Re: Ob H2G2
We've not designed rovers that can contemplate the rushing noise and their own existence before wondering if that big round thing will be friends?
5210 publicly visible posts • joined 19 May 2008
"And I'm very white and very middle class...
Everyone knows the drill. Be courteous , be professional and everything works out fine. Start playing games and expect your ass to get kicked. "
There speaks the voice of someone who isn't in a minority (a lofty position I share).
When I get that post from a young black man or a muslim then I will give it more weight.
"If we start extracting all that natural wind and atmospheric movement are we leading ourselves down another path to armagedden?"
If you start extracting it all you stop extracting any very soon after, you need the wind to carry on past the turbine to allow fresh wind in...
The theoretical max is under 2/3rds if I remember the numbers correctly. And of course there are substantial gaps below and around the turbines, let alone the size of the gap *above* them...
I was commenting on the overall attitude of "I don't need this user aid, so it's a waste", not the specific machine.
It's like my washing machine having the capacity to connect to a network - I can't figure out why anyone would want/need that (potentially useful for a laundrette to monitor usage and get notified of failures by the machine I suppose). However, it almost certainly adds next to no cost to the machine, and if it useful to even a very small minority then I don't have an issue with it being there *as an option*.
I have friends whose lives have been made massively easier by alexa.
I have had my life massively improved by things as trivial as keyless entry to a vehicle (something I used to dismiss as a gimmick).
Yes - but changing those things is beyond the scope of "what do I do for my computing needs".
And if you are renting services by compute power you have a direct incentive to minimise the compute power needed, rather that "oh we have a big underutilised server, what does it matter"
"I suggest that the very high capacity home connections are way more niche than many here might think and of those who do have very high capacity probably barely use it anywhere near full capacity."
Whilst I agree with your first point... I don't have the high speed connection for the bandwidth, but for the latency and consistency which fttp provides (an order of magnitude better on both, and living on remote sessions the latency is nice).
I then chose a service level which made economic sense based on my usage (if I get 5 times the bandwidth for 5% more cost then it's probably worth having that, even if I only occasionally use it, and could do the same but slower).
"no one forced them to overbid in the spectrum auctions."
This... The auctions were just that, they could easily have clubbed together and said... Nope - we're not doing that, we'll all invest in a spectrum company, and they can be the only bidder.
The rip and replace of huawei gear is something I do have sympathy for though...
And the more stuff you have in house the more risk you bear...
Are you buying more reliable hardware than amazon is, are you looking after it better, are you tolerant of it's failure?
For many small and medium sized companies... cloud acts to mitigate risk, they can't afford to employ a suite of people to look after the hardware.
I'm laughing at how many people seem to think that this was the only way into a tesla... there are several options for opening the car, and only one of those (probably the least used) was broken for a while.
Actually I'm really laughing at the non tech press who reported that "Approximately 500 people were locked out"
Great visuals, very risky (a very small miscalculation will have unexpected lithobraking), but still a smaller kick than a comparatively safe fly past the larger planet. Of course that safety does depend on people not being complete idiots, and that state is depressingly common amongst decision makers.
the moon is much, much lower mass than the earth, so you'd get much less kick - additionally it's harder to target, the orbit of the earth is wobbling about the barycentre of the earth moon system, that point is still inside the earth - the wobble is about six thousand miles. The moon's solar orbit is also wobbling about that same barycentre - but that means that it's wobbling half a million miles.
That no manufacturer has looked at the hearing aid form factor.
Several days of battery life, even whilst streaming, and comfortable enough to wear all day long.
I can even replace the batteries in mine, and they have space for a few buttons on the back.
The capabilities of the in ear drivers are astonishing (136dB if you get* the high volume ones) with pretty damned good frequency response, and with open silicone bits you don't get isolated from what is going on around you (closed cups do more isolation, full on moulded in ear sections are pretty isolating).
* Don't get these unless you actually need them, else you'll rapidly need them.
Their primary driver was cadence if I recall Peter Beck's comments on the matter. It's not that a reused first stage is hugely cheaper, but there is a significant saving in terms of time taken to build another one, so they can launch more often.
Don't get me wrong, I am sure that that time saving is also a cost saving, but the primary driver was to get more flights in a year, not just reduction in up front cost.
Hence the idea to use dragon for landing the meatbags.
The lunar lander (apollo) was first tested on the moon (yeah, slightly disingenuous, the ascent motor was a single use, and therefore each individual engine couldn't be tested).
There is no reason we couldn't have the starship lunar version do an automated landing without people on board (and there is the difference between the 60's and now).
The lack of an independent abort option is the challenge, but NASA have already accepted that, since there are a variety of abort options available - there are six engines on the rocket, and they aren't all needed for a lunar landing.