disclose things that may be awkward for them (had to deal with the odd awkward FOI request when working in central government myself), but that is the point of the IC and Tribunal - to stop them taking the piss.
... they've been genetically altered to be incapable of saying 'Yes' to anything.
The best you'll ever get is "well, I won't set the dogs on you just yet if you choose to store or transmit your sensitive electronic information in that way."
To get this grudging statement on iOS6 means that they've repeatedly put it through the penetration test wringer and were mightily disappointed that it didn't fail for the level of impact (i.e. degree of difficulty of penetration) they've specified.
... but I'm looking forward to fondling the iPad mini in PC World (or something similar) to compare it to my Nexus 7. I've been impressed with the Nexus, so the iPad mini will have to be pretty good to make me want one
(I really like the iPad 3 BTW, but it's too bloody expensive to perform the 'toy' function I'd use it for)
". And I'm more worried that the people buying Facebook stock might have been pension and investment funds, so that poor retail investors are actually the ones taking a huge bath on this Facebook Fuck-Up."
Exactly. We've all paid for this in one way or another, as the suckers will have included pension funds and insurance companies.
Grrrrr
... as I've always had them for work (alongside my personal phone, currently a 4s).
However, I must say I'm not sure whether I'll bother getting another BB for work if I have the choice (which I should do in Jan). I like the keyboard, but iOS & Android (haven't used WinPhone) are at the point that I'd happily use them as a work phone, despite not having a proper keyboard.
RIP RIM
... there is some value in preserving professional journalists.
But not via a hypothicated tax. The Guardian is a business - make money or die, it's that simple. You (i.e. the Guardian) deserve nothing you haven't earned.
Oh, and I'm a Guardian subscriber via the iOS app and have read (and paid for it) most days for the last 10 years. CHARGE ME MORE MONEY YOU IDIOTS
I wouldn't take the few soundbites that a minister has in their brief for the committee to be an accurate description of when they started thinking about security:
Minister: "Crap, I'm in front of the WaPC tomorrow. What will they ask?"
Official: "They'll mention security for sure"
Minister: "I don't know anything about that - what do I say?"
Official: "Don't worry, nor do they. Just mention some vague things about bank security systems and Amazon. And throw in a Google reference if necessary. On second thoughts, forget the Google reference"
That's not to say I know the security is fine on the system (though some guys I used to work with I know are working on its development) - just that ministerial pronouncements on this stuff are for the general public, not knowledgeable commentards on El Reg.
The first rule of the blacklist is that you don't talk about the blacklist as it breaks EU procurement rules.
What you do is ask for examples of relevant previous projects and the contact details of the clients so you can find out how useless they are. You also ask pointed questions about previous contracts where performance clauses were invoked, penalties paid etc.
Do this right and you don't need a blacklist...
... regarding the half vs 48% thing mentioned earlier, I read his main point as being they had assumed it was good for half right now, rather than half in the future with the inevitable growth in energy consumption.
Every time I read articles such as this, I wish I had a lot more time to read through the papers themselves so I could form a better informed view rather than relying on other people's interpretation of the papers. Maybe after a nice lottery win...
... apart from liking iOS, one of the reasons I've stayed with Apple is the ubiquity of connectors in my house (chargers, docks etc) that fit both the iPhones and iPods we have. I'll have to see how the adapter works but it may be a more open competition for my next phone - I've come to like Jellybean on my Nexus 7 tablet as much as iOS...
...yes there are mistakes, but for comprehensive and almost entirely correct descriptions of basic science its pretty good. It's easy for those in the know to notice and correct mistakes regarding the standard model etc. I've also found it good for some of the basic facts and dates in UK history, and as other commentards have said, the reference section at the bottom of articles tends to be very good.
All this doesn't change the fact that Jimmy Wales comes across as a giant douche though (hah - another south park reference sneaked in there...)
I had assumed that one of the reasons that it was successful is that they had better integrated Pinyin and better adapted the screens for Chinese script going top to bottom. Interesting to see your comment that it has merits beyond this - are you using it for primarily latin script or chinese? Do you think it would have a market outside China (and maybe Japan, given they use the sama character set)?
There are some great community organisations coming together to make this happen, but its surprisingly difficult to make standardised packages work for the whole country, and tick all of the boxes that we'd want (FTTH where possible, future proof upgrade path if not, choice of ISPs available, sensible cost to the punter, decent amount of backhaul, not extending the BT monopoly etc).
I think one of the successful small scale trials in North Yorkshire uses a village hall as the base for one of the fixed wireless transmitters. Thats the easy part - the difficultly is paying to install the backhaul, getting a viable business model so ongoing subsidy isn't needed and being able to provide a choice of providers at a sensible price - all possible but very difficult to sort out for all rural areas.
Really what the Lords are arguing for, without saying it, is a nationalised fibre to the home (or at least fibre to the cabinet/ community hub/whatever you want to call it) - something like what they're up to in Oz.
Fine, but you have to be prepared to pay for it.
As for some of the comments above asking for a reliable 10Mbit that doesn't slow down in the evenings- yes, you can have that but be prepared to pay for better contention ratios on your connection. You can't expect to pay for a cheap connection and not get slow down at busy periods. And be prepared for higher taxes for your 10Mbit - in a surprising number of rural areas, given the distance to the exchange and network topology (lines connected directly to the exchange etc) either FTTH or a clever fixed wireless solution is your only hope, both of which would require significant public money to subsidise the capital cost.
BDUK have done a pretty good job within the parameters they have been set by politicians - i.e. budget available, state aid rules, targets to hit etc. Any significant change in the implementation will need to start with a change agreed by Jeremy Hunt (policy) and George Osborne (cash available).
My view? Scrap High Speed Rail and use the cash to build a proper FTTH network..
... and this is a great example of why. Apple beat the year on year Q results and Previous Year to Date totals and their share price drops approx 5% ! The pointless cycle of hyping share prices up or down based on expectations of quarterly results makes it difficult for businesses to invest for the future and actually harms shareholder return in the long term. That's not to say the financial sector is the only one to blame - companies such as Apple (until very recently) refuse to pay dividends to their shareholders (who CEOs seem to forget are the owners, not them), expecting share price growth to provide adequate returns.
This is getting horribly off topic, so consider this - what became the mobile phone division of Nokia lost money for 17 years in a row. Despite recent management screw-ups, it has been immensely profitable for shareholders in the long term - who thinks that might have happened under the treadmill of Q on Q analysis?
PS I'm neither a hater or a fanboi - I like my iPhone 4s, but I'm also deeply impressed by my newly arrived Nexus 7 Andriod tablet.
..I salute your far-sighted imagineering, no doubt conceptised during one of your regular viral concept strategy pod sessions.
Can you send some of the Mobile Brand Protectors to Watford? There's no Olympic brand infractions I can see, but it's full of badly dressed Web 1.0 peasants with narily an iPad between them. Being inside the M25, their mere presence is leeching the electrons out of the social brand media powered Jubilympic celebrations this summer.
Bring on the 1000lbs of soot!
/nontrepreneur / logoff / null
... that I pre-ordered via Google Play a 16Gb version on the 1st of July and won't get it until next week, when I can order RIGHT NOW on the Tescos website and pick it up from store tomorrow.
I didn't think it was a stupid assumption that ordering direct would be quicker than waiting for resellers to get stock...
... just a shame I didn't get in first to predict it. To be fair, there have been a number of public sector IT screw ups, but there are as many screw ups in the private sector - you just don't hear about them.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - if you think you're so bloody clever, go and make your fortune in delivering public sector IT on time and on budget. Anyone? No, I didn't think so.
Interestingly, there are large government It projects that do go well, you just don't hear about them. Did you read about the IT system to support Employment and Support Allowance (replacement for Incapacity Benefit)? No you didn't, because it was on time and on budget (and incidentally I worked on it from start to finish).
The one on the video is overclocked and crucially overvolted to run at 1Ghz. However, if you read the R Pi forum threads there are a number of people who have only put mild overclock without overvolting and are still finding significant speed benefits. My Pi is apparently in the post, so I shall be trying this in the next day or so.
Oh, and Bill Smith 1 is either trolling (in which case don't feed the troll) or hasn't read the website to find out what the R Pi foundation are trying to do (and hence the reason it's sold without peripherals).
Well, at £45 it's almost twice the price of a Raspberry Pi. And at twice the price, I'd expect it to be at least twice as good. Not sure that the extras add much - my ebay adventures for power supply, card etc are probably less than £10 (£3 for a card, £3 for a power supply, £1 for an HDMI cable, £1 for an ethernet cable) - I have spares of all of those but can't resist the excuse to buy shiny new things (even if they are just cables).
For me the benefit will be eco system - with so much press there should be lots of people developing for them, and lots of 'how to' guides given the last time I cut 'proper' (i.e. not Excel macros etc) code (C++ using VIM on a HP-UX box ) was over 10 years ago.
Now, what did 'pipe' and 'grep' do again?
... but the retail partner they chose in Farnell was not a good idea. I've been stepping through a sales process since April with more stages than the WRC (register interest, register more interest, pre order, order etc etc) and I still don't have the bloody thing.
If there is a queue then fine - tell me why there is is a queue ("we're still making them and lots of people want them" is prefectly adequate), tell me my place in the queue (e.g. order 2672 out 10245) and how fast it is diminishing ("we're fulfilling 500 orders a week") and I will be happy.
Provide me with little or no information and make me step through an overly complicated sales process over several months and I will not be.
There, feel better now...
"Why didn't it happen after Vista"...
My view is beause although Vista didn't sell as well as hoped, customers generally didn't spend and stuck with XP - they lost specific licence sales but people kept within the Windows family. This time, because so many corporates are coming to the end of life with XP, there is a much bigger danger that if Win8 is rubbish they may start to plan a world without Microsoft.
Do I think there will be mass defections to Linux etc? Probably not, but if Win8 fails there will be enough to make Balmer lose his job.
Oh, and that's before I mention consumers - if Win 8 sucks on the desktop then there is less UX & brand leverage for a WIn Phone, Win Tablet, Win Laptop etc etc.
A couple of posters are mixing the fixing of LIBOR during the financial crunch with the attempted fixing they did pre-crunch to make a profit. The argument (which I don't scubscribe to incidentally) that the LIBOR fixing during the crunch was a good thing doesn't apply to most of their nefarious actions.
Thanks for the article Dominic - I knew what LIBOR was and vaguely how it was calculated, but didn't know the subtle details you set out. The thing you miss in your defence of derivates trading in your comments is that (certainly in theory) the positive effect should be in the overall placing of the costs of movements in price where they are lest economically damaging.
Misselling notwithstanding, one of the really important uses (at a macro economic level) of derivatives is to give companies certainty of a cost, even if that cost ends up being more than it would have been if they had taken the risk on that cost. Unfortunately this has been somewhat lost in the increasing complexity of the financial markets, and the move of financial transactions being divorced from their groundings in the real economy (or more simply, the move from completing a financial transaction because someone needs it, to bascially gambling).
... if so, that's a bit of a blow. However, I'm sure they'll update it at some point.
My order for the 16Gb one has been placed - I love the iPad (and have an iPhone), but the price is too high given I can't replace my laptop with it, and at £199 this would seem to fit the bill nicely